User Profile: FreeUsAll


Member Since: December 27, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [1] July 27, 2014 at 10:05pm

    Shoot someone for their opinion? The right and left… one and the same, I suppose.

  • July 25, 2014 at 8:31pm

    Lol! What makes you think “right” and “left” are even viable designations?

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 8:27pm

    I don’t consider myself OWS, but I’ve spent time with a few at protests and rallies. To just assume that “they” all share the same homogenous view, you would be wrong. I spent time with a few individuals who were very pro-liberty minded, just a little uneducated as far as economics is concerned.

  • [1] July 24, 2014 at 10:30pm

    Lol! Not a big fan of cops, but that cop was hilarious!

  • [2] July 24, 2014 at 8:56pm

    Not all of us are blind to Orwell’s writings. That book specifically cited the history of the Russian & Bolshevik Revolutions, and Stalin’s rise to power; but I do understand what you and cowboy57 are purveying. The real clincher is whether or not the irony was lost on Orwell that he basically exposed the weaknesses of his own ideology (Democratic Socialism) or even that of Democracy itself, as all democracies, regardless of the type, tend to devolve into brutal totalitarianism. The “left” and the “right” are the same party, though with small numbers of those predisposed toward true freedom in each. As time progresses, the people clamor more and more toward totalitarianism. William Graham Sumner summed it up rather well:

    “Gentlemen, the time is coming when there will be two great classes, Socialists, and Anarchists. The Anarchists want the government to be nothing, and the Socialists want the government to be everything. There can be no greater contrast. Well, the time will come when there will be only these two great parties, the Anarchists representing the laissez faire doctrine and the Socialists representing the extreme view on the other side, and when that time comes I am an Anarchist.”

    TL;DR? Lol!

  • July 24, 2014 at 10:07am

    Cloud watchers know that if you watch long enough, you’ll see plenty to convince you that this was just the right timing.

  • July 23, 2014 at 7:30pm

    Hence, why I really don’t believe in Intellectual Property rights. Wasn’t it Jefferson that stated [paraphrasing] that if you have a really good idea and want to keep it, then tell no one about it? All I.P. laws and accusations of plagiarism do is bog advancement down in a labyrinth of rules and regulations that strangle the growth of society. I think I.P. laws are baseless and have no foundation on anything other than arbitrary measures.

  • [32] July 23, 2014 at 9:33am

    Honestly, I would trust their judgment over that of roughly 97% of the populous in this country. They would most likely have little to no regard for “electing” any idiot to tell them what to do for the next two, four, or six years. They have already established an order outside of the supposed “Rule of Law” at work in this country – they have no need to corrupt it.

  • [2] July 23, 2014 at 8:03am

    I ran into this yesterday at the park. I was jogging and there is a wooden tower there. I didn’t see anyone up there, save for a water bottle and a truck parked in the parking lot. I ascended the top flight to see a man tugging a his pants and the hurried, “look innocent” guilt loomed over the air and I knew what they were up to. I almost said something, but neither would make eye contact or, save for the guilt, acknowledge I was even there. I also ran into a car a few months back with fogged up windows – a rendezvous of sorts. That could have been anything, but the woman’s behavior was the same… how do they say “caught with your pants down?” Frankly, I’ve run into people rolling or smoking a joint or drinking, which I really don’t mind, but I do mind seeing people having sex or at least the guilty feeling they leave hang in the air… am I guilty by association? No, I think not. These people need to do that in a private spot, not in a public park. I think I’ll write a letter to the editor in my local paper.

  • July 22, 2014 at 1:49pm

    808Patriot – No, I don’t. it is actually completely opposite of what I believe. I should have placed the word revenue in parentheses. Allow me to clarify, as people seem to think me a Communist. I am no Commie. I am an Individualist Anarchist of the free market persuasion. A.K.A – Anarcho-Capitalist or Libertarian Anarchist. If you must demonize me, I’d prefer being a demon with the proper name, but if not, then I suppose that proves me all the better as far as positioning. There have been plenty of Communists that have worn the skin of Anarchists all the while perpetuating crimes against humanity – this would be my own personal form of poetic justice. Lol!

  • [1] July 22, 2014 at 8:24am

    “…you want to have your cake and eat it too…”
    That seems to be the case with any special interest or “marginalized” group.

  • [1] July 22, 2014 at 8:22am

    That seems to be an underlying factor with any special interest or “oppressed” group.

  • July 22, 2014 at 8:20am


  • July 21, 2014 at 10:37pm

    True statement, skunk.

  • [2] July 21, 2014 at 10:35pm

    The revenue made by Catholic Charities is 50%+ federal dollars stolen in the guise of taxes.

  • [2] July 21, 2014 at 10:28pm

    I think the modern-day Pharisees are those who use scripture as a hammer to judge others and as a measure of their own or another’s amount of “faith,” not what you mentioned. With that, I think if one reads scripture and that is held above the example set by Jesus, then one is already missing the point entirely. What Tom stated regarding sex abuse and violence hold weight when held up to how Jesus acted.

  • July 21, 2014 at 10:24am


    I am no communist. Communists espouse collectivism. I was denouncing it. Remove head from ass and then speak. If you knew anything other than your small parcel within the depths of you primordial brain, you’d be asking more questions rather than throwing accusations. Oh, that’s right, you can’t have faith and still ask questions. You people are one of the reasons I left the Christian faith.

  • July 21, 2014 at 10:16am

    Wait, 808Patriot. Where can I find these records? I’m not speaking rhetorically here – I really want to know. I need a point in the right direction – can you cite any sources?

  • July 20, 2014 at 10:36pm

    The Israel government didn’t attack U.S. civilians, they did attack the U.S. government, so I am unsure what all this talk of “we” is, exactly. Besides, it isn’t all the Israeli people nor all the Palestinian people, it sounds like their governing authorities that are the issue. I think it best to stop this “we,” “us,” “them” collectivist mentality.

    Responses (7) +
  • [3] July 20, 2014 at 10:30pm

    The Jews technically did not even kill Jesus. Pontius Pilate acquiesced them, but they [the Jews] did not kill him. If the story is even true, Jesus was killed by the Roman government. He was killed by a government. I bet that puts a new paradigm on government if you truly see it.

123 To page: Go