TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying Freedom.Fighter's 10 most recent comments.

• Pope Francis’ Sermon Sparks Debate: ‘Even the Atheists’ Have Been Redeemed ‘With the Blood of Christ’

  May 23, 2013 at 1:39pm

  In reply to HaleStorm87.

  Before writing such a long comment, you may want to read the article in its entirety. The last few paragraphs explain that the pope is not referring to their eternal salvation.

• Pope Francis’ Sermon Sparks Debate: ‘Even the Atheists’ Have Been Redeemed ‘With the Blood of Christ’

  May 23, 2013 at 1:36pm

  In reply to wrestlingwithpigs.

  Read the entire article. The last four paragraphs explain what you are talking about. Especially, the part about what he said not being applicable to the afterlife.

• Pope Francis’ Sermon Sparks Debate: ‘Even the Atheists’ Have Been Redeemed ‘With the Blood of Christ’

  May 23, 2013 at 1:34pm

  In reply to battles.

  Read the whole article. The last four paragraphs especially.

• ‘We’re Not Going to Tolerate It’: Colo. Sheriffs Unite to Block ‘Unenforceable’ Gun Control Legislation

  May 23, 2013 at 1:08pm

  In reply to critterbait.

  @ SENDTHEMETEORS

  Actually, being a Colorado resident actively engaged with this issue I can tell you that by no means did Colorado ask for this. The representatives and the governor completely ignored the testimonies presented to them. At least 90% of the testimonies given were against passing these restrictions. Gov. Hickenlooper and the reps have been receiving an enormous amount of money from the white house and Bloomberg to try to assure them that they will stay in power.

  Here’s to hoping they are dead wrong.

• Pope Francis’ Sermon Sparks Debate: ‘Even the Atheists’ Have Been Redeemed ‘With the Blood of Christ’

  May 23, 2013 at 1:05pm

  In reply to Jael2.

  You need to read the WHOLE article before commenting. The last four paragraphs counter what you said.

• Pope Francis’ Sermon Sparks Debate: ‘Even the Atheists’ Have Been Redeemed ‘With the Blood of Christ’

  May 23, 2013 at 1:00pm

  I can see that most of the people commenting do not read the whole article before doing so. You probably only read the headline. You should especially read the last four paragraphs.

• Can the Government Ban ‘Assault Weapons’? Constitutional Experts Weigh In

  April 30, 2013 at 11:57am

  In reply to Proverbs17-12NLT.

  @ ENCINOM Your arguments are old now. You fail to understand that we do not have to justify our rights. The government has to justify its infringements. I have no need or right to a supercharged Mustang. It is fast and dangerous, but you aren’t taking it away. You don’t tasting food. It can make you fat. We should ration food for you instead. Maybe some MREs.

  You don;t get to decide what is the best option for protecting my family. I do.

  By the way. You need to educate yourself. You obviously don’t know what an assault rifle is. An AR-15 is not one. AR does not stand for Assault Rifle. Also, it was specifically designed for civilians. It is the opposite of a military-style weapon. Lastly, it is less powerful than most handguns, so you are less likely to kill anyone with it or shoot through walls.

• Can the Government Ban ‘Assault Weapons’? Constitutional Experts Weigh In

  April 30, 2013 at 11:51am

  In reply to caveman1o1.

  @ ENCINOM A $10 per bullet tax would create a great opportunity for people to make a lot of money in the black market. Which actually might be better since there is less paperwork. Thanks for the idea! : )

• Libertarian Party Accepts Bitcoin Donations (And Guess Who Owns Millions of Dollars Worth of the Digital Currency)

  April 14, 2013 at 4:06pm

  In reply to media-bias-steals-elections.

  You need to research BitCoins more. Even using the term “regulated” with federal currency is a bit oxymoronic don’t you think?

  Personally, I think those who rush to criticize BitCoins might be those who work for those who want to ensure that the federal currency has no competition.

• Texas Congressman’s New Bumper Sticker Is Going to Infuriate the Left

  April 13, 2013 at 11:39pm

  In reply to Kiba.

  @ RANDOMOUSITY and SEND:

  What a load of crap. Your morals are FUBAR. If something is legal, does that mean it is right?

  If your answer is yes, that is very dangerous. It means you actually have no morals, but rely on others to tell you what is right and wrong. I am a libertarian and I am very Pro Choice meaning the the man and woman already made the choice to have sex and taking the risk to have a choice. After that, the choice was made. Cause & effect.

  I don’t know about you RANDOMOUSITY, but I joined the military to defend the defenseless.