User Profile: Former11BRAVO

Former11BRAVO

Member Since: August 04, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] July 27, 2014 at 7:49am

    The NYT’s may be advocating legal MJ for reasons they share with lefties (using it as an intoxicant and the enormous tax-revenue to be collected from its sale).

    However, there are more than enough legitimate, valuable, highly-productive/beneficial reasons for legalizing this remarkably useful and versatile plant. Sadly, the potential uses are so numerous there’s insufficient room here, in this forum, to even begin to list (let alone, explain) them. Nonetheless, they exist and it takes little more than a cursory internet search to find countless sources of valid information regarding industrial hemp use(s).

    End prohibition? Yes. But, let’s end the ignorance too – and take advantage of a golden opportunity to revolutionize US industry and, thereby, revitalize our economy. If we don’t someone else will. Of that you can be sure!

  • [6] June 6, 2014 at 7:33pm

    Personally, I think it’s beautiful.

    But, of course, I still look at Old Glory and see her for what she was – not the corrupt, welfare state she’s come to represent today.

  • [-2] June 4, 2014 at 10:39am

    The ONLY way there would have been a First Amendment violation (regarding this principle’s speech) would have been if he’d been prevented from giving it!

    I swear, the lies never end!

  • [1] May 21, 2014 at 6:18am

    The list is bogus.

    Rob Halford (of Judas Priest) has an unbelievable range and makes Axle Rose look like a chump. And where’s Sebastian Bach?

  • May 17, 2014 at 8:06am

    I think I’d have to go with the biker dude.

    He sounds like he’s actually done something worthwhile and, unlike any-other politician I’ve ever heard of, tells it like it is. That dooms him, of course. But, it sure would be refreshing to know there’s a straight-shooter running the show . . . somewhere. :-/

  • [-1] May 14, 2014 at 6:43pm

    I’ll tell you straight, Glenn. As aggravating as your newfound pacifism has become, it pales next to your (and the majority of your members’) views on religion/matters of Faith. Yeah, I heard you deriding those of us who believe in the evolution of humanity, yesterday – and I’ve really just about had enough. Please, do yourself – and your loyal, long-time listeners – a favor and stick to American history and exposing the extreme danger represented by progressivism!

    Seriously, pal. You’re becoming quite the bore and apparently believe you’ve Blaze subscribers to spare.

    Trust me: you don’t.

  • May 1, 2014 at 7:10am

    It’s finally becoming accepted scientifically that a diet high in grains is detrimental to overall health. All the grains (and other high-carb foods) we consume are why we’re weaker, have more inflammation, auto-immune disorders and much, much smaller jaws than our forebears (we shouldn’t need to have our wisdom teeth removed – much less, other permanent teeth!). Evidence shows autism, Asperberger’s Syndrome and even Altzeimer’s may very well be related to the crap we put in our mouths too.

    Everyone – and I do mean everyone – should check out the Paleo-Diet (aka: the caveman diet) to learn about proper human nutrition and a healthy lifestyle. It’s hardly PC (as it’s high in animal protein), but it’s based on how we lived and evolved and, therefore, lacks all the high-carb poison in the common, modern, western diet. Humans are primarily carnivores and until we go back to eating like our ancestors did, thousands of years ago, we’ll continue to degrade physically AND mentally.

  • April 30, 2014 at 5:57pm

    Hey Blaze!

    Your stock photo shows .22 caliber ammo. The US military doesn’t use .22′s! No armed forces do!

    Not only that, the rounds in the pic are bare lead! ALL military ammo is copper/copper-alloy-jacketed!

    D’uh!

  • April 28, 2014 at 6:02pm

    Care to expand on that?

    Are you referring to the cameras//mics supposedly installed in flat-screens? Or, something else? Cuz those transmit over the power lines, not wireless, a I recall – although I might be FOS (mistaken)! :-O

  • April 20, 2014 at 10:47am

    @SoSorryFor You:

    That crap was federal blackmail – forcibly put in place (under threat) when Nevada solicited to become a state. It is, on its face – to anyone with even half a brain – utterly absurd that a state constitution would, so blatantly, abdicate its own authority to the federal government and consent to tyranny, under any/all circumstances!

  • April 17, 2014 at 6:53pm

    Why is it almost never mentioned that TWO SCOTUS cases have determined that police are under NO OBLIGATION to protect ANYONE during an “emergency”? They have a mandate ONLY to protect “the public at large” – not individuals under imminent threat by other individuals!!!!

    If cops show up in time and save you . . . great! Give ‘em a medal and buy ‘em a beer! But, understand they are NOT REQUIRED to do so. Only then will you understand the absolute importance of self-reliance and the critical, personal necessity of our 2A Rights (regarding self-defense).

  • April 16, 2014 at 10:26am

    Confederates AND Lincoln!

    I’d sure like to know what’s REALLY going on here, too. Could he really be a faux patriot – more concerned with fortune than sacred honor?

  • April 16, 2014 at 10:22am

    I wholeheartedly agree.

    However, as of this moment, we haven’t had a Lexington/Concorde-type event (thank Heaven!). Should the BLM/federal law enforcement return to the Bundy’s and become violent (over a civil judgement – wholly unacceptable!), that may be the moment: the modern “shot heard ’round the world”.

    Until then (or something similar), we must remain vigilant and hold fast. He who fires first, loses IMHO.

  • April 16, 2014 at 10:14am

    That’s from the Declaration, bro – not the constitution.

    Just sayin’. ;-)

  • April 16, 2014 at 10:12am

    Yeah . . . I’ll listen to a guy who can’t even spell martial.

    May your chains rest lightly upon you, my friend.

  • April 16, 2014 at 7:14am

    I too wonder what is going on in Glenn’s head, sometimes. He spoke so righteously (and correctly) about the Declaration and, in fact, the OBLIGATION of free men to resist tyranny, yet now, he’s back-peddling at full steam.

    HOWEVER, those inciting violence and aggression know not what they seek and have obviously never seen the ravages of war. To actually wish for such a thing in the US is utter madness. The time may arrive when such a thing becomes absolutely necessary. That’s true and I truly fear it will one day become wholly unavoidable. But, we’re not there yet – not by a long shot – and those calling for revolution should be shunned and avoided.

    By the way, Glenn, where does the constitution authorize the federal government to “own” land (let alone, the vast swaths of valuable real estate in the western states)? Short answer: it doesn’t – military facilities, government offices and border posts notwithstanding.

  • April 16, 2014 at 7:00am

    Yup. Funny how these “study results” suddenly are hitting the news, isn’t it?

    It’s all bull****.

    That said, I do think pot use among kids can indeed effect the way they think and interfere with their ability to absorb/hold knowledge. However, that can be said of many other, far more damaging substances – not the least of which are drugs prescribed for everything from depression to ADD.

    As with most things, education and moderation are the keys to a happy, healthy life.

  • April 16, 2014 at 6:53am

    Too bad my wife has to leave her teenie-weenie keychain pepper-spray at home because it’s considered an “illegal, offensive weapon” in DC.

    And my everyday-carry pocketknife is banned, too!

    I swore I’d never step foot in DC again after we were refused admittance to the Air & Space Museum for those very items (when we attended another pro-2A rally there a few years ago) and “threatened with arrest” by the idiot security guard! The regular DC cop who was present was sympathetic, though (thank God!), but I’ve still got the bitter taste in my mouth.

  • April 15, 2014 at 6:25am

    The way he said it made it seem as though the armed men were going to “round up & herd” the women to the front as human shields/cannon fodder.

    Pretty stupid.

    Now, if moving the women up front was a strategy the women were on-board with, that’s different. But, this fool should’ve said THAT – not come across like women are only useful as martyrs.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 14, 2014 at 8:34am

    While this rancher might not actually be the innocent golden-boy, stand-up-for-your-rights-against-a-totalitarian-government, folk-hero many (righteously) wish to rally ’round, the good news is there are indeed freedom-loving, patriotic citizens who’ve woken up and are willing to “pledge their lives, fortunes and sacred honor” in mutual defense against an overly-aggressive, unelected government bureaucracy and it’s hostile, armed agents.

    And sure. In the face of a rather large armed/ready resistance, the government backed down – for now – this time. But, as BLM says, “This is not over”.

    The reality is the government can easily out-last Bundy’s supporters – nabbing him when it suits them. It will be interesting to see what happens then.

123 To page: Go