User Profile: FreeUsAll


Member Since: December 27, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [6] April 8, 2015 at 1:41pm

    I agree. You could go a step further and add Oakley’s and a buzz cut on a balding head and complete the “I like to yell at my wife in public” ensemble. We’ve all seen that guy, though no word on whether he’d actually run the country any better/worse than Obama.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] March 4, 2015 at 8:52am

    Both hi and Jeninfl, you may want to read The Third Archon’s post from above – posted on March 3, 2015 at 3:10 pm. He basically explains why you can’t necessarily rely on “feelings” as any sort of factual evidence of anything.

    “Rather it is based solely on fallacious appeals to emotion, tradition, and popularity. Easy to understand, impossible to justify; and no mystery to me, for I was brought up in precisely that culture.”

  • March 4, 2015 at 8:47am

    Off topic, but it’s rather depressing when one has to place “TL;DR” after a paragraph only three sentences in length, but I suppose the cultural creep of idiocy had to set in sometime.

  • February 27, 2015 at 9:40pm

    He is not a libertarian. He is an *******. (Those are not necessarily mutually exclusive, however.)

  • [6] February 26, 2015 at 10:20am

    You may want to re-read the article, as your response isn’t really addressing the report, (at least directly.) I thought the article mentioned that the one who had the apple thrown at them was challenging the school’s stance on siding with traditional marriage, as well as their staunch efforts to silence any dissenting views on the matter. The “apple throw” could have served as an example of intolerance on the side of the traditionalists.

    Responses (5) +
  • [1] February 16, 2015 at 7:52pm

    What is Beck saying? That it will be the West v. ISIS/ISIL? I disagree with that assessment to an extent. Yes, the Middle East will be Balkanized, but I think the real issues will be between the major players, not ISIS.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] February 5, 2015 at 12:42pm

    What is wrong with skepticism? (That question wasn’t rhetoric.)

  • [4] February 5, 2015 at 12:33pm

    Idk about miracles, but here is a possible explanation of what could have happened:

    ‘”There are many examples in the scientific literature of humans who appear frozen to death. They have no heartbeat and are clinically dead. But they can be reanimated,” Roth said. “Similarly, the organisms in my lab can be put into a state of reversible suspended animation through oxygen deprivation and other means. They appear dead but are not.”

    Documented cases of humans successfully revived after spending hours or days without a pulse in extremely cold conditions first inspired Roth to study the relationship between human hypothermia and his own research in forced hibernation.

    In the winter of 2001, the body temperature of Canadian toddler Erica Norby plunged to 61 degrees Fahrenheit (16 degrees Celsius) as she lay for hours in below-freezing weather after wandering outside wearing only a diaper. Apparently dead, she recovered completely after being re-warmed and resuscitated.

    The same curious fate befell Japanese mountain climber Mitsutaka Uchikoshi in 2006, who was discovered with a core body temperature of 71 degrees F (22 degrees C) after 23 days after falling asleep on a snowy mountain.’


    Responses (3) +
  • [6] January 27, 2015 at 3:38pm

    The phrase “will be” isn’t correct. They are easy to enslave is more accurate. Think about how many still believe in the right/left paradigm…

  • [20] January 26, 2015 at 9:09pm

    Sounds like this man has been conversing with the likes of Farrakhan, Sharpton, and the various other social “justice” warriors.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] January 26, 2015 at 1:43pm

    Hello! Prospective law student, here. Would you happen to have anything more specific regarding the types of businesses and/or positions seeking lawyers? Thanks in advance!

    Responses (1) +
  • January 24, 2015 at 9:36pm

    I do agree, yet I want to know if Christians think Moore’s claim holds water. Should be interesting…

  • January 24, 2015 at 9:32pm

    Claiming such an extreme, such as “evil,” and leaving little room for them to be anything else is what Moore did when he called Kyle a coward, so it looks like we have a problem.

  • [1] January 24, 2015 at 9:28pm

    There’s one – chalk it up to another reason I’d never consider myself a Christian. I’m not trolling, as I really want to know if someone can refute his claims.

  • January 24, 2015 at 9:04pm

    Ok, ok. I get it – it seems that very few, if any, of you like Michael Moore. Aside from ad hominem attacks and red herrings, can anyone honestly refute his claim? Strictly from the teachings of Jesus, can anyone counter it? I am no Christian, I have plenty of reasons to dislike Michael Moore, but I have read the N.T. and I honestly think he’s right about this from a Christian perspective. Now, if I were Jewish, then I could understand the justification of war, being as the Jews only hold to the O.T., not the N.T. That being said, since Jesus represented the new covenant, wiping the slate clean and establishing a new way for mankind, anyone who claims to be a follower of Jesus must concede to his teachings. I really don’t care what anyone believes, (so long as they don’t hurt or force it on me) but I do wish there were more consistency. Bring on the down votes…

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] January 24, 2015 at 8:43am

    Rest easy, Ernie. Now, if the Cubs could pull off a World Series Championship in your honor…

  • [-2] January 18, 2015 at 4:30pm

    ‘“Why is God allowing something like this to happen, even to innocent children?” Palomar said through tears. “And why are there so few who are helping us?”’

    Therein lies the answer. Even if God exists, according to Christianity, he made a covenant 2000 years ago and that was the last time he chose to interact. If anyone is to see “God,” then it’s been left to man to carry out. In short, we’re alone.

    ‘And he added: “There are some realities that you can only see through eyes that have been cleansed by tears.”’

    ‘A mass of tears have transformed to stones now, sharpened on suffering and woven into slings. – Ashes in the Fall, Rage Against the Machine

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] January 14, 2015 at 9:04am

    I think you meant condescension. I don’t think there was any guise or veneer to this article. I believe he was fairly straightforward. Whether or not you agree with it is another story and you’re entitled to your opinion, but don’t misconstrue it to seem as though it’s something it really isn’t.

    In reply to XGP15A226's comment on the contribution My Marriage Wasn't Meant to Be

  • [1] January 14, 2015 at 8:56am

    The purpose is fairly clear to people like myself. Still searching.

    In reply to Chfnelson's comment on the contribution My Marriage Wasn't Meant to Be

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] January 13, 2015 at 12:52pm

    Article duly noted. Thanks, Matt.

    In reply to the contribution My Marriage Wasn't Meant to Be

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love