User Profile: grickm


Member Since: September 01, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [9] October 6, 2015 at 7:14am

    Obama is a Marxist seeking to create a “class struggle” by dividing us however he can. It’s difficult to have classes in a country founded on the principle that we are all individuals, but the Marxists are blinded by their religion and cannot understand that. Nonetheless, O has been very successful in sowing division among us. It’s time to expose his perfidy and his failed idea that Marxism is the way of the future. O belongs on the ash heap of history with the rest of his comrades and failed ideas.

  • [1] October 3, 2015 at 5:54pm

    The Islamists believe their system abrogates all others, therefore they see themselves as superior to us. The useful idiots in the west try to say all cultures are equal as the Islamists work within our system to subvert it. Those who refuse to acknowledge the enemy for who and what he is and the threat he poses will be the losers.

  • [2] October 3, 2015 at 4:33pm

    Islamic Sharia law defines “slander” as saying something the hurt party doesn’t like even if it’s true. The “Islamophobia” campaign was started by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation that represents the world’s 57 Islamic states. Since Muslims don’t like criticism of Islam, they call it slander and want to impose that concept of Sharia on our freedom of speech. They have convinced useful idiots in the west to support their imposition of Sharia on us by describing these concepts of Sharia as political correctness, claiming offense and hurt feelings when they are criticized.

  • [37] September 27, 2015 at 8:45pm

    Part of Islamic law is that it is illegal to criticize Muslims. Their definition of “slander” is to say something about the other party that he doesn’t like even if true.

    Ever wonder why so many “moderate” Muslims are silent about the terrorist acts of the jihadists? Oh, yes, Islamic law defines “terrorism” as “killing a Muslim without right.” Thus Muslims killing infidels is not terrorism by their definition.

  • [1] September 27, 2015 at 1:27pm

    Wasn’t it Glenn Beck who said an activist 10% of a population can effect substantial change, e.g., the Bolshevik revolution that created the Soviet Union, the evil empire? Muslims are about 1% of our population, but infiltrators from the Muslim Brotherhood have persuaded our government to officially ignore Muslim jihad whose goal is to subvert our system of government. ISIS is the new evil empire. It certainly is infiltrating Europe and the US and getting ready for “kinetic” jihad.

  • [24] September 26, 2015 at 7:57pm

    Lance Berkman was always a class act as a professional. I’m with him. In the America in which I grew up people got a spotless reputation by having principles and living by them.

  • [3] September 22, 2015 at 10:59am

    Islam has two aspects. One is its theological faith in God, the other is Sharia, which is a political system of laws. Among its laws are the concepts that Islam is the supreme religious/political system with dominion over all the Earth and that all Muslims are required to try to make Islam dominant over all the Earth. Thus Islam should be considered a political system with a state-forced religion. Its primary concept, that it is supreme over any other religious or political system makes it directly antagonistic to our constitution. Therefore any supporter of Sharia who takes the US oath of office is lying and a traitor to that office. Dr Carson’s exclusion of such a Muslim from the presidency is exactly correct. The same is true for any US office that requires an oath to support our constitution. This is a statement of facts. Calling it “bigoted,” “racist,” or “xenophobic” does not change its truth. It might be called “Islamophobic,” but anyone who supports our constitution should be against any acceptance of the political aspect of Islam in our society. Per our constitution Muslims are free to believe in whatever God they wish, but they are not free to subvert our political system with the goal of replacing it with Sharia.

  • [1] September 19, 2015 at 2:18pm

    All Muslims are a “problem” because we have no way to separate the jihadists from the peaceful. Why should we even try? Just say no until Islam disciplines itself.

  • [50] September 19, 2015 at 2:14pm

    Why are you insulting poodles?

  • [36] September 19, 2015 at 2:13pm

    “We have a job to do.” And that job is to win elections, not hold debates where the Dimocrats will actually have to talk about the things they will do if they get elected. Enough talk! Let’s get on with destroying what’s left of traditional (successful) America!

  • [2] September 19, 2015 at 2:07pm

    I had some respect for Sanders for openly admitting he is a socialist. After him calling Trump a racist, he shows he’s just another Dimocrat in the crowd supporting the Dim agenda and that meaningless ad hominem attacks are not beneath him.

    Responses (1) +
  • [11] August 23, 2015 at 10:15am

    Fiorina was too kind to Clinton. We have no idea how “hardworking” Clinton is. Her actions that are coming out in the wipegate scandal certainly lead me to question Clinton’s intelligence. From the Whitewater scandal forward, Clinton’s apparent goal is self enrichment, not public service. And finally, however one looks at it her policies as a pubic servant are a disaster for the country.

  • [7] August 22, 2015 at 11:01am

    We need to understand Trump’s policy prescriptions. It would have been better if Trump had said why he thought Nabisco moved south and what he would do to give them an incentive to stay here. We should assume Nabisco made a business decision made based on the cost of doing business here versus Mexico. If US government policy caused Nabisco to make a rational decision to relocate, boycotting Oreos is the wrong way to solve the problem.

    Responses (5) +
  • [6] August 22, 2015 at 10:51am

    Trump is popular because he focused first on an issue on which most of us agree, illegal immigration. Look at his website, that’s the only policy issue discussed. He is playing off his name recognition as well, and knows how to market himself.

    We need to understand all his policy positions, many of which he says today are different from what he advocated in the past. We called that “flipflops” when Romney did it.

    Beck has taken the “lets understand his full range of policies” approach, the best one for vetting a candidate.

    The candidate who has been most consistent in policy statements over time and with doing what he said he would do is Ted Cruz.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] July 20, 2015 at 11:52am

    It’s obvious Khameni believes that power comes from the barrel of a gun….

  • [9] July 18, 2015 at 6:32pm

    It’s sad to say this because I know decent Muslim people as individuals. Given the wording in the Koran, the law dictated by God to their prophet, that tells them to spread Islam via jihad until the entire world submits, and that it’s permissible to use violence and lie to infidels to advance Islam, how can we trust Muslims as a group when the fundamentalist Muslims poison the atmosphere with their violence and hatred? How can we tell who is sincere when their religious law tells them it’s moral to lie to infidels?

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] July 15, 2015 at 10:14pm

    Karl Marx is an old, dead, white guy.

  • [2] June 21, 2015 at 4:14pm

    Instead of reinstating the Patriot Act, how about getting the Muslim Brotherhood and its Civilization Jihad out of government, then educating those who protect us in the true nature of Islam and sharia. Read “Catastrophic Failure: Blindfolding America in the Face of Jihad” by Stephen Coughlin. George W Bush once said “If you’re not with us, you’re against us.” That’s Islam in a nutshell, based on consensus of Islamic scholars regarding Islamic law.

  • [13] June 19, 2015 at 1:50pm

    Sorry to all government political scientists, CO2 is to plants as O2 is to us. It’s not pollution. Anyone who calls it pollution is either ignorant or lying.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 21, 2015 at 9:25am

    Government imposed price controls are always the best way to destroy an economy. Just look at how well the minimum wage works.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love