User Profile: ECtech


Member Since: May 21, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • October 12, 2015 at 8:15pm

    Automatic weapons are illegal, nitwit.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 12, 2015 at 1:28am

    Considering that he’s 67 years old, I’d say he looks young for his age.

  • [1] October 7, 2015 at 8:20pm

    I’m ‘on the fence’ on this one. I think there might be something to it, but I don’t know enough about it,

    Please check out this short video called “Are You Hypnotizable?” and try what she says. You may be surprised at what happens:

  • [10] October 7, 2015 at 2:53pm

    If having stricter gun laws worked, then Chicago would be the safest place in the U.S.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 6, 2015 at 10:49pm

    Clicking a Flash video won’t hijack your browser unless you are already infected.

    Anyway, give Junkware Removal Tool a shot – it should be able to remove the infection:

  • October 6, 2015 at 10:37pm

    Mili -

    I have thought this through and my thinking is correct. You cannot appease these crazy people. You cannot bargain with them or negotiate with them. They cannot be reasoned with.

    The only way(s) we can reduce these shootings is by scaring and intimidating these evil, crazy people. You want them to think that they better not attack or they will be killed before they carry out their plans. It’s the same reason that these people won’t attempt a mass shooting at a police station.

    In order to (help) deter these shooters, you want them to THINK that everyone around them is armed, even if it isn’t true. You don’t accomplish that with signs that say “Please attack us, we have no way to stop you.”

    It’s even better if more law-abiding citizens around are armed and trained. At the very least, it improves the chances of stopping the evil person and reducing deaths caused by said person.

    Is it a guarantee? No, there are no guarantees in life. However, it’s a more realistic solution than more (worthless) gun legislation that criminals and crazies will ignore.

    In reply to ECtech's comment on the contribution Guns Aren't the Problem, Freedom Is

  • October 6, 2015 at 10:16pm

    1) Stop the “gun free zone” nonsense. Even if that particular place doesn’t allow guns on the premises – don’t be stupid and put up signs advertising that fact. If anything, put up signs that say “We are armed and will shoot back” – even if that isn’t true, how would the attacker know?

    2) Every (non-felon) law-abiding person should be allowed to carry a concealed weapon with gun training being the ONLY requirement. More armed and law abiding people around does make society safer (though you probably don’t believe that).

    Those two things would be a reasonable start. People (like you) need to face the fact that sometimes there is nothing you can do to prevent things from happening. You might believe that more legislation can stop such things from happening, but I don’t. It’s not realistic to think that way.

    My turn for a question:

    What law(s) would you propose that can stop such an event from happening? Why didn’t any of the current gun laws (over 22,000) stop this from happening?

    OK, so that’s two questions, but I think they are reasonable.

    In reply to ECtech's comment on the contribution Guns Aren't the Problem, Freedom Is

  • [4] October 6, 2015 at 8:42pm

    Mili -

    Have you ever seen a mass shooting at a police station, a gun store or a gun show?

    YOU are clueless.

    In reply to Mili's comment on the contribution Guns Aren't the Problem, Freedom Is

    Responses (3) +
  • [3] October 6, 2015 at 8:28pm

    Go read the 2nd amendment. Better yet, go read the whole constitution.

  • [2] October 4, 2015 at 1:37am

    …Mercer continued. “I’ve never held a gun in my life, and I never want to. But I know there are people that do.”

    THAT is precisely why you and other liberal nitwits:

    1) Are afraid of guns

    2) Blame the gun, instead of the mentally deranged murderous psychopath


    3) ALWAYS choose more “gun control” instead of solutions that could actually help in these situations (armed security, concealed carry EVERYWHERE, no more “gun-free zone signs, etc)

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] October 3, 2015 at 1:55am

    “One thing is certain, that classroom was not a gun free zone.”

    You are incorrect. Here’s some up-to-date information:

  • [2] October 1, 2015 at 7:58pm

    Well gee pResident Obama – maybe you can just make murder ‘more’ illegal – it will have about the same effect as adding more “gun control.”

  • [12] September 30, 2015 at 6:19pm

    Attention Koch brothers – you seem to have forgotten to pay me for my part in this vast right-wing conspiracy…

  • [2] September 25, 2015 at 7:56pm

    I’ve seen e-mail viruses that send less e-mail than Hillary. Is that all some of these bureaucrats do all day?

  • September 25, 2015 at 3:34pm

    So…yep, I was wrong about the transformers being damaged – I thought that they were more resilient than that, being oil filled.

    However, modern protection devices will probably prevent damage. Hopefully, we never have to find out.

  • September 25, 2015 at 3:24pm

    That’s one thing that direct-mounted lightning surge arrestors (SP?) will prevent; in addition to preventing lightning damage. Your Wikipedia source doesn’t cover everything – such as actual tests. This page does:

  • [1] September 24, 2015 at 8:41pm

    “Also,the larger substation power transformers are not stock items easily replaced,some can take up to a year to replace,they have to be special ordered. They will be damaged/destroyed if an EMP occurs.”

    No, they won’t. They are not sensitive electronics. They are large coils of wire and really only susceptible to physical damage.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] September 24, 2015 at 8:02pm

    Sure looks faked to me.

    Of course, liberals will probably pounce on this (fine with me) – yet, they believe Obama’s uploaded BC is real.

  • [2] September 21, 2015 at 3:14pm

    Fire this pedo perv immediately!

  • [1] September 17, 2015 at 10:25pm

    This is news?

    Seriously; I did that when I was 9 years old – that was 40 years ago.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love