User Profile: Gremlin1974


Member Since: July 17, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [2] November 26, 2015 at 9:11pm


    Actually it still does, because anywhere inside that 21 feet is still a danger zone. Basically less than 21 feet is even more dangerous, this kid was more like 10 to 12 feet from the officers, a distance he maintained throughout the video. So being closer than 21 feet can effectively negate the advantage of having a firearm unholstered.

  • [1] November 25, 2015 at 7:25pm

    What is true here is that you don’t have to right to not be offended and unless you are a resident of that county then your opinion or feelings don’t matter just like mine don’t matter.

    Happy Holidays and Merry Christmas.

    Responses (1) +
  • [228] November 25, 2015 at 7:16pm

    Technically correct, but laws change and nothing in the law says that the states have to make it easy. Also all it takes is one judge to agree with the states to tie this up in court for years, which I encourage the states to do.

    Responses (30) +
  • [-1] November 24, 2015 at 1:25pm

    “but it really looks like he wasn’t a threat to bodily harm, he was just a thief.”

    Exactly, no imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to you are someone else you don’t shoot.

    “hard to tell what’s in the background, so I can’t say whether that was a “safe” shot or not.”

    Well lets think about that for a moment. In the modern times are there really that many “safe backgrounds” left? Especially in the middle of a modern town or city? Especially in or near the parking lot of a major store?

    I would say no.

  • [1] November 24, 2015 at 1:21pm

    Yea, the one that clearly says “at night time”, so since this happened in broad daylight you would be incorrect.

    From that statute:
    “(A) to prevent the other’s imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or

    (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and

    I would also recommend this book to you.

    P.S. From someone who completed Sapper training I seriously hope that yours came out of a cracker jack box if you are truly that ignorant.”

  • November 24, 2015 at 1:16pm

    No lettuceRebel is just ignorant of the actual law.

  • [1] November 24, 2015 at 1:16pm

    Uhh, I suggest you take a course on Texas self defense law. And yes I know the part of the law to which you are referring and it clearly says during the nighttime or at night. This happened in broad daylight so no she would be committing murder if she had “dispatched the SOB.

    I would recommend this book to help educate yourself.

    The author is pretty much the countries leading expert in self defense law.

    Responses (1) +
  • November 24, 2015 at 1:11pm

    So basically she fired a bullet indiscriminately into the public? That makes her doubly stupid since she endangered the public and fired when she had no right to be firing.

  • [4] November 24, 2015 at 1:10pm

    Exactly, I carry daily and while not an instructor I have trained with guns most of my life. “Warning shots” are for hollywood and TV. What a warning shot is in the modern day is basically firing a bullet into the public indiscriminately. It is stupid dangerous.

    Also, I doubt even by Texas law that she was justified in even drawing her weapon. If the guy was running away there was no “imminent threat of death or great bodily harm to yourself or another” which is something there must be in order to justify it as self defense or defense of another. Also, when that threat is imminent you don’t shoot to scare the person and you don’t fire a damned warning shot, you shoot the threat, not the freaking air around the threat.

    Responses (2) +
  • [6] November 24, 2015 at 1:00pm

    That was my thought, it should read “If convicted madden “should” or “will” get the death penalty.

    In my preferred world he would be sodomized to death while being repeatedly water boarded and never asked a question, but then again I am an old softy.

  • November 23, 2015 at 5:27pm

    LOL, Its Teva, I am willing to bet they employ an attorney who is qualified to handle this case and will do so aggressively. Might be why Avis’s statement is no longer available it doesn’t take long to get the first filing done.

  • [167] November 23, 2015 at 5:10pm

    We do discuss gun law at the table during thanks giving. Well we discuss what guns we are going to buy next in case progressives try to make them against the law, does that count?

    Responses (18) +
  • November 22, 2015 at 1:39am

    He sounds like a pretty solid Blue Dog Democrat.

  • [1] November 22, 2015 at 1:37am

    He will also have the republicans in the state house to deal with, so he won’t have it his own way. I also think the Lt. Gov. was won by a Republican.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] November 22, 2015 at 1:36am

    Wonder if Vitter isn’t running for Senate again to make way for Jindal to run?

    Responses (1) +
  • November 18, 2015 at 6:12pm

    Just eliminate 2 or 3 of the apartments and turn in into a weapons room, workshop with reloading equipment, gunsmith, metal working and carpentry tools, and increased storage space.

  • November 15, 2015 at 3:27pm

    Since I can’t read French, I will just go with the thought that this alert says “Shoot on sight”.

  • [4] November 15, 2015 at 3:25pm

    “redouble efforts”? When I was in school 0 + 0 = 0 But then again that was before common core math.

  • [3] November 9, 2015 at 11:10am

    Yea this article doesn’t mention the fact that her “parents” are both male.

    Responses (3) +
  • [7] November 9, 2015 at 10:56am

    Press charges and have the thief arrested. Oh and ripping it out of their hands is assault as well dont’t forget to charge him with that either.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love