Member Since: October 04, 2011


  • March 13, 2013 at 5:13pm

    If I may: The title should be “Criminal Who Broke into ….” Good thing for the perp that the husband didn’t permanently neutralize him. You are just asking to die when you are in the bedroom of a little girl and have just stabbed the wife.

  • March 8, 2013 at 7:48am

    You do not drag an 82-year-old woman around like that. She was breaking the “no singing and instrument playing rule,” but how this guy acted is sick. She could have severly hurt herself in the fall. Even though she was apparently in the wrong, how this transit officer handled the whole situation is just as wrong, if not more so.

  • March 6, 2013 at 7:32am

    I’ve found a way to compromise with both sides. We should let responsible women who want to arm themselves do just that. Then, when a women blows away her attacker, we let this woman and other likeminded individuals videotape the corpse in the morgue. After the fade out, let other would be rapists know that, “You should not rape. And here is a reason why.”
    And while I am still in make-believe land, we should also let would-be rapists know that even if they commit their crime, once they are caught, they should be castrated in a painful way, then the double tap. Again have this woman and the likeminded videotape the corpse in the morgue…. You get the idea.

  • March 5, 2013 at 1:37pm

    What were they doing? Trying to qualify as a couples team for figure skating?

    In reply to the story This Is NOT How Hockey Fights Work

    Responses (3) +
  • March 5, 2013 at 7:41am

    She would probably say the same thing to a Jew who survived the death camps. “So glad you didn’t have a gun to defend yourself, the stats weren’t on your side.” Aren’t these the same liberals who ban the death penalty because one innocent person might die? Yet even if her stats were true, which I doubt they are, she pretty much said she would rather have a woman raped than saved by a gun.

  • March 3, 2013 at 8:07am

    Wait… was that Chris Matthews or Piers Morgan screaming in the background?

  • March 2, 2013 at 8:32am

    Well if it is really the Republicans fault than all I can say to them is…” Thank you very much, Thank you very much….” Though it is only a cut in growth, at least it is a start. Now if we really would start cutting at our budget and be serious about it. How about we start with a 50% cut in salary with the President, Senate, and Congress. All in favor say “AYE!”.

    Responses (8) +
  • March 1, 2013 at 1:27pm

    Maybe a little off topic, but something that puzzles me. We are told that teaching the Bible in public schools is akin to establishing a religion. Because it is a public school ,i.e. federal, this must not be allowed or tolerated. Yet they have no problem taking my money through taxes and then telling me I have no say in what is taught in a public school. So am I part of the public or not? It is true that if I had kids I would never send them to public schools because they do not teach what I would want my children to learn, yet that doesn’t and won’t stop my tax money from going to support public education. So if you believe God and His Word, are you a second-rate citizen, just to be seen and taxed but not heard?

  • March 1, 2013 at 11:38am

    Calm down. Just asking a question, but since you brought it up. It is called the theory of evolution by evolutionists. If you are saying that evolution is an absolute fact, than call it that. Personally, I believe evolution to be a lie, and God’s Word to be true. Now to you, that automatically means I am a nutjob, and probably a crazy person who is being brainwashed by my pastor. Of course you believe these things without knowing me or what goes on in my heart and head. So I am a nutjob not based on reason or fact, just your opinion. But I digress. Please “enlighten” me on how you believe it all began. Where did the matter and energy come from that produced life? Now I do know that life produces life and life can die, thus becoming non-life, but I have never seen non-life produce life. But what we apparently must believe is that non-life through great forces and, dare I say, laws of nature ( which too were just here), produced life. And not just any life, but one that evovled into many greater forms of life until today. Of course, science really can’t prove this because even if scientists could replacate this, it wouldn’t prove the theory. Why? Because apparently it all happened without any intelligent input whatsoever. And last I knew, non-life just doesn’t turn into a living thing, except that one time when it all began.

  • March 1, 2013 at 9:21am

    O.K. Mr. Biden, let’s have a townhall meeting without the press. Then you can tell us about it. While there, maybe you can give us the true details on Fast and Furious and Bengazi as well. There are two topics where you really don’t want the truth coming out.

  • March 1, 2013 at 8:55am

    Just wondering… are you talking about how evolutionists theorize that micro-evolution leads to macro-evolution?

  • March 1, 2013 at 8:08am

    The Bible will never be allowed to be taught in our public schools today. The Word of God goes against most of what is taught in public schools. And truth be told, those who tell us to accept diversity and different opinions will be the most vehemently against It. The Bible is too absolute in a world trying so hard to deny absolutes— be they physical or spiritual.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 27, 2013 at 7:15am

    I love this idea that America HAS to help the rebels because many people are dying. Hmmm… seems to me that when a Republican President did that in a country called Iraq, he was labeled a warmonger. A liberal Democrat President does it and he is labeled a wonderful hero. If the Syrains want our help, then they should pay for it, just like we did in the 1770s. And I want a lot of money upfront with more after. Stop the monetary aid we are sending them now and make them pay for any help. If we are going to support people who are only going to turn on us and kill us later, might as well soak them a little before.

  • February 26, 2013 at 6:07pm

    Exactly. Did you also notice the cheers and applause, especially at the end? Are you kidding me?

  • February 26, 2013 at 4:35pm

    Right, and your comments are based on absolute fact. Amazing how you know that Christians are controlled by their clerics. Boy, like I haven’t heard that one before. I wonder how long it will be before people start supporting pedophiles? I’m sure that they are only doing what they do because it is in their genes. Maybe we should allow marriage and sex between consenting individuals or consenting humans and animals. Who’s to say who is right and wrong? Live and let live. If it doesn’t bother me, why should I care? Can’t say that I’m sorry that my belief in God and His Word offends you, because I am not.

  • February 26, 2013 at 1:57pm

    As if those who are against homosexuals will be left alone if the government passes gay marriage laws. We are apparently told that churches will not be forced to perform gay marriages. Yet we already see businesses being attacked if they do not accept the business of gay “couples.” Those who believe God and His Word are being belittled and silenced, and this will only continue. Apparently you can believe and do whatever you want as long as you do not believe the Bible and live by its teachings.

  • February 23, 2013 at 4:36pm

    The more serious problem here is the fact that most Americans today think they need the government when disasters happen. Why do you need the federal government or even the state? Why ask for help from places that are more disfunctional and irrational than the mess you are already in? Let the government keep its money. I would not want one cent from the government to help rebuild my church . Besides, you can forgo having a church for awhile and still worship God. Its not about the building, it is what is in the heart.

  • February 19, 2013 at 7:48am

    Of course, you could say the setting reminds one of say, South American towns. I am sure Jews do not live in places that look like this. “Palestinian” children are targets? What about the Jewish children harmed by the suicide bombers, mortars, and rockets fired by the “oppressed Palestinian?” It is apparently alright for “Palestinians” to kill Jewish children, but not for a picture to be taken and posted (tastelessly, I’ll admit) of a child who might be Arab? But then again, what if that child is holding an AK-47 and just waiting for the day he can use it against Jews? Just saying if we are just suppossing.

  • February 19, 2013 at 7:33am

    “We are the Gesta….errr… Police. You have been deemed a threat to society and must be eliminated…errrr… dealt with. Come with us and do not resist.”

  • February 19, 2013 at 7:02am

    He has got to obey the laws, and at this point, who doesn’t know that a mere citizen cannot bring a gun to an airport. That being said, what FOOLS we are as a people to arrest someone for simply having a gun in their possession. That is his crime??? Or is his crime the supposition that he MIGHT have done SOMETHING with the gun in the airport or on the plane? He is charged with criminal possession of a gun. So is he a convicted criminal who shouldn’t have a gun, or is he a criminal for simply having a gun?

    Responses (2) +