TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying Standing With Israel's 10 most recent comments.

• S.E. Cupp Pulls Out of CPAC Until Groups Representing Gay Republicans Are Embraced

  February 27, 2013 at 7:44am

  Social Conservatism is another form of tyranny – it is a belief that the majority should use force to control the behavior of others. Ann Coulter said on Stossel, they do this because they pay for the behavior of others with their taxes – exactly why NY bans large bottles of soda. No difference between a social conservative and a liberal. Both think they have the moral high ground.

• S.E. Cupp Battles Martin Bashir Over Guns in Unscripted Exchange

  January 15, 2013 at 9:07pm

  How many bullets did Timothy McVeigh get off before he killed 168 people including 19 children under 6? 0. How many people were killed by Mao after the population was disarmed? 70 million. Don’t let the Enemy frame the argument – you will loose everytime.

• Fiscally Conservative Congressman ‘Purged’ by Speaker Boehner Issues Scathing Response on Facebook and Twitter

  December 7, 2012 at 6:36am

  In reply to Jamesjim.

  Not just him – the Republicans that nominated him for speaker while pretending to be conservatives for their constituents.

• Could Texas Really Secede From The Union? The Answer Is…

  December 7, 2012 at 6:31am

  In reply to grimmster.

  Money “returned” from the Federal Government is not really returned. Of 1 million paid to the Feds, 900k would be “returned” to pay for a Federally sponsored project Texans do not want or need, contractors and suppliers would be the relatives and supporters of politicians and the money, though paid out of state to them, would be considered a “gift” to Texas.

• Boehner to Obama: Sure, We’ll Consider Tax Increases — But Only ‘Under the Right Conditions’

  November 8, 2012 at 7:20am

  In reply to U-R-Busted.

  We will be treated to the Dog and Pony show as usual, then the last minute capitulation where the Republicans accept a tax hike pretending it is a compromise. Romney was nominated because the establishment Republicans would rather accept the loss of an election than the loss of the current power structure. The Tea Party did remarkably well – they were running against the Republicans as well as the Democrats.

• ’2016′ Creator Dinesh D’Souza Resigns College Presidency Amid Scandal Allegations

  October 18, 2012 at 8:52pm

  In reply to momrules.

  The progressives haven’t attacked him, it has been the conservatives – the progressives merely brought it to light and then let the conservatives do the dirty work for them.

• Overstock.com CEO Says He’s Voting in November — But for Ron Paul

  October 16, 2012 at 5:07pm

  In reply to Lion420.

  The assumption that voting for Romney will mean some sort of change from our current path makes no sense when all evidence suggests otherwise. Whoever wins, the country will continue it’s path off a fiscal cliff and both sides will blame the other no matter who is in the White House. If you want to make a difference, focus on local and State elections.

• Overstock.com CEO Says He’s Voting in November — But for Ron Paul

  October 15, 2012 at 9:54pm

  In reply to Lion420.

  Wait – if I vote for Ron Paul, I am not voting for Obama, so isn’t that a vote for Mitt Romney?

• Israeli Report: Sanctions Are Hitting Iran Hard

  September 27, 2012 at 7:29am

  Sanctions might work against Western countries where the population has at least a chance to change the ruling class. What are the people of Iran going to do? They have no power against an oppressive government like that. Is there evidence that sanctions have ever worked anywhere?

• Q&A With Former Libertarian VP Candidate Turned Romney Supporter Wayne Allyn Root

  September 12, 2012 at 9:05pm

  Why the assumption that if Obama wins, we will have a dictatorship? Isn’t it the responsibility of the other branches of government to stop it? We elect a president, not a dictator. If we vote for a nicer dictator, we are still left with a dictator. And if we elect Romney aren’t we just rewarding politicians for NOT doing their job and defending the constitution?