User Profile: getoffmylawncommies

getoffmylawncommies

Member Since: June 14, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [5] April 24, 2015 at 4:54pm

    Arnold’s a sneakily smart dude. He was a self-made millionaire at 22 years old from real estate investments and starting a mail-order body building equipment company.

  • [8] April 24, 2015 at 4:40pm

    You are literally only saying this because the kid is bIack.

    FYI: That’s why people sometimes call you guys racists.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 24, 2015 at 4:19pm

    Or possibly just a woman that noticed a man pointing a handgun at a group of people while she was walking out of the grocery store.

  • April 24, 2015 at 4:15pm

    How about when I repeatedly post that Barack Obama has been a bad President?

    Na, probably not that huh?

  • [-1] April 24, 2015 at 4:13pm

    Nebraska: Very true. I also don’t think George W. Bush actually believes in God.

    Paladin: k

  • April 24, 2015 at 4:07pm

    …I was referring more to the claim that “bIacks, hispanics, and NON whites” don’t get unjustly harassed by the police.

    But by all means please focus on “liberals.”

  • [-1] April 24, 2015 at 2:26pm

    That would be the final nail in his Presidential hopes coffin.

  • [5] April 24, 2015 at 2:25pm

    Nobody is blaming Senator Cruz, they are wondering why he flew to Dallas for a fundraiser, rather than do his job.

    It just looks bad for his brand. He’s supposed to be the no-nonsense, values-based elected official that’s here to serve the people. This makes him look like a normal politician, worried more about his fundraising obligations rather than actually being a Senator.

  • [7] April 24, 2015 at 2:08pm

    When it’s the Statue of Liberty and there are countless children on the island for a field trip, I’d say it’s best to err on the side of caution.

  • [-2] April 24, 2015 at 2:03pm

    What problem, being unjustly harassed by the police?

    Is that a serious question?

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] April 24, 2015 at 1:50pm

    I am far, far from an “ultra liberal.”

    What makes you think I’m “ultra liberal?”

  • [-2] April 24, 2015 at 1:35pm

    You betcha, everyone knows that making a guarantee in a comment on an article on Glenn Beck’s website is legally binding. MSSoldier’s got me there.

  • [1] April 24, 2015 at 1:29pm

    “When Wal-Mart sent three trailer trucks loaded with water, FEMA officials turned them away, he said. Agency workers prevented the Coast Guard from delivering 1,000 gallons of diesel fuel, and on Saturday they cut the parish’s emergency communications line, leading the sheriff to restore it and post armed guards to protect it from FEMA.”

    You are going to sit there and say FEMA handled this well? What world do you live in. Nagin was a huge POS, and is largely to blame.

    How about this, do you think President Bush or his administration did ANYTHING wrong, incorrectly, or untimely?

    If you are going to defend President Bush and his administration on absolutely everything that happened during his Presidency, than you believe he was the best President in our Nation’s history. The perfect President. He never did anything wrong, nor does he have to shoulder any blame whatsoever for anything that happened during his Presidency.

    That sounds like an indoctrinated apologist propaganda minister, not a rational American.

  • [-3] April 24, 2015 at 1:22pm

    No, it doesn’t have to do anything. I am making a guarantee, based on my opinion. Bush, like his father and Reagan, barely ever attended/attends mass.

    I don’t think the Bush family is very religious. I think that strongly enough to make a guarantee in a comment on an article on Glenn Beck’s website.

    Stop pretending we’re in the court of law. You are sounding like an idiot.

  • [-1] April 24, 2015 at 1:01pm

    MS:

    Uh…what? I actually said, verbatim “9/11 happened on his watch.”

    I then, as I said before, mentioned in that exact same comment that I am not blaming Bush personally or solely for the attacks, just stating that they happened on his watch, and Presidents will ALWAYS be “blamed” for things that occur during their Presidency.

    Learn how to read, please. It will greatly help you in your life.

    For Katrina, I said that he fumbled the response, because he did. It took weeks just to deliver bottled water to the survivors, let alone rescue and actually help them.

    And, once again, I also said that this was in no way his fault personally, nor solely. Again, a President will ALWAYS be “blamed” for things that occur during their Presidency.

    It’s frankly baffling that you can’t comprehend this.

  • [-11] April 24, 2015 at 12:58pm

    I 100% guarantee you that neither Obama nor Bush actually believe in God.

    I’d venture to say that the last U.S. President to actually believe in God was Jimmy Carter.

    Responses (10) +
  • [1] April 24, 2015 at 12:52pm

    Very true, I was just commenting on the claim that people were watching the fight but only called the police when a handgun was drawn.

    That’s just speculation (I think, at least).

  • [4] April 24, 2015 at 12:49pm

    Yes there were numerous factors cited in the Iraq Resolution, but the decision to invade Iraq was absolutely largely based on the assertion that Saddam had either a WMD stockpile or an active program.

    If the exact same Iraq Resolution (but without the assertions of WMD or WMD programs) was brought in front of Congress, it would not have passed.

    That’s what “largely based on” means.

    You’re welcome.

  • April 24, 2015 at 12:44pm

    No, I don’t think we invaded for oil.

    See what I’m talking about? You (for some unknown reason) think I am some ultra-liberal activist. If you’re going to act that way, you might as well just talk to a wall with a cardboard cutout of a “liberal” taped to it. Every single one of you assumptions about me is 100% wrong. I guarantee you I am far, far more “conservative” than you think.

    Iraq harbored no more terrorists than Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Jordan, Oman, Tunisia, etc.

    I think we invaded Iraq because the powers that be wanted to topple Hussein. Not because of WMDs, not because of IsIamic terrorist “alliances” etc.

  • [2] April 24, 2015 at 12:25pm

    1) With all that being said, it was still wrong to invade and occupy Iraq for a decade. So you’re saying that it’s perfectly acceptable to invade and occupy a country for 10+ years because “they might someday start working with IsIamic terrorists.” Saddam nor Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with the attacks on September 11th, 2001. Nothing. You think we invaded and occupied Iraq for a decade because of a “possible alliance.” That’s one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard.

    2) I said the attacks on 9/11 happened on Bush’s watch. They did. You’re the one that took that as me personally blaming President Bush for the attacks (obviously disregarding the statement I wrote in that EXACT same comment, where I say it was in no way President Bush’s fault personally nor solely, but President’s are always “blamed” for what happens during their Presidency).

    You just start making stuff up out of thin air about me blaming Bush. I said it happened on his watch. It did. I purposefully stated it in a way where I was saying that it happened during his Presidency, I never once said it was his fault, nor blamed him personally.

    I suggest you stop using my benign and factual comments as some sounding board for imaginary liberals that you disagree with.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love