User Profile: Eugene1


Member Since: October 06, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • April 7, 2013 at 12:10pm

    Wow, how ignorant a statement is that? As a Mormon I pity your ignorance. I hope you find within yourself to allow Christ truly into your heart.

  • April 7, 2013 at 11:49am

    Wow . . . what a poor, un-Christian-like response to this article. The Christ you must believe in must be a vindictive, angry, forceful Christ that attacks other religions even if they they do good in the world. I choose your so-called “other Jesus” espoused by Mormons who they believe is a kind and loving Savior and Redeemer. Shameful for you to claim to be a Christian and act oppositely.

  • March 17, 2013 at 10:16pm

    As a 50 year old man who was an Eagle Scout at 14 and has been a Scout leader for most of my life, I plead that the Boy Scouts of America holds to its convictons. I have never seen the BSA condone the bullying of anyone gay or lesbian, but that doesn’t mean the BSA needs to suspend the scout belief system and bow to their pressure. Who is being the bully now? Isn’t bullying exactly trying to force someone to do something they don’t want to do? In America, the gays and lesbians have every right to start up their own scouting organization, but they don’t have any right to change the BSA. Period.

    Responses (2) +
  • February 27, 2013 at 10:15pm

    KEATON: What good was Obama’s degrees as a constitutional professor? The Supreme Court found his recess appointments onconstitutional with almost every thing he has done up for judicial scrutiny. What good was his short stint as a Senator? All we know is that he railed against the very things he is doing now and voted present most of the time and did not have the guts to vote “yea” or “nea”. What good has he been as president? Massive debt, dependence on government, massive regulatory burden, massive taxes on all just not the rich, destroying capitalism, introducing socialism and extreme partisanship up the wazzoo! While not high crimes and misdemeanors, definitely should include “incompetence” as an impeachable offense.

  • February 26, 2013 at 8:37am

    Talk has been about the low information voters who put Obama back into office. Here is an example of a low information elected official that accepts the talking points as truth even when they make no sense at all. It is so sad to see such ignorance on display in Washington!

  • February 22, 2013 at 9:21am

    Jeesh, you can find racism anywhere if you are looking be offended. Just quit looking to be offended!!

  • February 16, 2013 at 11:43pm

    Those gun companies that are being squeezed by their own states need to move their operations to states that appreciate the fact that guns don’t kill people, people kill people. No amount of gun control laws will stop that fact and will kill with whatever is handy.

  • February 16, 2013 at 11:37pm

    Confused and mentally unstable seems now to be the norm. Where is this world going to?

  • January 30, 2013 at 4:34pm

    I am a polar opposite to everything Obama says or stands for, but even I respect the office of the president enough to find this joke beyond bad taste and poor judgement. I bet the jokester gets a visit from the Secret Service!

  • January 23, 2013 at 4:19pm

    The Clintons invented the Washington two-step, but Obama refined and patented it.

    Senator Rand hit hard and she deflected it using Bill’s own teflon coating.

  • January 21, 2013 at 12:00pm

    You invite a rapper to perform and expect them not to say something controversial? I thought that was the point of rap . . . push the envelope . . . describe the current status of things . . . tell the urban story!

    Maybe rappers are starting to see through the Obama experience since he sure has not helped the black community over the past 4 years in office.

  • January 11, 2013 at 8:56am

    One good turn . . . . wait a minute!

  • January 9, 2013 at 11:57pm

    Okay, if Obama (executive branch) can unilaterally destroy the constitutional right to own guns by taking this right awa, then the Supreme Court (judicial branch) can unilaterally strike it down, and Congress (legislative branch) should pass bills to correct it. Unfortunately, Congress is busy being ineffective.

    If Obama acts, then the Supreme Court must find it unconstitutional since this is a legislative matter, not one left to be decided by a self-appointed king.

  • January 9, 2013 at 4:15pm

    “Wow, look at the dead, headless fish that is floating in the ocean. . . let’s eat it!!”

    Being an avid fisherman who likes to eat the catch . . . this does not sound appetizing or smart!

    Responses (2) +
  • January 8, 2013 at 10:25pm

    Why do we continue to allow any racist air time? I don’t care if you are black, white, yellow, pink or burgundy, color should be cast out from being used as a tool to divide us. MLK’s dream continues to be outside of some people’s reach or intelligence.

    Thank heavens ESPN made the right call. We should never condone racism in any form especially when it is on the public airwaves!

    Responses (14) +
  • January 8, 2013 at 9:50am

    No story here . . . she is pretty . . . he is a QB . . . .commentators comment . . . game over!

  • January 6, 2013 at 9:36pm

    They here is that the Congress can cut expenses big time and still pay the interest on the national debt. That is all that is required by this provision in the Constitution . . .pay the interest on the national debt. That is the only default we should worry about since there is oodles of federal tax income coming in to do that.

    Republicans should hold true to the Constitution and not give in to the lies from the left. No more taxes . . . period . . . you don’t give an alcoholic more booze . . . and begin cutting the budget deficit by fiscal conservativism. This is the only way to survive!

  • January 1, 2013 at 3:37pm

    I honor our vets and all they have done for our country, but should our own government be spending $247,000 in tax dollars so that only those who watch a parade will see it? Our tax dollars need to be protected just as much as our borders.

    Responses (3) +
  • December 28, 2012 at 5:18pm

    Okay, this article only gave you a bent view of the TAG program. Notice that it was a guest opinion that originally posted on (and you trust info coming from CNBC?).

    As a banker of almost 30 years, I can tell you TAG was NOT a subsidy for big banks or any banks. They had to pay to participate and they received zero dollars in return. The only pay out comes if a bank fails and a depositor (consumer or business) is caught with more than the FDIC allowed amount and could lose funds. The customer would then get their entire deposit account back if it was in a non-interest bearing account.

    The benefit to small banks was that their larger clients did not bail on them and go to the bigger banks that were “too big to fail”. By not renewing this, we will see more deposit dollars migrate to these big banks and hurt the small community banks. Now does it make sense why credit unions would want TAG stopped? Credit Unions primarily compete against the small banks so this gives them an edge.

    Isn’t it funny that credit unions don’t pay federal or state income taxes (subsidized by the American taxpayer), but want to compete against fully taxed banking institutions who pay millions in taxes? This inequity must be addressed and fixed. The question is could credit unions compete with banks if they weren’t subsidized and paid the same tax? In the words of the President, how about credit unions paying their “fair share”?

    Responses (2) +
  • December 22, 2012 at 6:57pm

    Wait a minute, was this beat down of a Dem Sen on CNBC? Maria will lose her job since she didn’t tow the network leftist, elitist bias!

    Next week she’ll be on Fox!

123 To page: Go