User Profile: ferggie

Member Since: March 01, 2012

CommentsDisplaying ferggie's 10 most recent comments.

  • 750,000 individuals (your daughters, mothers, wives, sons, brothers and fathers), that’s just reported cases, were saved from rape, assault and or death because they were armed! I am sick of liberal’s belief that law abiding citizens must be disarmed and restrict their ability to protect themselves because a number of sick individuals that refuse to give a damn about the law choose to use a gun to take the lives of the innocent.
    The legislature that just got voted down had NOTHING to do with the recent CO & CONN murders nor would it have had made a difference if it would have been in place prior to those murders so knock off the political BS.
    The fact is the basis for Gun Control is all about POWER control. Liberals just like socialist, Marxist, Communists and Fascists believe the only way to control the population is to have the ability to overpower and suppress that population. The founding fathers knew that and is why they created the second amendment. It is about all rights because without the second amendment there will be protection for the rest.
    Liberals would rather see your wife, sister or mothers raped then have them protect themselves with the use of a gun. Liberals push the false premise that the government will take care of you. Hay dumba$$ if that was the case than 750,000 individuals would not have had to defend themselves.
    One of the great things about the second amendment is you have the right to own a gun. You are not required to own one.

  • Banned dodgeball but we didnt ban balls. You stupid B that would be the same as outlawing balls. Wake up or shut up.

  • Fire the B!T@H!

  • Just pass Texas law that allows landowners the right to shoot anyone trespassing on their property if they feel at all endangered and possible risk of death. Trespassers need not be armed. Problem solved.

  • As a conceal carry permit holder I am not allowed to enter that establishment. The police officer has no more a right to enter the establishment then I do with a gun. Supreme Court stated that a police officer’s job is not to protect a citizen. The only reason they carry a gun is for their own protection. If I can’t carry my gun for my own protection than the police officer can’t as well. Sorry but that is what rights are all about, they are not selective based on occupation.

  • It is a shame none of the people inside had a gun to protect themselves. Good thing the police arived in time to stop him from injuring anyone. Oh thats right they didn’t show up in time, sorry my bad. If there was a woman inside she should have peed on him. Rep from CO says that works.

  • Amendment I

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

    Please sight me THE LAW respecting a specific religion for the placement of this cross. The cross is but a form of the freedom of speech not forcing a specific religion upon anyone. Again show me THE LAW.

  • To put it into perspective and on the same plane as Feinsteins 2nd amendment assault we should duck tape everyones mouth shut prior to entering the movie theater. This would insure no one could yell fire. I

  • It is NOT a case of inequality or civil rights:
    1) Straight man can’t marry a straight man or a gay man. Can marry straight woman or gay woman
    2) Gay man can’t marry a gay man or straight man. Can marry straight woman or gay woman
    3) Straight woman can’t marry a straight woman or a gay woman. Can marry straight man or gay man.
    4) Gay woman can’t marry a gay woman or straight woman. Can marry straight man or gay man.

    As you can see both have the exact same rights. FACT

  • I would assume Holder wouldn’t have a problem if say the next president declared any and all socialists, Marxists & communists are an immediate threat to the US constitution which makes them a threat to this country and considered intellectual terrorists so the use of drone strikes on these individuals would be considered legal if so carried out.