User Profile: eyedr54


Member Since: March 18, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • [4] July 30, 2014 at 12:43pm

    Most pedophiles and rapists have a history of being sexually abused.
    Most violent offenders of domestic violence have a history of violence to them or another member of their family in the past.
    Not all people who are victimized end up committing bad acts.
    As sad as one victim is it does not justify creating another.

  • [5] July 30, 2014 at 10:13am

    I also find it pathetic when male suspects laugh or cheer as they beat up a woman. No matter what kind of slime you are that should be embarrassing. Sure you decided to choose the easiest “mark” for your pathetic self but at least realize where the chips are: You should be embarrassed you are not even a tough criminal it took two of you to attack an unsuspecting woman. Don’t laugh about it.

  • [4] July 30, 2014 at 10:08am

    So that fat one was wearing an orange shirt…probably just sticking to what he knows. I think all forms of violent crime should have a 3 strikes and your out rule. I’m sick of 2% of society committing the vast majority of violent crimes. Jail has not become a deterrent to these people anymore, for many it is a sign of pride, “what you do”, a way to make contacts, or even a relief. Prison needs to become prison again…hard time needs to become hard time. If you commit a violent crime 2 times it is not a fluke; but after 3 times no excuse can justify it (what you were set up 3 times? in the wrong place 3 times..come on). That is life doing hard time in my book. You pay for your stay at that point also. Hard labor, 60 or more hours a week; no tv (maybe antennae), basic meals, no gym, no pool, no cpu, if you are not working you are bathing, eating, using the restroom, or preparing for bed.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 28, 2014 at 1:01pm

    I believe the AK shoots a 7.62/308 round. The picture is definitely not a 5.56/2.23…I’d say if the story is true that is a well made grenade and a lucky man.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 28, 2014 at 12:54pm

    Oh it won’t affect the economy much? Okay sure lets just break the law then.
    I mean letting 1 serial killer out of prison just for fun won’t affect the economy much but we don’t do that.
    Last I checked perjury doesn’t typically affect the economy much but I don’t think govt officials are legally allowed to do that. Did nixon hurt the economy by covering for watergate?
    Some laws actually hurt or benefit the economy, does that mean we can just bypass our system of govt ? Should we just change the civil rights act without congress b/c we think altering it in some way is better for the economy?
    It should appall everyone that the argument to allow changing a law to this degree without congressional approval is simply “it really won’t hurt the economy”

  • [3] July 28, 2014 at 11:46am

    20 per county…Well the county where I grew up has only 400-450 students in total. The one I work in now has 2100. Now if 20 “8 yr olds”, as he says came even to this county that would be nearly an ENTIRE 3rd grade class (when only 7 classes currently exist). Likewise some counties in MN where I live (like in many states) have less then 1500 people in total in them; so this 20 per county thing is a massive farce.
    Likewise, if you add 20 improperly vaccinated or ill students per county you run the risk of a nationwide epidemic. It is simple epidemiology. Add even 3 cases of undetected TB to each states grade school population (little loan MDR TB) and you have the making of a TB outbreak on a massive scale. Add even 1 case per county of a flu strain our nation normally does not see in its current state (flu shot would be worthless against it) and you run the risk of a nationwide outbreak of this new flu that would kill thousands more beyond the normal flu.
    Nations have borders for a reason and one of them is to control the health status of it’s current population.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 3:47pm

    The problem we have is kids now are allowed to use Wikipedia as a reference. Wiki began becoming popular when I was doing my fellowship. The doctoral classes I was teaching at the time were not allowed to use Wikipedia as a source. It is a sad commentary on education if teachers/professors no longer vet sites that they allow as a reference pt for their class.

    Responses (1) +
  • [9] July 25, 2014 at 3:42pm

    This is what a lot of us conservatives talk about when we say you can not have a debate until you have established the language. Too often “right wingers” debate a topic but allow the left to define the language of the debate. Once you have lost the language you have lost the debate. (Even pro-life reverends now call Plan B simply “birth control”; people allow marriage to be redefined then debate from the stance that what the left says is marriage is indeed marriage).
    What I think is laughable about this is the definition they give of obstructionist is not even anywhere close to correct. I mean no wonder our kids are now idiots.

  • July 25, 2014 at 11:45am

    I think the question that needs to be asked is can anyone honestly believe that rockets can be stored in a UN school without numerous UN employees knowing about it? (I mean in the USA a hospital was just sued for millions because it “should have known” that a doctor was using a camera pen to photograph women during their visits). If they did, which they had to of, what does that say?
    On a lighter note if the Israeli ambassador wants CNN to show footage of the schools with the weapons in them just call a tip in that the Missing Malaysian jet was seen there.

  • [6] July 24, 2014 at 12:29pm

    I’m not from Nevada…I just make claims about it whether I know them to be true or not
    I’m not from Nevada…I just am the head the the DNC and I think the N might stand for national
    I’m not from Nevada…I just decided to appear on a Nevada TV show and talk about Nevada.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 23, 2014 at 10:03am

    Anything that goes against what homosexuals want = highly offensive in modern society.
    Dungy was correct in what he said and that was smith’s point. I think the fact that every NFL coach, former coach, and anyone associated with the league is being asked questions completely irrelevant to football about Mr. Sam pretty much confirms what Dungy said was correct. Can anyone here say that is will not be a massive distraction at training camp with the press? Some players may not bother at all with Sam’s sexuality but may not like being asked about it consistently.
    To those who have said “well Jackie Robinson was a distraction to..blah.blah.blah”. I will say this 1) He was an all star player 2) That was a different era where blacks were defacto banned from playing in the league and nation wide still subject to significant amounts of racism. Contrast that with this where homosexuality is nearly uniformly exulted in the media, no bans are present (ever), and it is something that is really a personal matter that has no relevance to the game (you can tell a player is a certain race; sexual preference can not be seen in a football game).

  • July 21, 2014 at 4:10pm

    Question: How on earth do you get that wrong?
    Bill said he likes to eat people while they are still alive….
    Correction Bill never once talked about eating or people or eating people…
    I mean seriously is there some MSM server bank out there somewhere that they just do pull quotes from for conservative people regardless of the story

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 21, 2014 at 3:01pm

    Horrible. Obviously contributes to democrats otherwise his politics would somehow played a role in the AP story.
    I have no issues with these women getting money. Even though it would be hard for the hospital to know they still are responsible for what happens inside their doors. The one thing I did not like was this statement: “A forensic psychologist and a post-traumatic stress specialist interviewed the plaintiffs and placed each woman into a category based on trauma level. That will determine how much money each one will receive.” Some of the most “traumatized” women may not have even been recorded while some of the least may have been. I would rather have seen a blanket pay out with very little variation unless some women could be identified. Beyond the blanket pay out those who required counselling or some other mental health intervention the related to this revelation should have those services paid for.

  • [5] July 18, 2014 at 4:47pm

    Was a translator present to translate it to her native tongue?

  • [1] July 16, 2014 at 10:54am

    –Reid then added that lawmakers should worry less about securing the border and instead focus on approving President Barack Obama’s $3.7 billion request to process the thousands of children who have flocked to the U.S. illegally from Central America.—
    So harry said the border is secure and then said we need 3.7 Billion to deal with thousands of children who have crossed the “secure” border…sooooo the border is so secure minors can find away across it at such a high rate we need an additional 3.7 billion dollars to deal with them? Harry say that slowly: The border is secure that is why we need 3.7 B more dollars to deal with minors who have crossed it.

  • July 15, 2014 at 6:12pm

    I have no issues with remembering someone that you lost. Even criminals are someones family that may mourn them. They can mourn the person but also mourn what they did. In no way should you memorialize them or say the stupid cr@p you read people saying in this article.
    Yet another murderer who’s actions will be blamed on institutional racism and a national history of slavery while completely ignoring the epidemic problems we see in our large urban centers.

  • July 15, 2014 at 2:59pm

    The govt either has the world’s sh!^^iest computers, the worlds most incompetent computer users, or is chronically destroying evidence. I think we all know which one is true.

  • [2] July 14, 2014 at 12:23pm

    “As long as it doesn’t lead to global warming” -Liberals

  • July 14, 2014 at 11:12am

    I am just sad to see the W.H.O being so homophobic and bigoted. Hopefully, they will evolve to see that this is not a problem just their own judgements harming people. Apparently teaching our grade schoolers about “safe sex” doesn’t work.
    Think of all the things the liberal establishment likes to tell people not to do because it is “bad for them” and yet this is one thing that not a single liberal in america would come within 2000 feet of.

  • [1] July 10, 2014 at 1:04pm

    So her hunting a legal game animal means you can “hunt her”? Ummmm lets ignore the fact that most people on the left would consider that, and possibly rightfully so, a death threat; instead lets just focus on how that makes zero logical sense: She kills big game legally; which means it is fine for you to sexually harass her and “ponder” about your own sexless life’s fantasy of what she may or may not like sexually?? A 18-22 year old woman is capable of hunting a large game animal. This 45-55 year old fat male is capable of having dirty thoughts about a women who likely would not even notice his sorry a$$ in a room?

123 To page: Go