User Profile: fbanta


Member Since: October 01, 2010

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 16, 2014 at 12:33am

    The SCOTUS has already ruled that the individual mandate is un-Constitutional when they declared that there is no such authority within the “Commerce Clause” to mandate commerce that doesn’t exist. Because it fails the Commerce Clause it necessarily fails as “Necessary and Proper” as well.

    Where the Roberts court failed so miserably was specifying that the ACA was valid as a tax despite vociferous claims by Congress that it was NOT a tax.

    It would be proper for the federal subsidies to be ruled un-Constitutional without specific Congressional authorization that would require cuts elsewhere to offset them according to PayGo.

  • April 8, 2014 at 11:02am

    The issue that gets over-looked is that these acts were perpetrated by the National Treasury Employees Union in an act of self-preservation over the best interests of American citizens and in opposition to equal justice under law.

    The federal government exists to serve Citizens, not unions. De-certify public sector unions. They serve no useful purpose to Citizens at large.

  • April 6, 2014 at 10:35am

    The principle obviously is a graduate of the Barack Obama school of investigative principles: “I don’t know what happened but the white guy is at fault” (Skippy Gates, IRS abuses, Trayvon Martin, etc.)

    How dare a teacher interfere with commerce in the classroom.

  • March 19, 2014 at 10:03am

    As a business owner, he should have the right to refuse service to anyone. The fact that he chooses to suborn fundamental and inalienable rights of Citizens simply proclaims his un-American mindset.

    He is right to publicly post his stupidity so that potential customers can decide whether to patronize his business or pass it by. Why anyone would choose to enter a business that demands it’s patrons be defenseless potential victims makes no sense to me, but “to each his own”. Count me out.

  • March 13, 2014 at 7:15pm

    So, when a 70 year old man needs his cane it’s okay to shoot him…it’s “understandable” and “reasonable”. But when a gaggle of SWATs bust into a domicile without warning to get that over-due library book or unpaid parking fine, the homeowner is not permitted any self-defense without at least a manslaughter charge.

  • March 10, 2014 at 10:14pm

    The Surgeon General is a federal officer, required to take a solemn oath to ‘preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic’ as a pre-condition to being DELEGATED ANY government authority.

    Given that Dr. Murthy has publicly campaigned to suborn the 2nd Amendment he necessarily is unfit to be a federal officer and must not be confirmed.

  • March 10, 2014 at 9:32am

    These are the morons and this is the moronic environment that is allegedly preparing the next generation in America.

    First they over-react to a correction of bad information; then they video their confrontation (imagine if she tried to do the same); and then they escalate it to a physical assault.

  • March 5, 2014 at 11:44pm

    Once again the president demonstrates that his word is not to be trusted in any matter. He also demonstrates that nothing preempts his political machinations.

  • March 5, 2014 at 11:19am

    What is the source of the Life force in plants and animals?

  • March 5, 2014 at 11:10am

    Please explain, within the Laws of Nature, and the laws of Probability how life began.

    While you are at it, please explain how thought processes evolved.

    For good measure explain how random development brought us to where we are today with all life-forms known to man and advise the requisite sequence and duration based on scientific evidence.

    Also explain why, through random development, why so many life-forms share fundamental structural similarities.

    The only real issue regards what we choose to believe in the absence of incontrovertible, measurable data. Science is the name given to Man’s feeble, ever-changing attempts to understand the universe as it is.

    Whether one believes in Creationism or in Evolution, great Faith is required to fill-in all the blanks in the development of the physical universe for which we do not yet have rational explanations.

  • March 5, 2014 at 10:31am

    It is telling that so many are willing to embrace Evolution that doesn’t even pretend to explain the origins of Man in a rational manner consistent with the laws of Nature and Probability; yet refuse to embrace Creationism until it is somehow proven wrong. Without such proof how can any counter-position be rational?

    If Evolution was provable it would be a theorem, not a theory. To make matters worse, it is a theorem without a plausible explanation of initialization.

    It is also interesting that in a society built on the self-evident Truth that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights; there are those that deny the Creator. Do they therefore deny those rights?

    Responses (1) +
  • March 5, 2014 at 10:10am

    Why do we continue to employ such nincompoops to educate the next generation? Clearly they lack any semblance of common sense, judgment, or respect for the Constitutionally protected inalienable rights of Americans.

    Teachers and administrators cannot teach or model understanding that they don’t possess.

  • February 24, 2014 at 8:45am

    Susan Rice is either a liar or a fool. In either case she is a ‘useful idiot’. She will not be held accountable for her lies because no administration wants to taint the well of available liars on demand.

    There is a reason that big-contributor ideologues head most government agencies: because those individuals are more invested in justifying their previous position than they are in seeking the truth. Admitting wrong-doing is admission that they are a dupe for a politician, a political machine, or a public sector union.

  • February 22, 2014 at 1:25am

    The reason for even mentioning Militias in the 2nd Amendment is because the INALIENABLE right of self-defense is AN INDIVIDUAL right. The Founders were simply acknowledging that it was a valid right when neighbors banded together to defend their communities.

    Stevens is all too typical of the nincompoops that pollute our federal court benches. His ignorance of American history regarding the 2nd Amendment is breath-taking.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 20, 2014 at 7:46am

    The Constitution says NOTHING about Republican or Democrat. The Constitution demands that only those who will ‘preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution’ should hold public office.

    That’s a simple standard to determine and the SOLE characteristic that is important when electing representatives.

    It’s time to stop voting for political parties and to start voting for Constitutional governance.

  • February 15, 2014 at 9:43am

    Lies told often enough become ‘the truth’. Bozo Joe is simply telling his myrmidons what to say.

  • February 14, 2014 at 7:44am

    According to BLS data, in the year following each increase in the minimum wage (26 times since 1945) the AVERAGE loss of jobs per increase is 933,000. Nearly 1 Million jobs lost each time the minimum wage is increased!

    Increasing the minimum wage doesn’t just impact the bottom of the ladder; it impacts jobs throughout the enterprise. Anytime cost exceeds the value of the job to the enterprise, the job is eliminated.

    Suggesting that a 40% increase in the minimum wage won’t cost jobs is utterly asinine! This is the worst job market in generations and these nincompoops want to explode wages? “Some ideas are so stupid only intellectuals believe them” George Orwell.

  • February 5, 2014 at 9:33am

    Lenin said “A lie told often enough becomes the truth”, but that too is a lie.

    “Congress shall pass no law restricting the free exercise of religion” is not ‘separation of Church and State’ it is a prohibition for Congress (and by the 14th Amendment) any other government entity to pass any law restricting the free exercise of religion.

    It’s time to give these ‘anti-religionists’ the boot.

  • January 25, 2014 at 11:37am

    Obama is a narcissist: he thinks everyone loves him…unless they are blinded by racism and prejudice. He isn’t satisfied that 99.44% of all media is progressive-controlled and adulates him.

    He is psychologically incapable of understanding that in his job, he is held accountable to the limitations defined by the US Constitution that he neither understands nor honors; or that when he violates those limitations as he does almost daily, he deserves to be removed from office.

    He needs to be in a padded room, not an oval office.

  • January 23, 2014 at 7:44am

    “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain INALIENABLE RIGHTS; that among these are LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness…”

    “…NO PERSON shall be denied LIFE, liberty or property without due process of law…”

123 To page: Go