The Brooks Ranches

User Profile: fordfan


Member Since: September 18, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [2] August 27, 2014 at 6:03pm

    Shut it the ____ down Steve!!

  • August 27, 2014 at 6:00pm

    Oh, and BTW, if he does what is feared he will do, when Congress shuts down the govt by cutting the funding for everything but the bare necessities outlined in the Constitution, THAT IS DOING THEIR JOB!!!!!!

  • August 27, 2014 at 5:51pm

    Kevino, get YOUR head outta YOUR ass and come to the immediate understanding that president does NOT have the legal, constitutional authority to do ANY frickin thing on immigration, outside of faithfully making sure he does whatever is necessary to execute the enforcement of the current immigration laws and any new ones that congress may pass. If they don’t pass any new ones, he is to enforce the old ones, AS WRITTEN!
    He also has no authority to legislate from the Oval Office via executive order or regulations.
    I am, and I think any other person who respects the Constitution, is sick to death of this tyrant’s unconstitutional BS as well as those who egg it on or think what he’s doing in right!

  • [1] August 26, 2014 at 10:25am

    I find it interesting that these “in the closet” Atheists understand that it’s a detriment to their political careers to be an Atheist.

    Why is it that it just cannot be accepted that apparently the majority Americans prefer someone governing them to be a Christian?

  • August 26, 2014 at 10:11am

    Here is Miriam-Webster’s definition of CULT. Read it and see if you might fit Atheism into it.
    Considering parts 2 and 3, I say you can…although I don’t see it as necessary.

    noun, often attributive \ˈkəlt\
    1 a small religious group that is not part of a larger and more accepted religion and that has beliefs regarded by many people as extreme or dangerous
    2 a situation in which people admire and care about something or someone very much or too much
    3 a small group of very devoted supporters or fans

  • August 26, 2014 at 10:01am

    Great point! Had totally forgotten about the Democrat convention nonsense.
    And yeah, I do believe, after what happened at that convention, any politician calling themselves a Democrat and a Christian at the same time needs to take a a looooong look at what they stand for and what they’re doing. The two conflict badly!!

  • [1] August 26, 2014 at 9:54am

    What bothers the crap out of me is that every time the subject of the Constitution, our government, religion, God comes up together, many people seem to see a need to again show their ignorance of American history or they know it and choose to simply ignore it. …and some even intentionally attempt to rewrite said history.
    None being a positive and one reason that I believe we’re in the mess we’re in as a nation.

    And BTW, you don’t have to actually believe in God yourself, but don’t ignore the FACT that most of the Framers and Founders did and that THAT played a huge role in our nation’s founding. Heck, a desire to freely worship God is why the first people came here to begin with!

  • August 26, 2014 at 9:36am

    It may not have been written into it specifically but the Framers, although clearly not all of them, leaned heavily on God’s guidance to draft this document, especially since 29 of the 56 had been to/graduated from seminary. So, try reading it again but this time read it all. Right above the signatures it states:

    done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the YEAR OF OUR LORD one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven

    Now if you can irrefutably prove that the phrase “YEAR OF OUR LORD” has EVER meant ANYTHING but God here in the USA, I’m all ears and eyes.

  • August 22, 2014 at 11:51am

    A point brush?

  • [5] August 22, 2014 at 4:40am

    So, a business owner lives on the same property the business in on doesn’t mean it’s private? You gotta be ___ing kidding me!
    You twits feel discriminated against because someone doesn’t want to do your wedding on THEIR property?!
    You just couldn’t make this s___ up if you tried.

  • [2] August 22, 2014 at 4:26am

    The 24/7 reporting/speculating as well as nimrods like the governor and Holder spouting off at the mouth with ignorance and race baiting, the idea this police officer will ever get a fair trial is now almost impossible. So…I just wish everybody claiming to actually know something about this would just stfu. Those who DO know the facts need to remain silent til the investigation is done.

  • [1] August 22, 2014 at 4:21am

    Just how do YOU know that no photos exist…were YOU there moron?

  • [1] August 22, 2014 at 4:17am

    Sighting “sources” that are unnamed is the same way the The Enquirer gets away with printing the fiction that they do.

    Don’t forget that “unnamed sources” is one way almost all reporters get some or most of their information. Just because a source is unnamed does not mean the info is false.

  • [2] August 21, 2014 at 4:52am

    You’re right.
    The only things I am willing to concede are the larger, more powerful military style weapons like tanks, cannon, shoulder missiles, grenades/launchers, etc.
    There has to be some level of secrecy when it comes to the military’s weapons therefore we should not be able to just readily buy them.

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] August 21, 2014 at 4:34am

    Since he has no clue what one is, we can all assume that he doesn’t own an automatic weapon. That said, it is possible for him to legally own one if he met all of the requirements. I hear one has to want one REALLY REALLY bad to even consider wanting to meet the requirements.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] August 19, 2014 at 4:07am

    They’re too busy dodging rocks, bullets and molotov cocktails to worry about some little thing like ISIS.

  • [8] August 17, 2014 at 10:40am

    And BTW, for the thugs and others perpetuating such crap as we’re seeing or thinking of joining in, if you don’t want the police to look all mean and militarized, ya might want to stop giving them a good reason to. For the most part, there are always a few bad apples, the police just react to its citizen’s behavior or potential behavior.
    Like the police chief said too (not a quote), if you don’t want to be seen as a violent protester, stay out of the crowds with violent protesters in them. He said they can’t tell the good guys from the bad.

  • [7] August 17, 2014 at 10:35am

    This is ridiculous! When will it be the right time for law enforcement to actually take complete control of this situation? When will the officials, i.e. the mayor and/or governor, realize that they are worthless as leaders?
    Yes, people have the right to protest but protests at this point are useless and just because you have the right to do something doesn’t always make it the right hing to do when you want to do it. The people who will protest properly (peacefully and orderly) can’t therefore until the thugs have been weeded out and ALL violence under control, IMO, NO ONE should be allowed to and NO ONE would.
    Curfew is not to be midnight til 5 A.M., it will be dusk til dawn. Anyone caught outside goes to jail and charged with whatever and everything the law allows.

  • [3] August 17, 2014 at 10:20am

    You’re exactly right. This is why every time I hear some idiot “in this great democracy of ours”, or something like that, my head wants to explode.

  • [14] August 14, 2014 at 2:50pm

    Rhetorical question: why does the DOJ have any reporter(s) on THEIR beat, much less some from what is known to be a left-wing rag?

123 To page: Go