Wouldn't it be great to vote for a candidate that you believe in instead of voting for someone because they are the lesser of the two evils? Conservatives haven't had one of those since President Reagan.
I'll answer your question. Overthrow.
a lot of dead traitors
Tremendous governmental involvement by citizens.
 June 23, 2015 at 11:59am
Becoming easier and easier to predict the next five stupid actions by the first communist president:
1) pardon all convicted druggies
2) put moveon.org in charge of the department of the interiior
3) Name Robert Kennedy to post of energy secretary
4) disband the military
5) give all military equipment and arms to newly formed national police
Oh, I could go on…. It is easy to predict by watching what the O says he will never do.
 June 16, 2015 at 3:14pm
Anti Semitism is growing day by day and this is just another manifestation on the world’ stage. This particular American administration and just about all of the media are anti semites.
God promises blessing for supporting His chosen people and curses for those who try to align against His chosen people. In addition to blindness most are deep in deception…
The clock is ticking!
 June 16, 2015 at 12:07am
I don’t ever watch this tripe from folks who do not understand us and never will. Get it over with and lose lots of money….
 May 9, 2015 at 9:51pm
Monk, it hurt me deeply to see that young man get a shot like that. Well, it was either that or my gut hurting from laughing so hart. Ok, honestly it was excessive laughter.
The innocent students who were punished along with the guilty just learned a lesson more valuable than everything else they were taught in school combined:
Life ain't fair.
 May 6, 2015 at 7:23pm
Who wrote this headline? Why the hell do we need to know the man is GAY? Homosexuals comprise 2-3% of our population and if you read the mainstream media (and The Blaze, evidently) you would get the impression that 90% of Americans are homosexuals.
If I were to describe a ‘typical’ American gleaned from the most recent census would sexual preference enter into it?
OK, I have to stop now…
 May 6, 2015 at 7:17pm
“On November 5, 2009, a mass murder took place at Fort Hood, near Killeen, Texas. Nidal Malik Hasan, a U.S. Army major and psychiatrist, fatally shot 13 people and injured more than 30 others. The shooting produced more casualties than any other on an American military base. Several individuals, including Senator Joe Lieberman, General Barry McCaffrey, and others have called the event a terrorist attack. The United States Department of Defense and federal law enforcement agencies have classified the shootings as an act of workplace violence.”
Really? A man runs through a crowd of our heroes screaming “allahu akbar” and he is given a pass as it concerns purpose of the attack. Horse hockey!
The Army personnel were not deemed to have suffered combat injuries, initially.
 May 6, 2015 at 6:59pm
The congress, with a few exceptions, is rotten to the core. The difference of a politician as compared to a statesman: the former cares about the next election; the later cares about the next generation.
I have given up trying to understand how congress conducts business in the swamp.
Waders, Alcohol, Horsefly Repellant.....make no mistake
I yearn to be a Texan! Even late in life...
texan, at this point, I'd be glad to go back to politicians instead of traitors.
 May 5, 2015 at 6:27pm
I would be more inclined to believe these promulgations when these scientists tell us who caused the ‘Big Bang’. Many say it demonstrates ‘intelligent design’. Whose intelligence could possibly design the breadth and complexity of the Solar System much less all of an expanding and as of yet undiscovered universe.
I am not a scientist but I know.
you really need to take a look at the ekpyrotic theory or read 'A universe from Nothing' by Lawrence Krauss. No 'intelligent design' needed.
Me too. Does that mean I'm actually a genius?
"finsout", 'no intelligent design needed' is just the opinion of those who want to believe that.
They started out with that bias and looked for 'facts' to fit their bias.
Besides, saying one was 'not needed' is not the same as having proof that there could not have been, one.
fortherecord, if it's just an opinion of those who want to believe that, you can easily say the same thing for people that support intelligent design. You just created an argument against yourself.
In fact the examples finsout cited indicate several examples, not of opinion, of how intelligent design is not needed for such creations. Same argument for evolution- complex systems create the illusion of intelligence, but when broken apart into simpler more digestible pieces do you begin to see how un-intelligent such creations are- ex, the human eye, or the neck of a giraffe.
"fortherecord, if it’s just an opinion of those who want to believe that, you can easily say the same thing for people that support intelligent design."
Except for the fact that there is evidence for it (such as the doctors who were staunch atheists who became believers in G-d after witnessing miracles, that they knew medically, could never have happened), and no evidence proving it could not have happened.
" You just created an argument against yourself."
No I didn't, because even if you say it could go both ways I still said 'could' not 'has to'
You are claiming by arguing against me that it 'has to' and it doesn't 'have to'.
Plus science is supposedly 'objective'.
"In fact the examples finsout cited indicate several examples, not of opinion, of how intelligent design is not needed for such creations."
Then explain exactly how life got started, in the first place.
" Same argument for evolution- complex systems create the illusion of intelligence, but when broken apart into simpler more digestible pieces do you begin to see how un-intelligent such creations are- ex, the human eye, or the neck of a giraffe."
No I don't see that it's 'unintelligent'.
All you did was claim it wasn't without any actual proof, that it's not.
fortherecord, what you are referencing as evidence is not evidence. Evidence is acquired by the scientific method. The fact you used the term 'miracle' discounts it as evidence from the start since a miracle is defined as something unable to be explained.
I will not condescend on this forum by explaining how life started, not that I think you honestly thought I would; that is your responsibility by picking up a biology, chemistry, and/or physics book.
If you see the examples I stated as God's design than he/she must be a horribly inefficient designer. Since the examples I used are clearly horrible 'design.'
The burden of proof lies with the claimant.
 May 4, 2015 at 9:07pm
“Conflict of interest, I don’t have no stinking conflict of interest!?! Now, white people, they have conflict of interests, that for sure. That’s why I am going to prosecute the every loving crap out of at least three of the dad gum cops.”
Ah, Avenger, you have such a wonderful way with words. LOL.
 May 4, 2015 at 4:34pm
Where is the consistency behind the hollow words? How about the many executions in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere? Where is the spirit of convert or die condemned? When was the last ‘expose’ shown/published in the American press?
If we were hearing the true beliefs of O than we would be achieving successes on the battlefield.
I am so tired of this poor excuse of an American!!!
 May 4, 2015 at 4:27pm
‘British Islamic State fighter Junaid Hussain?’: since when do we not call these vermin terrorist?
Muhammad is a child molester who is probably in Hell and he speaks through his father, the devil.
A headline in the British press says: ISIS fear in Texas. I will clean this up: horse manure!!! It is a rare instance where muhammad’s blind followers actually choose to fight face to face. They are cowards who hide in the shadows and kill women and children. No fear in Texas.
Another article says: ‘Blogger Pamela Geller, 56, president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative has a ‘long history of hatred’. Well, how can I say this? Bull fertilizer!!! It is called free speech. Maybe the press in England, similar to the press, don’t have a clue.
I only pray that our next president understands the history of America and how to prosecute a successful war. I would rather have us fight in the Middle East and then use the German and Japanese models of occupation. I do not doubt that we will not attempt this prior to 2017.
The media is so thoroughly afraid of being attacked for "offending" muslims that they go far, far out of their way to soft-soap the stories. Half the time, I'm amazed that they bother to even try reporting them.
But let a straight, white Christian be accused of doing something and the gloves come OFF!
I am only going to say this once to every terrorist POS... "REMEMBER THE ALAMO MOTHER F%$#@RS"
All the more reason to GLASS mecca. Then we will know our enemy!!!
 May 4, 2015 at 2:54am
I remember in a speech standing before the flag General Patton said something like: ‘The German bastards are going our there to die for their country and our job is to help them do just that.’.
Substitute muhammad for flag and we have the same approach for the 21st century we are in (maybe I should say we should have since the current commander-in-chief does not have the testículos,as the Spanish would say.
Sorry, I have to dissagree with you, our president does have baIIs, it's just that they're muslim sympathizing weather underground baIIs.
I like that but my favorite is from General Schwarzkopf during the first gulf war. It's something like, Their religion is between them and their god. Our job is to arrange the meeting.
Texasss The Muslims are Americans. You sound like Hitler. We must rid our country of Jews. Same thing Idiot
 May 4, 2015 at 2:37am
What we have is a group of people who are coming to our country and basically saying: “Your constitution and my religion are inconsistent; if you violate my religion then you will pay a price. When we have enough people we will replace your outdated document and laws with our sharia law; you either accept that or we will show up and take all of your lives.”
In some states we have the same answer that we used 239 years ago: we will meet you with violence until you either accept our way of life or leave. Your time to decide…
That's one of the reasons I'm moving there. While I'm not a big fan of Open Carry (prefer concealed carry) the fact that Texas' attitude of "We're not taking any crap from anyone" was the big attraction.
I don't think the law states you have to open carry, mcjackson. You can do either. So move here and conceal away!
Yeah but you want to bully Muslims.
April 30, 2015 at 9:13pm
“Speaking generally, breaking both the spirit and intent of the Constitution, to use your word, is not tantamount to doing anything wrong,” That should cover our actions for our eight years of purely legal but misunderstood actions.
 April 29, 2015 at 8:29pm
‘Greg Abbott says he has sued Obama administration 25 times’ Thank you Mr. Attorney General during your time in office and now, as our Governor, keep up the good/necessary work.
We have been and will continue to fight for ourselves and states who are of a like spirit. Many of our friends have joined us in the legal battle.
We are unhappy here and are just not sure what our next steps are for sure. It is so unacceptable the way the president has treated our troops and the reverse on both of the active wars against those who would eliminate us (a trend by the democrats since Korea).
It is illegal for federal troops to operate in Texas and it is ironic that the same guy, who could not spell war if we spotted him the ‘wa’, has the gall to send federal troops to practice battle against patriots versus protecting our borders.