User Profile: Grover_Standpipe


Member Since: March 09, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • [2] May 24, 2016 at 9:33pm

    No, Painter, it should be okstupid. It was right there.

    Responses (1) +
  • May 24, 2016 at 8:23pm

    Fair enough, DGDrew. If that’s what you believe, then your God, if He exists, is one worthy of worship. I just can’t say the same for sickandtired’s, who is with you so far, but will then decide to “strike us all down” over bathroom policies.

  • [1] May 24, 2016 at 5:50am

    Yes, I am familiar with the dormant commerce clause, and I know that while it automatically invalidates laws intended to discriminate against out of state businesses and motivated by simple economic protectionism, it does not do so to every law directed at a legitimate cause which has an incidental effect on interstate commerce. A law that imposes no greater burden on out of state suppliers than that which must also be met by local producers is clearly not discriminatory or protectionist in intent.

  • May 24, 2016 at 2:33am

    And we would have gotten away with it if t weren’t for that darn meddling Glenn Beck and christos, his stalwart comrade in the neverending battle against the forces of world Satanism!

  • [1] May 24, 2016 at 1:48am

    They didn’t ban chicken cages, They just banned cages so small that the chickens can’t lie down, stand up, extend their limbs or turn around. I don’t even like chickens. In fact I hate every stupid, stinking one of them that’s still alive instead of cooked and ready for me to eat it, but I can’t honestly see any reason to be against a law like that.

    Responses (3) +
  • [-5] May 24, 2016 at 1:07am

    Sorry, Bikkiboo, but no. Long after gay and transgender rights have been accepted as an essential part of our way of life, you and Rover will still have to keep things on the down low.

  • May 24, 2016 at 1:04am

    Gosh, Stan, I kind of think the fact that David, unlike you, has not Googled NAMBLA enough times to become some kind of expert speaks to his credit.

  • May 24, 2016 at 1:00am

    Yeah, that’s right. Your God, who sat back and let us work it out among ourselves during the Inquisition, the slave trade, the Spanish conquest of the Americas, two World Wars, and the Nazi genocide of the Jews, is suddenly going get his panties in a bunch because a girl with a winkie gets to tinkle in the ladies’ room. I am very scared of that because it is a completely sane thing to believe that totally makes sense.

    Responses (2) +
  • May 24, 2016 at 12:56am

    No, we won’t.Children cannot consent to sex. Gay adults can. There are no people who are so liberal and permissive that they can’t see the difference between homosexuality and pedophilia. There are only people who are so reactionary and puritanical that they can’t see the difference between homosexuality and pedophilia.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] May 24, 2016 at 12:52am

    No, lowering the age of consent to 14 is not really a libertarian ideal and is pretty hard to defend, though I do agree with the states that have enacted close age exceptions so that nobody will go through life with a sex offender jacket for sleeping with somebody their own age.

  • [-10] May 23, 2016 at 10:59pm

    There is no mystery. You can’t read the President’s college records for the same reason that I can’t read yours and you can’t read mine. It’s none of our business to do so.

  • [1] May 23, 2016 at 8:27pm

    Eisenhower was a RINO now? When you get to the point where you think that every Republican who ever actually won an election is a RINO, you’re the RINO.

  • May 21, 2016 at 7:20pm

    No reason to ban it, just don’t wrap the rope around your hands, and set some reasonable limit on the length of the rope and the number of people on each side.

  • May 21, 2016 at 1:22am

    Okay, but then you should try living on Staten Island for awhile, and see how long you can still remember why you once believed in America;’s greatness.

  • [-1] May 19, 2016 at 8:29pm

    Yeah, Willow, responsibility is good. People should behave responsibly, but there will always be people who don’t. Irresponsibility and failure to think of the consequences of you actions are reason why people shouldn’t have kids, not reasons why they should have to,

  • May 19, 2016 at 8:25pm

    No, GettimHank, I didn’t suggest any such stupid thing. I’m just saying that people change. People who make foolish mistakes when they are young often grow up eventually.

  • [-3] May 19, 2016 at 5:07pm

    That’s terrible advice as well as a downright nasty thing to say. Many women who wisely chose to get an abortion at some point in their lives have later become great parents to kids they conceived when they were better prepared to care for them as they deserve.

    Responses (7) +
  • May 18, 2016 at 5:14pm

    When there are still creeps who try to make you feel ashamed of what you are, you can take a little bit of pride in being strong enough to not let them get to you.

    Responses (1) +
  • May 18, 2016 at 4:52pm

    All countries have problems. They are not all getting progressively worse. Catholic countries do tend to get progressively worse due to out of control population growth, but turning away from aggressive religious zealotry is the first step in their recovery.

  • [-2] May 18, 2016 at 4:44pm

    Well, DZ, some people were born with unfortunate appearance deficits that they have little or no power to mitigate, but some people are just ugly out of spite.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love