User Profile: e7705

e7705

Member Since: December 01, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • April 22, 2015 at 11:05am

    I agree regarding Bob Beckel. His view points outraged me, but I liked him as a man and how he attempted to present his views in logical manner. He is well-versed on both sides, but simply doesn’t see the evil of the Progressives.

  • April 22, 2015 at 11:01am

    Desert Rose,
    You admit you never watch Fox News, yet you claim to be well-versed on both sides? How does that work?

  • [4] April 22, 2015 at 10:46am

    You ARE kidding, right?

  • [5] April 22, 2015 at 10:45am

    To USAGI:
    You say one syllable names, like Al are for white people? How about Al Sharpton?

    Responses (1) +
  • April 22, 2015 at 10:39am

    This is why I always open up my burger before I take the first bite – for different reasons. One time I found a hair in my Burger King burger….

  • [1] April 21, 2015 at 8:40am

    ‘umbrage’ probably comes from the same Latin root as does ‘umbrella’, both meaning to shade or shadow

  • [-1] April 20, 2015 at 10:19am

    I believe gays are born gay. (I don’t believe pedophiles are born that way, BTW. I think something caused them to be mentally sick.) But the point I’m making is I do not believe that the gov’t has the right to force a church (the Catholic church, for example) to change one of its sacraments. Marriage is one of the seven sacraments in the Catholic church. I’ve been wondering why those who talk about “separation of church and state” don’t see the irony of the “state” forcing a church to change its beliefs when it concerns gay marriage.

  • [-11] April 20, 2015 at 10:05am

    The Bible condemns homosexual BEHAVIOR, not the person. I believe gays are born that way. I don’t understand why God condemns their having sex, but my guess is that God has certain chosen people that He wants to live a life of celibacy: nuns, monks, etc., possibly gays?

  • [12] April 20, 2015 at 10:03am

    The Bible only condemns homosexual BEHAVIOR, not the person.

  • [106] April 18, 2015 at 8:36am

    You meant that as “slave owners who were black”. The first two times I read that I interpreted it to mean “owners of black slaves”. On a side note, when black history month began in the mid ’60′s, I was in middle school. Being the logical thinker that I was, I assumed it meant that changes were being made, and after a few years, when blacks were rightfully incorporated into the history textbooks, that black history month would cease to exist. I feel there is no need for a black history month (or a women’s history month, etc.) They all now are incorporated into children’s history books (which are abysmal, by the way, but that is a topic for another day).

    Responses (7) +
  • [-2] April 18, 2015 at 8:26am

    The one thing about his response that impressed me the most was his impeccable grammar and spelling. That is such a rare thing to see (especially on this site). Conservatives, PLEASE check your grammar, spelling and punctuation when writing posts. It gets noticed.

    Responses (3) +
  • [6] April 15, 2015 at 8:47am

    “Criminals tend to be liberal,” would be more accurate. I’m sure most of us on here have some liberal friends and relatives. We wouldn’t want to be calling them criminals just because they are liberal in their (misguided) thinking! ;-)

  • April 10, 2015 at 8:39am

    “…..who has severed honorably,…..” Severed WHAT honorably? His arm? His leg?

    Responses (1) +
  • [9] April 7, 2015 at 9:48am

    Just another example of what goes on in what is supposed to be the most tolerant, open-minded places in America – American Universities (and high schools). We send our children to be educated, not indoctrinated. I think I stand with most parents who want their children to be exposed to ALL sides of an issue, not just the politically correct (ie. Progressive) ‘approved’ version. Schools TEACH freedom of speech, then, do not allow it.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 7, 2015 at 9:36am

    More evidence from Catholic apologetics:
    Jn 6:60,66
    “Then many of his disciples who were listening said, “This saying is hard; who can accept it?” … As a result of this, many (of) his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him.”
    Had these disciples mistaken the meaning of Jesus’ words, Jesus would surely have known and corrected them.HE DIDN’T. They had clearly understood his meaning–Jesus’ flesh was to be really eaten; his blood to be really drunk.

  • [2] March 31, 2015 at 9:39am

    At the end of the video, it looked like he got on his cell phone – probably calling 911.

  • March 30, 2015 at 10:52am

    “During a hearing on a bill that would ban late-term abortions nationwide, an expert on human embryonic development informed members of the committee that unborn babies have the capacity to feel pain as early as 8 weeks.

    Maureen Condic, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Neurobiology and Anatomy at the University of Utah and obtained her Ph.D. from University of California, Berkeley. She is a widely published scientist whose works have appeared in a wide variety of peer-reviewed journals.”

    And by the way, not all readers of the Blaze are white men. I am a proud pro-life woman.

  • [61] February 21, 2015 at 9:45am

    Good! I would have done the same thing! This, (stealing of someone else’s work), is indicative of too many Americans today.) They feel entitled to someone else’s fruits of their labors.

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] February 13, 2015 at 9:37am

    Oh, please, can’t wait to get this adolescent out of the White House!

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] February 11, 2015 at 8:42am

    Also, one of the first things I noticed about this textbook is that it looks like it is written on a fourth grade level and it is being used in TENTH GRADE! Parents, listen up! HOMESCHOOL! It is not hard. I did it during the 90′s, pre-internet. If you tighten your belt, lower your standard of living, in most cases, it can be done.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love