User Profile: fordfan


Member Since: September 18, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [-3] March 27, 2015 at 2:41pm

    There is NO doubt that this song is about jealousy and not homosexuality. Still don’t give crap about it since being jealous of someone or what they have is just as bad.
    And for all you morons who think not liking this song, whether it because of jealousy or homosexuality or whatever, is what gives conservatives a bad name need to understand that there are principles and morals involved in the decision to not like it. We simply are more likely to stick by these principles and morals than the average secularist/leftist/Democrat….IF these people have any to begin with.
    As for me, I gave up most of country music years ago. I got sick of hearing about someone cheating on their partner and then the other whining and crying in their beer about it.

    Responses (1) +
  • [25] March 26, 2015 at 5:22pm

    The flag represents this constitutional republic (it’s actually NOT a constitutional republic any longer) and it IS in severe distress! Therefore, while I probably wouldn’t, I see no issue with someone turning their flag upside down.
    On top of this guy unnecessarily stressing over this, even though he clearly thought he meant well, he takes it upon himself to destroy the man’s flag pole rope? Now man just needs to go replace the rope and offer his own apology to the store owner.

  • March 24, 2015 at 11:55am

    Unlike in obama’s case, IF what we’ve been told is true about obama, Cruz never gave up his American citizenship and DID give up his Canadian citizenship so you’re grasping for straws and wasting your time.

    Here is Article II, Section I, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;

    Please tell us where it clearly defines “natural born citizen” ANYWHERE within these words.
    Yes, yes, I know what John Locke wrote and that the Founders relied upon his words to create the Constitution and this nation and all that but the U.S. Constitution DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY SAY what John Locke said here.
    Since Cruz clearly had one American parent, natural born could easily mean not a naturalized citizen…right? THAT definition is fine with me.

  • [3] March 22, 2015 at 1:47pm


    Responses (1) +
  • [16] March 22, 2015 at 9:36am

    Yes, he is a good guy, no he’s NOT a Canadian and yes, you will still be an idiot.

  • March 15, 2015 at 11:50am

    I should also point out that this is anti-American/anti-2nd amendment NYC where they want NO ONE to even OWN a firearm much less carry it in ANY fashion.

  • [1] March 15, 2015 at 11:49am

    You make some great points but all I was really doing was responding to the stupid, politically correct BS comment within the article. I guess I should have pointed out, for the ignorant among us, that having their firearm in their purse was an awful idea. But then again, if they carry, they have the responsibility to already know this sorta thing.

    When it comes to the which is better, open or concealed carry debate, I frankly don’t care which way one chooses to carry so long AS THEY CARRY. Both have advantages and disadvantages but neither makes someone 100% safe. NO CARRY surely makes one LESS safe or downright puts one in danger.
    When it comes to the “imprinting” issue, I really don’t stress over whether my firearm “imprints.” While I prefer to carry concealed, or the way I see it, “covered”, I mainly do it to respect those who feel uneasy around a firearm….or to keep these anti-2A businesses from knowing I am exercising my 2A rights so they don’t act stupid and raise a fuss.

  • [2] March 13, 2015 at 3:38pm

    What else would one expect from a crappy place like NYC?
    Then there’s this part: “this is just not the message you want to send to young women to just go out and look cute with a gun in their purse. That looks crazy.”

    I think actually having the gun in the purse (with NO image ON the purse) not only is much more preferred but makes a woman look a heckuva lot cuter.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] March 9, 2015 at 9:41am

    Oh, and one other thing, how can she diss Bush while supporting those who, of the elected masses in attendance from D.C., ever had ANY connection whatsoever to the civil rights movement of that era? John Lewis is the only one I can think of that did and he’s LONG SINCE strayed from what he fought for back then. Hell, obama came over there in ’08 talked BS and claimed he was born as a product of this movement when his parents/guardians were either non-citizens from Africa & Indonesia, a black communist mentor or white communists and couldn’t care less about what was going on in the civil rights movement!

  • [-1] March 9, 2015 at 9:29am

    She has clearly been indoctrinated by the Democrat party. OK, so she won’t walk with GWB over the things she just mentioned but she will walk with obama in a heartbeat?
    You know, the Constitution-hating, America-hating, racist, LAWLESS one who is destroying the Constitution and the rule of law and thus this nation (would she fundamentally transform something SHE loved?). The one who is also doing MUCH more to violate EVERYONE’S civil rights than Bush ever even thought of.
    I could go on and on but won’t because it will bore the short/closed minded among us.

    And she won’t walk with Bush?!!?

    Lady, you may have done good work w/MLK on civil rights, and for that you get two thumbs up and praise, but you’re an ignorant joke in need of some serious REAL education on this other stuff.

  • [2] March 7, 2015 at 5:05am

    Just like the RNC/GOP establishment picks candidates for us and Beck bad-mouths them for it, as he should, he does EXACTLY the same thing here….just maybe by a slightly different method. STOP IT!

  • March 3, 2015 at 4:54pm

    From what is written in this article, these two, one day, will have some serious “splaining” to do.

    The ONLY righteous thing the pastor’s wife could be doing here is to witness to these people in an effort to convince them there are better options than an abortion….and to try to win them over to Christ. To somehow promote the idea that a woman somehow has the [phony] right to MURDER an unborn human is absolutely not biblical in ANY way and is just downright WRONG.

  • [4] March 3, 2015 at 4:29pm

    Yep, it IS a nice car but so what? Jesus doesn’t condemn wealth nor is He against having nice things. It’s when one begins to worship the wealth or let either it or the belongings somehow get in the way of witnessing to someone, i.e. doing His work in general, that it becomes a problem.

  • [3] March 3, 2015 at 10:03am

    Sure he’s covering for obama. He does care if obama lived or died because if obama died, what do you think would happen to their cause. The Idiotology (thanks lock_n_load) sure as hell wouldn’t die but it’s been on a real roll for 6 or so years. They must protect all that goes with it.

    P.S. I’ll leave the pure antisemitism of obama and many of the members of his cabinet for some other time.

  • [11] March 1, 2015 at 9:23pm

    I agree…sorta. We should not get bogged down in abortion and gay marriage etc. It also should be issues for the states to decide. As a matter of fact, most (in the high 30′s in number I think) all have and have decided only to be dragged thru hell by the gay and abortion fascist activists and then forced to or being forced to change by a tyrannical federal govt.
    At the same time, it has become a sad day in hell when someone can’t openly/publicly stand on conservative principles and their Christian faith, both of which are incompatible with pro-abortion and gay marriage issues, without being dragged thru hell by the same pro-abortion, LGBTQ crowd and/or the fascist left in general. The way it is now, the left/pro-abortion/pro-gay rights crowd gets to have their points of view…but not our side.

  • [5] February 21, 2015 at 2:35pm

    This just proves that the 31% and 43% are either complicit in this “fundamental transformation” or they’re just plain ignorant and stupid.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 16, 2015 at 4:23pm

    First, I know that no plane, at least that we know of, has crashed because of a drone strike but do NOT be stupid enough to think near misses haven’t occurred AND BEEN RECORDED AND REPORTED and the potential damage that could occur if the near miss became a collision.
    Second, NEVER be so stupid to think my desire to have rules to keep you from invading my privacy or endangering someone’s life with your drone to mean I’m for a nanny state. I will NEVER be one to give up freedom or liberty for a little false security. I can, if left alone and supported by govt and law enforcement, take care of myself.
    But when selfish buffoons like you show such an utter disrespect for those around you by insisting on flying these things into places where they are NOT welcome or near manned aircraft something needs to be done. What exactly that something is would surely be up for debate but something needs to be done nonetheless. I’d start with me not being liable for your crap if you lost it while flying over MY property. ADVICE: keep your junk in your airspace and we’ll never have issues.

  • February 16, 2015 at 3:33pm

    No, he lives in some sort of anarchist’s fantasy land.

  • [1] February 16, 2015 at 3:31pm

    True enough about a shotgun at a few thousand feet. But don’t ever underestimate someone who is a crack shot. They WILL find a way given the opportunity.

  • February 16, 2015 at 3:26pm

    I have no idea why my replay went to this comment. It belongs as a reply to East’s comment about filming football practice.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love