User Profile: FAL Guy


Member Since: May 07, 2011


  • February 1, 2014 at 6:31pm


  • February 1, 2014 at 12:24am

    This court ruling is what marks the end of a free internet. W/O Net Neutrality anyone along the web that data flows can restrict or stop it. So with Net Neutrality gone if I’m an ISP and I don’t like Rush Limbaugh’s web site I can totally block or slow all data from it. This regulation has pretty much been in effect since the start of the web which has created the free form that you’re lamenting the disappearance of.

  • February 1, 2014 at 12:05am

    Net Neutrality is good. For the love of all that is holey just do a Google search about it and you’ll see. Basically it’s about treating all net data the same whether it be from Netflix, OR TheBlaze. Without it if Comecast doesn’t like TheBlaze they could limit or block it.

  • January 31, 2014 at 11:28pm

    Ummm as much as I don’t like Lord Osama you guys should really look into Net Neutrality. With out it some liberal commie service provider could decide that all conservative sites like The Blaze don’t deserve any bandwidth while PMSNBC gets all they want. It bothers me the lack of critical thinking seen here with regards to dear leader. Just because 90% of the time anything he supports is bad doesn’t mean you should just automatically discount the other 10%.

    Responses (2) +
  • December 6, 2013 at 10:09pm

    Hmmmm and Margret Thatcher got what?

  • April 8, 2013 at 7:08pm

    Funny how the Dems are crying about letting this come to a vote so “our system can work” and the people’s voices can be heard. Yet when it comes to a vote on a budget or any other Repub favored legislation Harry Reed won’t even let it be heard for a vote.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 7, 2013 at 12:31pm

    No Gabby’s handlers said those things. What Gabby said was probably more like mehhh aaaa errrr.

  • April 2, 2013 at 8:09pm

    If liberals didn’t care then why did he comment on Mr. Carson’s statement?

  • April 1, 2013 at 11:09am

    Did someone forget their happy pills today? Or is it that your simple little libitarded mind can’t grasp the very basic concept my post illustrates. Just so your child like mind can understand I’ll spell it out for you. Liberals are all about people being free to make choices when they agree with them. If they do not agree with a persons choice then they feel that person must be forced to agree with their beliefs or be punished. In this case I’m sure most liberals would agree with the bakers who refused to bake this cake but when the roles are reversed for a liberal subject then the bakers are horribly wrong and must be punished. I find this to be the height of hypocrisy. So the point of my post was to highlight this in what I thought was a simple fashion. Just to be clear I think any business owner has the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason and the free market will decide if their decision was prudent.

  • April 1, 2013 at 10:28am

    They should sue the bakers who refused to make their cake. I mean if homosexuals can sue bakers for not making their wedding cakes or rainbow cupcakes because the baker has moral objections why not for this?

    Responses (4) +
  • March 22, 2013 at 5:39pm

    Hmmmm with a name like De’Marquis I wonder if he’d look like a son of Obama if he had one.

    Responses (3) +
  • February 10, 2013 at 7:31pm

    Thing is that as much as I’d like to think that this is a man wrongly accused and lashing out, where are his friends? If I were to go psycho nut job my friends would be out there saying this is why. So for those who question his manifesto, where are the people refuting it?

    Responses (1) +
  • January 7, 2013 at 6:17pm

    All good RJJINGADSDEN. I was going to say good theory. Although I agree with the article and tend to think it was a shotgun. Only because if you catch when the officer ejects the shell it looks rather large for a rifle round. I just wish the video was better quality and then we could tell for sure. But I do know one thing that gun was definitely NOT an AR.

  • January 7, 2013 at 1:09pm

    Not the best article to post this to but I figured since this one is recent people might see this.
    The Sandyhook shooter didn’t have an AR, I hope the Blaze picks this up more people need to know. Watching the video of the deputy clearing the gun from the trunk you can see he’s pulling a bolt from the side of the gun. For an AR you’d be pulling from the rear. Pass this on, just one more way the media lies about guns for their fearmongering agenda.

    Responses (5) +
  • September 7, 2012 at 10:43pm

    I’m a major 2nd amendment supporter but even I have to admit on a web site like this isn’t this poll a little bit of verbal masturbation? I mean come on what conservative person is going to agree with this? I sure as hell don’t so what’s the point?

  • January 7, 2012 at 9:55am

    I live in Virginia Beach and it’s rated No. 1 for best city. Crony Capitalism is rampant with the city counsel. There have been several land and development deals that are tax payer funded that have gone to the same three companies repeatedly. We recently elected a counsel member who will help block the worst of this but right before he got elected the counsel pushed a bogus land/hotel deal through to an unelected subcommittee that once there pretty much can’t be stopped. So if we’re the best then I can only imagine what the rest of the country is like.

  • January 4, 2012 at 8:27pm

    Obviously this poor child was victim of educational system. He was never taught to read so he didn’t know he was in a “Gun Free School Zone.” If only he had learned to read then this could have been avoided as we all know if you post a sign or make a law to not do something then people won’t do it. I mean look at how effective gun free zones are like Columbine, VA Tech… oh wait. (For mental midgets this post is sarcastic.)

  • December 22, 2011 at 6:15pm

    Of course they focus on this allegation of antisemitism but not anything regarding the same and the occupy movement.

  • December 14, 2011 at 11:42pm

    Funny, I didn’t notice any outrage when advertisers were boycotting Glenn’s show on Fox. I also didn’t hear any calls for legislation to make it illegal then too. Hmmm I wonder why???

  • October 4, 2011 at 8:29am

    We’ve had a law just like this in Virginia for the past year. Guess what there haven’t been any shoot outs or anything else at least from what I’ve seen in the news. I’m shure if anything had happend it would have been all over the anti-gun media. Oh and yes I do carry in my local sports bar and no I’ve never drank while carring. What part of law abiding don’t some of you get? Every one I know who cares enough to get a CCW is more firearms safety concious than the non CCW’s I know.