He damned sure did answer the question! But one must be able to comprehend English and the Constitution to realize it.
[-16] April 18, 2016 at 11:49am
Regardless of situation, unless you have the authority, as do the Secret Service and law enforcement, you DO NOT put your hands on people unless you either want to risk an ass whippin’ or the consequences of the law. He shoulda left Trump’s security to the Secret Service.
In the end, this wasn’t as big a deal as made out to be by Fields but a deal nonetheless that should have been handled according to the law…unless there’s no law against simple battery where they were.
This thug knew full well what he’d done wasn’t right (even if this realization came later). The fact that when called on it he began to twist and spin and lie, as did his mob boss, in an attempt to discredit her and to minimize the damage proves this. He shoulda taken the high road, swallowed his pride and apologized at the very beginning, even if he didn’t think he’d done wrong. this would’ve likely ended the entire issue. He chose the low road like a good little thug.
P.S. this isn’t the first shady situation for this guy…this sort of thing follows him.
P.S.S. And don’t give me the crap about her history of playing the victim. I see it and don’t care. To me, generally, each case is to be considered separately.
PRETTY OBVIOUS YOU HAVE NOW CLUE ABOUT LAW – I DO – Your comments are TOTAL BS regarding the whole incident…..I’d take his case Pro-Bono just on principals.
In fact, aside from the 2nd Amendment your close to LIABLE action in your comments.
Lyin' Fields was the only Thug in this Incident!
“This thug knew full well what he’d done wasn’t right (even if this realization came later).”
Anti-Trumpers are now mind readers? The prosecutor believed he could not prove the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, that’s why the prosecution was dropped. Why would any rational human being apologize for (confess to) a crime for which they were not being prosecuted? If Lewandowsky did apologize (at your insistence) then you would, probably, argue that he was stupid for confessing to a crime that wasn’t going to be prosecuted in the first place. If you haven’t figured it out yet, to apologize is to confess and he still has a civil prosecution coming up from the Fields bimbo.
So, if Lewandowski does not apologize (confess), the Anti-Trumpers will call him a liar. If Lewandowski does apologize (confess), thereby resurrecting the criminal prosecution and handing a civil judgement to Fields, The Anti-Trumpers will call him stupid. Sounds like a lose-lose scenario to me.
Using your logic, perhaps it would be the right thing if YOU apologized for (confessed to) being D.B. Cooper and/or kidnapping the Lindbergh baby. These are two very long standing cases which have never had any resolution. Perhaps you could bring closure to them. After all, it would be the right thing to do.
He had the authority to do what he did. End of story.
Lewd has a history of being a hot head and using profanity laced intimidation.. He was employed by the Koch backed Americans for Prosperity and was a New Hampshire state policeman before going to work for Trump. Lewd also boasts to his associates that he is line to be the White House chief of staff. He is making quite a name for himself and Trump for being the west end of a horse headed east and totally unacceptable/inappropriate behavior toward women. Another defamation suit is in his future.
[-12] April 18, 2016 at 11:34am
Anyone who condones such thuggish behavior wouldn’t be bothered by it.
April 15, 2016 at 10:54am
You’re right. Trump is no Romney. he’s worse.
But in any event, nba made a very valid point. Romney was pumped up to be Superman by these hacks and he turned out to be Minnie Mouse. They’re now pumping Trump up to be Superman too while other polls, etc show him to be exactly the same as Romney, A LOSER, while never reporting on Trump’s massive unfavorability numbers against Hillary. And may I add, they did the same crap with McCain. The only difference between the McCain and Romney for me was that I actually thought Romney had a decent chance regardless of what the Trump News Channel had to say.
No one will ever try to stop you from making your own determinations but at least try insert all the factors into the equation before you attempt to solve said equation….you know, for the sake of the republic.
 April 15, 2016 at 10:41am
It should. Then there’s Trump’s MASSIVE unfavorability numbers against Hillary. They’re higher than ANY OTHER GOP CANDIDATE IN HISTORY. People may not like Hillary but waaaaaaaay more than that don’t like Trump!
Trumps unfavoribility and Hillarys are almost the same, so it's a wash. Cruz's are almost as bad, and once the general public hears tapes of Cruz saying he would force a young girl that was raped and impregnated to have a baby, or that he wanted to outlaw dildos his negs will be over 70%
 April 15, 2016 at 10:39am
If this poll is accurate, which I seriously doubt, it’s nothing more than an indication that the Trump News Channel’s (formerly the Fox News Channel) anti-Cruz bias and pro-Trump propaganda is working. They should be proud and we should be madder than hell about what the Trump NC is doing! But then one would have to be able to see thru their BS and then accept it as BS to be mad about this. They’ve simply taken their place in the Praetorian Guard with the rest of the lib media…just with Trump rather than obama. It will worsen if Trump is elected.
lol! You Cruz Zombies know Cruz is done, such sore losers!
[-1] April 14, 2016 at 11:23am
Exactly! There are two categories of people here: those who actually know the Constitution and despise it (obama is a good example of this) and those who truly don’t have a damn clue what it says and means and don’t care….both being the path to the death of this republic
April 14, 2016 at 11:20am
….Cruz, Beck and Levin have put all there efforts NOT into stopping the Democrats and trying to get a their party elected but instead stopping Trump by attacking and dividing there own party and voters. They do not care about saving the country, stopping the democrats and reversing all the damage that has been done over the past 7+ years.
****JUST this part of your comment means that you likely don’t actually listen to what they say or see what they do and most importantly, it means you’re a total frickin idiot********
April 14, 2016 at 11:15am
So what you’re saying is, 1. you don’t have ANY principles because you couldn’t care less who the GOP nominee is 2. because you call this no-constitutionalism, you likely have no idea what federalism is or means and likely little understanding of the Constitution 3. because you probably never truly participated in your precinct or county caucus with full knowledge of how they work and because you disagree with the results, it means that surely some sleazy politician is subverting the will of the people.
And finally, two things, (1) if you have knowledge of wrongdoing, present the evidence PROVE IT and (2) you were supporting Cruz until the media and Chump TOLD YOU he was a liar and an overall bad guy. All you’ve from one end of this to the other is bought into the propaganda from Chump and the media hook, line and sinker without doing ANY real research into these things.
Just know, Trump LOST in CO because he had this wild ass idea that he didn’t have to play the game and Cruz didn’t STEAL anything. But, if you still truly think the game is rigged in CO, LEAVE.
 April 14, 2016 at 10:42am
Putin’s a thug, our commander in chief is a puss, our military strength is far too low….and this is the result. End of story. IMO, the U.S. did the right thing here….nothing.
I do wonder tho what they would have done had a couple of FA-18s had shown up to play too
 April 12, 2016 at 4:36am
Surely these two are smart enough to know the this much immigration and a welfare state are NOT compatible. Or maybe not.
Milton Friedman said free immigration and a welfare state aren’t compatible but at this point, I say THIS MUCH immigration. Eisenhower also did what he did to make sure vets had access to a job after the war. How does allowing as many guest workers as possible, back then or today, even remotely accomplish that?
 April 11, 2016 at 10:13am
Whether this circus clown and his gang agree with the system or not, it is the system used to nominate the GOP candidate. Whether he, his gang or anyone else agrees with what CO did concerning their delegates or not, it’s what’s called FED-ER-A-LISM. This brings me to the more important point. If The Donald doesn’t approve of how CO did this, he apparently doesn’t approve of this concept we call FED-ER-A-LISM which is most if not all of the Constitution. AND if he thinks popular vote should determine the nominee, it clearly means he prefers true democracy over constitutional republicanism. We do NOT need another dictator/king!
All summed up: Donald Trump is a damn fool and anyone who supports him is or on the way to being one too.
And BTW, Trump supporters, I’ll let you know UP FRONT, you can put your feelings back in your pocket, I’m not interested in seeing them. I don’t pick or reject a candidate based on emotion so, to me, your feelings are irrelevant here. I pick mine on how likely they are to follow the Constitution.
You are correct it is all about the Constitution. As a Coloradan it really doesn't make a difference to me if Cruz gets all of the votes or Trump or Ksiech(sorry about the spelling) did...it was the fact that we the people of Colorado voted, last month (March), in our state caucus, the voting totals were never released, and they are never going to be released. In my local caucus site Cruz didn't win (not even close), and the talk in our state and local papers is that that wasn't the only caucus site that did. This past weekend our non-public voting primary was held...and wamo it was unanimous all the votes for one person.
If this happened in your state You might be as upset as most people in Colorado are. The will of the voting people in Colorado were subverted...that isn't called Federalism.
This non-constitutionalism has been going on for way too long, and the politicians have been telling us for years that they will change it.....It still continues to this day!
A politician is a politician, and a Washington D.C. politician is a Washington D.C. politician and they have proven to us for the past 40 years that they never change.
At the start I supported Cruz but over time My mind has changed...no politician should be aloud to continue this proposition of subverting the will of the voting public.
Come november there should be two levers
2- anybody but Hillary
April 10, 2016 at 3:15pm
With just a few names like Bill DiBlasio, Michael Bloomberg, Al Sharpton and Charlie Rangle on the list of those representing much of the state of NY and NYC, just what else does one need to be able to understand where the term “NY values” comes from?!
Sadly, the good guys in NY/NYC either can’t or refuse to break free of these values.
 April 10, 2016 at 3:10pm
The definition of conservative, or as many call it, constitutional conservative is clear and has been explained COUNTLESS times….maybe you should try learning a little about it.
 April 10, 2016 at 3:08pm
So he visits the 9/11 Memorial Museum, so what? Good for him. Chump still shouldn’t be president.
Frankly, I’ve never questioned his patriotism or love for his country (although I have been told that I probably should). I question his total lack of principle, political actions in the past and for how he says he wants to govern this country, etc.
In this case, he’s simply politicizing 9/11 for his political benefit…again… for which he should be ashamed.
I’ll even go so far as to say bluntly that smart people will see right thru this and not allow it to play ANY role in whether they vote for him or not.
 April 9, 2016 at 7:09pm
If they make it mandatory, I’ll vote if I want or just become a criminal
[-1] April 9, 2016 at 4:50am
Who let so many Trumpsters in?
[-1] April 8, 2016 at 10:04am
texoldguy, lemme just say that NO ONE should be for open borders and EVERYONE should be for free trade…..with a FEW rules to keep each side honest of course.
 April 8, 2016 at 9:58am
Yeah, I want Kasich nowhere near the WH…or D.C. for that matter.
 April 8, 2016 at 9:56am
What’s funny to me is that now that Hannity has become just as much a Trumpbot as O’reilly, maybe bigger, he can’t figure out why the Cruz clan have no interest in being on his show any longer. But then I’d really like to know just how hard Hannity actually tried to get Cruz to come on.