User Profile: formidable_foe

formidable_foe

Member Since: January 13, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • July 3, 2015 at 11:10am

    Here’s hoping this kid doesn’t grow up to be an progressive lib who wants to take fireworks away from all the rest of us because of how “dangerous” they are.

  • July 3, 2015 at 11:06am

    makingout,

    Nope. They say “M-80″ on them, but they’re not the same.

  • [53] July 3, 2015 at 10:58am

    Let’s hope his path to change begins with this moment of humility. Glazer’s demeanor and words were excellent.

  • [1] July 2, 2015 at 3:52pm

    We have not lost our borders, language, and culture, but they are certainly at risk due in large part to the influx of illegal immigrants.

  • [18] July 1, 2015 at 9:52pm

    The progressives never consider themselves changing. I will expand on Monk’s characterization and say they frequently act like “insanely spoiled” CHILDREN. If a person’s values don’t support their agenda, it is THEY who should always relinquish and sacrifice… never the progressive. I believe an underlying narcissism in these people is also often at hand. Those who disagree with them are never viewed as equals… a dangerous premise that unfortunately, may one day cause America to literally become a battleground once again.

  • [6] July 1, 2015 at 10:36am

    I had to quit using Internet Explorer because it constantly crashed when on The Blaze. It was sooooooo frustrating.

  • [1] June 30, 2015 at 4:56pm

    Maybe RuPaul.

  • [1] June 29, 2015 at 4:15pm

    Rocttz77,

    You are talking in circles, along with making connections in my commentary that are not there. First of all, those who truly understood the bible adequately don’t become ex-believers. Secondly, I happen to believe true morality encompasses the God-given rules for man and his behavior in the world. While I’m not Catholic, here is an interesting discussion:

    http://www.catholiceducation.org/en/culture/catholic-contributions/true-morality-is-based-on-objective-principles.html

    Thirdly, heterosexual marriage is the measuring stick here. Heterosexual marriage poses no risk to a productive society! It is the distortions of this institution that would pose any risk. And you speak of interracial marriage as if it is universally accepted today without controversy… even so, interracial marriages are between a man and a woman…. unless, of course, you add a disclaimer.

    And yes, heterosexual couples, even those not planning to have children, pursue marriage, in part, for individual happiness. However, for those who are Christian, it is a holy sacrament… a commitment before man AND God. A humanist / hedonist is not concerned with matters of spiritual relevance… all acts leading to individual happiness are warranted “as long as you’re not hurting anyone.” Isn’t that how the saying goes?

  • June 29, 2015 at 3:32pm

    Ah, yes. I believe it was Africa, though.

  • June 29, 2015 at 3:19pm

    One strategy I used was telling them eating spinach helps keep them from getting hair on their back. This worked amazingly well, actually.

    Responses (3) +
  • [6] June 27, 2015 at 12:47am

    @Understandbothsides,
    Ms. Cupp’s comments may be clear, genuine, and unrehearsed, but it is a warped notion to believe the SCOTUS ruling is something to applaud and celebrate. She and others’ focus is not, and has not been, on the potential negative outcomes this “moment in history” poses for our society and way of life. Her thoughts come not from a sense of true morality, but from humanistic ideology. Individual happiness is first and foremost, and any and all paths to it are not open to criticism.

    Also, I must say that given your take on the Book of Life, it appears to me it is not one of the sides you understand. It seems that both of your sides are the gays and the atheists.

  • June 27, 2015 at 12:16am

    It’s hard for me to believe they were still in the U.S.

  • [1] June 26, 2015 at 9:10pm

    …and fish.

  • [2] June 26, 2015 at 9:10pm

    You are correct, sir. Nice, but expensive.

    Responses (1) +
  • [9] June 26, 2015 at 9:06pm

    Don’t forget whooping cough, which until now hasn’t been an issue for decades.

    Responses (1) +
  • [15] June 26, 2015 at 3:15pm

    These people didn’t sleep tight, and let them bite. A shame, really.

  • [15] June 26, 2015 at 3:03pm

    Tuna,

    While she certainly doesn’t have a religious perspective to shape her views, atheists aren’t exactly incapable of common sense or an awareness of how gay marriage could be counter-productive to the stable family structure, …which, by the way, is the absolute core of any productive, lasting society.

  • [278] June 26, 2015 at 12:45pm

    “And that’s (gay marriage) a good thing for American family values, that’s a good thing for children, that’s a good thing for adoption, that’s a good thing for economic stability.”

    This quote indicates S.E. Cupp is either delusional or has some serious cognitive distortions. Furthermore, she tells us she believes America should “applaud” gay marriage, i.e., that tolerance and acceptance simply aren’t good enough. Too bad she’s given such a forum to broadcast her wackadoodle ideas.

    Responses (8) +
  • [6] June 25, 2015 at 7:03pm

    What does her mother know about a “healthy family life?”

  • [1] June 24, 2015 at 4:13pm

    Even if public prayer was outlawed and the faithful were perfectly fine with praying on their own time and in their own place… there would STILL be one like you somewhere who would complain that they overheard them, and allege that their life has therefore been ruined as a result. Weeeaaaaaaaaahhhhh!!! Grab a pacifier, babies.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love