User Profile: Lesbian Packing Hollow Points

Lesbian Packing Hollow Points

Member Since: April 25, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [13] October 20, 2014 at 7:23pm

    If just one of those seven women had been carrying a personal protection sidearm in contravention of Hammond’s city code, things might have turned out better for them and worse for their murderer.

    Responses (2) +
  • [14] October 20, 2014 at 7:14pm

    “Doesn’t The Blaze have proofreaders?”

    Not that they can prove.

    [See wut I did thar?]

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] October 20, 2014 at 7:11pm

    Jordan v. New London
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_London,_Connecticut#Recent_policy_challenges

    Police Departments have a public policy interest in keeping their officers fat, dumb, and happy on the job.

  • [2] October 16, 2014 at 10:22pm

    Eight-legged parasitic freaks!

  • [6] October 8, 2014 at 10:57am

    Who the Hell OCs a .22 or a Walther, let alone a .22 Walther? .22 is for training, marksmanship, plinking, etc. You want to OC for defense, at least have the common decency to get a 9mm, minimum. even a .380 Auto, c’mon! And Walthers are a CC gun. Always have been. Always will be.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] October 6, 2014 at 9:21pm

    Looks like it used an ultrasonic transducer to detect when the subway train was coming and a Raspberry Pi to generate the variable video stream. Cool.

  • [11] October 5, 2014 at 12:34pm

    This administration has been the epitome of the “Something must be done! This is something. Therefore, we must do this!” school of emergency management.

    Never let a good crisis go to waste.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] October 1, 2014 at 11:13am

    “the FBI will investigate and bring to justice those who use illegal means to monitor and track individuals without their knowledge,”

    If that were true, half the FBI, most of the NSA, and all of the Obama regime would be behind bars already.

    Responses (2) +
  • September 28, 2014 at 6:12pm

    Actually, Hitler was baptized into the Roman Catholic faith, a baptism he never publicly renounced. Depending on which sectarian adherent you talk to, there’s a distinction between Catholic and Christian.

  • [4] September 28, 2014 at 2:51pm

    Way to completely misrepresent Atheists and Atheism!

    Responses (4) +
  • [5] September 27, 2014 at 1:27pm

    There’s nothing libertarian about Social Conservatism. Telling people, by law, what standard of morality they must live by, who they may love/marry, what they may do as recreation. Social Conservatism needs to go the way of Phrenology.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] September 23, 2014 at 11:33am

    Soft-wear? Does that mean I can 3-D print my undergarments?
    Oh, sorry. For me, that would be DD print.

  • September 23, 2014 at 9:39am

    Notice that too, didja? And how about Kiba, there, with the Internet stutter?

  • [11] September 23, 2014 at 9:20am

    I call BS on this entire dataset. Note how there’s a definite periodicity to the dates both inside and outside the Jun-Oct corridor for holiday season “get-togethers”. Every seven days, there’s a spike, generally two days long. Do people really have a preference for being born on weekends? I’m sure there’s a preference for conceiving on weekends, but there’s no way you can convince me that after all of the vagaries of gestation, when you were conceived plays out with single day precision.

    This chart has nothing to do with general human proclivities. This chart has everything to do with Ob/Gyn doctors’ proclivities to induce labour on weekends and to delay labour on major holidays. Being as this is a dataset just about doctors and not truly about everyday people, I declare this story boring.

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] September 22, 2014 at 10:20pm

    I can has hugs?

  • September 22, 2014 at 3:10pm

    Would it matter? These people believe their diseases are caused by demons and that the health care workers are spreading it, not curing it. Most of them are prolly illiterate. English, Mandarin, Klingon, would it matter?

  • [1] September 22, 2014 at 2:56pm

    It’s the zombie apocalypse! Run for the hills!!!!

  • September 22, 2014 at 2:48pm

    This case is not about the coach’s right to pray. If that’s all he did, he’d likely be free and clear. What he did was direct his students to pray, and then prayed with them. That’s what got him in trouble. Even if it didn’t go against the handbook he was a part of drafting, it would still be a Constitutional violation. Government employees (public school teachers included) can’t direct their captive audience (students) to conduct themselves in religious practice.

    Had the teacher just gone off by himself to pray privately, or even with other adults over whom he had no authority, he’d be in the clear. Though, one would question who was looking after his charges during the time he was communing with his god while on the clock.

  • [2] September 22, 2014 at 9:53am

    I just use Metamucil to keep me regulated.

  • September 22, 2014 at 9:47am

    A) He didn’t *allow* the kids to pray. He *directed* the kids to pray. Monumental difference.

    B) He hasn’t been fired (yet). He’s been suspended.

    C) He was suspended not for the violation of the kids’ rights, but for violations of handbook regulations he himself was a part of drafting.

    Please note my own comments elsewhere for this article. Huge difference between directing student prayer, allowing student prayer, and forbidding student prayer. First is a violation of the Establishment Clause. Last is a violation of the Free Exercise Clause. Middle is not what happened in this case.

123 To page: Go