User Profile: GotMullet


Member Since: April 20, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [1] November 3, 2014 at 1:23pm

    The only cogent response listed in the article was by Atrus00.

    Not only has world history been shaped by Islam, is has also been shaped by other movements, i.e., the Romans, the Catholic church and the Byzantines, Martin Luther, Hindu culture as well as communism and representative democracy. Feudalism and Industrialism.

    History is what it is. Was it only Islam being taught, or was it being emphasized over other historical events? If so, they have a case.

    Responses (1) +
  • November 3, 2014 at 12:59pm

    15 yards on kick off? So? As long as they didn’t take away the points.

  • November 3, 2014 at 12:53pm

    “Malice towards none…..” ?

    Sick and tired of Beck deliberately dividing conservatives!

    Responses (7) +
  • [1] October 30, 2014 at 10:58am

    That’s the trouble with trying to funk up things that should stand as symbols. God bless her. She deserved to be there, however.

  • October 28, 2014 at 2:24pm

    I understand Beck wanting to make a buck, but this is ridiculous! I make it a point to never, ever purchase anything advertised with a pop-up.

  • October 22, 2014 at 12:17am

    I got George Washington. I’ll take it. But like all of this things, the questions are rigged. I can’t explain it.

  • October 22, 2014 at 12:01am

    How about the unpaid bills the nation must bear since you’ve been president?

  • [-2] October 19, 2014 at 12:57am

    This was no journalist. It was an idiot with a camera.

  • October 19, 2014 at 12:51am

    What an idiot. If it is that important, file a case through appropriate channels. Maybe having unmarked cars is a violation of law, but it has been in practice for a long time. The cop was doing his job, and does not have the time for some smart@$$ do gooder shoving a camera in his face.

    Yeah, I have problems with an over zealous police state, but there are ways, and there are ways to do things right.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 17, 2014 at 8:23pm


  • [3] October 17, 2014 at 8:19pm

    I cannot think of a single, constructive thing to say.

  • [1] October 17, 2014 at 12:31pm

    How about taking down the satanist display because it is rude. If the satanists make a holiday display, for say, the solstice, the equinox, or something…. believers should stay out of their faces also.

    We all have a right to be ridiculous, but it is rude to get in another’s face when there is no common ground. It demonstrates nothing but childishness.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] October 17, 2014 at 11:34am

    Hopefully the guy will live to testify that he did it, he was ready to cut them up! Before he got his balls shot off.

  • September 25, 2014 at 12:09pm

    I agree. The norm should always be probable cause.

  • [1] September 25, 2014 at 12:05pm

    I agree, but in today’s world, a bloodied nose won’t do. You’d be lucky to get off with broken limbs, ribs, a blow-out fracture of the right orbit, and a subdural hematoma.

    All that being said, the kid did the right thing. The school authorities are PC wimps and, evidently, cannot authoritatively decide what should or should not be disciplined.

    It’s like the evil biting a Graham Cracker to look like a pistol. Imagine the terror!??

  • [4] September 24, 2014 at 3:30am

    But it does make it law until overturned.

  • September 24, 2014 at 3:25am

    If the Left were to outlaw nose picking, would that allow for the gendarmes to window peeping to find people digging for gold?

    Is there a such thing a probable cause if everyone does it?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] September 24, 2014 at 3:06am

    I just don’t understand the “concealed carry” concept. Why must you conceal your weapon? And when it is concealed, if you bend over to tie your shoe, and your weapon is flashed momentarily, you are in breach of law? What is the difference between having a weapon on your hip for all to see, or hidden, or in a woman’s purse, where it isn’t seen? What if it is 100 degrees outside, must you wear a coat to hide your weapon?

    If a place of business, church, civil office building, or workplace does not want firearms on their premise, it should be their right to request that you leave them at the door. But, they have should have no standing to tell you what you can, or cannot, have in your car or home.

    I just don’t get the argument. The Constitution gives us the right to bear arms. I don’t read where it says you must hide them, or where it says private property owners must allow weapons on their premises if they don’t want them there.

    If you brandish or threaten another human being with a weapon, or any sort, unnecessarily, you go to jail.

    This is all stupid to me.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] September 17, 2014 at 10:50am

    They are Muslims that follow Islamist doctrine that is not unique to ISIS. Read The Looming Tower, by Lawrence Wright. If only 1% of Muslims believe in the application of Islamism, and the the requirement of Sharia by the world, an army of 1,700,000 is a pretty big force by any measure.

    Obama’s administration, with all present and past members, have refused to see Islamism and Jihad for what it is, because of their misguided “faith” in populist, Progressive ideology.

  • September 17, 2014 at 10:22am

    You mean you don’t parley voo?

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love