User Profile: duhTruth

duhTruth

Member Since: October 13, 2012

Comments

123
  • [2] April 15, 2015 at 1:58pm

    … Continuing

    As An Observer: That only leaves three possible dates left, July 16, August 15, and August 17. Albert knowing the correct month wouldn’t be able to determine the exact day if the month were August because there are two dates left in August (15 and 17) so he must know that it’s July, and Bernard knew it was 16. It is July 16!

  • [4] April 15, 2015 at 1:55pm

    Bernard: I don’t know, but Albert just gave me a clue by saying that I don’t know. If I was told 19 – then I would know that it is May 19 because there is only one 19. If I was told 18 – then I would know it is June 18 because there is only one 18. If the month was May or June, Albert would be thinking that I could know the exact date because there’s only one 19 and only one 18.

    So Albert must know that it’s either July or August and that is why he knows I don’t know. Since Albert tipped me off that it can’t be May or June, he eliminated one of the two possible dates for me, so, now I know!

    Albert: Hmmmm. Bernard has always known the day, and now he says he knows the month also. I must have tipped him off when I said that I knew he didn’t know. He must have eliminated May and June because if his day were 19 he would know the month was May, and if his day were 18 he would know the month was June. Hmmm, by eliminating May and June, Bernard has just eliminated one of the duplicate 15’s, on of the duplicate 16’s and one of the duplicate 17’s. This tells me that the day must be one of the single 15, 16 or 17’s left.

    Additionally, his day can’t be 14 because he wouldn’t know if it was July 14 or August 14. Now that both 14’s are eliminated I know the exact date also!

    Continued……

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] April 5, 2015 at 9:42pm

    The question should be “were they out of their response district?”

    They will need to drive to a grocery store for food. Did they abandon their assigned response area in an attempt to save themselves money?

    If they were within their response area, there shouldn’t be much problem. If they left their area unprotected, then you must decide if that is ok.

  • March 30, 2015 at 9:18pm

    I am a firefighter, and nobody should have been on that roof. The damage had already been done. There was nothing to save at that fire, as they will tear it down and rebuild it anyway once the fire is out. Risking a life to save a savable life is noble, ruining a life to save property that is ALREADY destroyed is tragic.

    My prayers are with the injured fireman.

  • February 5, 2015 at 9:26pm

    Yep the study said they explored photos of right hands, but the author of this story thinks a photo of the opposite hand is truthful enough.

    Not as bad as they story where they described the black lettering on a particular sign, but showed a photo with big bold white letters on the sign.

    Proofreading may have caught this mistake – but they don’t proofread here.

  • [8] February 3, 2015 at 12:13pm

    We are commenting on this story because we are starving for real news.

    We are commenting because we know the potential that theBlaze has.

    We are commenting because theBlaze, the network that we are building is no longer living up to our expectations.

    We are commenting because we are so, so tired of junk, especially thoughtless or blatantly untrue junk.

    Sensational headlines followed by stories that seem to be written by slow children is not acceptable any longer.

    Figure it out Blaze! We know you can!

  • [2] February 3, 2015 at 12:08pm

    We are commenting on this story because we are starving for real news.

    We are commenting because we know the potential that theBlaze has.

    We are commenting because theBlaze, the network that we are building is no longer living up to our expectations.

    We are commenting because we are so, so tired of junk, especially thoughtless or blatantly untrue junk.

    Sensational headlines followed by stories that seem to be written by slow children is not acceptable any longer.

    Figure it out Blaze!

  • [3] February 2, 2015 at 11:11pm

    Oldollie

    You must be unvaccinated since you are so afraid. And if that’s the case, I don’t understand your argument.

  • [4] January 23, 2015 at 6:23pm

    Good question!

  • [3] January 23, 2015 at 6:18pm

    Union workers saw a median weekly wage of $970 in 2014, while the median wage for non-union workers was $763. This difference amounts to more than $10,000 per year.

    Of course. When you have unionized government ‘public servants’ making more money than their private sector ‘masters’, the servants are going to make more money then the masters. And therein lies the problem.

    Government union membership 35.7 percent vs. 6.6 percent private union membership.

    Responses (2) +
  • [27] January 22, 2015 at 10:47pm

    TheBlaze makes news by calling out someone for leaving a letter out of a word, all the while leaving a letter out of a word in their news article!

    You can’t make this stuff up!

    From theBlaze “The senator deleted he original tweet, conceded his mistake and attached a corrected image.”

    Maybe you could update the story to read: The senator deleted THE….

    Responses (3) +
  • January 22, 2015 at 6:05pm

    I would have cleaned the story above up a bit, but I don’t have that much respect for y’all to take the time to do that. Sucks for you.

  • [8] January 22, 2015 at 5:54pm

    Here, let me summarize the story for all of you who are to dumb to understand what happened:

    Two masked robbers in Chicago picked the wrong Target, they meant to be at a Walmart. an off-duty deputy of the law.

    There was these too masked cops in an alley in Rosco P. Coltrain Village near Chicago Iowa’s North Side around 11:30 p.m. in the evening while a nearby school was still in session.

    You see they had been to a humongous poker chip party, and both men needed some fresh air.

    She stepped outside and donned her mask while her deputy shot onother one down. Then he joined him in the alley where they watched a Tesla utterly destroy a Dodge in a dramatic drag race. Since they were preoccupied wondering why the Dodge driver false started and then burned rubber for 3 miles down the track they didnt notice bad guys sneaking up on them and picking their pockets.

    One man sherrif noticed that one of the bad guys had taken her cellular phone. Even though he was off duty, she grabbed his service weapon and began trying to shoot someone in the back.

    A witness said that the deputy returned to J.C.Penny to inform everyone that the back of one of them had been probably shot. If everyone wanted to come outside look by the garbage cans they might maybe could find blood.

    Yup, Based on WHat She Does for a Living, They picked the Wrong Target For Sure!

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] January 22, 2015 at 5:23pm

    I couldn’t agree more.

    I’ve sent many emails to them about their sloppiness. Their replies have been incredible. Scott Baker said they are in a hurry, and they depend on us to notify them of any errors. How do you convince someone like that to improve?

    The author of this story is one off the editors. Imagine that.

  • [4] January 22, 2015 at 5:18pm

    Look at the author of the story. Jonathon Seidl. Based on his other confusing stories it all makes sense.

    Over the years when I read dribble that doesn’t make sense on theBlaze, I scroll up to see who wrote the article. Mr. Seidl is one of three names who usually appear.

    He doesn’t appear to proof-read anything before publishing. Sadly, once again, the TRUTH does not live at theBlaze today. I wish it did, but their stories are often riddled with errors.

    Sloppiness doesn’t inspire confidence that they’re concerned about making sure a story is buttoned up and as truthful as they can get it!

    Guess we’re not worth it to them?

    I’ve asked, but actions speak louder than their words.

  • [4] January 21, 2015 at 12:36pm

    Yes, confusing summary, and words missing mid paragraph. The last story I read by Jon Street was the Tesla race “slaughter”. What a wreck that article was.

    He is beginning to remind me of another Blaze writer who’s articles were always missing key elements, had partial sentences, and just plain confusing.

    Jon Street are you sure your not Liz Klimas reincarnated? I emailed Liz several times asking her to simply proof read her work before foisting the confusion upon us, because we expect good work, let alone the TRUTH from TheBlaze. I offer you the same advice.

  • [32] January 20, 2015 at 9:03pm

    My jaw dropped in amazement that the author of this story could be so dense as to not even understand what he had witnessed in the video. And then he goes on to formulate a bogus description of the video. THE TRUTH does not live at TheBlaze today!

    Responses (1) +
  • January 20, 2015 at 8:55pm

    Couldn’t have said it better.

  • [4] January 20, 2015 at 8:53pm

    Yup, it’s nice running across misleading stories on TheBlaze. Not!

  • [6] January 20, 2015 at 1:44pm

    I agree.

    On another note though, again another Blaze writer has untruths in their story. The truth is that the out of control truck did not cross over into oncoming traffic. The cars on the other side of the barrier were traveling the same direction that the out of control truck was traveling.

    Sure it’s more dramatic and sensational to say that the truck plowed into oncoming traffic, but that doesn’t square with the truth. Just sayin.

123
Restoring Love