User Profile: GhostOfJefferson

GhostOfJefferson

Member Since: September 01, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [4] September 10, 2014 at 2:22pm

    Besides, he doesn’t read other people’s posts. He throws crap bombs onto threads then runs away like the sissy he is. It matters not what anybody says to him, he is a cipher.

  • [6] September 10, 2014 at 2:21pm

    He’s insinuating the GOP are war mongerers. I ask that he check his premise, since he is a member of the party that has started more wars in American history than all the others combined. If he wishes to criticize then he needs to address the plank in his own eye before the splinter in others, first.

    I’m sorry if that paints the left in a bad light.

    Ok, I’m kidding, I’m not sorry.

  • [2] September 10, 2014 at 2:10pm

    Aye, exactly. It’s like having Jeffery Daumer as a representative of the Beef Council. Probably not a great marketing idea, eh?

  • [4] September 10, 2014 at 2:04pm

    You may wish to check on which party has started more wars in U.S. history than any other.

    You may be a bit shocked, so be sure to be ready to dissemble to your own self until you’ve rationalized it away.

    Responses (3) +
  • [30] September 10, 2014 at 2:03pm

    That didn’t seem like a swipe at libertarians, rather, a swipe at isolationism. Which libertarians, to my knowledge, do not advocate. You’re not an isolationist if you want to open up free trade across the planet. That’s kind of the opposite of isolation.

    The real term, Blaze, is “military adventurism”. That’s what Cheney stands for. His kind never get enough war, and when they get war they go ahead and start creating the next enemy to be fought in the next war. They then scream for a new war because the new enemy of their own creation has, surprise surprise, gotten all uppity. A never ending cycle.

    Responses (10) +
  • [105] September 9, 2014 at 3:56pm

    There was no love lost between her and the Obamas, at least after the second election. You’ll notice that Obama went on and gave a personal message about Robin Williams, but Joan Rivers – not a peep (unless he did and I didn’t hear it, which would be odd).

    Responses (1) +
  • [19] September 9, 2014 at 3:51pm

    She’s a typical leftist feminist. She wants all of the fun that comes from having a body, without any of the responsibility for what she does with that body.

  • [2] September 9, 2014 at 2:48pm

    Instead of down rating, how about openly challenging my points? Or does that take too much effort and you’re afraid you might not be able to win the debate, down raters? Hmmmm?

  • [23] September 9, 2014 at 2:41pm

    She looks like a Marine with pink hair, dear. Your feminist shaming techniques don’t work on me, they only make me laugh. Heh. See? I laughed right there.

    Here’s a hint: the majority of straight men don’t find buzz cut up the sides, pink dyed hair attractive. Do it “for my own empowerment!(tm)” if you want, but we’re just going to laugh at you AND pass you over as a potential romantic prospect.

    You may now return to HuffPo. G’day.

  • [4] September 9, 2014 at 2:11pm

    With an average divorce rate at or above 50%, it’s only logical to figure the odds, n’est-ce pas?

  • [9] September 9, 2014 at 2:10pm

    No, we were not immigrants, we were colonists and invaders. We came in and settled, and if the natives didn’t like it, we killed them. Like it or hate it, it’s a fact. That is not “immigration” in the same sense we’re talking about today.

    Women are not getting married because they spend their prime child bearing years in a corporate cubicle. By the time they feel the clock ticking they are past their prime and finding it harder and harder to lock down some simpy schlub. You see, men are catching on to the horrible Family Court racket that destroys the lives of men. So, women buy cats and cry into their pillows at night, and men disappear into the shadows or off to foreign lands to snag actual feminine “non-empowered” women.

    And our population declines.

    During the depression you’d find the average household with 4+ children, btw.

  • [6] September 9, 2014 at 1:33pm

    Our future is the nation becoming one large Detroit.

    Responses (1) +
  • [18] September 9, 2014 at 1:32pm

    We’ve been educated to self exterminate. This is why the illegals are being brought in, we’ve “chosen” to decline.

    -Birth control pills
    -abortion on demand
    -high sexual promiscuity resulting in less desirable marriagable mates to pair up with
    -celebration of homosexuality (by definition, non-sexually reproducing)
    -feminism and its “don’t have kids, have a career!” message
    - Constant media messaging that family is bad
    - celebration of the “single mom”
    - Divorce culture

    Results: Declining birthrate run amok. Families disappearing. Importing illegals to replace the native population. Europe also going the same route.

    If I were conspiracy minded, I might just notice some kind of pattern here.

    Responses (6) +
  • [6] September 9, 2014 at 1:28pm

    Something about short cropped hair, tatts and piercings is not exactly endearing. Unless you’re into Marines. I guess.

  • [116] September 9, 2014 at 11:43am

    Ah, the short cropped hair, the tatts, the promiscuity, the glee in publicly seeking funds to kill your own child.

    Feminism: You’ve come a long way baby!

    Responses (3) +
  • [39] September 9, 2014 at 11:37am

    The process in the American system is brutal. It’s not that people don’t want to adopt here, it’s that the system is so cumbersome and expensive that you’re really better off looking elsewhere.

    You may extend your thanks for this situation to your local government paid social working drone.

  • September 9, 2014 at 11:23am

    You letting her in is the same reason we don’t have any male spaces left. You know, and I know. that men act and talk differently when women are not around. You notice the sickness, but then you yourself have helped spread it by your own admission.

    We need male spaces for men to be men again. Sorry ladies.

  • [10] September 9, 2014 at 11:21am

    How is it that women have the ability to hit a man without recourse, but men should never hit back? They are empowered and independent now and they Don’t Need No Man! ™. This is what equality looks like. When women go back to being feminine and sweet then come talk to me about the special privileges we used to grant that type of woman.

    And here’s a really funny clue: The chick married him after this. Ponder that, if you will.

  • [1] September 2, 2014 at 2:38pm

    That’s putting the cart before the horse a bit isn’t it? I don’t believe Syria was a known hotbed of journalist beheadings prior to this, and they were captured last year or longer, not last week.

  • [70] September 2, 2014 at 2:35pm

    Something I don’t understand: Why do they read the messages (the captives)? They know they’re going to die, or at least the second guy knew what was up. So why do it? I really don’t understand the tactic of going along with peacefully with a guy you know is going to behead you with a small knife, thus torturing you in the most terrible way possible. I’d rather spit in their face and tell them to f-off defiantly than to sit there and read their propaganda while the barbarian readied his blade.

    Responses (5) +
123 To page: Go