User Profile: GeoChk

GeoChk

Member Since: December 13, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [39] September 8, 2014 at 11:50pm

    Heaven forbid she can’t afford cigarettes and Rock Star….

  • [2] September 2, 2014 at 4:14pm

    And the useful idiots will buy this BS propaganda and the Republicans as Terrorists meme will be all over the place. As though trying to save the taxpayers money or doing your legislative duty is the equivalent of beheadings and rapes. Compromise on any issue is impossible with people who spew this kind of hateful rhetoric… They are only interested in advancing their sick, twisted, country destroying agenda.

    Responses (1) +
  • September 1, 2014 at 7:16am

    A bit worse than standing in front of a “Mission Accomplished” banner (that didn’t mean what the MSM made it out to mean), wouldn’t you say?

  • [3] August 26, 2014 at 1:23am

    No justice, no peace! I think I need to riot and loot. Since I have a brain, and I worked for the things I own, I won’t start in my own neighborhood. I’ll go somewhere where “I didn’t build that.” As soon as I recover from the shock of this revelation.

    Sarc off/ but why bother? Sarcasm is all that gets me through the crap this government churns out.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1101] August 21, 2014 at 9:12pm

    I see… So if the officer was beaten severely, and has a broken orbital bone, the shooting is justified? But if the injury is only to soft tissue, then the shooting is NOT justified? I am so tired of biased reporting. The main stream media keeps reporting the autopsy results, headlining “he was shot SIX times!” Without emphasizing that he was shot, from the front, four times in the arm and shoulder, and twice in the head, in a pattern that shows that he was coming towards the officer in an aggressive manner? It’s obvious they want the rioting, they want this to be a racial issue, they want to distract from the miserable failure that is progressive leadership. It makes me sick, and I’ve lost hope that the people in this country will ever wake up and see that they are being manipulated.

    Responses (40) +
  • [17] August 21, 2014 at 3:45am

    SAR I am well aware of the history of firearms laws and the scarily progressive FDR era. So difficult sometime to understand ideas when there’s no inflection or body language involved! Lol. I totally agree, a law abiding citizen should be able to buy ANY firearm with no interference from government.

  • [105] August 21, 2014 at 2:39am

    The problem is that most Americans, even “Second Amendment Supporters” have conceded that citizens have no right to own fully automatic weapons? Why the heck not? Oh, I don’t need an automatic weapon to shoot a deer or a burglar? What about a tyrannical government armed to the teeth and determined to rob me of my basic rights? Why do we always concede the argument that the government has ANY right to control arms AT ALL?

    Responses (7) +
  • [63] August 15, 2014 at 7:58pm

    The same office that indicted Tom deLay? Forcing him to quit his congressional position and then NOTHING was found? THAT prosecutor has indicted a republican presidential hopeful right before the start of campaign season? While our president daily uses the constitution for toilet paper? The misuse of the judicial system for political purposes is one of the biggest travesties of our era. It WILL result in the fall of the nation. A nation without law, is no nation at all.

    Responses (1) +
  • [16] August 8, 2014 at 12:04am

    Moderate: And what about all of the small businesses that have owners making $40k? A minimum wage increase would put them out of business. Please also consider that most minimum wage employees “trying to support a family” are also receiving tons of subsidies from the taxpayer (food, healthcare, housing, etc) So you think their lives will improve if their measly $2/hr raise puts them over that threshold and they lose thousands of dollars in welfare? And what of the more skilled, more experienced worker who is currently making $10 or $11 an hour? You basically just have them a pay cut. The government causes more problems than it solves.

  • [1] August 2, 2014 at 12:59am

    Except the DEMS would decide what is “fair” and they would only make outlets like Fix and The Blaze change programming.

  • [20] July 31, 2014 at 12:01am

    Anyone think the DEMS might try And run Colin powell in 2016? My lib friend brought him up the other day as “the only republican he respects.” Which tells me something about his taste in politicians.

  • [21] July 30, 2014 at 3:51am

    So if a mad gunman is a really bad shot, and only occasionally maims or kills someone, he should still be allowed to indiscriminately
    Shoot into civilian populations? No one should take him out and destroy his weapons?

    Responses (3) +
  • July 28, 2014 at 4:04am

    I understand the frustration, but the very fact that Obama so obviously WANTS the house to impeach demonstrates what a bad idea it would be. If Obama is talking about it, it’s basically a guarantee that it’s bad for the county, and ESPECIALLY bad for conservatives.

  • [6] July 28, 2014 at 1:59am

    It doesn’t sell more. Mainstream media sources have been bleeding money for years.

  • [14] July 27, 2014 at 12:53pm

    Fighting back to protect yourself is NOT the same as killing people because they don’t share your faith. Spare me the Crusades BS…. We are no longer in the Middle Ages.

  • [7] July 27, 2014 at 2:19am

    I was discussing politics with my “proud liberal” friend and he kept referring to me as a republican. Exasperated, I finally said,” My politics can be summed up like this: I think you should be able to do whatever you want, as long as it doesn’t infringe on another’s right to do the same.” He says,” Sounds like liberalism to me.” Ugh!!

  • [11] July 26, 2014 at 9:38am

    Obama doesn’t NEED an army. He’s completing his coup just fine without a shot being fired. Apathetic Americans won’t wake up until they are being marched into the gas chamber.

    Responses (3) +
  • [12] July 26, 2014 at 9:27am

    Obama wants republicans to initiate impeachment proceedings so bad he can taste it. Anyone on the right advocating this is playing right into his hands. I was talking politics with a liberal friend of mine yesterday ( anyone notice that all liberals ever do is repeat talking points?) and he said,” I can’t take the tea party seriously because all they ever talk about is impeaching Obama because he’s black.” Impeachment proceedings, however well deserved, would only serve to distract and allow democrats to hold onto the senate. If Obama wants it, you can bet it’s bad for the country and bad for conservatives. Beware!

    Responses (3) +
  • [4] July 26, 2014 at 12:19am

    It is painfully obvious that the administration would like nothing better than for the republicans to start impeachment proceedings. Be a great fundraiser for them….”Racists try to get rid of the black man in the White House.” Will be all they will say on their campaign ads.

  • [4] July 25, 2014 at 4:29am

    Vicious. Or Viscous? What the H E double hockey sticks are VISCOUS attacks?

    Responses (3) +
123 To page: Go