“well, what’s your plan” or “do you have a better plan”
Is pretty much saying that you’ve failed and you know it.
Lame cowardly excuse
 October 2, 2015 at 2:17pm
“The problem is that he’ll be replaced with another one just like him….or worse”
I’m not sure if his replacement could be any gayer than him?
 October 2, 2015 at 2:15pm
Take your Common core, and your “how to create a gay society 101″ indoctrinatioon with you, loser!
 September 30, 2015 at 3:21pm
Let me figure this out.
Single mom who got pregnant and got dumped.
Gave birth to a handsome baby boy.
In her demise biterness and desperation for compannion she raised this boy as a girl.
Dress him up, paint his fingernails, did pony tails on his hair, dress him in pink.
I’ve seen moms in married relationships do that to their boys, until dad puts a stop to it.
In her case no husband, no dad for the kid. She created her own best girlfriend to go shopping for clothes.
I had all boys, ended up single mom, and never once did I EVER think of doing this. I even made sure my house was not decorated in a feminine way because I shared it with all males and didn't want them to feel out of place.
I knew a woman who was painting her 6 y/o son's fingernails - and was told she taught her older kids to masturbate when they were young. there are some really sick parents out there.
I once caught my wife telling my son when he was 4 to take some TP and wipe himself after going #1.
I told him to never ever wipe after #1, you shake, and I better not ever catch him sitting down just to go #1.
 September 29, 2015 at 12:21pm
This woman makes more money than most governors in red states with budgets three times lager than hers
The poor liberals who believe in fair wages pay this woman that kind of money??
PP is toast.
Good Bye federal funds for planned parenthood
 September 28, 2015 at 5:31pm
If you don’t know by now what the tenets of Islam are, than perhaps you shouldn’t even be following politics let alone getting upset about his stance since you’re obviously uninformed and ignorant about the issue.
BTW not directed personally at you but your comment in general about the tenets of Islam
 September 28, 2015 at 11:37am
Tapper is no longer interviewing but pontificating to Carson.
He wanted to domininate Carson and get him to go down the PC road..
This is what the left media does and has done for decades relentlesly to conservative candidates, until they convince them to cease and desist to tell the truth and prescrive to progressive ideology of PC. lies and apeasing.
I applaude Dr. carson for remaining solid on his stance when it comes to a Muslim president.
Carson should point to the destruction wrought by a president who is "just" a Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer.
Dr. Carson should carry a copy of the Quran with him, so when the useful idiots ask him inane questions..he can point to the passages in the Quaran and make the leftists cry like little girls!
 September 27, 2015 at 9:50am
Stupid is, stupid does
 September 25, 2015 at 1:12pm
Watch all progressive liberals rush to his side and praise him while demonizing conservative TEA party.
That’s how dumb liberals are
 September 24, 2015 at 6:01pm
I have a better answer:
Pay your tickets!!!
DON’T DO DRUGS!!
I spent time in jail for the same offense and I got thrown in with a bunch or offenders and criminals.
No reason to die.
Pay the fines or do the time. Stop victimizing the man for his bad choices.
 September 20, 2015 at 9:22am
Will someone please send annoying ESL third grader Ramos back to his parents!!
Why is this ignorant idiot there??
 September 14, 2015 at 5:08pm
I’m terrified of Jeb Bush and Christie.
What a nimwit brain washed useful idiot this blonde girl is!!
I’m concerned of uncharted territory with Trump.
September 10, 2015 at 4:16pm
The rear end was meant to be one way only as meant by nature.
The fact that perverted people figure other uses for it and the bible does not addrese it doesn’t mean it was meant to be.
Some of those uses:
Inserting foreign objects in it.
And who knows what else.
This lady’s premise that two men in love sounds platonic and with no morbid intent is laughable.
specially the part that because the bible does not adress it “SPECIFICALLY” must mean it’s OK in the eyes of God.
Law of God, laws of nature!!!
there’s nothing natural about two men or two women being married to eachother.
I love my father, and I have male friends who I care for dearly.. Doesn’t mean I want to have sex with them.
By her argument, two men loving eachother supersedes the sin of sexual desire and action between the two of them???
DON’T THINK SO LADY
 September 10, 2015 at 10:57am
I like to see how the 1% elite react to this?
Specially the liberal anti-war elite, who want to resolve everything with kumbaya peace and love.
I’ll bet they’ll be clamoring WAR and destroy Al qaida in a nano second now
The liberal anti-war elite wouldn't favor war if their own families were blown to bits. Whoever they viewed as the oppressors of the bombers would be at fault, and they would cry in the streets, carrying signs before they would carry a gun.
Those idiots would still blame Bush.
 September 9, 2015 at 4:47pm
I would like to see the 50 people that turn to watch Killary, Sanders, and O’Malley debate.
 September 9, 2015 at 9:08am
Gun goes off she gets a free hysterectomy
 September 8, 2015 at 3:48pm
Nothing a hollow point .45 in the chest can’t cure
Yes, it is very brave to deny two consenting adults their pursuit of happiness. It's very brave to use your position of power to deny legal rights to a minority.
"Yes, it is very brave to deny two consenting adults their pursuit of happiness. It’s very brave to use your position of power to deny legal rights to a minority."
Don't ever forget. Everything done to the Jews in Germany was LEGAL. There is a "higher law" than the Supreme Court. It is a law that you cannot understand and refuse to understand. I don't expect understanding. To some, Federal Law is supreme. History has shown that man is fallible. Manmade laws can get out of harmony with God's law or Nature's law if you prefer. "When this happens you have an obligation to break it." - Martin Luther King Jr.
@publius Would you ever deny a license to an adult son marrying his consenting adult dad?
MLK defined an unjust law as "difference made legal," while he defined an unjust law as "sameness made legal." By this very clear definition, marriage equality is right and just. I find it absurd that you assume MLK's citing of "God's law" suggests that he would be in favor of discriminating against a minority.
She's not brave, she a pathetic little dictator who thinks she has the right to inflict her bronze age morals on the rest of the world. Not so. Sane people reject her out of date moral view. The only people who will be at the rally will be the knuckledragging throwbacks who haven't realised that the world no longer cares about her moral stand. She's had her 15 minutes. Now give her an orange jumpsuit and chuck her in solitary until she realises what century it is and obeys the law.
"@publius Would you ever deny a license to an adult son marrying his consenting adult dad?"
Is there a state in which this is legal? If not, then it's obviously a moot point.
Denial of a state-issued license is not crushing anyone's pursuit of happiness. If it does, I know I have always wanted to be a doctor - can I force the state to give me a medical license?
From your question we have chirps from pencil member. Of course he has to say it would be ok with because they are "consenting" Otherwise it would be a hypocrite.
Even Jesus said render on to Caesar what is Ceaser’s This women should be fired to point out there is separation of Church and state. You all cheer the court when you get your way then call them names when they go against them. Christians have damaged their church social strength by splintering into 38,000 churches that allow most behaviors. Their is no Christian church anymore, just the remnants of archaic philosophy that has evolved in order to keep the pews full. NO ONE FOLLOW THE REAL JESUS ANYMORE BECAUSE HIS TEACHING WERE LOST WHEN KING JAMES REWROTE THE BIBLE.
That is the most pathetic answer ever!
Let me spell it out for you, since you seem a little slow. The supreme court recently changed the definition of marriage nationwide, which definition was not EVER before accepted by MANY states. So “moot” my a5$.
Would you ever deny a license to an adult son marrying his consenting adult dad?
Would you ever deny a license to an adult son marrying his consenting adult dad?"
Would I issue a license for a marriage deemed illegal? No.
@ PUBLIUS....Just looking for an answer to my question from any liberal poster, but don't seem to be able to get a response from anyone?????
should all public officials in sanctuary cities go to jail for ignoring Federal immigration laws? simple yes or no answer will suffice
I answered your questions above, but since you don’t seem to actually know what a sanctuary city is, I thought I might add some more details.
So-called “sanctuary” policies limit the extent to which local officials are required to assist federal authorities in the enforcement of immigration laws.
“In San Francisco, for instance, a 1989 law called the City and County of Refuge ordinance prohibits city employees from helping federal immigration enforcement efforts unless compelled by court order or state law.”
See those key words: state law or court order! Nothing here allows officials to break laws or refuse services to the public in any way.
So, I guess if you are asking whether we should throw public officials who haven’t broken any laws in jail just because we disagree with their policies, I would say no.
Thank you for your insightful reply PUBLIUS....Now if you could just site the Law this woman broke I would be eternal grateful....Also, are you telling me that a city ordinance trumps Federal law?
"Now if you could just site the Law this woman broke I would be eternal grateful"
Well, she defied a court order and was held in contempt of court. Seems pretty straightforward.
@ PUBLIUS.....You did not site the federal law she broke when court ordered. Please do so. Thank you....
@publius You pathetic moron! You still sidestepped the question! I never said if it was illefal.
Again. Let me break it down again for your pea brain.
Would you ever deny the claim of right to marry from an adult son wishing to marry his consenting adult dad? As you know, gay marriage was illegal in some states, so this being illegal now is irrelevant.
You pathetic coward can’t answer the question!
MLK defined an unjust law as “difference made legal,” while he defined an unjust law as “sameness made legal.” By this very clear definition, marriage equality is right and just. I find it absurd that you assume MLK’s citing of “God’s law” suggests that he would be in favor of discriminating against a minority.
Really......It seems to me he defined it much more clearly than you would propose he did. I'll let his words speak for very clearly about what he believed.....
“One may well ask, ‘How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?’” King continued. “The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: There are just laws and there are unjust laws. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that ‘an unjust law is no law at all.’
“Now, what is the difference between the two?” wrote King. “How does one determine when a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law.” - Martin Luther King Jr.
Cont. from above
To understand MLK you must first understand what King is referring to when he says "moral law", "eternal law", or "natural law." I do not expect most would understand him because they do not understand nor read the Bible. The Bible was key to what MLK believed and taught his movement. Everything he taught about non-violent protests came from the Bible. Most people don't understand because they REFUSE to read it for themselves. They ignore it. Therefore, they can only fall back on the only thing which is left which is law developed by man. King knew that manmade law can be fallible. Man is fallible and therefore the laws that man makes can fall out of harmony with "Nature's Law" or "God's Law"....whichever you prefer. To truly understand Mr. King you must understand what he was talking about. It's been evident throughout history that men and governments can violate this divine law. Hitler was a prime example. His laws became "out of harmony" with divine law even though it was supported by many in Germany at the time. King was obviously saying that when this occurs "you have an OBLIGATION to break those laws."
A law that has the general public's acceptance can also fall into this category. Regardless, you will never understand Mr. King unless you study the book he based all of his action upon (the Bible). Otherwise, you will remain stunned at people's willingness to go to jail for the violation of "nature's law" that he was refer
@ Pencil (continued from above post)
Otherwise, you will remain stunned at people's willingness to go to jail for the violation of "nature's law" that he was referring to. He was a good man. I would suggest looking into what he thought was important. It's the key to a good life. He died for it, but he died a man of honor. I respect him greatly.
Kinky Kathy should get into the Religion Industry and not subject herself to a job where she is serving the public.
 September 3, 2015 at 5:21pm
Unions do not provide legal or collective representation anymore, I ought to know, I used to belong to one
Their main purpose is extorting union dues from members in order to feed their leaders and politicians while defrauding the taxpayers with extravagant benefits and payraises the rest of us don’t get.
The largest donors by far to the democrat party are unions. IT’S A FACT.. that’s where most of the dues are going.
 September 3, 2015 at 2:31pm
Why isn’t Obama thrown in jail for violating the constitution with DACA?
Why isn’t Charlie Rangel in jail for corruption with Nacy Pelosi?
Why insn’t Holder in jail for fast and furious?
Why isn’t Hillary in jail for the murder of four Americans in Benghazi?
Why isn’t Sharpton in jail for tax fraud?
I call it duplicitous selective enforcement of laws for political gain