User Profile: Former11BRAVO

Member Since: August 04, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • August 28, 2016 at 11:38am

    Stop confusing the Libertarian Party screed with libertarianism.

    Two completely different animals.

  • August 25, 2016 at 8:47pm

    One of the most direct and to-the-point posts I’ve read all week – anywhere!

    Thank you. Sir! I agree wholeheartedly!

    Well said!

  • [4] August 18, 2016 at 8:37am

    Whether Clinton was under oath (or not) is irrelevant. She was being interviewed by federal investigators and it would be a felony to lie or withhold information.

    And as we all know, she did exactly that. Martha Stewart was locked up for far less, IMHO.

  • [31] August 18, 2016 at 8:29am

    I used to be an ardent follower of Beck’s, but I’ve come to the regrettable conclusion that he’s either suffering mental health issues, or he’s been corrupted himself (by someone).

    Glenn, seriously . . . Hillary is (by far) the greater threat to liberty and our Constitutional Republic. I’m not a fan of Trump’s, but we’ve GOT to stop the Clinton machine – and the nation could sure use your help!

    Responses (1) +
  • [13] August 14, 2016 at 8:28pm

    Yet, he gets the same vote as you/me.

    What’s wrong with this picture?

  • [-1] June 22, 2016 at 8:24pm

    Despite the prudence of covering one’s camera/mic, it looks to me like he’s using an Apple MacBook Pro.

    If so, two things come to mind:

    1st, the camera on those has a light which cannot be circumvented by a hacker and which illuminate when the camera is in use, no matter what. (Yeah. I have one. I know.)

    2nd, if it is indeed a MacBook Pro, the mic is outside the camera’s view – tucked behind Zuckerberg’s right arm/elbow.

    Just saying. ;-)

    *Sadly, if I’m right (and I’m pretty sure I am), this is another ridiculously amateurish article – written on what used-to-be one of my favorite “news” sites. I sometimes wonder why I even bother anymore . . . :-(

  • [3] November 3, 2015 at 7:11am

    It’s my understanding there was another “lost” amendment against “titles of nobility”.

    As I recall, it was the original 14th amendment and it was intended to prevent foreign influence (particularly of the British Crown and Bank of England) and dual allegiances and applied mostly to those practicing law. It was passed just before the US Civil War and copies of the Constitution/BOR’s from that era include it – yet, it magically disappears from post Civil War copies.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 26, 2015 at 6:54pm

    Exactly. Were it to zip radically and rapidly from one location to another, well…. That’d be different.

    But, hovering static in the air? Uh-uh. Not buying it!

  • [4] February 26, 2015 at 6:23pm

    The fact is, if .gov can get away with this crap, it can ban ANY .223/5.56 ammo because it will ALL pass through a level I vest if fired from a pistol – at least, I’d sure think it would.

    Heck! A lowly .22 fired from a carbine will zip through a level I vest like it’s not even there! There can be no doubt this is a move to disarm law-abiding citizens. M855 is cheap – AND relatively inaccurate, too. But it’s inexpensive and abundant – and therein lies the “problem”. As for the effectiveness of M855 on flesh, it’s not even in the same league as JHP ammo, nor does it perform as well as FMJ. That’s why this must be stopped – IMMEDIATELY. If they get away with this, we’re screwed.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 5, 2014 at 6:19am

    Like so many others, this article is so poorly written that it’s neigh onto impossible to determine which “side” of the global warming argument this “Nobel Prize winning doctor” is on!

    The headline assets one thing – the article, the opposite. WTH, Blaze? :-(

  • [1] August 26, 2014 at 8:01pm

    I checked out the link, but . . . no cedar?

    I loved pulling stuff out of my grandmother’s old cedar trunk. The smell was terrific and it seemed impervious to bugs and mildew (and the like) too – although, it has been a long time, so I may be wrong about that last part! I DO know there was a reason beyond the smell that cedar was so popular, though.

    Nonetheless, the trunks look awesome! Good for you! Best of luck in your new endeavor!

  • [1] August 8, 2014 at 9:52am

    Where does the Blaze gets the people it calls “writers”? That’s what I’d like to know!

    It’s even more baffling than the (apparent) fact that used cig filters can be singed into superconductors!

    Grammatically, this story (like so many others) is practically incoherent. The Blaze editor(s) and staff should be shamed of themselves.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] July 27, 2014 at 7:49am

    The NYT’s may be advocating legal MJ for reasons they share with lefties (using it as an intoxicant and the enormous tax-revenue to be collected from its sale).

    However, there are more than enough legitimate, valuable, highly-productive/beneficial reasons for legalizing this remarkably useful and versatile plant. Sadly, the potential uses are so numerous there’s insufficient room here, in this forum, to even begin to list (let alone, explain) them. Nonetheless, they exist and it takes little more than a cursory internet search to find countless sources of valid information regarding industrial hemp use(s).

    End prohibition? Yes. But, let’s end the ignorance too – and take advantage of a golden opportunity to revolutionize US industry and, thereby, revitalize our economy. If we don’t someone else will. Of that you can be sure!

  • [6] June 6, 2014 at 7:33pm

    Personally, I think it’s beautiful.

    But, of course, I still look at Old Glory and see her for what she was – not the corrupt, welfare state she’s come to represent today.

  • [-2] June 4, 2014 at 10:39am

    The ONLY way there would have been a First Amendment violation (regarding this principle’s speech) would have been if he’d been prevented from giving it!

    I swear, the lies never end!

  • [3] May 21, 2014 at 6:18am

    The list is bogus.

    Rob Halford (of Judas Priest) has an unbelievable range and makes Axle Rose look like a chump. And where’s Sebastian Bach?

  • May 17, 2014 at 8:06am

    I think I’d have to go with the biker dude.

    He sounds like he’s actually done something worthwhile and, unlike any-other politician I’ve ever heard of, tells it like it is. That dooms him, of course. But, it sure would be refreshing to know there’s a straight-shooter running the show . . . somewhere. :-/

  • [-1] May 14, 2014 at 6:43pm

    I’ll tell you straight, Glenn. As aggravating as your newfound pacifism has become, it pales next to your (and the majority of your members’) views on religion/matters of Faith. Yeah, I heard you deriding those of us who believe in the evolution of humanity, yesterday – and I’ve really just about had enough. Please, do yourself – and your loyal, long-time listeners – a favor and stick to American history and exposing the extreme danger represented by progressivism!

    Seriously, pal. You’re becoming quite the bore and apparently believe you’ve Blaze subscribers to spare.

    Trust me: you don’t.

  • May 1, 2014 at 7:10am

    It’s finally becoming accepted scientifically that a diet high in grains is detrimental to overall health. All the grains (and other high-carb foods) we consume are why we’re weaker, have more inflammation, auto-immune disorders and much, much smaller jaws than our forebears (we shouldn’t need to have our wisdom teeth removed – much less, other permanent teeth!). Evidence shows autism, Asperberger’s Syndrome and even Altzeimer’s may very well be related to the crap we put in our mouths too.

    Everyone – and I do mean everyone – should check out the Paleo-Diet (aka: the caveman diet) to learn about proper human nutrition and a healthy lifestyle. It’s hardly PC (as it’s high in animal protein), but it’s based on how we lived and evolved and, therefore, lacks all the high-carb poison in the common, modern, western diet. Humans are primarily carnivores and until we go back to eating like our ancestors did, thousands of years ago, we’ll continue to degrade physically AND mentally.

  • April 30, 2014 at 5:57pm

    Hey Blaze!

    Your stock photo shows .22 caliber ammo. The US military doesn’t use .22′s! No armed forces do!

    Not only that, the rounds in the pic are bare lead! ALL military ammo is copper/copper-alloy-jacketed!


123 To page: Go