TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying ECOMCON's 10 most recent comments.

• Did the IRS Scandal Affect the 2012 Presidential Election? It’s Much Worse Than Democrats Will Admit

  May 17, 2013 at 1:58pm

  What needs to happen is an open tax revolt. Basically that would entail all private persons and companies that are fed up with both the size and corruption that is the US government, and further, the progressive authoritarian regime in place in the administration, to simply stop paying taxes when they’re due.

  If a few did this they’d be crucified. They would be up kaka creek without a paddle. But if even a few million did this as a broad revolt, then the system would grind to a halt trying to screw each and every one of them. Safety in numbers. Yes, some will be crucified, but the majority would not. If a more broad revolt of let’s say, 40 million did this, then life as Washington knows it would cease to exist. It would effectively cut them off at the knees. Nothing strikes more fear into any government than a braod tax revolt, because unlike a military coup (which they can overcome with greater resources), a tax revolt cuts off resources at the source. That’s why in my country, Canada, there’s specific laws that are strictly enforced against even breathing any kind of tax revolt.

  So, the government would go co-magon on the first few, but they would be stopped cold once more joined. Up until now, the occasional individual gets taken care of quietly, out of the public eye. But there’s no way Washington could keep anything quiet for a magnitude of this. Therefore it would become self-sustaining, more people would know, and more people would join the revolt.

• This Is How Americans With No Religion Feel About Abortion (Plus: Are Most Women Really Pro-Choice?)

  May 16, 2013 at 11:43am

  In reply to ECOMCON.

  For some reason the link got cutoff at the end.

  It was a direct link to the Silent Scream video on YouTube. It’s easy enough to just go there and type in that search parameter.

  But it does graphically illustrate what these abortionist doctors are saying to the girls in the hidden cam videos.

• This Is How Americans With No Religion Feel About Abortion (Plus: Are Most Women Really Pro-Choice?)

  May 16, 2013 at 11:39am

  In reply to ECOMCON.

  Continued:

  Now after many years of personal evolution I am dead set against any and all abortions unless it regards the life of the mother. Rape and incest is tricky because it sure isn’t the baby’s fault. I still have to ponder that.

  Considering the amount of good people desperately trying to adopt children, I would propose some sort of system where support is given to the girl in order to help her carry what would have been an aborted baby. I know that might be rife with abuse because the welfare queens would gladly hop on this new gravy train. It could either be privately funded, or by government, but preferably private. There are enough decent people who are pro-life that would step up and make donations. Further, considering the amount of big bucks paid by people who can’t adopt in our own country and have to go offshore to adopt, it would be better if they could also help fund the scheme, and it would probably be half of what they outlay now. A win-win scenario. More baby’s lives are saved, and more funds for the adoptive parents to have to help raise their new child.

  Abortion as a form of birth control is just sick, and lazy. It shows how low our basic societal morals have shrunk. Because some girls don’t know if they’re pregnant until after they miss a period (some are such stunned wonders they never figure it out) I say ban all abortions are the first trimester.

  This is a supplement to vids of the doctors talking to the girls:

  http://www.youtub

• This Is How Americans With No Religion Feel About Abortion (Plus: Are Most Women Really Pro-Choice?)

  May 16, 2013 at 11:23am

  The statistics are both discouraging and encouraging. It’s nice to see that what is put forth in the popular culture, that the vast majority of the population is pro-choice, has been debunked.

  As for myself, when I was a youngin’, I performed the dubious deed of getting 4 different girls pregnant, as well as a few miscarriages thrown in along the way. I was totally pro-choice back then. Not because I figured it was a women’s right to choose, it was more self-centered and self-interest, specifically, oh crap, get rid of it now if not sooner, I don’t need the grief. And the ones that were miscarried I just figured I had dodged a bullet.

  All that being said, as I got older, my attitudes changed, or in Obama’s version, “evolved”. I no longer thought of abortion as a quick way out of a mess. Also, I came to the conclusion that this “women’s right to choose” is so much rubbish, because it takes 2 people to make a baby, but only one has the final say of keeping the baby or aborting. I was still in self-interest mode in that if I wanted the baby gotten rid of, but the girl wanted to keep it, and me get stuck with 18 years of grief, I didn’t have a say in that, only the girl did. But further evolution made me think of the flip side. What if I wanted to keep my child but the girl didn’t? I had no say at all in that either.

• The Possible Change to Drunk Driving Laws That Could Affect You

  May 16, 2013 at 1:36am

  In reply to tucker104.

  Who would want to go anyways? Cute waitresses making tons of extra money on tips? Sure, sure, I can just imagine what a Hooters would look like when they’re all in burkas. And strip joints? Ugh, probably sheeps all tarted up on stage. Worse, you could get a lap dance, but it would be a 12 year boy.

  On second thought, these mental images alone will give me nightmares tonight.

• Soundtrack For Scandals: Our Top 8 Songs About Lying (Suggest Your Favorite)

  May 15, 2013 at 2:53pm

  In reply to RayfromRoy.

  Incredible, you beat me to it.

• Soundtrack For Scandals: Our Top 8 Songs About Lying (Suggest Your Favorite)

  May 15, 2013 at 2:53pm

  Liar by by the Rollins Band

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt3oD0AI7j8

• The Possible Change to Drunk Driving Laws That Could Affect You

  May 15, 2013 at 12:12pm

  They’ve done this in BC Canada too. It put a chill through the restaurant and bar industry. They had already taken a big hit when they banned smoking in their establishments, but this further eroded profits.

  The population was now scared as to what they could or couldn’t do. A couple of drinks at lunch? No way now. Stopping for a bite to eat and a couple of drinks on the way home? Nope, not now. Even going out for a nice dinner became dangerous. Sharing a bottle of wine runs the risk of getting busted. Men naturally can drink a bit more than women and stay legal even if weight is thrown out of the equation. Gosh, men and women are different, go figure.

  Anyhow, it used to be that if you blew over .08 you’d get a formal charge. Anything under could endanger you for a capricious 24 hour suspension of your license because it was up to a cop’s discretion. But now the legal bar is set at .05. Worse, in order to try and unclog the court system (and because they knew more people would fight that they were “drunk” in court) they passed a law that gave police full discretion as to whether or not to take away licenses on the spot and not charge them with the formal charge of DWI. There would be no ability to dispute this, the cop would be both judge and jury right on the spot. They also added on fines and re-education (running around $3500 at your expense) into the mix.

  Highly undemocratic, and it has now gone to judicial review and certain parts have been overruled.

• Did Harry Reid Really Say Abortion Protesters Forced Women to Go to Murdering Doctors Like Gosnell?

  May 15, 2013 at 11:57am

  This old fool’s magic undies are probably strapped on a bit too tight. Quite frankly, it’s too bad his mother didn’t abort him.

• Benghazi whistleblower confirms: Special Forces told to ‘stand down’

  May 6, 2013 at 2:27pm

  The truth shall set us free.