GLENDUH, so facts mean nothing to you? Oh yes, thats right, facts mean NOTHING to liberals, in fact, they fear them, so of course it makes sense to mock the facts. You are disgusting. All liberals are pathetic liars.
How's it 'feel' being a low-life taker?
Probably pretty good for a degenerate like you. Now go back to your step-mother, she's calling you to paint her toenails.
What's $1.39 your portfolio ?
Claiming it's wrong is easy.
Explain exactly how it's wrong, or else admit you lied.
De-Nile is more than a river in Egypt.
What part of that graph is inaccurate?
I write this not for your benefitm but the beneift of everyone else.
Either the tax increases proposed will raise in the ballpark if $ 62 billion or they won't
You did not deny that they would.
Either the CBO projected budget deficit is in the neighborhood of $1,098 billion or it is not.
You did not deny that it is.
The rest is simple arithmetic, fractions & percentages that kids should be learning in grade school.
The additional tax increases bring enough additional revenue to close the budget deficit by 5.7%.
That is mathematics that is beyond dispute given the 1st 2 points.
You want to dispute the CBO numbers or the arithmetic? Either you are no Marine or I now see why you could not make sergeant. So 4 & out whether you had anything lined up or not.
Is that what you paid for your education?
You guys should read my posts and not disparage them.
dont beat up on GlennDuh he is just a bit off level
Facts are hard. This is an excellent video by Bill Whittle that explains the situation also. Eat the Rich http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=661pi6K-8WQ
Read your posts GLENNDUH/WANGO/HORSEDANCER/PANTLOADIAN? Why? Are the scribblings of a delusional lefty troll like you valuable to anyone?
January 1, 2013 at 7:04pm
Blah, blah, blah and some more blah.
January 1, 2013 at 6:52pm
How about $10 in cuts for every $1 in taxes? No? Hmm . . . .
He about ANY net cuts, at all? This *thing* puts us another 330 billion in debt, after cuts and taxes are combined for a net result, according to the CBO.
I think the GOP is working with the dems. The bill started in the senate then they sent it to the house knowing the tea party group wouldn't go for it. This is a setup.....
Posted on January 1, 2013 at 8:15pm
I think the GOP is working with the dems. The bill started in the senate then they sent it to the house knowing the tea party group wouldn’t go for it. This is a setup….
You are sooooo right, may it be known as boehner's Last Stand, and may eric cantor et al remember the fiscal cliff as well as Americans used to remember "Little Big-Horn". It's what happens when the "Leadership" think they don't have to listen to common sense.
The Chinese have a saying. Rich country, strong defense.
The opposite would be a weak country, weak defense.
We definitely need more cuts. We need enough cuts until we have a surplus. Even $10 billion so that we can start paying down the debt.
Too bad we can't recall Glenda because his or her contract is up a few years ago.
..spending and taxes are going up...the Republicans could have raised taxes and cut spending..they have chosen not to...say what you will but the Ds stick to their guns,hehe, and don't bend..Rs have no standards ....and that's why they keep losing,we can't believe them...Obama does what he says he will...if we ever want to win,STAND for SOMETHING...
You are right. the Republicans spent too much during Bush's terms.
They used Medicare part D to buy the votes of Seniors 7 win Florida. I wonder if they could have without handing out the candy.
Yes drugs are high. But the drugs they worry about being expensive during 2000 to 2004 are all going to come off patent by the end of this decade. So for a generation drugs that prolong your life are expensive. Well not even that long., It is time form filing, which is before it hits the market. So it less than 20 years.
Patents expire 20 years from the date of filing. Many other factors can affect the duration of a patent.
But Republican overspent in other ways too, the usual, pork.
Still the Democrats offer a great deal, a 1 party oligarchy with an overlay or facade of socialism.
Subsistence for the obama-hone voters, & middle classhood for the unions that keep everyone in line & present a veneer of democracy (i.e the new apparatchiks). Even neo-oligarchs need lackeys.
GLENNDUH, LOL, that fits quite well, but WANGO/PANTS, I still like my suggestion for a name change better.
Walkabout, is an Aussie Team - the 2nd shift appears to be a girly girl - if you get my drift, a transplanted Celt with a passion for speakin' gaylick - if you can mouth that- lips to lips. Anyway- an hour ago "wankRoboto" began to spell better but use clipped expressions - that are in line with "marketing workflows exhibited by US citizens" assigned to conservative UK advertisers.
Walkabout team does not care if you end up on a Secret Service "interest" list.