TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying gladwing's 10 most recent comments.

• Here Are the 5 Key Things to Take Away From Wednesday’s Benghazi Hearing

  May 9, 2013 at 7:21am

  In reply to SpankDaMonkey.

  That is unfornately true. To quote Al Gore “Their’s no controlling legal authority.” This is what happens when we elect people with no honor! The very meaning of freedom has changed from freedom to govern self to freedom to get a free phone. It’s in Gods’ hands now. Lord have mercy!

• ‘Are You Human?’: Gosnell Trial Brings Fiery Claims, Murderous Accusations in Closing Arguments — Here Are All the Details

  May 3, 2013 at 8:51am

  In 1973 at least five men/women declared that it was legal to kill unborn babies (US Supreme Court). since than over 100,000,000 millon babies have been slauthered. If we allow them to be human beings and not tissue than we have killed more innocent people than any other nation in history! This includes Germany, Russia, China and many others. The world view that thought it was “OK” to kill people off that got in the way of “progress” is the same. The next step will be child sacrifice after they are born. Recently I had our young nephew come stay with me and my wife, out of the blue he asked: “What is evil?” I was speechless. Later I gave him the book “Pisoner In Cell 25″ by Micheal Paul Evans. I thought about this and I come to realize that outside of the Judeo-Christian world view evil can not be defined and does not exist. But, if God is real and I know He is, than his judgement upon this nation will sadly come swiftly and he will distroy us because we have broken his covenant. I predict it will take only one hour. (Rev. 18)

• Famed Atheist Richard Dawkins: Forcing Religion on Kids Is ‘Child Abuse’

  April 23, 2013 at 11:45pm

  In reply to tnman65.

  Tnman65

  Now that was funny! As well as brilliant!

• Famed Atheist Richard Dawkins: Forcing Religion on Kids Is ‘Child Abuse’

  April 23, 2013 at 9:11pm

  To say that evolution is science is invalid. It would be more correct to say that evolution is a theory within the framework of a naturalistic and materialisic science and world view. Darwinian evolution prostulates that micobes through natural selection and mutation evloved into higher forms of life including man. The evidence for this falls short in the fossel records. In micobiology the differerence between creationist and evolutionist explanations is that former involves separation of already-existing information (in the DNA) and loss of information through mutations; the latter requires the generation of tens of millions of ‘leters’ within the code,resulting in new information being created. I think the reason that Dawkins would like to suppress alternative veiw points like Intelligent Design and creation/science is that there theorys tend to prove out better than evolution. Reading the posts on this subject I suspect their needs to be more education on critical thinking and less indoctrination.
  I am a Christian, but I think all these theorys should be taught. the bottom line is: YOU GET TO CHOOSE!

• Creationist’s Biblical Battle Call Sparks ‘Overwhelming’ Response From Evolutionists

  March 30, 2013 at 8:21am

  In reply to wolverine.

  The word Dinosaur was coined in the late 1800′s. I don’t think you will find that word in the Bible.
  but check out Job 40:15-24 also Job 41:1-34. It’s amazing what you will find when you do your own homework! For 150 years we have been made to believe in the big lie of Evolution and uniformitianism which justified us turning our back on our creator. It is out of these lies that came the progessive, communist and fascist ideas of the of the last centenary and has turned the United States, which were founded on Christian princples into BABYLON. Rev.18:

• Creationist’s Biblical Battle Call Sparks ‘Overwhelming’ Response From Evolutionists

  March 30, 2013 at 7:26am

  In reply to blinknight.

  That fact that Intelligent Design was ruled not a scientific in a secular court does not let you off the hook. Why don’t you look at all the evidence yourself? Ultimately you will have to choose!

• Creationist’s Biblical Battle Call Sparks ‘Overwhelming’ Response From Evolutionists

  March 30, 2013 at 7:17am

  To Make the claim that random,purposesless forces accidently created all that you see around you is
  ludiccrous. Would be like, after seeing, Mt. Rushmore and thinking it was caused by erosion.

• Creationist’s Biblical Battle Call Sparks ‘Overwhelming’ Response From Evolutionists

  March 30, 2013 at 6:55am

  How about Phillip E. Johnson as judge. He graduated from Harvard and the University of Chicago. He was a law clerk for Chief Justice Earl Warren and has taught law for twienty years at the University of Berkeley. Look Him up.

• Creationist Offers $10,000 to Any Evolutionist Who Can Scientifically Disprove Genesis in Court

  March 28, 2013 at 4:24am

  Why do think its sham? Is it because he refuses to be put in the materialistic box. Both intelligent design and creationist theoreticians have something to contribute. The evidence they present is the same evidence that the materialist present but with a different frame of reference. They will not debate him because its “just religion” and is outside their box of “true science”. I recomend that people look at both sides and then you decide. It really comes down to your world view.

• Creationist Offers $10,000 to Any Evolutionist Who Can Scientifically Disprove Genesis in Court

  March 28, 2013 at 3:50am

  In reply to Matt-Thomes.

  One word “uniformitarianism” the very fact that we have a “fossil record” indicates that this geological theory maybe incorrect. Science has used evolution and uniformitarianism to build a materialistic box where God is not allowed. Then we wonder why we can’t find him!