I am fascinated by the strength and power of gorillas and pit bulls. They seem to be a giant muscle.
Speaking of pit bulls, my niece has a dog that is a pit bull labrador mix. It is an interesting dog. It has the and strong muscular appearance of a pit bull but with the friendly easy going personality of a lab.
 April 16, 2015 at 4:34pm
So where does Ms. Saldana draw the line on following the law or the president’s directive? It sounds to me that she is like the soldiers at Tiananmen in1989 and would shoot and kill her fellow citizens because the president ordered it. Oh, my example is extreme you say? Then tell where is that line and is that line clear? Regardless, I believe it is the duty of higher ups to challenge the president when ordered to do something immoral or illegal. Was that part of the lesson of the Nuremberg trials?
 April 16, 2015 at 4:17pm
It seems the Blaze used a picture concerning the 2nd Ft Hood shooting in an article about the 1st Ft Hood shooting, Someone messed up.
 April 16, 2015 at 2:16pm
Some jobs have to be done, such as accounting, custodial. Some jobs are created because increases production or sales of the companies product. If the COST of that additional product/sales exceeds the REVENUE from that additional production/sales, that job will be eliminated. That is also basic economics which few seem to discuss. The Left seems to be ignorant or deliberately ignores. So if that $9/hour burger flipper produces $12/hour of product, a $15/hour minimum wage will result in that position being eliminated.
 April 8, 2015 at 10:45am
On the day of the year commemorating the resurrection of Jesus, Obama uses the occasion to beat up on his political opponents. He claims to be Christian but I don’t see any evidence of it.
 April 8, 2015 at 10:43am
“cherry picking the Bible to rebuke Christians” – That technique is from Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, rule #4. This is a book with an expression of admiration for Lucifer in the forward.
Obama is a disciple of Alinsky. Hillary Clinton was not only a disciple of Alinsky but knew him personally and had a friendship with him. The Democrats have been applying Alinsky quite a lot, particularly during the Obama administration. Those techniques have proved very effective but no honorable person could use them.
April 5, 2015 at 3:56pm
Agreed, but I am sure she knows it, as does everyone else So what is the point in commenting on it. There is no value in the comment except for a cheap snicker. I also think Ms. Susteren should have let it go. Does every little comment made in bad taste need to be policed? (My opinion is “no”, but some, such as Ms. Sustern, apparently don’t agree.)
 April 5, 2015 at 3:51pm
That mostly applies to me as well. (This differences are I am 53, drive a Mustang, and am not White; I assume you are White because of the privileged redneck part.) I can’t watch MSNBC or Obama speak because I am almost guaranteed to feel insulted by what they say.
The head of MSNBC has said he believe their rating are plummeting because their programming is boring. No. It is because they insult their audience and their audience’s intelligent constantly.
Me too. But the reason libs don't watch MSLSD is because they really know it lies, but don't want to be reminded of it.
agree with you Geoin!
 April 5, 2015 at 1:02pm
Exactly. Do people here only believe in private property rights when there is no associated “heart tugging” story?
 March 31, 2015 at 2:10pm
Krauthammer stock just made a quantum step down. So what if Israeli’s have made trades in the past? What does that have to do with us? That sounds like a Dem argument – rather than argue the merits of their position, they justify it by claiming it is analogous to what someone else has done. I am tired of those techniques.
I say Bergdahl lost his rights of protection by the United States when he abandoned his post and fellow soldiers, especially when 6 died trying to get him back.
March 30, 2015 at 10:52am
It just wasn’t funny. That is the main crime. I dislike off-color jokes. I don’t recall hearing a single one that is funny, beside being distasteful.
 March 28, 2015 at 12:29pm
The government running up the debt, particularly long term, is truly “taxation without representation”. The ones that will pay for most of it haven’t even been born yet.
 March 22, 2015 at 9:59pm
Of course Obama admires Singapore and Lee Kuan Yew. Singapore is a model of the benevolent dictatorship the Democrat Party seeks. The problem that the Dems ignore is what happens when there comes a dictator that is not benevolent? I guarantee that day will come. Even with our constitutional republic, the people reaching the highest positions tend to be self centered people who place their own interests above that of the nation. It will be even more so as the US becomes more of a dictatorship.
 March 22, 2015 at 1:14am
Isn’t it amazing? We PAY the UN to abuse us and our friends. It is really sick.
March 22, 2015 at 1:10am
The government and the millionaires and billionaires that support big government view themselves as the shepherds and us as the sheep. They don’t want us thinking for ourselves or doing for ourselves. They believe we should just shut up and do what we are told. We should be happy with whatever crumbs they allow us to keep. The money we think we earn isn’t really ours in their view. They just allow us to take care of it until they need/want it. That really is the view of the big government people (Dems and establishment Republicans).
Leftist millionaires/billionaires like George Soros and Bill Gates view themselves as shepherds and they certainly have influence over politicians. The big gov types are fine with them. But conservatives are the real threats to them. Conservatives think independently, they do for themselves, they expect to keep the fruits of their labors. These are exactly the things that threaten their view of what societal order is. That is why the Dems and establishment Republicans like McConnell and Boehner disparage conservatives so passionately. The Constitution and constitutionalists (a.k.a. conservatives) are the primary threats to their power.
 March 21, 2015 at 9:06pm
I groan when I hear such ignorant statements. Shooting a handgun accurately with pinpoint accuracy isn’t easy even in stressless situations. Now add to that the stress of a dangerous situation to self and others and the fact that the target isn’t just standing still waiting to be shot. With a gun, the slightest shake will throw off the bullet’s point of impact a lot.
I have been in a self defense situation before. The adrenaline rush had my heart racing and breathing so rapidly I was shaking like a leaf even many minutes after the situation was over. I can normally shoot a gun fairly accurately, but there would have been no way under that stress, especially with a moving and uncooperative target.
Some people like to talk like they are experts on topics they really know nothing about.
March 18, 2015 at 10:14am
From what I have seen of Mr. Williams, he was only honest with that one incident and it seemed to be by accident.
March 16, 2015 at 11:07am
Half correct is incorrect. KingOfPrydain must be like the too common Democrat appointed federal judge who twists the interpretation of law to mean whatever he wants to mean.
 March 16, 2015 at 11:02am
Mr. Schieffer, you ask how productive is the letter sent to the leaders of Iran, how productive is it to negotiate an agreement in bad faith, as the Obama administration is doing? It is obvious the agreement is only for political cover, to delay the bomb during Obama’s remaining time as president and during a possible Dem president immediately after him. Obama escaping accountability during his whole presidency has been about plausible, not probable, denial. He has been able to get away with because of the compliant press, LIKE YOU!!!!
 March 15, 2015 at 1:32pm
I think this story is not only plausible, but probable. There have been rumors for years that the Obamas and Clintons despise each other. There were things said by the Clintons during the 2008 campaign that suggest the Clintons have a low opinion of Obama. While I don’t recall Obama swiping at HRC during 2008, the rumors are that the Obamas view the Clintons as unprincipled political opportunists, in contrast to the Obamas being “principled” radical Leftists. (I share that opinion.) That is, the Clintons are more for advancing themselves than advancing the “cause”. (“Principled” in this context doesn’t mean moral in the sense of the 10 Commandments or basic honor like keeping promises (such as Obama’s rumored promise to help HRC win in 2016 is HRC didn’t make thing difficult for him in 2008 after he got the nomination) or not lying. The Obama camp will lie/cheat/steal/do anything to advance their radical Leftist cause and Obama might even have a bigger ego than Bill, but the cause comes first before personal gain and ego. The Obamas believe the Clintons have that reversed. I agree that Obama has that view and the Clintons are opportunists.)