Misinterpreted “love” and supplanted it with “sex” is more like it.
April 1, 2015 at 4:52pm
Muslims have invaded BC!
April 1, 2015 at 4:50pm
Sue for defamation and win those dump trucks and the house as booty.
April 1, 2015 at 4:40pm
Early Alzheimer’s can make the patient unusually aggressive and paranoid. Were I his lawyer, I would have him evaluated, not that this is an excuse but it can mitigate his bad behavior and remove weapons fm his house.
April 1, 2015 at 4:34pm
Truly a shame when one gives the rest of the group a bad name.
Keep up showing young people the right way. Maybe in time, you will catch more than just one kid.
April 1, 2015 at 4:30pm
Hmmm…sounds like Big Foot has indigestion ;-)
 March 27, 2015 at 4:06pm
Who knows, but he needs to repeat the whole seminary experience and really read the Bible.
Use OT prophecy the way it was intended — If you keep this up, says the Lord, this is what’s going to befall you….
 March 27, 2015 at 4:00pm
A seven minute old embryo is also a tiny, tiny human w/his/her own DNA, separate fm Mom or Dad.
Yep. A 7 millisecond old embryo is as well. Why the pro-aborts choose to not see this is a sad, sad question.
March 27, 2015 at 4:00pm
Neither did He act that way under the covenants w/Noah, Abraham, nor Moses!
 March 27, 2015 at 3:51pm
Good riddance! Now for the rest of you –
3 for the House
2 for the Senate
2 for the V/P while we’re at it
Pay and benefits — like those of an O-6 in the military
Build family housing for senior officers on DC area bases, billet Congress there
Add more military doctors to see to Congress and families
Enjoy the perk of the military Commissary and Exchanges, too
Time for Congress to remember they serve at OUR PLEASURE. Time to remind those jackwagons, they are public SERVANTS, not overlords.
 March 27, 2015 at 3:46pm
Authority and choice begin w/the woman saying “no” to sex outside marriage. That child has its own DNA at conception, but when science supports the conservative, you on the left balk and kick.
Abortion is not acceptable for birth control. There are may other ways of preventing pregnancy, incl vasectomy.
Hosea ref is not abt abortion. It’s abt retribution.
2 Kings — war, not abortion.
Numbers — abt husband’s jealousy
Exodus – laws of compensation at a time when NICUs were not present, not abt abortion
Genesis – not abortion but abt adultery/fornication
All the rest of the OT quotes are 1) out of context 2) not referring to abortion. Abortion is NOT addressed in the Bible. Reason: children were gifts fm God and a tangible reminder that God was blessing that family. Abortion was a non-starter in the mind of Jews of Biblical days.
The quote fm Jesus is abt the End of Time trials, not abt abortion
The other NT quotes are rather random and do not reflect on the topic of abortion at all. The one fm Acts is Stephen recounting the Pharaoh’s attempt to kill Hebrew babies and God’s response, which ultimately cost all Egypt the firstborn.
This shows me that you just grabbed at something that looked promising without bothering to read it or think much abt it.
Try again Dem4dem
March 27, 2015 at 3:35pm
It’s America where you can say whatever you please unless you are inciting violence.
Is it reprehensible? Yes, it is.
March 27, 2015 at 3:34pm
Like Harry Reid…
 March 27, 2015 at 3:33pm
Gordon — you are batsh*t crazy, man. God of the Bible does not act in the way you seem to have interpreted.
Did God give us free will? You betcha, bubba. Do we abandon His ways for our own twisted and perverted ways? You betcha, bubba. Did the killer violated God’s laws? You betcha, bubba. Did God of the Bible cause the whack-a-doo to do what she did? Oh hell, no!
Gordon, you need to go back to seminary. You mostly need to try reading the Bible, praying and listening for God’s voice, and be kinder to sinners. You are hating them along w/the sins they commit.
 March 27, 2015 at 3:19pm
Having been a teacher — some of those really wild hair styles are mega-distracting to those around. That takes away fm the classroom orientation toward learning and moves in the direction of gossip and/or bullying.
Dress codes have a place in public schools. However, they need to be fully published before the school year begins and not made retroactive for this or that one.
I personally think that dress codes for a shool is a benificial thing. You do not go to school for a fashion show, you go to learn. School uniforms creates an atmosphere of expectation, when there you are expected to focus, to study, to learn. Socializing is not the point of schools, education is. That being said. This boys haircut is in no way a Mohawk. This school should make their dress code clear and well defined. Having a regulation banning “mowhawk haircuts or other extreme cuts,” brings vagueness to a new degree. Be clear and well defined and you wont run into problems like this.
Hi Elena. I can totally see your point for it being a distraction and possibly bully material. But.... are teachers not there to teach kids to concentrate on the task at hand and learn how NOT to be distracted by meaningless fodder like a hair color or hair style? And if someone gets bullied over their hair color or style, then the bully is the one with the issue, not the student who is wearing it. Making up the rules as they go along rather than having a clear cut (see what I did there?) definition is only going to create more confusion and separatism for both faculty and students.
Total BS. The over reaction of the so called teachers and administrators is the cause of the distraction. If there was no reaction there would be no distraction. The same applies to bullying and gossip. The lack of reaction takes the fun out of it for the bully. We should be teaching our kids to be mentally tough instead of how to be offended at every situation. I taught my kids to ignore less intelligent people because what they think or say does not diminish you. I taught them that no matter what they did or how nice they were,there was going to be some people who did not like them. You can’t please everyone so don’t expect to. Life is not fair and all people are not nice.
 March 27, 2015 at 3:17pm
Truth be told, that principal likely has never served in the military. Truth be told, the principal likely does not care for the Constitution in action only in principle, where most leftwingers like it to remain.