Hang in there, man – it’s a tough loss but it does get better. I lost my boy, Jack early this year. I usually wait a lot longer before it feels “right” to adopt again but the house was just too empty and I brought Buddy (avatar) home a few months later. I had no idea just how deeply depressed I really was until that first day home with him. You know those paw-shaped bumper/window stickers that say “who rescued who?”, yeah, I get it now.
Just try to remember, his paw prints will always be on your heart.
 September 2, 2015 at 5:21pm
No, HE is mentally ill.
 September 2, 2015 at 5:19pm
How’s this for a noun: HE is a MENTAL CASE.
[-1] September 2, 2015 at 5:03pm
The Tueller Drill. Look it up and learn something. Watch some of the videos for a really eye opening education.
 September 1, 2015 at 4:01pm
September 1, 2015 at 3:33pm
You’re preaching to the choir, AJ – - I live in the western burbs outside Chiraq.
August 31, 2015 at 5:05pm
I think you’re thinking of Eddie Torres (Cheeh and Chong:)
August 31, 2015 at 4:49pm
Obama has wanted to “work” with Bear ever since he got so turned on watching him give himself a urine enema on one of his show’s episodes.
“Why is no one talking about that?” Why also no questions re this:
If she ONLY used her personal server and she NEVER had (received or sent) any classified documents/info on said server, then just exactly how the heck did she get/transmit classified information during her tenure as SecSt? Courier handcuffed to briefcase? FedEx? Snail mail? Carrier pigeon?
Why also is no one questioning the volume of her supposedly personal emails? Somewhere right around 50% of the 60K she sent/received while in office were personal? Seriously?! Open up your office email system and do a quick count of how many personal vs work-related emails you sent/received from your work address just for July. Out of just slightly over 225 (July is a really slow month in the securities industry), 2.15% of my emails were personal/unrelated to my job.
At least Bill had a talent for it. You knew he was still lying through his teeth, but at least he was good at it.
 August 19, 2015 at 4:46pm
I respectfully disagree. It’s yet another case of “just enforce the law (amendment in this case) as it is written. The necessary language is already there:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”
As they are not born to persons who are “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. (because they’re here illegally and are not citizens), they themselves are also not “subject to the jurisdiction” and are therefore not U.S. citizens simply due to the location of their birth.
August 18, 2015 at 4:36pm
I had to download and open your avatar to see if it was what I thought it was.