you do not have riots happening over a shooting of a unarmed innocent man…you have riots because a media that wont report the truth to people..the establishment on both sides appears to need this unrest …we will know why shortly I believe …the young man shot was assaulting the officer along with 2-3 others…he was simply the slowest runner of the group…the ensuing melee is media driven thru withholding of accurate information..this is going to get real bad real fast ….
 June 26, 2014 at 12:09pm
I would have been out of that chair milliseconds after she told me…this is Sierra Bravo…
 June 26, 2014 at 12:06pm
I would be outta that chair seconds after she told me
 June 23, 2014 at 2:03pm
and also that those same engineers by virtue and timing of their deaths were precluded from the patent that the Rothschilds then garnered exclusively for themselves…pretty lucrative motive ……..the got fuddy’d….
February 10, 2014 at 1:33pm
The only crime I see here is making that kid wear that sweater
Stop screaming you idiot!!!!!!!
If he really loved his kid so much, he would NOT have him in the front seat!!!!
Which incidently, is against the law!
Tuna, I didn't realize you were an expert on the laws in Russia.
By the way, If you knew ANYTHING (i yelled there - teehee) about cars, you would know he was in total control at all times.
February 10, 2014 at 1:30pm
child abuse at it’s finest…every dad should teach his kids how to experience the exhilaration of pullin’ G’s…and don’t tell me he was in danger. When I was a kid my mom drove a car with the rear floorboards missing . we loved to watch the road go by as we drove . it was a team building exercise amongst us siblings reminding each other not to fall out the floor ..not once , not one damn second did I ever feel I was in danger or abused. it was just life in the fast lane …..thanks mom, thanks dad…..good times man , good times
 February 10, 2014 at 1:29pm
January 13, 2014 at 4:33pm
Higher Road..my thoughts exactly…the historians didn’t know about them ?…the locals didn’t know about them..they have never been photographed before now?…the dirt around the edges is a different color than the ground surrounding it , indicating recent activity. the cement should be age tested…this stinks …they are markers for post EMP when the planes come rolling in to finish us off….
What kind of concrete delivery system did they use back in the '20's? It would have bee a little difficult to deliver sidewalk quality concrete to a remote region like this--wouldn't you think?
July 14, 2013 at 1:03pm
Lets consider an alternate scenario.I am as anti Obama as they come. BUT….I also am open to other possibilities. Israel wants the ME to know it is ready , wiling and more importantly , able to defend itself as proven with this strike. So instead of taking public responsibility for the attack, it has the whitehouse “leak” the news of Israels involvement. By no means does the Obama adm. want one of our carriers sunk in the Straight of Hormuz, and especially in a manner that blocks the entrance. These weapons were able to do so and posed a threat to both Israel and the US fleet. I can see a scenario where the US leaking the details of the attack accomplish letting the players know who did it, thereby giving them pause potentially concerning Israels abilities and capabilities, and protecting our warships by removing the threat ….
I wish Hussein Obama's group of security advisers were as cogent as they would be in other more friendly previous administrations. What you say is interesting, but would have more likely occurred during the Reagan Era of close cooperation with Israel. Look at the people Hussein Obama has in his immediate circle, Chuck Hagel, John Brennan, and now Ms. Samantha Power. Oh I forgot Susan "it was that Youtube video" Rice. Sorry I can't give the Obaminable one that much credit.
Well beyond the range of those weapons. Syria to the Straight of Hormuz is 1500 or more miles. Those cruise rockets are only good for 200 or so.
May 31, 2013 at 8:33am
you need only to look to everything Cass Sunstein laid pen to in order to find the fraud. He was brought into the EPA to fundamentally transform America and no one even noticed. He was quietly installed and then quietly snuck away just prior to the last election. The entire fraud lies with him….
April 29, 2013 at 12:55pm
have been to a few MLB games in my time. during BP people would be filling the stands down low . Not a soul in sight except the Amish family off to the right….Now I subscribe to the theory of common sense. How many of you have been within 50 feet of an incoming baseball which is headed at you. The sound those seams make once inside that 50 ft. mark, are enough to make this girl be very aware she was about to have a bad day..look at the direction her ear is in relation to balls incoming arc…enough said………I call B.S all day long…
Actually the sox take practice early, usually earlier than most fans get there...she's up on the green monster -I think this is probably real in fact
Totally fake. Here, get your calculator and follow along.
A baseball struck by a bat travels about 100 miles/hour. Doesn't matter if that's exact, just follow along. That means it's traveling about 147 feet per second. The shutter speed on cameras varies of course, but a cell phone shutter speed in bright light is probably about 1/10 of a second.
That means that during the time the camera took the photo, the ball traveled almost 15 feet.
There is simply no realistic ball speed or shutter speed that is going to give you an virtually unblurred image like the one in that picture. Not even close.
Coud it be as simple as someone behind her and below the camera range simply tossing a ball into the air? just a thought :)
You remind me of an old saying "Figures never lie, but liars often figure". Cell phone sutter speeds typacally range from 1/10 to 1/500th of a second. Clearly this was taken in full daylight so the shutter speed should be assumed to be 1/500 of a second. Terminal velocity of a baseball has been measured at 95 mph, so your assumption of 100mph is reasonable. Correcting for shutter speed it reduces the ball's motion from 15 feet to 3.6 inches. If the ball was traveling at a right angle to the camera this would result in a very blury image, but if traveling toward the camera would result in almost no blur. Clearly it did not hit the camera, but if angled off a few degrees to miss the camera would result in slight bluring which is what we see in the image. While it could be "totally fake" I believe it to be plausable.
@Meteors....c'mon, you can't even get basic physics right. So we'll take your assumption of 100 mph (you're actually a tad bit low for the pros), the ball is losing momentum from the moment it breaks contact with the bat. It loses roughly 1mph every 7 feet of flight. [See reference 1] This is an estimate, because we all know the speed/distance curve is nonlinear and varies with speed. The MINIMUM distance this ball has flown is 250 feet. Which gives us a decrease of at least 35 fps. Now the assumption of shutter speed. 1/10th of a second is LOW LIGHT speed. Cell phones shutters range from 1/500th to 1/10th (see reference 2). This is full sunlight (note the streaking) so shutter is going to be on top speed. So, at 111 fps with shutter speed at highest setting, the ball moves .2 feet, or a bit less than 3 inches. With a travel vector that is approaching the camera (not directly at it, but moving it nearer) that's just enough to account for what distortion there is. Of course, she may have a better
So holler fake all you want people, but the physics don't back you up.
 Robert Adair (Sterling Professor Emeritus of Physics at Yale University in his book "The Physics of Baseball"
@ITS ONLY DAD
That's precesely what was done. Somebody tossed a ball into the air behind her. It could have been an intentional hoax or just happening to catch a ball being tossed and msitaking for a ball flying through the air after being struck. Either way it is 100% impossible that that is a picture of a batted ball.
@itsonlydad/rowge the motion blur is all lateral.
Leave it to meteors to look at the ball and forget the chick.
SkepticalLibertarian, I'm impressed. Cell phones have a shutter speed of 1/500 of a second? Maybe, I'll take your word for it. And you're right, the ball's motion can be divided into vectors, one directly at the camera and one perpendicular. My calculation was the perpendicular one. So, yes, if the ball were headed more or less directly at the camera, it would have less lateral movement. I didn't think anyone would catch that.
However, suppose the ball is three ft away when the shutter opens and three feet minus 3 1/2 inches away when it closes, it's angular size (check me) would increase by 10 percent, blurring the photo. The center of the ball would have a higher exposure time than the edge.
Plus, doesn't a ball spin when it's hit? Why are the threads in focus?
If the ball is coming from behind her where is the batter and the electric ball machine for practice? It could very well be someone just tossing a ball vertically behind here. Although I was looking at the babe and not the ball....
Ahh....meteors ? Where did you get the idea it was done with cell phone. ? Real cameras, mostly used by reporters, easily do 1/5000 of a second. question is: are they real ?
@Meteors and @Skearit
I always find it interesting when people look to math and physics to resolve an argument and appear to have no knowledge of the such whatsoever. You both actually forced me to just make an account so I could respond to your blatant misunderstanding of physics. I have degrees in Physics and Mechanical Engineering so feel free to argue with me and educate me on your bs. Oh, and I've also played baseball for 15 years. Now let's go to work:
Physics lesson #1:
An object in motion will tend to stay in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. There's two forces at work here - gravity & fluid resistance. Yes, I will give you that a baseball from a major league hit can have a muzzle velocity of 100 mi/hr. Muzzle velocity is the initial velocity after impact for those that don't know. That velocity is fighting against gravity and air.
Physics lesson #2:
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It's hard to tell where she is standing by looking at the picture in relation to the field. The fact of the matter is, the ball must expend energy during its trajectory & that energy is lost due to sound and friction with the surrounding fluid (air). It's the same with bullets, the reason they lose energy is because their velocity is decreasing.
Bottom line: This ball was doing nowhere near 100 mph in the picture. Also, terminal velocity has nothing to do with an impact, only free-falling objects. This would mean bullets could only go 180 mph. Hop
Meteor- If you would of put this much effort into vetting your dear leader you might not of voted for the con man, oh and by the way it was a foul ball, no where near traveling 100mph my guess is less than 50 easy
There could be a story on the Blaze that the earth is round and our solar system is heliocentric and Meteors could spend hours refuting it. He's probably some liberal pansy with a chip on his shoulder that thought "I'll go over and outsmart all those conservative rednecks. That'll make me feel like a big man" but then he showed up and found out that Glenn's listeners infinitely more informed than any progressive Obamaton. Do us a favor meteors, go back to DU or Media Matters. You can pretend to be the smartest idiot there.
Actually, I flung that pitch and missed. She was irritating the living crud out of me with all the picture-taking and inane questions.
SendTheMeteors... WOW really. you are the craziest cook I ve seen since sinistablackflag. And how about the false flag op of 9/11 and the navy seals killed everyone in Boston??? You should be over at MSNBC where people agree with you, rather than somewhere everyone calls you a WEIRDO.
You mean there's a ball in that picture?
Thanks EngineeRock45 for your lecture about Newtonian physics. But the topic is whether the photo is faked or not. Try to keep up okay?
This is a Fermi problem. Given your background, perhaps you could estimate - estimate - the velocity of the ball - if the photo is real - when it came to the point of the photo. And with your knowledge of baseball and other clues, the direction the ball was traveling relative to the camera. And, based on your estimates and given the ball's velocity perpendicular to the camera, and the shutter speed of the camera, would the ball be more blurred? And would the spin on the ball, or the increased angular size of the ball, with an estimated shutter speed, blur the photo more than it appears?
And why don't you correct your post while you're at it. You say "energy is lost due to sound and friction." Sorry, friction is the reason energy is lost, not sound. Friction produces sound. Sound doesn't cause the ball to lose energy. And you say, "It’s the same with bullets, the reason they lose energy is because their velocity is decreasing." You got that backwards.
No matter. You missed the point. We're talking about if the photo was faked. As a new member, would you care to comment on the topic of this thread?
This is real. You can tell the ball is moving at an angle away from the camera and its not spinning too much, so it didn't blur. I'm not a camera expert, a baseball expert or a mathmatician and I could tell. Besides, why would she risk her reputation so some camera expert could openly call her bluff?.
This is actually a picture of Hillary Clinton taken an instant before the "great baseball accident of 1970" when she was working under cover for the American Communist Party as a conservative Republican. When the bandages were removed it became apparent that she could no longer work in that capacity so she was ordered to Arkansas to marry another party member and run for public office. With the collapse of the USSR headquarters were moved to her home state of Illinois and the rest is history.
I think any balls near her face is hot :)
January 11, 2013 at 10:42pm
Anybody remember how unknown GB was before he became unhinged and then went on to become Paul Revere. The left vilified him and made him out to be a clown. After that he soared and became mainstream.Me thinks this is Alex Jones attempt at becoming a house hold name and I for one hope to God he succeeds…and I could care less how he gets there , just get there fast ….
January 29, 2012 at 12:05pm
To all you rocket scientists that denigrate Col West and even throw Marco Rubio in there as well. Did you take even a millisecond of your brain pan capacity to consider that you haven’t got a clue what is really happening in this country to make men like these vote for bills like NDAA. As soon as I saw that West and Rubio voted for this I immediately stood down on my objection to the bill, and believe me I objected. You are either good or evil and I know evil when I see it . these two men ain’t it ….
December 7, 2011 at 8:12am
The part of his comments where he stated that he felt he was”outed”. is very telling. Igarner from that statement that he is ashamed of his views and doesn’t want anyone to know his heart. II am a true believer of whatever it may be , Iwould relish the opportunity to stand for my convictions. This man is clearly a fake and has no place defending this Christian nation. May God find accurate aim for the enemy to find it’s mark on this abomination.
Did you just pray for God to kill an American Soldier? Wtf
October 5, 2011 at 7:31am
“I’m not sure what the president has to do with the gubernatorial race in West Virginia. That’s kind of a non-issue,” he said.
that’s like saying “I’m not sure what the secretary of state in each election has to do with the final outcome of the vote….West Virginia is proving itself to be lost …
September 10, 2011 at 11:39pm
If it wasn’t for the Blaze playing videos of this loser I wouldn’t even know this man existed …He is completely irrelevant …move on ….nothing here….listened to the whole video and didn’t hear a GOD darn thing
June 14, 2011 at 6:45pm
The National Defense Authorization Act is the name of a United States federal law that has been enacted for each of the past 48 fiscal years to specify the budget and expenditures of the United States Department of Defense
May 23, 2011 at 8:53am
Thank you so much for bringing this to people’s attention.I have been talking this up as much as I can . In Conn. it has been cloudy and rainy since I can remember and the sun never shines. I have been watching the Chemtrails being sprayed around here for years and no one seems to be open to what I am saying . I live near an airport in New Haven and went there and asked them who was spraying and what were they spraying and I was practically run out of the building . I cant believe man would go this low to push the agenda .We are heading for dark times and the real America needs to pull its head out of its a## and wake up…thanks again for this….
March 31, 2011 at 10:23pm
Ithink Glenn has all the credibility he needs outside of the far left lunacy …