User Profile: Lesbian Packing Hollow Points

Lesbian Packing Hollow Points

Member Since: April 25, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [5] July 19, 2014 at 5:01pm

    I’d want her to realize that her 2 year old little girl is A) not potty trained and liable to wet herself in the first place, and B) realize that potty trained or not, the kid needs to be dressed in more than just a pair of panties below the waist.

    I agree that once the kid wet herself, the mother reacted as best as she possibly could have, modulo the legitimate critique of the cashier. Problem is, that’s not a very human thing to do. Any animal can react to circumstances that befall them. The thing that makes us human is our ability to plan, to imagine, to predict and anticipate the future. This woman clearly lacks in that department, if she was incapable of predicting that her non-potty trained little girl, dressed only in tighty whities might, possibly, could just maybe have an accident out in public like that, if she made no plans to deal with it short of reacting in the moment.

  • [-4] July 19, 2014 at 11:19am

    If I were, I would not be taking them out in public in their underwear, especially not before they’ve been successfully potty trained.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] July 19, 2014 at 10:47am

    WBC, haven’t you people ever heard of… closing your G.D. mouths?

  • [5] July 19, 2014 at 10:39am

    Let them run around naked or in their undies… AT HOME. Even in the backyard, no one cares about them doing that there. Okay… maybe DCF, but screw DCF.

    This is a public place. Society demands a certain modicum of decorum in public places, even in a DG.

    Responses (3) +
  • [-5] July 19, 2014 at 10:33am

    It’s not an issue of “accidents happen”ing. Okay… it’s not ONLY an issue of accidents happening.

    It’s an issue of the mother of this child not acting like a responsible mother in the care and CLOTHING of said child, especially in light of the still tangible probabilities of said accidents.

    Responses (5) +
  • [-11] July 19, 2014 at 10:29am

    But she WASN’T properly dressed for a public place!!!!!!

    Clearly, the potty training was not complete, which means there’s no reason whatsoever to eschew diapers for panties. That’s issue one. If this incompetent mother had not done that, this situation would not have happened.

    Second, even if the potty training had been successfully completed, what makes this woman think it’s appropriate to eschew proper outerwear over said panties? Anything, a skirt, a pair of pants. The only people who want to see your 2 year old female child’s panties are sick pedo pervs!

    If the wearing of outerwear over your child’s lower half might cause them to have an accident or be less than confident in their toilet training achievements, guess what, toilet training ain’t over. Dress them in diapers.

    Responses (5) +
  • July 19, 2014 at 12:33am

    Sup, Monk?

    And who would down-vote your last post? Sassenachs!

    I up-voted to even it out.

  • [2] July 18, 2014 at 10:03pm

    At a bare minimum, you’d get a ticket for no seat belts!

    Maybe a PFD would suffice? Think a cop would buy that argument?

  • [1] July 18, 2014 at 9:58pm

    Zero to salvation in 5.6 s.

  • July 18, 2014 at 9:56pm

    Yeah. Limo with a hot tub in the back for passengers with three rear axles to support it is one thing. A street-going hot tub with accelerator and brake a la speed boats? That’s not kosher. And I think even the hot tub toting limos are required to require passengers disembark from the tub and remount the vehicle’s normal passenger cabin before the vehicle is permitted to move.

  • [4] July 18, 2014 at 8:50pm

    “That’s amazing.”
    “That’s awesome.”

    That’s not street legal.

    Responses (6) +
  • July 16, 2014 at 8:14am

    Rest assured, the pipeline of MRAPs to civilian police SWAT teams will continue apace.

  • [4] July 12, 2014 at 1:12am

    What flavour of idiot was this track official to venture out onto the racing surface without frickin’ LOOKING?

  • [1] July 10, 2014 at 3:38pm

    1k-2k psi is the kind of pressure that if focussed into a stream will inject water through living flesh, to the point of amputation of extremities.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 9, 2014 at 1:04am

    When did “Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader” devolve into “Are You Smarter Than a Five Year Old”?

    Is this what the education level of the average American TV-Viewer Type person has become?

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] July 8, 2014 at 7:43pm

    I didn’t know rape whistles came in 6.5 Grendel. +1

  • July 8, 2014 at 12:35am

    .45ACP or .357MAG, but I’m thinking of getting into .452 cap-and-ball.

    Waiting for the testicle jokes in 3… 2…

  • [10] July 7, 2014 at 12:19pm

    Jihad Bunny!

  • [8] July 7, 2014 at 8:31am

    I have a compromise.

    On the battlefield, maps are marked with the presence of enemy infantry with an “ei” marker. I say we use the same designation of “ei” for these illegal immigrants, or, if you are so opposed to the term illegal, we can call them another term that is just as, if not more, accurate in describing them, “economic invaders”.

    This flood of humanity will be no less detrimental to the sovereignty, security, liberty, and prosperity of America than they would be if they were an actual wave of armed enemy infantry pouring over our borders.

  • [21] July 7, 2014 at 7:03am


    I read “Susan B. Anthony” as “Betsy Ross”. I had a History/Feminism brain fart. =(

    Responses (5) +
123 To page: Go