User Profile: EgoLacuna

EgoLacuna

Member Since: January 23, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [3] November 21, 2014 at 10:05am

    It’s a shame the same can’t be said for The Blaze readership.

  • [1] November 18, 2014 at 9:30am

    You ask private merchants to change the channel? You have crossed the line into stupid. What if someone asked a hotel to remove the bible from the room before check-in? Maybe someone in the restaurant enjoys CNN. Use those eye muscles, and look away if you find it so offensive, instead of being a little Napoleon who can’t tolerate even seeing something he doesn’t approve. You probably make people put out their cigarettes.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] November 18, 2014 at 9:18am

    Well said.

  • [2] November 18, 2014 at 9:17am

    Did you read the same article? Devastating fear? She said, “I don’t take it personally…”. I think that must be your devastating stupidity.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-3] November 15, 2014 at 10:27am

    It seems reasonable that if the guy calls pita to take dogs in his area, he would keep his dog in the house. Or at least keep a collar with a tag on his dog! The pita folks were doing the job they were sent to do.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] November 9, 2014 at 10:18am

    I sense you are trying hard to make a point, but the specifics are elusive. What the heck are you saying?

  • November 9, 2014 at 10:16am

    Seriously? This was a personal decision. You can’t blame Obama for everything!

    Responses (1) +
  • November 7, 2014 at 10:40am

    What conclusions do people draw from this?

  • November 7, 2014 at 10:33am

    We don’t know the facts!

    Responses (1) +
  • [-2] November 7, 2014 at 10:32am

    You might be correct, but we don’t know yet. When you assert your opinion as if it were fact, you are no better than the people saying he was carrying school books and lunchbox when he was “gunned down.”

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] November 4, 2014 at 11:16am

    Everyone needs to vote. That said, it’s not true that “they do this every election year.” Anyone can easily go to the Internet archive and look at sites on 11/6/2012. I posted a link to the huff post below. I’m not trying to call you out, but it’s frustrating how many factual inaccuracies get posted on the blaze.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20121106114915/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

  • November 4, 2014 at 10:45am

    Do you understand the danger of lies? When the left calls unwanted kisses “sexual assualt,” they are lying and it subtracts from their credibility. When you call a scene like that, or some commercials “porno,” it’s a lie and it subtracts from your credibility. It’s a cheap way of making a point. You can’t articulate exactly how a scene like that will hurt children, so you go to the ways porn will hurt children. I’m certain you have scene “hardcore” pornography, do you really think it’s the same?

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] November 3, 2014 at 10:57am

    Wow…you are an imbecile. None of us choose to live. That decision is built into every one of us. There is nothing brave about living…you are just excercising your default position. Choosing to die is another matter. A person that chooses to go against what every part of their psyche tells them, is very brave indeed. Choosing to die is never the “easy way out.” I don’t blame you for not figuring that out because I really think you probably are a little dim.

  • [1] October 26, 2014 at 11:04am

    Amen! It’s a little ridiculous that Moses is the person he thinks was especially barbaric! Even the twentieth century provides much better candidates. So many actors are very morally confused.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-2] October 26, 2014 at 11:00am

    That’s a little unfair. The Old Testament is every bit as gory as the Koran.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 25, 2014 at 10:10am

    What countries? Many conservative talk show hosts make reference to the UK, that is a lie. British airways has VOLUNTARILY ended flights. The British government, like our own isn’t made up of fearful idiots.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-4] October 25, 2014 at 10:06am

    When people say things like this, it is evident that their science education stopped in high school. If you really believe there is something dangerous going on, please describe the scientific basis for your beliefs. If you are unable to do so, realize that you are just fantasizing about things. Nothing more.

    Responses (4) +
  • [-2] October 25, 2014 at 9:59am

    Almost anything will kill Ebola, or HIV for that matter. Sunlight, bleach, windex, alcohol, salt water, hot water, and the list goes on. This is true for virtually all viruses. Good luck getting that lemon juice into your lymphatic system. That’s the catch…

    Responses (1) +
  • October 23, 2014 at 10:55am

    You have no idea if he got planning or logistic help from anyone else. Certainly the majority of recent terrorist attacks have been orchestrated affairs, but there are absolutely examples of lone wolves. Hassan comes to mind. This guy has a criminal history, and this may have been just one more antisocial behavior he initiated himself. His genral ideology was obviously Islamist, but that doesn’t mean it was part of a larger plan.

  • October 21, 2014 at 11:44am

    Suggesting the CDC is “learning on the job” demonstrates the ignorance of the author, and many posters. The CDC is not doing research in realtime. There are nearly 40 years of data on this virus. When a result gets published on something like the transmission of Ebola, hundreds of other virologists scrutinize, attempt to duplicate, or disprove the finding. If a result is confirmed, it enhances the working theoretical understanding of the viral mechanism. This takes YEARS! The CDC isn’t doing new science, and if they did it would be junk science because there wouldn’t be time for the result to be published and reviewed. If you disagree with something they are saying, you are disagreeing with the scientists who did the research. The CDC is just aggregating and reporting. If you do disagree with the science, fine…explain why you think the science is off. Obviously you would have to read the primary sources. If you can’t understand the science, please stop pretending that you know anything about the topic.

123 To page: Go