User Profile: getoffmylawncommies

getoffmylawncommies

Member Since: June 14, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • May 29, 2015 at 3:35pm

    This is honestly hilarious.

    You think calling somebody out is limiting their rights? That is the most backwards, self-defeating argument I’ve ever heard.

    So you think that saying MSNBC is a biased, running joke of a News Organization is limiting their right to broadcast the news?

    Think before you hit “Post,” please.

  • May 29, 2015 at 3:33pm

    lol….what?

    Did you even read the comment I was replying to?

    armyof7 said: “To equate Iraq and an Islamic Government is to say the United States has a Christian Government.”

    That’s just blatantly false. The Iraqi Government IS an IsIamic Government. It’s literally in the first sentence of their Constitution.

    The Marine in this article said the he believes IsIam is rooted in terrorism; that it’s inherently evil.

    Cooper used his own logic against him, saying that would mean US soldiers in Iraq were over there supporting and building an evil, terrorist government.

    I’m not tying anything back to conservative theory. I find it a little puzzling as to why you’d think so…

    I did not mention Conservative Republicans once. I did not imply anything about Conservative Republicans. This interview/video, this article, nor armyof7′s comment does not have ANYTHING to do with Conservative Republicans.

    Grow up.

  • May 29, 2015 at 3:28pm

    …what outrageous lie? This man believes that IsIam is rooted in terrorism.

    By his own logic, he then thinks that US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan were over there supporting and building a terrorist government.

  • [1] May 29, 2015 at 3:27pm

    Are you having a nervous breakdown?

  • May 29, 2015 at 3:07pm

    fortherecord: I was replying to a post by “hi” that claimed this can only happen in America.

    That’s nonsense. It happens everywhere.

  • May 29, 2015 at 3:05pm

    MS: Dude, are you honestly that much a drama queen?

    In your mind posting a simple reply to a comment = rushing to the defense of a fellow progressive?

    So every single reply you’ve ever posted here was “rushing to the defense of a fellow conservative?”

    Is this seriously how you live your life? It’s sad.

  • May 29, 2015 at 3:04pm

    Why would I get angry about that? It’s a fact.

    All I said was that the average your referencing can be very misleading to a lot of people (for the reasons I posted)…because it can be.

    It’s ridiculous to argue against that.

  • May 29, 2015 at 2:59pm

    “Anecdotal evidence is considered dubious support of a generalized claim; it is, however, within the scope of scientific method for claims regarding particular instances.”

    This is a claim regarding a particular instance. The instance is the highest paid female CEO vs. the highest paid male CEO.

    It was used to highlight to disparity between two numbers. I wasn’t using it in a generalized claim (no matter what you pretend/think was my cryptic message).

    Perfectly within the scientific-method.

    Nice try though!

  • May 29, 2015 at 2:55pm

    You are honestly just arguing with yourself right now.

    The only reason I used Mr. Zaslav’s salary was to show that Mayer’s salary isn’t that outlandish in the grand scheme of things.

    It’s literally the absolute perfect time to use anecdotal evidence. Like literally one of the only instances where it’s accepted.

  • May 29, 2015 at 2:51pm

    See? Perfect example of what I mean when you assume and project.

    I have never, EVER, in my entire life propagated that “77 cents to every dollar” thing. If you want to yell at a cardboard cutout of a “liberal,” go right ahead. Just don’t pretend it’s me.

  • May 29, 2015 at 2:48pm

    lol, now I see you’re just troIIing.

    Makes sense.

    TroII away!

  • May 29, 2015 at 2:46pm

    Yes, that average is absolutely a fact. All I said is that the average can be misleading to many people, as there are exponentially more male CEO’s than female.

    It makes perfect sense that their average salary will rise at a rate much higher than their male counterparts.

    And the limits to the State are enumerated in The Constitution of the United States of America.

  • May 29, 2015 at 2:42pm

    MS: Okay, now I’m honestly beginning to think you are a little mentally-challenged.

    I’ll break this down so you can understand it better:

    I. Stated. A. Fact.
    The fact that I state has absolutely no bearing on what I think of the situation or what I think should remedy the situation.

    The averages you/The Blaze posted can be very misleading for the very reason I posted. When there are only a handful women among the top 100 highest paid CEO’s, their average salary will be extremely misleading.

    Again, that’s all I’m saying. Nothing “communist.” Nothing “progressive.” HeII, nothing “liberal.”

  • [-1] May 29, 2015 at 2:34pm

    Sweden: Sven Johan Gösta Barthen Hagströmer

    Germany: Karl Hans Albrecht

    England: Sir Frederick Henry Royce

  • May 29, 2015 at 2:19pm

    …do you understand how averages and/or statistics work?

    Women make up 5.5 percent of the highest paid CEO’s. When their salaries rise, OF COURSE the average salary of a female CEO will skyrocket as compared to that of male CEO’s.

    I suggest you read Derek Pilling’s “The Fallacy of Averages.”

  • May 29, 2015 at 2:13pm

    MS: lol…what?

    No, I don’t look to the state to “remedy this situation.” That’s exactly what I’m talking about when you blindly assume that everyone you’re dealing with here is some cartoon-ish version of a liberal activist. I don’t look the the state for anything.

    And you should probably enroll in your local Community College’s statistics class. I’ll start with this, what do you think there are more of; male or female CEO’s?

  • [1] May 29, 2015 at 2:08pm

    jb: ummm….the Marine in this interview/story is claiming that IsIam=Terrorism.

    Did you even watch the video or read the article?

  • May 29, 2015 at 2:07pm

    jb: I’d like you to point out here is saying that you don’t have the right to draw muhammad or say offensive things…

  • [2] May 29, 2015 at 2:06pm

    Who is saying they don’t have the right to do this?

    Questioning the motives of something or someone isn’t stripping anyone’s rights away…

  • [2] May 29, 2015 at 2:04pm

    ummmm…The new Iraqi Government IS an IsIamist Government.

    “The federal government of Iraq is defined under the current Constitution, approved in 2005, as an Islamic, democratic, federal parliamentary republic.”

    And your claim about CAIR and ISIS????

    Direct quote from CAIR:

    “”American Muslims view the actions of ISIS as un-Islamic and morally repugnant. No religion condones the murder of civilians, the beheading of religious scholars or the desecration of houses of worship. We condemn the actions of ISIS and reject its assertion that all Muslims are required to pay allegiance to its leader.

    “CAIR strongly urges American imams and other community leaders to continue to speak out against American Muslims traveling abroad to join extremist groups and sectarian militias. While ISIS uses romanticized imagery in its propaganda materials, its human rights abuses on the ground are well-documented.”

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love