User Profile: Eric Window

Eric Window

Member Since: September 03, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [2] September 22, 2014 at 9:19am

    Muslim hell…72 fat Lesbians greased up in pork fat !

  • September 21, 2014 at 7:05am

    Over the years we have isolated our president and now spend more money on him annually than all the royalty on earth. The place where he lives at taxpayer expense is now elevated to Fort Knox where nobody except elites can visit even though “We the People” pay for it. What’s next? Mandatory checkpoints manned by the Secret Service around D.C.? …OK…OK…this guy was trespassing and embarrassed the Secret Service but did he threaten the president or national security? A:NO. Look at what the Secret Service does today, it’s a lot more than their charter….They even protect unelected members of the president’s staff. Just saying.

  • [5] September 21, 2014 at 6:38am

    Is rape laws were prosecuted under the same rules as in the US, your fact #1 would not be true. Christianity is a religion of love and forgiveness at it’s core, not submission and death to those that don’t.

  • [1] September 20, 2014 at 7:23am

    Reading some of the comments, I think a lot of the posters (or liberal trolls acting as conservative) don’t need to worry, their words do that for them in flashing lights. Remember, there is plenty of white and other color “scum” to go around…

  • [1] September 18, 2014 at 9:44pm

    The Nazi’s had a conscience and I be they thought they were moral. Christian’s laws are summed up by Jesus::

    Love the Lord
    “Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment” (Matthew 22:37–38).

    Love Your Neighbor
    “And the second [commandment] is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets” (Matthew 22:39–40).

  • [5] September 18, 2014 at 9:00am

    True, however if you are atheist, what is the penalty for an immoral act? (A:nothing if it is lawful or you get away with it). I for one do not wish to live in a society that lives like this. The result is dystopia in the end. This study is actually full of holes.

    Responses (10) +
  • [4] September 17, 2014 at 12:32pm

    Sanity is what is lacking.
    - Green is not the use of hazardous material to make batteries and the carbon footprint of charging them.
    - Cost savings of less than $10K/yr is now costing $$$ millions to buy these trucks and all the specialized mechanics that come with them.
    Green Democrats at their best/

    Responses (1) +
  • September 15, 2014 at 2:48pm

    Leaving Islam is a legal death sentence in Muslim countries.

  • September 15, 2014 at 12:37pm

    Try to get the SCOTUS to agree….good luck ! Only if we change the constitution to define religion will that change.

  • September 15, 2014 at 12:34pm

    But you fail to realize the price for choosing another religion is death. As a Christian I cannot condemn one of God’s children for being forced into this perverted religion. I knew a lot of Muslim that practiced a more tolerant approach to their religion in Turkey (they are not orthodox) who believed the forced practice of prayer at certain times of the day was worshiping God (a practice if done voluntarily is very honorable). They also were EXTREMELY trustworthy, even the poorest ones and friendly to strangers. I cannot say the same thing about the Persians and Arabs I have known, If we have the guts, the only way to win is to neuter the religion’s brutal laws and condemn the practice of not allowing other religions to live in peace without fear of reprisal.

  • September 15, 2014 at 8:51am

    There is active downvoting on people who start to get to many upvotes on this topic. This is why a blog needs to show both. Just saying.

    Responses (1) +
  • [12] September 15, 2014 at 8:21am

    “No religion condones the killing of innocents”.. the problem is how the religion defines INNOCENT. Does any other religion condone honor killings, killing for leaving their faith? These are tenants of Islam, not radical beliefs in their mind. Lying is also OK in their religion. We in the west are very ignorant to true Islam. I have no problem with muslims that practice tolerance but they follow a distortion of their religion.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] September 15, 2014 at 8:07am

    Islam needs to be isolated and shamed by the majority of the world. The true muslims are not peaceful if they practice their faith. The hatred of Islam stems from the fact they forcibly impose their religion on their people and others through the treat and application of violence. They do not accept the concept of free will.

  • [1] September 15, 2014 at 8:01am

    At it’s core Christianity is based on love, Islam is based on forced submission. You need to read and understand history before you make such a comparison. Sectarian politics played an evil role in the church…yes…but it never was a tenant of the faith.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 15, 2014 at 7:12am

    Thus we find the cracks in our Constitution which handcuff us. The 1st amendment’s wording”…no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;…” does not ban Islam. It actually protects it’s practice. But the rub is Islam is not compatible with democracy and does not respect other religions or laws made that restrict their practice of the the inhumane punishments their religion promotes to themselves and to others that don’t submit to their evil teachings. The real issue is Islam itself, it is more a cult if practiced according to the Koran. Their religion is flawed, Mohammed was a false prophet and evil. Their people are not the problem, it’s the religion. A majority of their people are actually not bad…they are just misguided.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] September 8, 2014 at 5:17pm

    I have spent a lot of time in Saudi since the early 80′s to the early 2000′s while in the military. I have worked side by side with their military . Their king pays off the religious leaders to stay in power. The Saudi’s indirectly bank role a lot of the terror groups and provide funding for madrassas Islamic schools which ferment radical Islam. IMHO, I believe the king believes he and his family will control the Caliphate when it is formed. The Iranians also believe they can do the same with a different flavor of radicalism. The two sides hate each other, and IMHO we are pawns in this fight. I asked once a Saudi Colonel why we are tolerated there since we are “Infidels”. He told me the truth… because we help them stay in control and keep the Iranians in check. I don’t know if the Saudi king will be able to control this movement, I think they are scared now. Oil unfortunately is what keeps us in the fight, that is why we, the US need to rapidly increase oil production if we want to prevent the inevitable WW III when this all plays out and Europe and the East need their oil. This is my opinion, for what’s it worth.

  • [3] September 8, 2014 at 4:57pm

    Very expensive theater I might add. Arming a flight deck is much easier and cheaper.

  • September 6, 2014 at 12:29pm

    I used to be in Air Defense. The 9/11 attack was brilliant in the way they exploited our vulnerabilities at the time. We had very few true radars within the interior of the US that were linked to NORAD. The NORAD search radars and identification priority only was concerned with aircraft entering US airspace, not those within it. When the hijackers turned off their SIF transponders, they were stealth aircraft for the most part. There was an AWACS airborne that was diverted to the area, but they did not have the capability to send down their radar picture to ATC who controls internal air traffic, nor was it possible to correlate it to flight plans in a reasonable time. AWACS was just looking at thousands of “flying dots” trying to find a “needle in a haystack”. This is why SCANTANA was implemented, grounding and diverting all planes. It was too late though. We were caught with our pants down since our air defense systems never envisioned this type of attack when they were designed.

  • September 6, 2014 at 12:13pm

    That decision would not get to that level. The NORAD Rules of Engagement are already written and approved.

  • [3] September 5, 2014 at 5:06pm

    This is not a front line weapon. It would be used in rear areas that need protection. Your argument is valid for many weapon systems if you get close enough to shoot at them. You can take out a Patriot site with a rifle too. This system, if they pull it off, is far more cost effective than smart missile systems and vastly more effective than other systems. I assume that this will also be on ships too since missiles are becoming faster than current systems can defeat.

123 To page: Go