User Profile: elfman

elfman

Member Since: October 19, 2011

Comments

123
  • [1] October 17, 2014 at 10:39pm

    Atheists don’t “deny” the existence of God, we just don’t believe in it. It requires no proof or assertion against theists claim.

  • October 17, 2014 at 10:32pm

    What kind of bogus BS is this?:

    “I got to the point where I accepted that Jesus was the son of God and died and resurrected, but I wasn’t at a point where I had made a decision to follow him,” Ordway said.

    WTF, If you believe that Jesus was the son of God, and therefore God exists, why on earth would you not follow him? No sane person thinks like this. I’ve learned a lot from Beck, been a paying member of GBTV for almost 2 years, but this kind of nonsense making me question his good sense and the honesty of the people he hires to write this garbage.

  • October 13, 2014 at 7:50am

    Couldn’t just say that without the racist pejorative at the end… Might as well have spelled out *********** and removed all doubt. G e t l o s t.

  • [15] October 11, 2014 at 4:29pm

    You’re the kind of agree-with-me-our-your-the-devil Christian that repulses me.

  • [1] October 8, 2014 at 12:05pm

    Come back to reality people! “Today’s Hook up Culture” was popular 70 years ago, with its US roots going back over 150 years: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_love#Origins_of_the_movement

    Remember the popularity of songs like Love the “One You’re With” or “My Baby Does the Hanky Panky”? How about those “liberals” Tony Orlando and Dawn’s, “Knock Three Times”. Listen if you’re too young to remember:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7Jvsbcxunc

    Yea, this doesn’t contribute to a stable society, but it’s not new.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 8, 2014 at 11:25am

    Maybe I missed it, but did the officers ask the passenger to open the door early on? Five seconds before the window was smashed in, one yelled, “ARE YOU GOING TO OPEN THAT DOOR?”. The passenger turned away, became agitated, and at that point the officers’ safely was in danger. If that was their second request, I have no problem with the officers’ response.

    Responses (2) +
  • October 4, 2014 at 6:14am

    Yep, Technically, this site is a mess. Same with Breitbart’s & HotAir. Even Drudge with his refresh every two minutes is annoying. But we come for the content sometimes anyway.

  • September 24, 2014 at 9:23am

    Rotaredomsyfg, You would be acting against what you’ve pledged to defend.

    The Constitution’s 2nd amendment recognizes citizens’ right to self defense, not retaliatory use of force. Government is solely authorized to apply retaliatory force. When challenging an officer’s authority to do something as common as see your drivers license, and he jerks your door open, no jury in America will ever believe that you shot him in self defense. They (and I) will simply believe that you are an imbalanced hot head, and executed a cop for being an a******. That’s not a right we do or should recognize for civilians or for military unless lawfully ordered, former military or not. Semper Fi, and thank you for your service.

  • August 25, 2014 at 4:06pm

    Not a bad idea. Next time I see another divisive story like this, I will. Thanks!

  • [7] August 25, 2014 at 1:08pm

    “Atheist” is no more a proper noun than is “theistic” or “blond”. Atheistic is just an aspect of an ideology, not an ideology.

    And for FWIW, as an Objectivist, thank you for not throwing all atheists into the same bucket as the embittered fools who want to strip religion out of government. As long as I can occasionally replace a school prayer with some brief secular words of encouragement, pray all you want on my dime. It’s still a million times better than apathy.

  • [4] August 25, 2014 at 12:56pm

    Thank you! As an Objectivist, I absolutely feel the same. We have hundreds of critical issues that we need to fight together for if we’re going to same our free republic, and I’ll be damned (no pun intended) if I’ll start firing and by buddy in our fox hole because he sees 25% differently than me.

  • [-1] August 25, 2014 at 12:44pm

    The Blaze is in my top five information sources because 1) it’s insightful and 2) Glenn Beck works to reach out to atheists.

    I’m an Objectivist, and believe I have much more in common with Christians than 95% of atheists who base their morality on contemporary values. But this forum has become much more militant toward atheists than it’s owner. There are atheist vs. Christian stories here every 4-5 days. From my perspective, it’s taken a dark turn. I know what the editor is doing. Activity and revenue is enhanced by disconsonance. It’s as easy and as sleazy as just putting up some T&A like other do media. But it’s destructive to the fabric of what Glenn’s trying to construct. I ask you to reconsider.

    I love GBTV, but I can get 99% of what’s on TheBlaze.com from Levin, Drudge, HotAir and Breitbart, none of which agitate people against me. I never liked the way The Blasé teases readers to click on links or overloads each page with aggressive banners, but at least that didn’t tear us apart. Keep this up and The Blaze will be just a dark echo chamber of agitated social conservatives.

    Responses (2) +
  • August 7, 2014 at 10:31pm

    I don’t think so

  • [24] June 27, 2014 at 10:49am

    I HATE the way The Blaze WASTES OUR TIME with teaser links to stories on pages that are so full of advertisements that even on a fast computer it takes so long to discover what the story really is. Too often they’re cr~p k like this!

    You don’t respect us. You’re all frauds.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] May 28, 2014 at 5:53pm

    Compare that crap to Ayn Rand’s phenomenal Address To The Graduating Class Of The United States Military Academy at West Point, “Philosophy: Who Needs It” Ithttp://fare.tunes.org/liberty/library/pwni.html

    I swear Obama is itching to go head to head with Ayn Rand’s philosophy. Conservatism is not the antithesis of his philosophy, it’s Objectivism. Obama once snapped back at criticism of his policies with something like, “What do you propose instead? The Virtues of Selfishness!” (That’s Rand’s explanation of Objectivism.)

  • April 8, 2014 at 11:59am

    Think again: 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution
    The Scientific Case for Common Descent
    Version 2.89
    Copyright © 1999-2012 by Douglas Theobald, Ph.D.

    http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

  • April 8, 2014 at 11:56am

    Intelligent design activists who want signs to protect their dogma are acting like gay activist on the right. Divine intervention is wholly and fundamentally incompatible with scientific investigation! Therefore it has absolutely no relevance to a FREAK’N “SCIENCE CENTER”!

    I have nothing against your non-evidence based religious hypothesis. Christianity has been helpful if not fundamental to lifting the West out of barbarianism. As long as people want it, teach ID/Creationism in Religious Studies, Social Studies, Cultural Anthropology or even Literature. But IT HAS ABSOLUTELY ZERO TO DO WITH SCIENCE and any campaign to shoehorn in there is just a profoundly aggressive and bone-headed attempt to undermine science!

  • March 26, 2014 at 4:48pm

    Ha! Mike Rowe ends his video about a group of teenage school boys protesting with “because wood is a beautiful thing”. Funny guy…

  • February 28, 2014 at 12:13am

    This is not that unusual. In 84, a room mate of mine in the USMC got busted down just one rank for stomping on a flag and saying some crap about Reagan. I don’t know what he was thinking.

  • February 26, 2014 at 12:20pm

    I watched it 10 times and can’t see the foul. Looks to me like she just lunched forward.

    Responses (2) +
123