Christian, right? Be brave you little coward and go tell the girls father all of this to his face… of course you won’t… you only pick on little girls… you and Reality-Defender should move in together. Imagine the fun you can have picking on all kinds of kids together. Idiot.
May 20, 2014 at 6:54am
You hold yourselves up to be the party of Family Values, and then you post something like this about an innocent 17 year old girl? Shame on you–how would you like someone to talk about your daughter like that? Not everything is political you callas ass! Regardless of political affiliation, the VP did a classy thing–and you did a despicable thing–true colors always come out don’t they? You are truly disgusting and that comment should get you banned from this site…or at the very least locked in a room with her Father for 5 minutes you reprehensible cad. So, in your little, perverted, narrow, warped, degenerate mind only daughters of conservatives are worth championing? You disgusting slob of a town fool…make fun of Biden all you want–he is a grown man but lay off the little girls you pathetic pile of rhino dung–or is that the only competition you feel you can take on? You like picking on little girls? Does that make you feel manly? Moron… go play in traffic and do the world a favor idiot. It was wrong when Palin’s kids were attacked, and it is wrong now! Be consistent at the very least, you poster-child for fetal alcohol syndrome… what a waste of a human being you are. What’s next? A trip down to the nearest elementary school to push kids over on the playground and take their lunch money? I bet your parents wish the condom hadn’t broken, dumb-ass. Let me guess, you’re a Christian, right? Go tell that joke to your Sunday Congregation, punk-ass!
May 20, 2014 at 6:25am
As I scan the posts this is what I see: A ‘recall’ suggestion for SCOTUS (aren’t you folks supposed to be the Constitution party?) There is no SCOTUS recall!; there are tons of comments that Kagan is ugly or a man…well, that is a high-brow argument if I ever saw one!; Anti-Semitic and racist comments about ‘Jews teaching Blacks how to lie’–classy! But you guys aren’t racist or bigots, right?…that is just a lame-stream media label you have unfairly been given!; and of course all the folks piling on that Kagan isn’t fit if her work has to be edited…really? Do you feel that way truly? If a Justice has to have their work corrected they should leave the Highest Court? Ok, sounds good to me! http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/04/30/supreme-court-corrects-scalias-cringeworthy-error-in-pollution-case/ … Bye-Bye Scalia! Yep, you folks are ‘fair and balanced’ alright! You are the Real ‘Amuricans’ who tell others who differ in opinion from you to get out of the Country! I look forward to your well-reasoned, fact-filled, Constitution-abiding comments about what old, fat, male actor Kagan looks like–oh, almost forgot the guy who wishes Kagan will die during a conservative presidency from her ‘Clogged Artery’…wasn’t Beck the one talking about how it is a God-given right to be obese? Some actually make sense and have substantive arguments to bring to the table…the problem is for every reasoned post there are 10 racist, ignorant or factually-incorrect posts!
All elected or appointed officials can be removed from office. The method for removal from the SCOTUS is by thru the impeachment process. Oh and when the left follows the edicts of your rant then talk about fair and balanced.
Yes, yes, everyone who disagrees with a leftist is a bigot and a racist and a homophobe and a sexist and breaths through her mouth and married her cousin and lowbrow, and uneducated and evil and in the KKK and a slave to the Koch Brothers and worships Rush Limbaugh (MPBUH) and loves dirty air and water and and and and and...
Your name calling may be a great substitute for logic over at the Puffington Host, but not here. No Points. Sure she is called names here, but the arguments made for the most part aren't "she's wrong because she's ugly" or "her jurisprudence is weak because she's a Jew" even though she really is an ugly Jew. Compare that to what you get from the left: "he is against race quotas because he's a racist." He's a homophobe so he's against homosexual marriage. They are nothing but ad hominem attacks. See the difference?
We are not mocking Kegan because of a minor error, that's the game the left loves to play...remember nu-clear? How about Potato? Ring a bell? It's actually not even worthy of a headline but the Blaze needs its' red meat to get its' clicks so here it is.
November 22, 2013 at 12:26pm
It gets worse… look how the leftists are trying to justify this–Rach-cow Man-dow just had this to say:
“There are seven specific instances in the Constitution where they call for a supermajority. I believe it’s unconstitutional to filibuster. It is not about advice and consent now to ask for a supermajority on judicial nominations. I believe that is not constitutional.
There’s been a lot of talk about what we describe as the “constitutional option,” which is that the Democrats would unite and vote, and there would be an up-or-down vote on all of the judicial nominations.”
Any excuse for a power grab!
April 23, 2013 at 3:32pm
I love how many folks on this thread are expressing their disappointment that the story is not true. You do realize that by doing that you no longer can be taken seriously when you talk about hypocrisy, respect and family values, right? You can’t have it both ways by lambasting liberals like Bill Maher for the inappropriate things he says (and rightfully so to lambast him for that) but when you turn around and rejoice in the idea that the President of the United States could be injured–you become a ridiculous person no longer deserving to be in adult conversations. Reply all you want, call me all the names you wish and justify yourselves however you see fit–those words no longer carry weight–you have been exposed and no longer bring anything to the table–your babble will fall on deaf ears if the owner of those ears is a serious and honest person.
I hear ya.I can't stand Obama,but he IS our President.Hackers are one thing,but supporting injury to him is where I draw the line.There's enough real stories to stress me out everyday.Let alone a false one.The Blaze has many good posters though.Everything can't be perfect and sanitized.
son. let me put in my hearing aid, what did you say?
Agreed. I don't like Obama, but he is the president of these United States. The death or injury of ANY president during his/her term is a serious situation, and can have important/critical consequences on everyone.
The hacking and joking post made by these hackers is deplorable. I can understand a joke, but hacking something like this puts you in the realm of Anonymous, whether the perpetrator was simply playing a joke, or they really wanted to cause havoc. I personally despise Anonymous, and anyone with their mentality.
On another note, I don't use Twitter, or Facebook. The most connected I am to any social media comes from any online game I play... and these are obviously mostly limited to the subject matter of said game.
With that said, I find it pathetic that a site like Twitter commands such influence over market movements...
He's not the president of this country, so I can say anything I want. It's all a bad dream and not real.
Correction= Steward of the United States. Sad to say the actual president is Joe Biden. It would not make any difference if the Steward was dead or not anyway. The Commy ba#tards control the entire World.
April 23, 2013 at 3:22pm
Hey Thunder–would you like folks questioning if you ever served? You speak so confidently when you say someone else didn’t serve in the military…but then one has to think… you have no idea, so why oh why would you answer for someone else? To get respect you have to give it. Try treating folks the way you wish to be treated, or is that just something Christians say to sound good but don’t really live by? Lead by example, not a loud mouth and you will get the respect you deserve.
arent you just as guilty as me by assuming I'm a Christian?
April 18, 2013 at 7:17pm
Uh… have you watched the videos they released? Do you know how many folks are there with backpacks? Who indeed, other than a vast number in that crowd. You don’t care much for personal liberties do ya? I suppose a door-to-door search of all residences in Boston would be ok with you, right? I mean, only the guilty have something to hide… Great thinking! Why stop at Boston–all residences should be searched by their local police–that is the only fair–we will nab all the bad guys that way. It is always ok to search the ‘other guy’ right? But, you… come on–they don’t need to search you–you’re… you know… ‘normal’.
April 18, 2013 at 7:12pm
Yeah, they probably need to ask those questions of people who are not suspects in the first place because after all they do look muslim-ish, right? I mean a team that is capable of determining the possible cell phone of one of the real suspected bombers by triangulating the location based on cell records and the date\time stamp on the surveillance footage–probably would have no clue how to determine if someone is a real suspect or not–maybe you should conduct the investigation since you are obviously more qualified than those Obama cronies. Unless… wait a second… where do you live? I think we need to come over and go through your things with a fine-toothed comb before we hand you the investigation–just to be sure… Once we have enough proof to satisfy our suspicions, which are based on our own speculation and nothing more… then you will be free to proceed. Again, only if you pass muster though!
April 18, 2013 at 3:24pm
I don’t understand… these are not the two? but they look Muslim… it has to be! Well, nobody owes them an apology… they should know better than to go in public looking like Muslims… I still think we should arrest them… after all, it is only a matter of time.
April 10, 2013 at 4:01pm
better parenting skills, right? 2 Samuel 12:13-14:
And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has put away your sin; you shall not die. However, because by this deed you have given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, the child also who is born to you shall surely die.”
And if a man sells his daughter to be a female slave, she shall not go out as the male slaves do. If she does not please her master, who has betrothed her to himself, then he shall let her be redeemed. He shall have no right to sell her to a foreign people, since he has dealt deceitfully with her. And if he has betrothed her to his son, he shall deal with her according to the custom of daughters. If he takes another wife, he shall not diminish her food, her clothing, and her marriage rights. And if he does not do these three for her, then she shall go out free, without paying money.
Instead of looking to the Bible to defend your hate of a woman, why don’t you take her advice and practice what the Bible says about loving those you disagree with? Why is she so evil for believing that we as neighbors should look out for each other’s family? Sounds Christian to me!
Let each of you look out not only for his own interests, but also for the interests of others.
Let’s give that a try, shall we? Or does the Bible only count for some teachings and not for others? Try to be Christian if you are going to give us the ‘Holier-than-thou’ tr
November 24, 2012 at 3:35pm
So…your guy loses, it’s voter fraud, when called out that the election was not stolen you make veiled threats that dems need to be ‘put out of their misery’ …always the last resort of the desperate. And to all those who say there will not be another election or another repub in the white house, when history proves you wrong…say in 4 years when there is another election and historically speaking the republicans win as is usually the case of the party that is out for 2 cycles…will you admit how wrong you were?
November 15, 2012 at 6:39pm
The ‘him’ I was referring to was Ronald Reagan by the way–who did all of the above mentioned things while serving his terms in office.
November 15, 2012 at 10:42am
Look you don’t like him because he has nearly tripled the federal budget deficit (Cheney said that doesn’t matter, and he is right—it will go back down) You don’t like him because he will raise taxes (to get out of this mess we may need to raise taxes 8 times or more on things like Gasoline , payroll taxes and social security benefits on higher earners, estates, liquor & Cigarettes and maybe a phone tax—all reasonable) You are afraid unemployment will go as high as 10%–(but we will get out of it if it does). It is not so bad if Federal Government grows, you have to get over that honestly! Government jobs are JOBS! You think he is weak because he is ‘friendly’ with Iran, he is not friendly, he is willing to talk to them and to sell goods to them…that does not make him wrong or evil. He wants to eliminate Nuclear weapons…that is a good thing folks—and shows his strength, not weakness. You don’t want him to give illegals the right to stay in this country, why? What is wrong with that, honestly? We can take 3 million immigrants and give them amnesty, I say, and I have not heard a good argument against it—it would actually bolster the economy not hinder it. These things are good things, the right things to do in hard economic times—just give the man a chance, will ya? Please be honest with yourselves—does that really sound like a horrible plan? Look past your hate and honestly evaluate.
The 'him' I was referring to was Ronald Reagan by the way--who did all of the above mentioned things while serving his terms in office.
November 14, 2012 at 8:32pm
For goodness sake, your guy lost—your political ideology was voted down by the electorate—you don’t like it, so you do what every losing side has done since the dawn of politics…you delegitimize the election—“it was stolen, I have proof!” (by the way, have you noticed all the ‘proof’ just points to opinion blogs, no actual real proof?—but that can be debated in other posts). When that doesn’t work, you delegitimize the electorate—“everyone who voted for the other guy is getting something from it—they are on the take, profiting unfairly by the guy who was elected” (in this case you say that everyone wants free stuff from the government, abortion on-demand, birth-control and all the usual stuff you write about)—and when that fails, you go to the ole ‘let’s start our own country’ ploy—secession petitions, calls for a new civil war if you are not allowed to leave peacefully, etc…
(this is not the first time a losing political side has bandied around the notion, by a long shot) In the end, none of that will happen. In the next four years some political battles by your side will be won and some lost. Some legislation will be put in place that you will swear will end America as we know it—but it won’t. Eventually your guy will get in office, and the other side will say all of this stuff you are saying now.
Want proof? Just go back and look what was said in 2008 after the election. Then go back and look what was said in 2004, 20
This isn't about Obama or Romney being in the White House, this is about the future of our country. If you can't see that, then there is no point in discussing it since you have not been paying attention over the last four years.
I'm sure you are very proud that Obama won the election. No doubt, you are equally proud over his lying to the American people so many times, that I have filled up a 1TB hard drive of videos archiving him for posterity. I guess you don't care about his class and race warfare that he so effectively deployed over the last 5-years. His going "under the radar" to get his agenda enacted rather than using the system must make you very happy indeed. His statements against the Constitution must have given you a full-on Obama chubby. Maybe you even cheered when Obama repeatedly quoted the Declaration of Independence & left out the words "Creator" and "Unalienable".
Well, some of us paid attention and feel our country deserves someone better to represent us. However, we were unsuccessful in our attempts to bring out the truth since we were not only fighting against the Obama "Truth Teams", but also the main stream media. Duty and honor may mean nothing to you in a president, but we feel it is very important. Yes, we are unhappy, yes some want to secede, but our cause is just and our spirit will not be extinguished.
To my fellow conservatives, remember this "We are never defeated unless we give up on God." - Ronald Reagan
Wolfgang the Gray, as usual you have a voice of reason. Keep God front and center and a guiding light for all to follow who can see even the faintest flicker. Judaism has Hanuka or the festival of lights that will be coming up soon, it wouldn't hurt for Christians to remember what that was about either. We need to remember all times that God has protected those who trust in His Ever-presence.
Fintoilhat, sorry you seem to try to reason with others by telling us we are stupid, ignorant clods who couldn't find our backside with both hands so you talk down to us thinking you will force us to have to agree with you. Sorry, but all you've done is help me to feel you are a pompous jerk and I'd not want to agree with you no matter what you had to say. Doesn't matter if you are a pompous jerk or not, I am left with that impression about you.
 November 12, 2012 at 6:49pm
Care to look at some of the precincts where Romney got 0 votes? Cleveland 16-H.02 cast a total of 13 votes; 16-G.02 cast 0 total votes; 14-K.02 cast 21 total votes; 09-Q cast 17 total votes; 08-Q cast 49 total votes; 16-U cast 118 total votes; 06-L cast 70 total votes and 03-R.02 cast 2 total votes.
I get that you are upset your guy didn’t win…but are you really contending that you don’t think BO could carry Cleveland precincts where such a handful of overall votes were cast in the first place?
Are you willing to pull the precinct counts in red states to see if BO carried 0 votes particularly in rural areas? How much you want to bet Obama has precincts in other states where he carried 0 votes?
Oh, and speaking of votes–there were 7 choices for Pres\VP in Ohio–not to mention write-ins. In the county as a whole Romney carried 184,475 votes (or 30.12 %) and BO carried 420,953 (or 68.74%) and again…this is in CLEVELAND–anybody been to there? You really think Cleveland would go strong for Romney? Not exactly Mitt’s traditional demographic.
Some precincts are very small, or have traditionally small turnout. Just throwing out ‘Romney got 0 votes’ tends to make folks picture this huge electorate and wonder how it could be possible? But when you break down the numbers and see that he got 0 votes out of the 21 or so cast, then yeah…I can see that…