User Profile: Lesbian Packing Hollow Points

Lesbian Packing Hollow Points

Member Since: April 25, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [42] June 22, 2016 at 12:36pm

    Wook at aww of the widdle tywants thwowing their widdle tantwums over not being allowed to be more tywannical.

    Responses (6) +
  • June 22, 2016 at 10:24am

    Could someone explain for me, please, because I’d like to know, when did a simple greeting intended to demonstrate that you were not holding a weapon in your hand become a feat of strength? I remember when I was a kid shaking hands with my elders and they would try to crush my little digits in their giant man hands. I remember cartoons of my youth depicting big, stupid, powerful characters shaking hands with lesser, weaker characters and leaving those lesser characters’ hands mangled with fingers pointing akimbo.

    So, I ask again, when did shaking hands become a feat of strength?

    Was this some kind of negotiating tactic? “Hi, Bob. I’m here to buy a new farming implement, and to show you that I’m in a better, stronger, negotiating position, before we start the negotiations over how much I’m going to pay for this farming implement, I’m gonna see how many PSI your distal phalanges can take before shattering.”

    That would not put a person in a better negotiating position with me were I the seller of said implements. If anything, it would sour me on cutting you any breaks whatsoever, seeing as you prolly just broke my hand.

    The handshake is a greeting and a show of mutual trust before segueing into whatever greater purpose for which two people are coming together to talk.

    Let’s leave the feats of strength to the gym, the bell-ringing mallet game at the carnival, and places where manual strength is actually appropriate, shall we?

    Responses (2) +
  • [16] June 18, 2016 at 8:15am

    He does partially have a point, besides the one on top of his unusually conical head. There is a legislature that bears some responsibility in the body count at Pulse.

    The Florida Legislature. They are the ones that passed the law that mandated Pulse be a gun-free zone regardless of the opinions of its owners.

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] June 17, 2016 at 7:13am

    “Their morals, their ‘code’ (adherence to the Constitution) is a bad joke, dropped at the first sign of trouble. They’re only as good as the world (their anti-gun constituents) allows them to be. When the chips are down, these civilized people (Democrats), they’ll eat each other.”

  • [3] June 16, 2016 at 9:13am

    So, they remade the 1981 Richard Dreyfus movie, “Whose Life is it Anyway?” http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083326/

  • [1] June 16, 2016 at 8:49am

    Doubly poignant coming from someone with your screenname and avatar.

  • [-1] June 14, 2016 at 11:46pm

    Overgeneralize and stereotype by pulling lies outta your ass much?

  • [9] June 14, 2016 at 10:07am

    You know nothing of hunting culture.

  • [15] June 13, 2016 at 9:17pm

    I’ll say one thing for Chick fil A, they cook up the best spicy chicken sandwich I’ve found anywhere.

  • [13] June 13, 2016 at 4:49pm

    I’ve mentioned Pink Pistols more than once. Maybe some Blazers need a full blown article on it before they’ll believe it exists.

  • [11] June 13, 2016 at 4:46pm

    Name a Leftist politico.

    That person.

  • [9] June 13, 2016 at 4:43pm

    I totally want that “Gaysden” Flag. I really want to fly it from the flagpole in front of my house. Fly it high and proud.

    Responses (2) +
  • [13] June 13, 2016 at 3:01pm

    You must be new around here.

    “Hi! I’m ***** as a three dollar bill.”

    If you stand too close to me in this place, please mind the rotten produce and scatological epithets that get hurled in my direction on a semi-regular basis.

    You’ve been warned.

  • [10] June 13, 2016 at 2:55pm

    Screw the other cheek. I just say, “Check your backstop and aim center of mass.”

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] June 13, 2016 at 2:51pm

    When I first saw this story, I thought of it as an attack by ISIS on “my people”. Were they “my people” because they were LGBT? No. I considered the victims of this atrocity to be “my people” because it happened on the soil of “my nation”. These people are my people because they are my fellow Americans. I need nothing more than that to feel solidarity.

    Apparently, Social Conservatives need a terrorist attack with massive loss of life to feel any sort of solidarity with the LGBT community.

  • [30] June 13, 2016 at 2:37pm

    I’ve always been a pro-gun, pro-small-government/anti-big-government (and hence anti-Left) LGBT type person.

    This is what it takes for the LGBT Left and the pro-gun Right to join me politicly? 49 dead innocents and 53 injuries of various degrees?

    Damn. I feel loved.

    Responses (8) +
  • [2] June 13, 2016 at 12:38pm

    “I think we’ve got to get back to commonsense safety reform…”

    If that were true, then you wouldn’t be proposing reinstating an unconstitutional ban that when it sunset in 2004, even the most hardened of gun-grabbing Leftists of the day acknowledged made not a bit of difference in either the crime or accidental death/injury statistics for the period it was in effect, pre-, or post-.

    But that’s okay, we all know it’s not true, which is why the mass media is giving you a pass on your anti-gun ********. Everyone knows the code language; gun safety law = gun control law, and gun control is not about guns, it’s about control.

  • [1] June 13, 2016 at 12:21pm

    @ Maji:
    Clearly, if YOU’VE never needed a subway pass, then by Jason’s logic, we need to ban subway passes for everyone. I’m pickin’ up what you’re puttin’ down.

  • [1] June 13, 2016 at 12:18pm

    Virtually?

  • [1] June 13, 2016 at 12:17pm

    Oh good. I’m not the only one who thinks so.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love