She’ll fight for almost everyone when she’s in the White House. Everyone except the children who have been ripped apart and sold by Planned “Parenthood”. They simply don’t matter to her. How, in God’s name, does this woman even sleep at night?
McDowell is a well-respected Christian author. Kind of harsh to judge someone you know nothing about based on the description used here. And I don’t think he is insisting that no one use it, i.e. in the sense of a ban, rather that we try to educate people about the devastation that porn causes. There have been many, many studies about the dangers of porn and what it does to people. Even former porn “stars” have attested to the dangers of its use. The main problem with porn is that one taste is never enough and it can easily overtake a person. So no, McDowell is not stepping over the line by bringing this to our attention, rather he is trying to alert us to the dangers that it involves.
I'm familiar with at least one of his books.
Because I've seen 'Evidence that Demands a Verdict' completely dismantled.
[-1] January 27, 2016 at 10:57am
This is very sad. Seth has an incredible voice, and I love his music, but after this, I will not be purchasing any of his music. I’ve never understood why anyone would make comments like this, except to purposely incite anger. Mission accomplished, gentlemen.
Comments like this are made to make people like me laugh. Mission accomplished.
 January 22, 2016 at 9:20am
It’s telling that Obama commented that this is an “inexcusable” situation, and that someone got fired over this. Yes, it’s a terrible situation, and he’s right that it’s inexcusable. But so is Obama agreeing to give Iran billions of dollars and having Kerry admit that some of it will go to fund terrorism. Who will get fired over this equally inexcusable situation?
 January 8, 2016 at 3:03pm
“In no way, shape or form does anyone believe that this Sheriff has any brain in his head”.
January 8, 2016 at 8:03am
“Whoa, Anderson, hold on here! This is CNN! You’re on MY side! Now let’s stop this journalism, and get back to boot-licking!! You know well, that anyone who doesn’t agree with me is a consiracy theorist, so what kind of question is THAT??”
 January 8, 2016 at 7:58am
Interesting comment from the President: “The challenge we have is that in many instances you don’t know ahead of time who is going to be the criminal. It’s not as if criminals walk around with a label that says, ‘I’m a criminal,’”. This is the same reasoning that conservatives have used to try and get the President to build a wall around the border in Mexico. There are hundreds of illegal aliens coming into the U.S. via these unsecured borders. Not all of them are potential terrorists, but we don’t know which are and which aren’t. They don’t announce their intentions to do harm, as the President stated about criminals with guns. If it’s important enough to make us safer by banning firearms, isn’t it equally important to build a wall to protect us from unknown terrorists? Sadly, this doesn’t fit the President’s cause du jour, so nothing gets down.
 June 19, 2014 at 11:46am
Once again, free speech is fine as long as it’s liberal free speech. Conservative free speech– not so free.
What's so hard to understand? He's not going to jail and the government isn't after him. Please tell me how his free speech is being infringed upon.
That'll get you censored.
How many White House dinners did George Will attend on the request of Barack Obama? Five or six? Knowing the only reason for these invites were to get Will to write complimentary and supportive articles on Obama's policies. George Will is the same RINO liberal phony as NY Times "conservative" columnist David Brooks. Big government. Pro amnesty. Capitulate to Obama. No credibility.
It is up to the readers of the Post Dispatch to raise hell if they object to the change. They may or may not have much influence, but they are paying some of the bills and are the reason advertisers pay for space. A far-left political activist married to someone in the administration. Sounds like Michelle. I love the title of the administration official: the director of progressive media and online response. And they can never find any place to cut back staff or expenditures!!!
liberal free speech= Liberish
Woo Hoo, Michael Gerson. Puh lease!!
Actually I don't care. I don't live in St. Louis, thank God.
Free speech is a right, but speech you get paid for is a privilege. If George Will wants to be George Will instead of being FedUpinIndiana, then there are limits to how much he can piss off the people who have to pay for him to get to be George Will.
I'm sorry--what part of "free speech" entitles you to a syndicated column? Where's MY syndicated column? Think before you open your mouth, and your constitutional ignorance MIGHT not be so blatantly obvious next time.
But of course....liberals have no interest in controlling free speech an thought.
The St. Louis Post-Dispatch is a "Major U.S. Newspaper"?
I wonder if the loudmouth feminazi, Nita Chadhaury, who demanded Will be fired, had the same compassion for rape victims back when Pres. Happy Pants Clinton was accused by Kathleen Willy of having raped her. My guess is that.she marched in lockstep with every other femanazi who spouts faux outrage on the subject of rape, unless of course the actual rapist is a prog scumbag like Slick. Disgusting hypocrites the lot of them.
FED: Suggestion> Copy and be ready to paste.
That will also buy you time in the 1st to post wars that go on here.
How many times do you people have to be told, and you STILL don't understand how the whole "Freedom of Speech" thing actually works. It applies to GOVERNMENT action, not the actions of PRIVATE individuals and organizations. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch is a PRIVATE business interest exercising its FREEDOM to conduct its business how it seems fit. I just cringe at how you Baggers scream "CONSTITUTION! CONSTITUTION!" but are totally ignorant of how it actually functions. Pathetic....
While not a free speech issue, it is a tolerance issue. The libs like to talk about how tolerant they are of others. That's BS. They're only tolerant when the other individual agrees with them, otherwise they demand that the individual be silenced. This intolerance of the left is what is infecting our universities.
I agree but why would he say such a thing?? I don't agree with his view on this, I usually do, but not on this.
How dare he bring light to the fact that by claiming sexual assault or harrassment that was not, pseudovictims are treated to sympathy and undeserved empathy, and at times ruin the lives of those they accuse (hint hint, Reverend Al... shame on you).
That does not minimize what victims of rape endure during their rape and after, any more than the rape... advocates (those who protest against rape in whatever means they can find) hurt victims by the too oft stated 'rape isn't a sexual crime' mantra.
Rape is a horrible violent intrusive sometimes crippling attack on the victim. It should not be minimized or trivialized. But by equating getting whistled at as being raped, and by denying that some cry wolf for their own gain, real rape victims are hurt again, as well.
Is what George Will wrote that day part of the Conservative beliefs and values?
“a coveted status that confers privileges,” right up there with more amazingly ignorant rants like women have a natural mechanism that protects them from getting pregnant during a rape. At no point did anyone claim he didn't have a right to make such an ignorant statement, What they said is that he should not be provided a public forum, like a news paper to make such ignorant statements. People expect more from elected officials and more from journalists. George Wil became victim of the same insidious virus that plaques Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin an other attention getters who purposely say outrageously ignorant and inflammatory things to get attention for their TV appearances and book promotions. Another great sign of advanced capitalism. Where $$ means more than integrity, ethics, truth or facts.
Read Will’s article, it’s linked in the Blaze story. I references a story where a man and woman in college who had been “hooking up” for a while were hanging out in her dorm room.
The girl thought they had agreed to “just be friends”.
The guy fell asleep on her bed while “hanging out”.
She changed in to PJs and CLIMED IN TO BED WITH HIM.
He sort of woke up and started fondling her and she said “we agreed to be friends I don’t want to have sex with you”.
He stopped, then sort of woke up again and started feeling her up and took her panties off and his underwear.
She said she was so tired and just wanted to sleep so she let him finish, put her panties back on and went to sleep.
A few days later she claimed she was “raped”.
Will’s article was calling out this progressive BS calling something like this assault.
I recommend that guys in college simply allow girls to “rape” them. The girls are just as horny and wanting as the guys. The guys should just hold out, forcing the girls to jump their bones because IT WILL happen for them.
Then, if the girl pisses him off, he can claim “Rape”. In fact, he should record everything and complain the whole time, then say, “I was afraid to push her off of me because she would cry rape and assault!”
Progressive idiots don’t even realize they are driving young men to want to wait till marriage before having sex, the exact opposite of what degenerate Liberals want!
Wow - George Will was a Conservative. I quit listening to him about 7 years ago...just didn't find whole lot of there, there. He's all you're Nina.
Agreed! How dare anyone disagree.
Good grief. What next? Does that monster in the WH ever rest?
Well, at least the "Gates" Foundation will NOT fund abortions in any way shape or form from now on. I'm sure the left is thrilled about that.
April 8, 2014 at 3:02pm
Love you guys, but let’s fix that headline! You wrote “Dem Pac Get’s Fact Checked…” Take out that apostrophe in the word “gets”!!!
March 27, 2014 at 11:45am
Uh, double LOL: “They’re”, a contraction of “They are”…
February 27, 2014 at 10:02am
She moves in with the guy, pays for everything, cooked and cleaned for the guy… and she calls HIM stupid?
I just kept watching that stupid door closing… back and forth, back and forth… ARRRGGGHHHHH!!!
October 21, 2013 at 10:21pm
I’m waiting for the day when Carney loses it and stomps up and down while screaming “Now you guys stop with all these hard questions!! You supposed to be on OUR side!!!” Easy to make snarky fun of Fox reporters, but when the guys in your back pocket start acting like real journalists… well, that’s a bit of a problem.
October 15, 2013 at 12:33pm
MSNBC doesn’t report news. Their hosts are partisan liberals whose goal it is to uphold the Obama Administration. This is obvious to anyone who listens to their programs. At least on Fox, they don’t try to pass off show like Hannity and Kelly’s new show as hard news shows, rather as the analysis programs they are. People who follow the news are generally smart enough to know that the hosts at MSNBC are inventing facts and disguising them as news. Thus, their ratings dive.
October 8, 2013 at 9:46am
Carney is starting to implode. He must go home at night and think “how much longer can I keep shoveling this crap?” I sense a resignation coming… And another one bites the dust! Kinda hard carrying the master’s water when it’s polluted, eh Jay? The stench alone…
October 2, 2013 at 10:28am
Another reason to simply get rid of everyone there. Emails are pretty indicting, and if Boehner did indeed conspire to exempt himself and other Repubs from Obamacare, he needs to answer for it. Most of the lawmakers in Washington do privately what they can to protect themselves, but talk publicly of the opposite. It’s all a game to them, and frankly, “the American people”, as politicians refer to us ad nauseum, are sick of it.
It may not have been Boehner himself writing those emails. It was probably one of his sheep.
Speaker John Boehner:
Phone: (202) 225-0600
Fax: (202) 225-5117
its not a game to them its a circus freak show to take our eye off the cup with the pea under it.
Mine responded saying they could not return email because of the shutdown, but that they received the email. This government is run by idiots! Park Service webpage is down? Really? It does not take one person to keep the stuff running on autopilot and be unmanned for days, if it can't then the government IT dept needs to be fired.
September 25, 2013 at 2:27pm
I’ll bet Pelosi and Obama are shaking in their boots! Maybe now, these Union idiots will learn that like many other Americans, liberal democrats are in this for themselves. They don’t care what ANYONE thinks. You put boots to the ground for Obama Mr. Hoffa, and now Obama’s putting HIS boot somewhere: right on your big fat butt! Enjoy the ride; the kick from this should last quite a while. Ready to come to the other side yet?
September 25, 2013 at 8:28am
No, Chris. Your head is so firmly jammed into Obama’s behind, that even you can’t use the brain God gave you to realize that Cruz is actually trying to SAVE the country from this monstrosity. Have you even read the bill? Have you heard of the insurance nightmares that are already starting to happen? Stop supporting this bill because of who came up with it, and try to use the few brain cells you have to admit that it is a failure. Health care reform? Yes. With this plan? No. It will have the exact opposite effect of what was intended. Wake up.
September 17, 2013 at 10:04am
Interesting to watch O’Donnell try to fit Obama’s actions into his opinion of what he wants the babble to mean. Obama says “red line” and he means “don’t cross this line or else”. Until the line is crossed, Obama gets cold feet, and now “red line” means we MIGHT do something. Good try Larry, but sadly for you conservatives are much smarter than that. Kasparov is absolutely right. Obama laid down a line that was crossed, and he did not follow through on the threat. America continues to lose prominence and importance in the world. Come quickLy, 2016!
September 9, 2013 at 12:22pm
In other news, it was reported that John Boehner has committed to changing his political affiliation to Democrat to more fully reflect his leanings of date. The Republican Party gave him a swift kick in the ass to thank him for making this move.