User Profile: eyedr54

eyedr54

Member Since: March 18, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] July 23, 2014 at 10:03am

    Anything that goes against what homosexuals want = highly offensive in modern society.
    Dungy was correct in what he said and that was smith’s point. I think the fact that every NFL coach, former coach, and anyone associated with the league is being asked questions completely irrelevant to football about Mr. Sam pretty much confirms what Dungy said was correct. Can anyone here say that is will not be a massive distraction at training camp with the press? Some players may not bother at all with Sam’s sexuality but may not like being asked about it consistently.
    To those who have said “well Jackie Robinson was a distraction to..blah.blah.blah”. I will say this 1) He was an all star player 2) That was a different era where blacks were defacto banned from playing in the league and nation wide still subject to significant amounts of racism. Contrast that with this where homosexuality is nearly uniformly exulted in the media, no bans are present (ever), and it is something that is really a personal matter that has no relevance to the game (you can tell a player is a certain race; sexual preference can not be seen in a football game).

  • July 21, 2014 at 4:10pm

    Question: How on earth do you get that wrong?
    Bill said he likes to eat people while they are still alive….
    Correction Bill never once talked about eating or people or eating people…
    I mean seriously is there some MSM server bank out there somewhere that they just do pull quotes from for conservative people regardless of the story

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 21, 2014 at 3:01pm

    Horrible. Obviously contributes to democrats otherwise his politics would somehow played a role in the AP story.
    I have no issues with these women getting money. Even though it would be hard for the hospital to know they still are responsible for what happens inside their doors. The one thing I did not like was this statement: “A forensic psychologist and a post-traumatic stress specialist interviewed the plaintiffs and placed each woman into a category based on trauma level. That will determine how much money each one will receive.” Some of the most “traumatized” women may not have even been recorded while some of the least may have been. I would rather have seen a blanket pay out with very little variation unless some women could be identified. Beyond the blanket pay out those who required counselling or some other mental health intervention the related to this revelation should have those services paid for.

  • [5] July 18, 2014 at 4:47pm

    Was a translator present to translate it to her native tongue?

  • [1] July 16, 2014 at 10:54am

    –Reid then added that lawmakers should worry less about securing the border and instead focus on approving President Barack Obama’s $3.7 billion request to process the thousands of children who have flocked to the U.S. illegally from Central America.—
    So harry said the border is secure and then said we need 3.7 Billion to deal with thousands of children who have crossed the “secure” border…sooooo the border is so secure minors can find away across it at such a high rate we need an additional 3.7 billion dollars to deal with them? Harry say that slowly: The border is secure that is why we need 3.7 B more dollars to deal with minors who have crossed it.

  • July 15, 2014 at 6:12pm

    I have no issues with remembering someone that you lost. Even criminals are someones family that may mourn them. They can mourn the person but also mourn what they did. In no way should you memorialize them or say the stupid cr@p you read people saying in this article.
    Yet another murderer who’s actions will be blamed on institutional racism and a national history of slavery while completely ignoring the epidemic problems we see in our large urban centers.

  • July 15, 2014 at 2:59pm

    The govt either has the world’s sh!^^iest computers, the worlds most incompetent computer users, or is chronically destroying evidence. I think we all know which one is true.

  • [2] July 14, 2014 at 12:23pm

    “As long as it doesn’t lead to global warming” -Liberals

  • July 14, 2014 at 11:12am

    I am just sad to see the W.H.O being so homophobic and bigoted. Hopefully, they will evolve to see that this is not a problem just their own judgements harming people. Apparently teaching our grade schoolers about “safe sex” doesn’t work.
    Think of all the things the liberal establishment likes to tell people not to do because it is “bad for them” and yet this is one thing that not a single liberal in america would come within 2000 feet of.

  • [1] July 10, 2014 at 1:04pm

    So her hunting a legal game animal means you can “hunt her”? Ummmm lets ignore the fact that most people on the left would consider that, and possibly rightfully so, a death threat; instead lets just focus on how that makes zero logical sense: She kills big game legally; which means it is fine for you to sexually harass her and “ponder” about your own sexless life’s fantasy of what she may or may not like sexually?? A 18-22 year old woman is capable of hunting a large game animal. This 45-55 year old fat male is capable of having dirty thoughts about a women who likely would not even notice his sorry a$$ in a room?

  • [1] July 9, 2014 at 12:47pm

    The fact that people, many of which are buying BC themselves, believed that Fluke was spending 2K a year on it should plainly show the current state of our inept public. (lets remember she said 2K on BC not on wellness visit or hormone replacement/modification…strictly for BC):
    2K would buy 2,600 condoms (free at PP)
    2K would buy 130 months of (generic) orthotricycline (cash pay/no ins)
    2K would buy anywhere from 2-4 IUDs (cash pay no ins)
    2K would buy 100 months of the birth control shot (cash pay no ins)
    2K would buy 600 “sponges” (cash pay no ins)
    2K would buy (if the others “fail”) 35 packets of Plan B (cash pay)
    Must I keep going to point out how dumb we have become as a society

  • July 9, 2014 at 12:36pm

    I truly think reid is mentally handicapped.
    Regardless of his mental state I would hope someone would quickly review the functions of the 3 branches of our govt with him. Harry, if you don’t like the court ruling you will have to amend the US constitution in some insane way to allow for women to get 4 specific kinds of birth control paid for by their employer…the problem is the modern left never has the guts to say we are going to amend the constitution. Instead they try and subvert it.

    Responses (2) +
  • July 9, 2014 at 12:28pm

    Have we bastardize the word “right” so much now that people think they have a “human right to water”….like what it will just show up? Tell that to the people who get lost hiking in the desert. Have you ever seen the TV show naked and afraid? Maybe those folks should just say their right to water is being violated and viola the planet will just give it to them.

  • [1] July 9, 2014 at 12:24pm

    So let me get this straight. The women says she thinks shutting off the water is a violation of the people basic human right to water but then says no one is out there thinking they will always get water even if they don’t pay. She just argued that people should get water if they don’t pay as a “right” then said no one is saying they think they will always get water if they don’t pay….. ummmm you are saying exactly that lady.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 7, 2014 at 4:43pm

    Funny how sally mentions Gov LePage as a republican but seems to forget to mention Wallace was a democrat.
    Of course she is relying on the idiots that buy what she is saying to self convince themselves (more accurately would be to say just don’t know) that Wallace must have been an evil republican.

    In reply to the story Is the 'I-Word' the New 'N-Word'?

  • July 7, 2014 at 4:38pm

    I feel terrible. My brother in law is in law enforcement and I have just come to realize how racist he was this past 4th of July weekend at our get together. He basically was telling me this:
    It is N-word to drive without a seat belt in our state
    He had to stop someone for doing a N-word U-turn in a parking lot of a school almost hitting a kid
    I would be shocked if I saw all the N-word stuff drivers did when they didn’t know people were around.
    He said he would turn the other cheek when it was time for us to light off our N-word fireworks.
    He talked about how many people don’t realize how N-word it is to buy minors booze.
    I mean this just went on and on and on and on….I never knew how racist he was; after all these years. It is so sad.

    In reply to the story Is the 'I-Word' the New 'N-Word'?

  • [1] July 7, 2014 at 10:28am

    She has a “great” point. Yesterday some one N-wordedly broke into my car.
    My wife tried to rush home to help me out but was pulled over. The officer told her it was N-word to speed. On the plus side to calm down we went out to an amazing dinner that night. I told my wife the scallops were so good here they should be N-word.
    Yeah sally that makes a lot of sense..thanks

    In reply to the story Is the 'I-Word' the New 'N-Word'?

  • [3] July 7, 2014 at 10:24am

    The way liberals shape public opinion (typically through the young) is by redefining words by just saying something “is” a certain way until people feel it is that way (we laughed when clinton talked about what the definition of is is; that was a window into how the left operates). Conservatives and especially republicans have for far to long allowed these word games to not really be challenged. We need to wake up; you lose the language and you lose the fight.

    In reply to the story Is the 'I-Word' the New 'N-Word'?

  • [9] July 3, 2014 at 3:20pm

    I get it leftists are trying to find a way to have an over powering govt. The problem is it is in the copperplate which is the only readable officially made permanent copy of the document. Just as it is in the states copies from mere months later.
    Liberals love to rewrite history but this is going a bit to far.
    Federalist Papers + State Copies months after the original + Legal govt copper plate = there is a period. Are we really going to trust the people who fabricated decades of global temperature data to “figure out” via “imaging” if the period is on the original?
    “she thinks it may have been meant to be a coma”…..the left also “thinks” it is about as good as toilet paper until it suits them so I could care less about her academia fantasy.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 3, 2014 at 1:12pm

    Before I could observe another doctor seeing patients as a student in medical school I received a full physical. I was also tested for hepatitis, HIV, I was asked if I had ever had chicken pox and a host of other diseases, and was not able to deny a genitourinary exam (and still be given a clean bill of health). Do you think any of these people/kids were even tested for HIV?

123 To page: Go