User Profile: Gitbakup

Gitbakup

Member Since: November 07, 2012

Comments

123
  • [6] June 23, 2016 at 3:10pm

    I’m not a legal scholar.I might be wrong.I have absolutely no faith in the GOP to do what needs to be done.
    I’m having fantasies in la-la land.No need to explain that to me.
    I would delay the indictments until Obama has no chance to grant her a pardon.Then,I might wait as much as one more minute just so there would be no clock argument. Then drop the hammer.
    Snowden compromised national security.He is in deep trouble,and will be prosecuted if the Feds get hold of him.
    At least for Snowden the arguement can be made that his motives were to expose Federal Gov abuse of citizens.Whistleblower.Trying to be part of the solution.(No,I’m not a Snowden advocate)
    Hillary’s carelessness with classified info is at least as unlawful and damaging.
    I do not know all of her motives.I do not suspect anything admirable.
    Follow the money is always a good bet.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] May 5, 2016 at 9:40am

    You are spewing the same crap that has been repeated for decades.The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over expecting different results.
    Rove is wrong.
    Your mantra was supposed to elect Dole.It failed.Your “Truth” was supposed to elect McCain.You were wrong again.”Romney ,the moderate,is the only one who can win”

    George Bush had to go through all the hanging chad BS and he BARELY squeeked out a contested win…..Against who? That thundering powerhouse(moron) Al Gore??or John Kerry?
    Who did McCain lose to?Junior Obama,a 6 month rookie senator with nothing.Who did Romney lose to?SECOND TERM Obama!!!
    All that your pragmatism has gotten us is losers and a corrupted SCOTUS.Your hot air is pure speculation which history has proven not credible.You and yours pick LOSERS.The cost has been near destruction of USA.
    “Pragmatics” like YOU said the same thing,tha Ronald Reagan could not win in 1980.He answered with an incredible landslide victory.
    Those are FACTS of History that demonstrate your theory is stupid and wrong.
    Your mantra is to protect the very corrupt,impotent,spineless,worthless POS in the RINO establishment GOP,which IS the problem.
    One more thing.Yes,I am very concerned about SCOTUS.
    I seriously doubt Trump has ever read the Constitution.But he does make “deals”.I don’t want “deals”with our Constitution

  • [92] May 5, 2016 at 2:21am

    Hannity,you live in the small,narcissistic,self aggrandizing world of NYC.It has truly limited your mind.You need to get out more.
    You also need to get honest.I listened to you get on your knees for Trump and marginalize (or worse) Cruz.
    Now you are lying about it.
    Your Trump advocacy made a difference,both for Trump and against Cruz.And you are accountable.We’ll see how Trump does.If its good,I’ll give you credit.If not,you are personally responsible..
    You played a part in robbing what Cruz would have done for the USA from my Grandchildren.You,personally.
    Now you try to run and hide because you know what you did.It won’t wash off,Hannity.
    You have thrown away Trust,Respect,Credibility.
    Those do not come back.You are done.So is Fox News.Oreilly is a joke.Megan will leave.Fox has lost what made them successful.
    Its why Glenn left.
    You are a fraud,Hannity.Alan Combs has more of my respect than you do.And Huffington post has higher credibility than Fox News.
    You may not know it yet,but its over for you.
    The Blaze,Levin TV,,other outlets will rise,and you and Fox will go the way of big newspapers and Detroit.
    No one likes liars,frauds,sellouts.
    And yes,me too. “F” you,Hannity .

    Responses (8) +
  • [8] October 26, 2015 at 5:34pm

    People younger than 50 something have not experienced a Conservative administration.Most of them have an image of Conservatism that was taught to them by the media,a liberal education system,and peers who have the same experience.They do not have the foundational principles (such as knowledge of the Constitution) to work with.Even the Patriots who founded this Nation have been trashed .They have Alynski instead.
    I will agree with an outreach to educate many more folks to what Conservatism is,and how non-chrony,free market capitalism floats the boat.
    I support that sort of outreach.That is what Reagan did.It worked,creating the greatest electoral landslides in USA history.
    Actually our AM Radio Conservative hosts carry on that tradition more effectively than anyone else today.
    I will ask Rand Paul if he is educating folks on how Conservatism is the path to Liberty and Prosperity ,or is he pandering and compromising Conservatism to pastels rather than bold colors?Instant mashed potatoes?
    I believe if we give Ted Cruz the microphone and podium,give him the opportunity to speak to the American People,the message of Conservatism will reach out.
    The more I listen to Rand Paul,the less I want him on the ballot.
    The more I listen to Ted Cruz,the more certain I am heis my choice for President.

  • [1] August 20, 2015 at 12:04am

    Yes,well,if I am one man about to be lynched by a mob of 99,I represent 1%.The major point of the Constitution is to protect Individual Liberty.Individual.That means the Liberty of one Human Being.
    The lynch mob is Democracy.Majority rule.Tyranny of the majority.
    Monarchy and Theocracy are also inevitably tyrannical.
    Our Founders did quite well in establishing a Constitutional Republic….if,as Ben Franklin pointed out,we can keep it.

  • August 19, 2015 at 11:55pm

    This one seems quite simple.
    A court house wedding must remain secular.That clerk cannot refuse to marry an atheist couple,yet a church certainly can.
    If I were a vegan who took a job at a steakhouse,it would not work out for me if I refused to serve beef.Yet I could open a vegan restaurant and not serve meat.
    The Gov’t is forbidden by the1st amendment from “establishing” what the Covenant of Marriage”might mean for a particular church…..whether the Gov’t respects and obeys the Constitution or not.

  • August 19, 2015 at 11:24pm

    I would first say I support Individual Liberty.Thomas Jefferson said something about “If it neither robs my pocket nor breaks my leg….” I also believe in authenticity.I believe LGBT people should be free to be authentic.I do not believe in discrimination against LGBT people.
    At the same time,I believe in the religious freedom protected in the First Ammendment.The silly part of this debate,the word “marriage” has more than one meaning.There is a civil meaning that,IMO,should remain secular.I believe that a Church,and Individuals,have a right to a definition of Marriage as a Covenant defined by God in their tradition.Government has no right to “establish” what that covnenant may be.
    I think it is horribly wrong that this example with the bakery has resulted in a draconian fine levied against the bakery for following conscience…yet I am troubled by the picture of “We don’t serve your kind here”.
    Perhaps I have found a path through this minefield that could hold up in court.
    It is not OK to refuse service to someone because they are LGBT.If the baker makes wedding cakes,he should not refuse a couple a wedding cake because they are gay.
    However,the baker does have a right to determine what product is on the menu. I cannot/would not force a Kosher Deli to make a bacon sandwich.The baker may offer a limited catalogue of cakes he will produce.
    But,he must not refuse to serve the LGBT couple.
    That covers questions about Nazi cakes and Confederate flag cakes.”I do not make those”

  • [7] March 27, 2015 at 5:44pm

    Amusing!!Once again,the ProgRat twist to define the argument.Dems or not,the law was written to make killing the unborn easy and convenient by simply labeling the unborn non-persons.This position does seem to lie in the ProgRat camp.
    The outrage over the lack of homicide charges in this case brings appropriate focus on the fallacy of labeling an unborn child a non person.

  • March 26, 2015 at 11:33pm

    Ridiculous.I offer no support for that has-been ,pathetic fishwrap that used to be a newspaper…..but it is weak and foolish to give the power to define an argument to your opposition.
    Those words are androgenous.The lack gender.
    This group that assembled the list insults women by assigning women these characteristics.
    Perhaps they are only defining their own fears by listing a few of Hillary’s many vulnerabilities.
    I would call it great SNL comedy material.

  • March 24, 2015 at 4:41am

    Regarding establishment DC RINOS,and the squishy go along to get along,I must agree.King included.
    Cruz ,however..We are going to elect this man.I believe there will be results we have not seen in thirty years.

  • March 24, 2015 at 4:38am

    A) Libsknowbetter B) Only according to libs C) Libs lie a lot D) Libs love to believe in the lies of bigger libs E) Libs live in the realm of illusion F) Truth IS inevitable G) Therefore,it is the destiny of Libs to become disillusioned H)The pangs of disillusionment may be the path to embitterment,or the birth pangs of Adulthood.
    On America,Libsknowbetter,”You did not build that”.The Founders and Patriots built it,based not on any Man or Woman ruler,but Principles Recorded on Great Documents.
    Looney? By what absurd thought process do you describe those who uphold the Constitution and Liberty Looney?We are America,and you are an ungrateful spoiled child
    ProgRats…..

  • March 24, 2015 at 4:21am

    Wrong.The legal scholars have already determined Mr Cruz is good to go.
    See,I get on account of where you live they only got two mules,a wagon and 4 horses,and more shoes on the horses than the folks.
    And you do live in a big county.But
    They done made these Aeroplanes and such,folks get out more.
    There is foriegners hate America,don’t understand America,and that iswhythe Constitution says like that.Folks who would hate the Constitution and fundamentally want to change America.Now,how could a man say to his new bride,”Sugarplum,I LOVE YOU with ALLmy Heart,and now I’m going to fundamentally transform you..like it or not.
    Them Founders was Smart that way.
    But I listened to lots of folks.Some not from around here.Some wholived in Poland,Hungary….and Cuba.Some folks who know from cages and blood and tears and bones in the earth what “NOT free,and NOT America are about.Its like if you ever really been hungry,food is different.
    Now you get a man or woman comes from some communist dictator tyrant Marxist etc place…they get to America…its like sunshine and rain and they sprout,and they grow and blossom.They become an American Tree..Ain’t no doubt those are Americans who would fight,bleed and die for our flag,as many have.
    So I suggest you put yur nit pikkin aside,itsdark,hateful,ugly,and it ain’t about the Constitution.
    So that our Grandchildren can know America,Freedom and the Constitution,we need Ted Cruz.
    Jebbie ain’t gonna cut it.He will lose,anyway

  • [1] March 24, 2015 at 3:54am

    Yeah.Cruz was never going to be elected Senator,either.And that Actor guy…Reagan?He had No chance,either.
    All the news had me really bummed that Benjamin Netanyahu was done.
    See,I don’t believe Fox News,or CNN,or MSNBC,or NPR….
    Understand,all those outlets are telling YOU what you are SUPPOSED to believe.
    Suppose we do not give them permission to craft our thoughts.
    I will tell you who is not electable.Hint,they told you McCain was the electable one.They told you Romney was the electable one..
    So when they piss down your neck,,and tell you its raining,you believe them?
    Its folks like you that help put LOSERS on the ballot.And so its folks like you who put Obama in office.
    Now you have a chance to do something different.
    I’m with Cruz all the way.
    Who Dares,Wins

  • [1] March 24, 2015 at 3:39am

    Eloquent,Sir!

  • March 24, 2015 at 3:37am

    I did not know Rodney.But I do know that at least once in his life he spoke something of profound merit.”Can’t we all just get along”?
    AFAIK,King has never made such a contribution to society.
    Without sugar coating Rodney King,Perhaps you over compliment Peter King.

  • [3] March 24, 2015 at 2:13am

    I am delighted to hear Mr King’s assessment of Sen Cruz’s debating skills.I look forward to debates between Sen Cruz and Jeb Bush,or Hillary.
    It will be entertaining.
    I’d be delighted to tell you more,but I prefer not to spoil the ending of the story for you.Oh,well I’ll tell you.Sen Cruz was in the debate club at school!! :-)

  • [1] March 20, 2015 at 2:25am

    “The video at NBC” Enough said?Try this:Search “Boulder County DA ,Longmont attack”
    See what you find out.

  • [3] March 20, 2015 at 12:12am

    Pending the childs autopsy results.The law will only consider this Mother’s Child a person if the Child was alive and viable “for a period of time” outside the womb.If this Child is deemed “not a person” then homicide or murder charges cannot be filed.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] March 20, 2015 at 12:07am

    The Boulder County ,Co,DA has jurisdiction.Per radio announcement,filing charges is pending the autopsy being performed on the baby.If the baby was not viably living “for a period of time” outside the mother,the laws protecting abortion label this 7 month unborn baby a fetus,a non-person.Per the DA office,it will then be impossible to file any homicide or murder charges.
    I’m sure the Mother who was attacked will find great comfort in that.(No,I think ,in addition to her horrific experience being attacked,and the loss of her baby…this is real crap)

    Responses (1) +
  • [15] March 11, 2015 at 6:04pm

    Community organizing??

    Responses (2) +
123