User Profile: GeoInSD

GeoInSD

Member Since: January 29, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [9] June 25, 2015 at 6:29pm

    Obamacare won’t implode from its own weight because the central government (notice that I didn’t say “federal”, it doesn’t behave as a government of a federation) will just rewrite the law as necessary without Congress as they have been doing. When it runs into fiscal trouble, the central government will just tax us some more and/or print more money to pay for it. Would you like to bet that I am wrong?

    The REAL problem with Obamacare is not so much that it is costly, cost ineffective, etc. but that it changes the relationship between the citizen and the government. Obamacare is camel’s nose getting into the tent. The floodgates have been opened for government intrusion into the individual’s life. THAT is THE real problem with Obamacare, and THAT is THE real reason the Progressives have been trying to pass national health care for the last 100 years.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] June 22, 2015 at 1:47pm

    Roof used a Glock. If he was out, the slide would have been held open and he would have very clearly known he was out. If the gun didn’t fire, it seems to me that it was due to a misfire (which doesn’t happen often with a centerfire, but it does happen. My daughter got her first misfire at the range the last time we went.). Or it was a failure to feed. (That doesn’t happen often with Glocks but it is possible.)

    It seems that most mass killings are by suicidal people that, unfortunately, want to go in a memorable way. I wouldn’t be surprised at all if that was Roof’s plan.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] June 9, 2015 at 7:12am

    Our template of democracy simply is NOT POSSIBLE without a pre-existing civil society. Iraq and Afghanistan prove daily that they did not and do not have a civil society.

  • [7] June 3, 2015 at 5:29am

    A good tree bears good fruit. A good tree does not bear corrupt fruit. A corrupt tree bears corrupt fruit. A corrupt tree does not bear good fruit. By their fruits you shall know them. Please learn this, my fellow people of America.

  • [2] June 2, 2015 at 1:21pm

    I am not so sure of the details but I agree that is the high level strategy. I believe it is the Dem side leadership that is behind all the leaks of Clinton corruption. They understand that HRC is a terrible candidate and that she will lose if nominated, but they can’t be seen publicly as being disloyal to their royals – hence all the scandalous leaks about HRC. I bet the Clintons understand this and are fuming, as they were when BHO snatched the nomination from HRC in 2008.

  • [3] May 25, 2015 at 12:36pm

    Aside from the obvious taking the Constitution out of context and twisting its meaning into a pretzel, as the Left does on a regular basis, notice how the Left use the Constitution and the Bible (two documents they don’t believe in) to support their positions. (Of course, they use bogus interpretations of these documents to do so.) They are so stunningly insincere.

  • [5] May 24, 2015 at 2:30pm

    I believe that tweet does reflect the heart of the modern Democrat Party.

  • [39] April 27, 2015 at 10:50am

    Each of the women are moderately to very attractive. I don’t believe Kayla that she chose the women at random.

    It isn’t true that the church doesn’t love “who she is”. It is the sins that aren’t loved. (The LDS church considers homosexuality a sin, as it does pedophilia, incest, necrophilia, name your -philia. You might disagree but that is the state.) A male womanizer’s womanizing isn’t going to be accepted either. An open womanizer is certainly going to feel uncomfortable in the LDS church. But the person isn’t persecuted and is welcome by the church as long as the person doesn’t try to get others within the church to join him/her in the way they live. So Kayla’s characterization of the church is not correct, but of course she is uncomfortable. Even a smoker isn’t going to feel comfortable, but it is because how the person feels about him/herself, not because of any actions by the church.

    Responses (15) +
  • [1] April 25, 2015 at 11:42am

    I agree with Whiplash completely. This guy was just a guard. He is not Himmler or Hitler. He is already in his last days. Forgive him and move on. Seeking revenge on this guard is more destructive to those seeking vengeance than to him.

    Of course, this doesn’t speak to the legal issues, but more to us as people. I don’t know if the German system has anything like prosecutorial discretion. In the US today, prosecutorial discretion seems to be used more often as an excuse to look the other way for cronies or favored groups, rather than for making use of limited resources or for making allowances for extenuating circumstances. Prosecutorial discretion today in the US seems to be an excuse for injustice under the law.

  • April 20, 2015 at 1:36am

    Add me to the list of those that want to hear such an explanation.

    Mark Levin says it is self-hating Jews. I think that accounts for some, like George Soros, but I don’t think that is a full explanation. The president of one company I worked for is definitely a proud Jew yet is a self described “dye-in-wool” Democrat, as was his father. However, he did admit to be dumbfounded by many Democrat policies. He said he could not and did not vote for Jimmy Carter in 1980, but he wouldn’t vote Republican either. As far as I can tell for him, supporting Democrat is a family tradition that is almost as hard for him to break as Yom Kippur.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 18, 2015 at 12:24pm

    I don’t think it is sexist. However, I don’t think it is nice. What value is there in this photo? Best case, what was there to gain by posting it? As a person in the public eye, Mr. Buble needs to take a little more thought than most about what he is associated with. He should know that. Sorry, but that is the price of fame. If he doesn’t care about his fame or popularity, he can feel free to reclaim his liberty.

    I don’t think Mr. Buble should be skewered over this at all, but it is stupid and tasteless and there is no upside in posting it, in my opinion.

  • [1] April 17, 2015 at 4:06pm

    I am fascinated by the strength and power of gorillas and pit bulls. They seem to be a giant muscle.

    Speaking of pit bulls, my niece has a dog that is a pit bull labrador mix. It is an interesting dog. It has the and strong muscular appearance of a pit bull but with the friendly easy going personality of a lab.

  • [3] April 16, 2015 at 4:34pm

    So where does Ms. Saldana draw the line on following the law or the president’s directive? It sounds to me that she is like the soldiers at Tiananmen in1989 and would shoot and kill her fellow citizens because the president ordered it. Oh, my example is extreme you say? Then tell where is that line and is that line clear? Regardless, I believe it is the duty of higher ups to challenge the president when ordered to do something immoral or illegal. Was that part of the lesson of the Nuremberg trials?

  • [3] April 16, 2015 at 4:17pm

    It seems the Blaze used a picture concerning the 2nd Ft Hood shooting in an article about the 1st Ft Hood shooting, Someone messed up.

  • [2] April 16, 2015 at 2:16pm

    Some jobs have to be done, such as accounting, custodial. Some jobs are created because increases production or sales of the companies product. If the COST of that additional product/sales exceeds the REVENUE from that additional production/sales, that job will be eliminated. That is also basic economics which few seem to discuss. The Left seems to be ignorant or deliberately ignores. So if that $9/hour burger flipper produces $12/hour of product, a $15/hour minimum wage will result in that position being eliminated.

  • [2] April 8, 2015 at 10:45am

    On the day of the year commemorating the resurrection of Jesus, Obama uses the occasion to beat up on his political opponents. He claims to be Christian but I don’t see any evidence of it.

  • [10] April 8, 2015 at 10:43am

    “cherry picking the Bible to rebuke Christians” – That technique is from Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, rule #4. This is a book with an expression of admiration for Lucifer in the forward.

    Obama is a disciple of Alinsky. Hillary Clinton was not only a disciple of Alinsky but knew him personally and had a friendship with him. The Democrats have been applying Alinsky quite a lot, particularly during the Obama administration. Those techniques have proved very effective but no honorable person could use them.

  • April 5, 2015 at 3:56pm

    Agreed, but I am sure she knows it, as does everyone else So what is the point in commenting on it. There is no value in the comment except for a cheap snicker. I also think Ms. Susteren should have let it go. Does every little comment made in bad taste need to be policed? (My opinion is “no”, but some, such as Ms. Sustern, apparently don’t agree.)

  • [20] April 5, 2015 at 3:51pm

    That mostly applies to me as well. (This differences are I am 53, drive a Mustang, and am not White; I assume you are White because of the privileged redneck part.) I can’t watch MSNBC or Obama speak because I am almost guaranteed to feel insulted by what they say.

    The head of MSNBC has said he believe their rating are plummeting because their programming is boring. No. It is because they insult their audience and their audience’s intelligent constantly.

    Responses (2) +
  • [7] April 5, 2015 at 1:02pm

    Exactly. Do people here only believe in private property rights when there is no associated “heart tugging” story?

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love