User Profile: Firesaber

Firesaber

Member Since: November 07, 2011

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123
  • January 20, 2014 at 10:03am

    Bill Maher is a hypocrite. He wants guns to be banned, but he owns two guns to defend himself (one for upstairs, one for downstairs) and will not give them up until everyone else’s has been taken away. I have a feeling that he lives in a neighborhood that is fairly secure. The police will probably defend his house for him. Just like every other anti-gun elite. They can afford private security and live in good neighborhoods or own guns themselves, but the poor shouldn’t be able to defend themselves. The poor cannot be trusted with guns. The elites are the only ones that need to be concerned with defense. After all, poor people have nothing to lose. Why would anyone target them? What’s to defend?

  • January 16, 2014 at 3:31pm

    I vote Full Metal Jacket as crap military movie of all time.

    Responses (2) +
  • December 4, 2013 at 2:37pm

    Ever read 2084 search for love hope and faith? He talks about that. There’s always someone on top.

  • December 4, 2013 at 2:32pm

    What an idiot! It’s out of modern syntax, but this is what it really means: “Anyone that wants to help the poor should be rich.” ie – If you cannot feed and clothe yourself, you are not going to feed and clothe the whole of the people.

  • September 27, 2013 at 10:04am

    I had a cousin that lived in FL. One day, their neighbor came into their yard and killed her husband right in front of her with a gun. No reason other than he was crazy. He got 3 years in jail. She got 20 years for shooting a wall…

  • September 23, 2013 at 10:10am

    Wow. another prediction from 2084, the Search for Love Hope and Faith, comes true. amazing.

  • June 17, 2013 at 1:03pm

    Yes, you answered it after hearing the question, having time to process your own response, and time to sit at your computer and type it. Well done. That is the same as being in front of a crowd and hearing the question for the first time and having a 30 second time frame. That answer still would have lost her the title. Only the “We need to change” answer would have won.

  • June 17, 2013 at 9:29am

    You people are idiots who are hating on this girl because she was pretty. I would like to see you try to answer this question off the cuff in under 30 seconds. I couldn’t do it (and I’m smart as hell). Her problem is she is a conservative (politically). She doesn’t believe in the war on women, and that question was geared to be answered in such a way to say, “This country is unfair to women, and we need to change and pass laws to ensure that women are paid the same as men.” Too bad she drew that B.S. question. I agree with one person, that was a trap unless you wanted to spout the full blown liberal perspective. No way to answer at least a 3 part question in 30 seconds when you completely disagree with the premise.

    Responses (7) +
  • May 24, 2013 at 11:21am

    If you believe in religious freedom, no, you should not punish them at all. Punishing them for this is the same as being against speech when you disagree with it. Read the 3rd paragraph in the following:

    http://swampfoxpress.com/current-events/contraception-mandate/

    Responses (1) +
  • May 15, 2013 at 4:33pm

    This is where you are wrong. I’m a CPA. Yes, that is true, but the types of questions they are asking far exceed if they were trying to figure out if they were political. They were data mining. The questions they were asking were utterly inappropriate.

  • May 7, 2013 at 10:31am

    Insane except for the fact that there extensive writing from the Founding Fathers saying that was EXACTLY what it is in there for. The difference between the Civil Rights nullification and this one is that nullification was being used to deny equal rights/freedom from blacks and this time it is being used to protect the freedom to keep and bear arms. There’s a big difference between a few crazies like Shay’s Rebellion and an open opposition to a tyrannical government.

    Responses (6) +
  • April 15, 2013 at 3:11pm

    Until they make it illegal to pass down guns since your heirs did not pass a background check.

  • April 15, 2013 at 2:50pm

    Poor Bloomberg. Can’t understand why non-billionaires might use a financial transaction instead of just giving stuff away. Fascist.

    Responses (1) +
  • January 23, 2013 at 11:57am

    Oh my god! 2084 the Search for Love Hope and Faith was right!

  • December 4, 2012 at 4:24pm

    We spend more per student than most any other country. You are wrong. Only when parents focus on making their kids excel will they do so. Until then, you are just throwing money at the problem.

  • December 4, 2012 at 3:58pm

    Marxist propaganda. Have you noticed that ALL the jobs mentioned come from the government? Also, there is no talk about the legitimate functions of government? Finally, all the jobs mentioned are products of the STATE government. Federal taxation has little to do with that. This is also in California. Their main problem isn’t that they aren’t taxing the rich enough…it’s that the rich high-tailed it to TX and other places WITHOUT income taxes. Read 2084 the Search for Love Hope and Faith. Just more indoctrination like he says.

  • November 5, 2012 at 4:36pm

    To recap: God killed over 100 people so that Obama could be re-elected.

  • November 5, 2012 at 12:47pm

    Wow, this is totally the plot of 2084: the Search for Love, Hope, and Faith. Scary.

    In reply to the contribution Why the New Left Is Now the Democratic Party

  • October 25, 2012 at 4:24pm

    It’s a lie. No 10 year old would ask about the 47%. If they do, they are the most boring little kid in the world.

  • October 23, 2012 at 4:12pm

    She’s basing her decision on what she is reading on the mainstream media which is promoting Romney as anti-gay and waging a war on women. She is merely uninformed. This is why a free press is necessary and why 2084 (search for love hope and faith) says that the Left hijacked the media to brainwash us.

    Responses (3) +
123