User Profile: ECtech

ECtech

Member Since: May 21, 2012

Comments

123
  • [3] August 23, 2014 at 8:25pm

    “Wow men, if the worse you got hit with from a “crazy” wife is a little jail or court time, be thankful. And of course, it has nothing to do with anything you did, like cheat on her, really download porn, or any number of things men do that disrespects the marriage.”

    First off; it’s NEVER “just a little jail or court time.” It screws up people’s lives and they may end up with a (false) record!

    You are nuts…and that’s coming from someone that’s bipolar.

  • [2] August 23, 2014 at 8:16pm

    Unfortunately, there is no way to know what is legit (legal age) and what isn’t without actually seeing the web page.

    Some internet search engines do include a “family filter” such as Google and Startpage (I use Startpage), but it’s impossible for them to catch everything. They will block pages based on search terms also, but can block some legit pages (like medical information) if the filters are too aggressive.

    The “lady” that did this probably had to do quite a bit of searching to get what she was after because all main search engines will block such pages – the known ones anyway.

  • [2] August 23, 2014 at 1:58pm

    Lol. Great movie!

  • [1] August 15, 2014 at 5:24pm

    Angry inquiry? Lol, no. LDS? Uh…no.

    “Dawkins speaks on this subject because I imagine he’s concerned about humanity and its future as a species.”

    Shouldn’t that be “Dr. Dawkins”? Frankly, I don’t care who/whom believes what, nor do I care what they think of me or my beliefs. That includes you.

    Furthermore, I’m not going to waste my time obtaining “insights” into this fool. That’s EXACTLY what he is, in my opinion. He can claim there is no creator, but that’s a foolish claim because atheists cannot possibly know something that they won’t know until they have died.

  • [1] August 15, 2014 at 2:37pm

    Hey Mr. Dawkins – A couple of questions for you:

    Why do you care SO MUCH about a religion and God that you profess to not believe in?

    Also, have you managed to find a toothbrush and toothpaste yet?

    Seriously, this guy’s teeth are really bad.

    Responses (3) +
  • August 14, 2014 at 5:48pm

    Same here Kupo. I have since switched to Guild Wars 2 (no monthly fees).

    Dattebayo -

    Alliance always had it easier…LOL
    Doing raids on Stormwind was a pain if you died – the graveyard was like 2 miles away.

  • [1] August 13, 2014 at 4:41pm

    Unless you’re running a “Hackintosh”, there is a proprietary piece of hardware built in called the TPM (Trusted Platform Module).

  • [1] August 11, 2014 at 4:10pm

    Nice try, but you are the one that is wrong. Go read the law. What you are talking about only applies to government institutions (DMV, etc.), although I’m sure you wish the government could force businesses to serve everyone.

    You see, I have owned a business prior to this one that was in a brick and mortar store (California). I could very easily refuse to do business with someone if I chose to. Now, that wouldn’t be a smart thing to do – UNLESS I had good reason. however, That reason is UP TO ME, It is not illegal as you claim – UNLESS your state has a law that states that EXPLICITLY – which is nearly impossible to do without citing every possible condition the law would have to include.

    BTW, I would have sold them the wedding dresses – it is up to them to wear them for whatever they wish after the sale, but that is MY opinion.

    Do you understand what I am saying yet?

  • [1] August 11, 2014 at 10:17am

    Well, I’m not gonna’ repeat myself to someone that can’t comprehend what I’ve said.

    I repair computers and I have refused to do so for certain people. It is my right to do so. Now, some people might believe that they can force me to do labor for someone, but they are wrong. They are, of course welcome to try and sue me, but I will still be the one that decides who I will do business with. Period.

    This is called freedom.

  • [1] August 10, 2014 at 3:59pm

    So, are you going to address my ACTUAL points, or just ignore them?

  • [1] August 10, 2014 at 3:58pm

    You know what I meant.

  • [1] August 10, 2014 at 2:58pm

    Grover_Standpipe -

    Why is it that I have to explain the obvious to you?

    IF the bar patron decides to not serve a person, they already have a reason. That doesn’t mean that they are correct in their reasoning, although they may BELIEVE they are right.

    Maybe they think the person is intoxicated already. Maybe they think the person is going to cause trouble. Maybe..maybe..maybe. These are legit and legal reasons to refuse service, even if the bartender is wrong.

    You see, at that point it doesn’t matter. That person isn’t getting served. Sure, that person could probably sue the bar, but good luck proving your case when it comes down to “he-said-she-said.” I don’t believe it would be worth the money anyway.

    This really is one of those legal “grey areas”, but perception on the part of the bartender (even if incorrect) is reason enough to legally deny service to someone.

    I don’t claim that it’s right or fair, but it happens and there’s really not much most people can do about it.

  • [4] August 10, 2014 at 2:44pm

    How would this “someone” know what faith (if any) that a person is?

    …UNLESS that person wanted to make an issue out of it in order to provoke a response.

  • [3] August 10, 2014 at 2:45am

    Precisely.

    Liberals could possibly even notice that fact, but they would somehow have to develop decent comprehensive abilities first. I don’t imagine that happening anytime soon.

  • [1] August 10, 2014 at 2:08am

    No they DON’T!

    You must not have much bar experience. You can walk in, go up to the bar and they can refuse to serve you and even ask you to leave without you having done anything wrong.

  • [5] August 10, 2014 at 1:50am

    How did the boutique know that these two women were “gay” and “marrying” each other unless THEY MADE IT A POINT IN ORDER TO PROVOKE A RESPONSE. In this case they got the response they were looking for.

    Liberals are so dense.

  • [30] August 9, 2014 at 8:12pm

    The “couple” did this on purpose. They could easily have gone in separately to get a dress. This was planned to force their agenda.

    Unfortunately, the business will probably be forced to comply through illegal legislation.

    Responses (5) +
  • [-1] August 6, 2014 at 4:51pm

    Not me. Mine’s plenty fast. I have no complaints.

  • August 6, 2014 at 4:28pm

    - Wanted to add:

    This website loads completely in about 3 seconds or less for me.

    I simply don’t understand why someone would prefer such slow internet speeds, especially when you’re so limited by what you can do AND the annoying fact that internet surfing alone is “painful.”

  • August 6, 2014 at 4:19pm

    Why?

    These days, broadband is pretty much a requirement if you want to even keep your OS updated.

    BTW, I live in a town of about 2600 people and have a 30Mbps broadband connection.

    Responses (2) +
123