User Profile: frgough

frgough

Member Since: October 02, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [5] July 3, 2015 at 1:30pm

    Suggest you go back and read a book on basic human biology, focusing on the chapter on sexual reproduction. Because then you won’t sound like such a fool when you go around denying basic biological science.

  • [24] July 3, 2015 at 1:29pm

    Actually, the sin you are illustrating right now is bearing false witness. Because your accusations are just that. A false witness.

    In reply to jeffg730's comment on the contribution No, America Is Not a Great Nation

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] June 9, 2015 at 10:53pm

    Archeology is most definitely a very soft science. For the simple reason it’s almost impossible to do any sort of laboratory experimentation to independently verify your claims.

    When you assemble bones and then take a vote to see if you did it right, you barely qualify as scientific.

  • [1] June 9, 2015 at 10:52pm

    Except, apparently, the lifetime of soft tissue.

  • [2] June 9, 2015 at 10:51pm

    No, the evidence suggests that our dating techniques are horribly inaccurate and the bone is not 75 million years old.

    Real scientists aren’t afraid to go where the evidence leads. If chemistry tells us soft tissue can’t survive for 75 million years, and we find soft tissue in a bone dated to 75 million years, then the only conclusion you can reach is that the bone is either contaminated or is not 75 million years old. There are no other options.

  • June 9, 2015 at 10:48pm

    Or more likely, TheMotWay, our dating techniques are horribly inaccurate and the bones are not 75 million years old, but instead a few thousand.

    But nobody wants to follow the evidence precisely because that would be the conclusion.

  • [2] June 9, 2015 at 10:46pm

    Laws of chemistry. That’s why not. If these folks were the least bit scientific, they would be jumping up and down in excitement because finding the soft tissue means their dating techniques are completely wrong and everything they thought they knew needs to be completely re-examined. True scientists would be unable to contain their excitement at the possibility of overturning and entire paradigm.

  • [7] June 9, 2015 at 10:41pm

    While you are proudly touting your moral scientific superiority, you might want to take time to consider the chemical impossibility of any sort of soft tissue surviving for 75 million years.

    Finding any type of soft tissue, in a truly scientific discipline, would be incredibly exciting, on the order of discovering red shift being caused by something other than expansion of the universe, because it would overturn an entire accepted understanding of how we thought things were.

    True scientists find that exciting.

    In simpler terms: soft tissue in dinosaur fossils is smoking gun evidence that the fossil is not 75 million years old, or even a million years old, or even 100,000 years old. In fact, it would be a stretch to consider it 10,000 years old.

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] June 9, 2015 at 10:21pm

    False Dichotomy is the mating cry of the liberal.

  • [6] June 9, 2015 at 10:20pm

    That’s not why he was hired. He was hired to curry favor with government. In today’s America, if you want your business to survive, especially if you are being targeted like McDonalds by the Michelle Obama’s food nazi corps, you need to establish the right political connections.

    That’s what this hire is all about.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] May 15, 2015 at 9:56am

    A woman is happiest when she makes family her career. Ditto the man. Men are happiest when they can provide and protect. Women are happiest when they can support, nurture and care. It’s a wonderful system when you let it work.

  • [7] May 15, 2015 at 9:52am

    Here’s a better idea. Realize that your daughters are happy playing with dolls because women like to nurture and care. So instead of trying to make them like a man who loves engineering and math, and thus implying that men are inherently superior, celebrate the uniqueness that is womanhood.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] April 6, 2015 at 11:02pm

    Translation: You will get your mind right, or we’ll mob you.

  • [-1] April 6, 2015 at 11:01pm

    Again. We are talking about not wanting to participate in an EVENT. I doubt you are actually too stupid to get this, so you must be deliberately misrepresenting what is being discussed.

  • [-1] April 6, 2015 at 10:59pm

    Since no one is actually doing that, what, exactly is your point? The bakeries in question didn’t want to participate in an EVENT.

  • [-2] April 6, 2015 at 10:57pm

    A “gay” Christian wouldn’t call himself a “gay” Christian. He would simply call himself a Christian. Because he would understand that his defining characteristic is his discipleship to Christ, not his sexual appetites.

  • [-1] April 6, 2015 at 10:56pm

    The answer is the same one I give to Muslims. It doesn’t matter. Because it is the extreme element of your ideology that drives and controls the agenda.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] April 6, 2015 at 10:54pm

    Once again. This is not about refusing service to a person, but refusing to participate in an EVENT.

  • April 6, 2015 at 10:30pm

    Right. Because as we throw off more and more of the chains of religion in the United States, life has become so much more wonderful. Crime is down, families are stronger, honesty is on the rise, selflessness and charity are exploding, self-reliance, dignity and work ethic are on the rise, life is valued more and more, compassion for others above self is becoming more and more pronounced. Why, we’re on the verge of utopia.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] April 6, 2015 at 10:22pm

    GaryNOVA you normally let other people’s actions and decisions dictate how you choose to live your life?

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love