User Profile: Fonebone


Member Since: February 27, 2012


  • April 14, 2015 at 3:19am

    +1 Too few will get this.

  • April 14, 2015 at 3:17am

    You are incorrect. No assumptions need to be made. It is a purely deductive logic puzzle.

  • April 14, 2015 at 3:14am

    It’s a logic question, not strictly a “math” question. However, I think if more students were taught how to reason through logic problems such as this we’d have far fewer irrational leftists wandering around.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 14, 2015 at 2:51am

    … and that remaining date in July is July 16.

  • [2] April 14, 2015 at 2:47am

    You were so close up until #4! Your explanation is very concise.
    (4) Albert, upon hearing that Bernard knows the correct birthday month between July or August based on his already knowing the date number, deduces for himself that the date number must be unique to either July or August, ruling out July 14 and August 14 and leaving July 16, August 15, and August 17. Albert already knows which month the birthday is in, having been told at the outset by Cheryl. If Albert knew the birthday was in August he would still not be able to deduce the date number since it could be either the 15th or the 17th. However, since Albert is able to deduce the date number, he must know it is in July since that is the only remaining month with a unique date in it.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] October 21, 2014 at 2:28am

    Thanks for the heads up. I had this app… but not anymore.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] October 7, 2014 at 3:03am

    Reminds me of this:

  • [36] October 7, 2014 at 2:53am

    I dunno, from his perspective I bet he’s loving it. It sounds like he seeks out situations involving police in order to assess whether people’s rights are being violated. I guess he’s policing the police. So I bet he’s chalking this one up as a victory.

    Responses (2) +
  • [12] October 7, 2014 at 2:42am

    He’s here… He’s here! Now broadcasting from the underground command post, deep in the bowels of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a nondescript building, we’ve once again made contact with our leader… Mark Levin!

  • [5] September 29, 2014 at 11:02pm

    Wow, she got those domestic violence charges dropped by doing some required consoling… “There there, did the mean lady hit you and cause bruisey woosies?”

    Must be some of that creative restitution I’ve heard about.

  • September 23, 2014 at 11:49pm

    Hey, at least she was (probably accidentally) honest when she called it “laundering the money.”

  • [11] September 23, 2014 at 11:45pm

    Does it strike anyone else as massively ironic that she considers a tip from Rush “blood money” which can only be “laundered” by using it to fund abortions? That is some messed-up logic.

  • [3] September 23, 2014 at 11:42pm

    Yeah what an evil S.O.B., giving you $2,000 like that. Nothing says “evil incarnate” like over-tipping your waitress. I hear you – generosity always strikes me as “really bizarre” too!

    Wow, that book sounds like a real page-turner. I heard she was strongly considering two alternative titles for her book early on: “Love on My Back” or “Love My Backdoor.” It must have been a tough call.

  • [2] August 28, 2014 at 1:30am

    I think this guy was in on it. Why would he call the police on himself (or have an associate do it)? Perhaps he has an agenda of exposing police over-militarization or something similar following the Ferguson mess. It’s just too coincidental that he’s got his webcam going coupled with his first reaction being that they are getting “swatted”. How many people are even aware of that term? Either that or he and his gaming buddies think it’s funny to pull this prank on each other.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] August 15, 2014 at 7:33pm

    Right, RealityObserver. The 2nd Amendment need not be actually repealed in order to be eviscerated by statist activist judges and rogue presidents issuing “executive actions”.

  • August 15, 2014 at 7:24pm

    Lol. Or he needs “Just For Men” to increase the color contrast of his beard hair.

  • [1] August 15, 2014 at 7:23pm

    I think that what Joe Miller asserted can be much further generalized. The granting of legal status to a massive number of illegal aliens would affect every hotly contested issue between liberals and conservatives, toppling the balance of power in the left’s direction. As a further result of that, aspects of American life that are not now even considered to be controversial will become the next targets of the radical leftist statists.

  • [2] August 12, 2014 at 3:50am

    It was a true shock to hear of his passing. He was one of a kind. I have been amazed today at hearing all the normal everyday people who recounted some small, but uplifting encounter with him. They all say that he was friendly and down-to-earth in real life, frequently taking the time to just make them laugh. Without a doubt, his mirth and energy made the world a little bit better place. I will say a prayer for him and his family.

  • May 20, 2014 at 1:21am

    Whoa, I read this just in time! I was just about to guzzle a tall glass of iced pee.

    Responses (2) +
  • May 13, 2014 at 12:57am

    Jeez, so much for freedom of speech. From the Federal level down to the local levels, government deems it unacceptable to be criticized and will try to intimidate you into silence. Yeah, right, someone might take the adopt-a-pothole video seriously. And so what even if they did? Something might get fixed? The horror!

Restoring Love