This is not a limited access highway, so she had no obligation to pull right to allow him to pass. She was going to be making a left turn. I lived in Florida. I know these roads and if you don’t get it that lfet lane far ahead of needing to make that turn, you’re going to miss it. He wanted to speed. That is NEVER a reason to pass under any circumstance. Having driven 18 wheelers, I’m well aware of the idiocy, ineptitude, and recklessness of 4 wheeler drivers. This guy did get exactly what he deserved.
Except that it’s the movement of the earth – moon system that is causing this illusion of Saturn moving behind the Moon. So I guess the Earth is the woman?
February 10, 2014 at 6:25pm
Awwwwww. Nothing says sweet love, romance, and tenderness like a shredded dead baby! What beautiful people they are at Planned ( non )-Parenthood. Just touches the heart…. and every other organ if you’re the baby!
Levitation can probably be accomplished by electrical charges of the same polarity on the child and the bed repelling each other. Walking backwards up the wall? Magnetic shoes. It’s probably all explainable through some kind of natural phenomena. A lot of the physical properties of matter and energy are beyond our senses. That’s why it took so long to discover and put them to use. There are things about quantum mechanics that are spookier than this.
January 27, 2014 at 11:12am
I wonder what her own mother thinks of her opinion? If Glass thinks raising children is easy, she should try it sometime.
January 20, 2014 at 4:02pm
His son Trayvon is deceased, isn’t he?
May 8, 2013 at 2:00pm
They were money changers, not money lenders. They were the equivalent in their day of George Soros today!
May 8, 2013 at 1:55pm
If the idiot Democrat “artist” wants to use selective Bible verses to try to prove his point, that works both ways. Let him paint this one from the KJV version of Matthew: “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.”
February 6, 2013 at 5:19pm
Isn’t it funny how a freed people want to turn right around and impose the same tyranny that their ancestors lived under to everyone else once they attain power. Obama is not our Master and we his slaves. We are his boss. “Governments are instituted among men deriving their just power from the consent of the governed.” Maybe he’s never heard this.
December 11, 2012 at 9:15am
In Washington State, we’ve solved the problem by legalizing Gay Marriage and Marijuana on the same ballot. This makes us compliant with scripture because it says in Leviticus 20:13 “If a man lies with another man he should be stoned.” :-)
Thanks for my laugh of the day! Yes, Mr. Truck Driver, you have nailed it! Personally, I am not as charitable about the militant gay movement. Homosexuality is abnormal human behavior and contrary to the reproductive cycle. And it ALWAYS will be. Passing a law will change nothing and Adam and Steve will always be an abnormal couple to most people.
Gray: You're entitled to that opinion, and I won't fault you for it. But as long as Adam and Steve are living a civilized life, adopting and raising children responsibly, and being productive members of society, it's not our business to dictate their lifestyle choices.
Sweet! Quote of the day...lol
And it's not their right to interfere with my right to have an opinion and live as a Christian. Do I believe being gay is wrong? Yup! Are they allowed to be gay? Yup! Can I have an opinion of their gayness without being labeled a bigot? Yup. However, I have been on the wrong side of the so called tolerant gay community. I was sent threats, my bank account was compromised, shunned by many teachers, etc. Because I had an opinion about a gay film being shown to a 8 year old child.
I believe government needs to get out of our lives and stop granting rights. It's all about equal freedom not rights.
TMOVERBECK: Its not dictating lifestyle choices. It is a self-determining citizenry setting its standards. No one will stop homosexuals from behaving as they wish. But they should NOT be allowed to set the standards for the rest of us.
"Can I have an opinion of their gayness without being labeled a bigot?"
No, you can't. You do not have a right to avoid the truth. The truth is your opinions, which are your right to have, are bigotted by today's standards. Sorry, the world has past by bigotted, old white men. The polls show that the Baby Boomer generation will be the last generation where a majority oppose civil rights for all and where your bigotted opinions are exceptable.
Why I waste my time with you is beyond me, but I'll humor you. So what you posted is free speech only pertains to certain groups and proves your ignorance to freedom. BTW, I would assume bashing Christians is free speech, but having an opinion against gays is bigoted, hateful, unacceptable speech.
Wow... the irony is astounding.
@Cessna, you are free to make your bigoted, hateful, unacceptable rants, you are have no right not to be called out for your comments, you have no right to expect others will remain silent as you spew you bible based hate.
ENCINOM....Actually, the 'baby boomer' generation, is the last generation of "whole" people. We sit back and watch as you guys scurry about your cage, scavenging what was left to you, never building your own version of life. You can't understand how this 'infrastructure' you depend on, was built.
We tried to protect you, but you would have none of it. You bought the lie of forced equality. Sooner or later you all will realize that ''Dad was right"......You don't get anything lasting, without working for it.
You got your 'participation' trophy, and you thought you won......poor thing.
Born equal...but growing up means accomplishing something lasting.
What about your incessant bigotry against Christians ENCIDIOT? In typical lefty style..that's acceptable to you right?
Why do you insist others have to stand back and allow the fantasies of homosexuals to change standards and norms that have served human civilization for centuries?
Why do we have to accept the sexual mores and proclivities of homosexuals as "normal" or "acceptable" when they make up over 64% of new cases of HIV in this country each year while only making up less than 2% of the population"? The disproportionately higher cases of gonorrhea and syphillis among them? Their exaggerated promiscuity?
What possible benefits does this behaviour and characteristics of homosexuals offer society and why should we just turn around and ignore it all?
Answer the bloody question you cur.
Sorry Max, its over, the bigots lost. The younger generations have learned from your mistakes. You can not say you beleive in a Constitution like ours and in the next breath deny a group equal protection under it.
Your post makes very little sense. Equal rights have been a struggle, its only now that a majority of Americans are seeing that bible based bigotry has no place in a secular Republic like ours. Your doom and gloom opinion is your grieving over the loss of a America that never was. Leave it to Beaver and the mythical 1950's was a white washi fo rthe unrest and dirt under the surface. The others was swept under the carpet and kept out of sight. America is moving beyond the need for fairy tales to help us sleep at night. While you hold onto your myths and a past that never was, America is moving forward and truly becoming a Nation that respects the rights of all of its people.
The excess use of "civil rights" when one desires to push an agenda is becoming boring. Gays have and have always had the same right to marry as non homosexuals. Any person can marry a person of the opposite sex - period. Using the arguments of the homosexuals community regarding changing the definition of what constitutes marriage opens a can of worms. If changed then only bigoted people would deny two loving siblings or parent child to marry.
You bandy words around like a true reptile ENCIDIOT. Insidious and slimy to a fault.
"Equal protection"? Tell me what protection homosexuals are denied? They have EXACTLY the same rights and protections you and I have.
What research can you site proving that a gay couple raising a child will have no adverse effects on that child's preferences of sexuality? Are you like most of the other gay marriage advocates who have done little or nil to consider the consequences this would have on society? Scandinavian history sites an increase of divorce rates and increase of out-of-wedlock birthrates after the right of gay marriage was passed 10 years ago. In Sweden, the divorce rate among gay men is 50% higher than among heteros, and lesbian divorce rate is 170% higher! Where is your research? I'd love to hear it, and please site your source(s). Here is mine: http://byfaithonline.com/the-cultural-argument-against-gay-marriage/
Just say it openly ENCIDIOT...you don't want "equality" you want to elevate a liberal protected class and want to enshrine your delusions about that class in legislation so as to make sure those delusions are forced onto the entire society. Statism in it's purest form.
@Fifthwheel, thank you. I am still laughing. I needed that. Uh oh...AAHAHAhaha....uh oh, can't stop...AAHARHHARHAHRHARHARHAHAHR%HARHarharyharhharharhahr.......*~*
"Learned from mistakes" ENCIDIOT? Tell me champ...what mistake is there in making sure kids know the health and psychological risks of homosexuality? Or does the thought of giving your child HIV appeal to you? A little extreme you say? Not at all little fella...groups like GLSEN and the "It gets better" project through their voices and advocates in the education system recommend that children should "experiment" with homosexual sex and the lifestyle. Don't believe me? Look it up champ. Hate me all you want afterwards...it doesn't bother me in the least.
By all means ENCIDIOT..tell your son or daughter to "experiment" with a homosexual lifestyle for a while....I dare you.
Posted on December 11, 2012 at 11:42am
The excess use of “civil rights” when one desires to push an agenda is becoming boring. Gays have and have always had the same right to marry as non homosexuals. Any person can marry a person of the opposite sex – period. Using the arguments of the homosexuals community regarding changing the definition of what constitutes marriage opens a can of worms. If changed then only bigoted people would deny two loving siblings or parent child to marry.
I have heard these arguments before, they were made in support of laws that prevent mixed race couples from marrying.
ENCINOM said"While you hold onto your myths and a past that never was, America is moving forward and truly becoming a Nation that respects the rights of all of its people." You are a LIAR!! You know as well as anyone that what you say is not what is going on. What you want is to have a society that allows you unfettered access to any and all sin with a non-judgemental attitude. You obviously believe that 'license' is preferable to prudence.....You will find out that it just ain't so!
Go on with your bad self, We'll see what happens. What you don't know is that ALL the things you do follow you till the day you die, and every choice you make, good or bad, lives on your face forever.
Your philosophy is an affront to every faithful parent, and is proof of your decayed soul.
"What you don’t know is that ALL the things you do follow you till the day you die, and every choice you make, good or bad, lives on your face forever."
What you are failing to understand is that they ARE MY CHOICES TO MAKE. Not yours, not anybody else's. What right do you have to dictate who others should live their lives? If it doesn't break your arm or pick your pocket of what concern is it of your's?
Z: I'll see you that and raise you a... http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/514477
ENCINOM....wrote" Sorry Max, its over, the bigots lost. The younger generations have learned from your mistakes. You can not say you beleive in a Constitution like ours and in the next breath deny a group equal protection under it."
What did you learn? That you can screw indiscriminately? That you can smoke dope in school?
That stealing is OK, as long as you don't get caught? That lying gets you out of a lot of trouble? That making promises you don't intend to keep, to get what you want, is par for the course? That your hoodlum friends are more important than your family? How to cheat on exams? How to cheat on your girlfriend? How to get away with vandalism? How to talk and walk like a rap star? Where to go to score at 2 AM. Which neighbors leave their doors open when they're gone? How to fake an I.D.? How to hotwire a chevy? How to roll a blunt?
I'll bet there is one thing you don't know......Do you know the "Key of David?"
ENCINOM wrote.....What you are failing to understand is that they ARE MY CHOICES TO MAKE. Not yours, not anybody else’s. What right do you have to dictate who others should live their lives? If it doesn’t break your arm or pick your pocket of what concern is it of your’s?
I think that you just made my point for me....You just expressed how self absorbed you really are. I would break my own arm and toss my wallet onto the highway to keep you and those like you who put the welfare of innocent children on the altar of Baal, in the name filthy, deviant sexual behavior, away from any child, If homosexuals get to marry they get to adopt children, and that is unacceptable.....I put it right up there with fetal murder.
"I would break my own arm and toss my wallet onto the highway to keep you and those like you who put the welfare of innocent children on the altar of Baal, in the name filthy, deviant sexual behavior, away from any child, If homosexuals get to marry they get to adopt children, and that is unacceptable…..I put it right up there with fetal murder."
You are chasing pink elephants. We are not a theocracy and you have no right to force your moral codes on others. This concern about children is a product of a paranoid mind with no place in reality. Talk of Baal and other demons from myths again show maybe you are not playing with a full deck if you believe in this stuff. Let me guess this is all a conspiracy dreamed up by the freemasons/Catholic Church? Key of David is further evidence of your cultish beliefs.
December 4, 2012 at 10:10pm
Here Bobby “Bonehead” Costas. Here is the reason: “When the government fears the people there is liberty, when the people fear the government, there is tyranny.” – Thomas Jefferson
December 4, 2012 at 2:32am
Give a man a pair of boots and he’s shod for a day. Teach a man to cobble and he’s shod for a lifetime!
September 10, 2012 at 6:44pm
What hath the liberals wrought? It’s astonishing. She has somehow transmuted what most of us are familiar with, “it’s between a woman and her doctor” into this. I don’t agree 100% with that either, but it’s so much less egregious an affront to the sensibilities of decent people than, “it’s between a woman and God!” How is it possible that we’ve gotten to the point where someone could try to even make such a ridiculous argument on any basis, be it theological or logical? Does she mean each and every case of terminating an innocent human life negotiable with God and given adequate reasons he will sanction it? This seems to go way beyond even Roe V Wade, which was a legal decision, albeit a perverted one. I’ve got news for her. The Supreme court is NOT the Supreme being. He may forgive the act, but he’ll never sanction it.
August 13, 2012 at 4:06pm
What’s next? How about a universexual? That would be someone attracted to males, females, transgender males, transgender females, males who identify as females, females who identify as males, inanimate objects that identify as females, inanimate objects that identify as males, inanimate objects that identify as plants, plants that identify as animals, animals that identify as humans, humans that identify as animals, humans that identify as inanimate objects, humans that identify as lesbian androids, humans that identify as gay androids, animals that identify as human lesbian androids, etc, etc, etc. The possibilities are endless!
Donkeys that respond to female, or male, depending on how they "feel" that day. When will the left's proclivity to "do it if it feels good" really be seen for what it is?
They just want to go against anything that has morals or responsibilities that being a church going individual wouldn't do.
August 10, 2012 at 1:58am
I quote from the article, “They only have one set of gentiles, which you can imagine could pose a challenge later down the road.” I didn’t know gentiles came in sets. For that matter, do Jews come in sets? I don’t know what religion has to do with it anyway, do you?
July 2, 2012 at 9:33am
If meteorology and climate science is that good, then why weren’t they able to forecast the severity, extent and location of these storms? Secondly, why have we had 30+ days in May and June with below normal temperatures here in the Pacific Northwest? Would you please send us some of that global warming idiot!
May 17, 2012 at 12:55pm
I live in a 5th wheel travel trailer. You couldn’t tell by my handle. I think I have more space than this guy, but the concept is similar. Everything is built in. Hey, as long as his lifestyle and mine are personal, free choices then it’s no one’s business but our own. However, if liberals try to shove it down anyone’s throat, then I object. Of course, they’d never try to get anyone to live my lifestyle because I have a diesel pickup truck to pull this thing when I move, which I do frequently. However, in spite of that I’m sure my total “carbon footprint” (their concern, not mine) is nothing compared to a house. Especially the houses of most liberals like AlGore. I’m sure he uses more electricity in a couple of days than I do in a year.
March 7, 2012 at 11:58am
LDS? I didn’t know he was a Mormon.
March 7, 2012 at 11:56am
Nice job and painfully true. Poor James. I love him as a musician, singer and songwriter, but politically he’s just another bleeding heart liberal. It never ceases to amaze me how musicians, who are essentially entrepreneurs in a market of almost pure competition, still don’t get it.