To what ever race baiting moron who made this video I can think of no better response than this movie quote; “what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your race baiting poverty pimp video were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought or argument. Everyone who has seen your video is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.”
 February 9, 2016 at 3:21pm
While she is obviously very pretty, she gained her fame the old fashioned way. By getting naked in a music video with Robin Thicke. So I am sure her political acumen is worth taking seriously.
 February 6, 2016 at 6:20pm
Frankly, I can’t believe that a trip to Israel was included.
 February 5, 2016 at 12:36pm
Accidents just happen sometimes, it is sad and tragic, but true.
Exactly. The death of Brandon Lee is pretty much the definitive example of this.
There are no accidents-all is God's will-maybe he was a bad man? Maybe gay.
 February 5, 2016 at 12:35pm
 February 4, 2016 at 5:53pm
If they did cause the collapses, then I say; “Excellent work to their engineers and explosives guys, keep it up. You might want to increase the frequency though.”
 February 3, 2016 at 5:54pm
Which last time I checked is the way they handle it in Alaska, there is no permit to carry a weapon and anyone can carry concealed if they are legally permitted to own the weapon. If a felon is caught with a weapon well then they have laws to deal with that.
 February 3, 2016 at 5:47pm
A double tap is just my way of saying stay the F down, lol.
February 3, 2016 at 5:44pm
The only time I can see open carry to be helpful is to and from my hunting area’s, I tend to carry a pistol with me, usually a .22 or .22 Mag and I carry it in a hip holster that is not really concealable.
[-8] February 3, 2016 at 5:34pm
which is why I refer to evolutionist as the church of evolution.
[-6] February 3, 2016 at 5:31pm
Yes, what that page doesn’t point out is that it is putting forward a corrupted definition of Theory than is used in real and pure science. It is trying to make Theory equal to Laws in science and it is simply ignorant.
[-7] February 3, 2016 at 5:29pm
Actually you are incorrect it is a Law, which is the final step in uncorrupted scientific method, that’s why it is called the Law of Gravity, you will usually found it discussed somewhere near “Newtons Laws”. But thanks for playing anyway sugar pants.
[-7] February 3, 2016 at 5:27pm
Well that statement is also demonstrably false, since we have Newtons Laws and things like the Law of Gravity. Law is the final step in Scientific method.
[-1] February 3, 2016 at 5:22pm
Well you do have to admit the church of evolution members are a certain kind of “special”. Anyone who says that the Theory of Evolution is the end all and be all is no real scientist, because real scientist realize that theories change constantly.
Unless we discover something really dramatic, the theory of evolution isn't going to change a whole lot.
The theory of evolution changes quite often. From Darwinism, to neo-Darwinism, to the modern synthesis.
I believe the next incarnation will dramatically shift from natural selection and gradualism.
The once discarded "punctuated equilibrium" has been resurrected and is currently being seriously revisited and revised.
Once Darwin and Mendels ideas were paired up, we got the modern theory of evolution, which hasn't changed from what fundamentally said from the very start. Darwin had no idea what the mechanism was, but we've long since figured out what it is.
The only thing that changes in evolution are the exact position on the tree of life that some things have.
Blinky, you're starting to disappoint!
The "modern synthesis" or Darwinian synthesis, (the desperate clinging to a failed supposition), is the modality where evolution is argued from several biology disciplines.
Guess what? Paleontology is not a biological science which is one of the prime precepts Darwin depended on for his theory, besides bird beaks and tortoise shells.
You know why? Neither the fossil record, nor bird beaks can give Darwinism any validity.
[-4] February 3, 2016 at 5:20pm
Only since the definition of theory was corrupted by fanatics like you who are unwilling to have their ideas challenged. The everyday definition, as you put it, is the original definition used in science.
February 3, 2016 at 5:18pm
Well said @dawnzola, well said.
[-6] February 3, 2016 at 5:17pm
“No one has ever found such contradictory data.”
Yet. But we find new things every day that disprove old theories and Hypotheses.
Actually this is quite rare these days in the hard sciences. Researchers and theoreticians tend to advance their fields by building on previous theories and discoveries.
It’s like the famous quote attributed to Newton,
“If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants.”
I just posted a similar comment. I too said "yet".
Hawkins just recently rejected his own backhole theory.
Let's not even start with this third world science, politicized, redistributionist, man caused "climate change" unscience.
Nah, no way science is manipulated.
Are you ass thumb people suggesting that Hawkins hasn't rejected his own blackhole theory?
You are really grasping.
The black hole information paradox if the perfect example of a real dispute within science. This is what it looks like. Unlike evolution and climate change. I am not going to use the phrase “settled science” since science is never settled (good theory = conclusions are testable and falsifiable) , but there is very high (96%-98%) consensus that both theories are correct.
The state of play is quite different wrt to the Black Hole Paradox where you have two large camps each arguing for their own theoretical paradigm. Hawking Camp vs. Susking/Maldecena Camp.
[-4] February 3, 2016 at 5:14pm
Only by your corrupted definition of Theory.
[-7] February 3, 2016 at 5:09pm
She is correct that evolution is a Theory, simply because as of now we have no science to prove it. What has been happening is that the liberal science movement has corrupted the word Theory to basically mean the same thing as a scientific law whenever it suits them. In pure science when something is proven it becomes accepted Law, such as the Law of gravity. In pure science a Theory is something that is believed to be the case but isn’t proven.
This is the real reason that evolutionist are so vicious in their defense, because they know several things to be true that they don’t like to admit. Like the fact that the statistical probability of spontaneous evolution is so small it that you may as well call it impossible. How about the fact that the statistical probability of Intelligent design is much more realistic or the fact that there is just as much evidence for Intelligent Design than there is for Evolution that evidence is just suppressed. My favorite is the fact that the “Father” of evolution the Liberal Sainted Darwin even renounced his own theories and conclusions. Oh well, liberals have never let silly things like facts stop them.
Heh, so are you going to pretend that everything we call a theory is just some grand speculation in science?
Germ theory, gravitational theory, atomic theory, theory of relativity, so on and so forth.
 February 3, 2016 at 2:53pm
If women are going to be eligible for all combat jobs then yes they should have to register. Actually the better idea is to do away with the registration all together and just say that every able bodied young man or woman is subject to the draft, if necessary.
Good point. With the exception of immigration. It isn't like all new born don't get a Social Security Number at birth. Say..yes, technically everyone from birth can/could be registered. Then it would be matter of keep the address updated.
Knowing the way Libs and Democrats are. The new borns could be registered to vote to; ..while they are at it. lol