User Profile: floridahank

Member Since: July 07, 2011

CommentsDisplaying floridahank's 10 most recent comments.

  • I would think that the bomber(s) would have realized there would be many overhead camers and that the FBI would try to use facial recognition in their attempts to identify the bomber(s). I would think that whoever was involved would use a subtle disguise — perhaps a beard, or a pair of eye glasses, or some other type of “coverup” — so I don’t think there’s going to be any quick identification of
    the bomber(s), unless they did something very stupid

  • I am a football nut — love watching all the teams and love it when the underdog wins. Kurt was always one I pulled for and he truly was an exceptional QB. And now following through with his
    Christian beliefs, I know his program will bring much good to many people and along the way will being some of them to be followers of Christ Jesus. The best of it all for this program.

  • Christis sounds like an idiot. First, he’s afraid of the truth that most people have accepted about what Romeny said about who/what/why Obama’s voters gave him the Presidency.
    Most politicians are dishonest and will only say what will self-promote themselves in preparation for getting ahead or reelected.
    The GOP lacks the needed leadership to make an impact for the next election. Unless they grow up and get people who have the best interest in America first….we’ll just be second best next time. The indications that the USA has lost its principles of our Founding Fathers makes me sad. I don’t know which great, America-loving leader will straighten out this country, but I’m praying that he comes forward soon.

  • Our GOP, outside of perhaps 10% men/women, has absolutely no worthy leadership. They all are vain, inept, self-serving, “do anything for themselves instead of the nation” wealthy, corrupt to various degrees, and not worth voting for to be our representatives.
    If only we had term limits, we’d get rid of these lazy, money-grabbers and make them get a legitimate job. We are at a turning point for the future of our nation. We must get real Americans who will guide us back to the principles of our Founding Fathers, otherwise ours will be a 3rd country status within the next few years.

  • These “debates” are a waste of time — they do nothing for understanding one’s position or getting to the truth of any issue. They should be discontinued as they are set up. Instead there should be perhaps 3-4 one hour “talks about one’s position on each major topic, and if would be forbidden to talk negatively about your opponent, because most of the time it’s not totally accurate. I think the public is sick of negative ads. Each person will have plenty of time to give their own positive view, and absolutely no negative mentions about the opponent.
    If you can’t persude me that you are the best person simply by presenting your best positions on the major topics, then you’re not the best candidate. Today, half the time is wasted saying how bad the other person’s positions are — which to me is worthless — I’ll find out by doing my DD on the person, so just keep telling me the positive, good things you have to offer and I’ll make my decision on that.

  • If the facts are as they seem, the justice system must take strong measures against this teacher, who seems to be interested in Islam than in teaching students. Has she ever discussed American History to the kids? I doubt it. A local lawyer should go after her big time and throw her out of the school. She is a phony Anerican.

  • OK….I know all of you have the facts, 100% so you can make your judgment on this case. If you don’t have ALL the facts all you’re doing is gossip, which God hates.
    So all you “Monday Quarterbacks” who know it all should keep your mouths shut unless you truly are a prophet with unerring insight.

  • I firmly believe that Romney is much more intelligent than Obama, but what has to be foremost in preparation for this debate is preparation. Have Romney’s advisors/researches/writers done the proper research to come up with sharp, memorable answers to the basic questions that should be expected? If Romney has head the expected questions and comments that Obama will ask, and Romney has gotten good input from his team, he should do well.
    There’s no doubt the moderator will be biased, but with proper preparation, Romney should be able to handle the biased questions.

  • If Romney has intelligent, sharp-minded researchers, advisors, they should be prepared for some very biased questioning. But if the group is on the ball, they will have figured out the one-sided questions that will be asked, and Romney should have those answers available. It’s very similar to a court case, you have 2 opposing lawyers throwing very penetrating questions at the defendant, but whichever lawyer did the best job preparing his client to handle “unexpected” questions, will win the jury. If Romney’s people did the job properly, he’ll win the debate — much of the decision lies with the people who prepared Romney. Will be very interesting to see who did the best research and preparation. If done properly, Romney should shine.

  • This might be one of the stupid news I’ve ever seen. Why would anybody get excited over this and
    make comments about this setup photo?