Reloading components are getting hard to come by, not to mention the EPA making them insanely expensive to ship.
July 14, 2015 at 3:41pm
Holy-Moly, It’s literally “F-Bomb” ! If some fool actually spelled out what that word insinuates over a photograph a a dude getting a bull-whip colonoscopy from Jesus in a vat of urine and posted it on the side of a metropolitan transit bus, it would be deemed “art” in need of especially strong first amendment protection. A fine upon anyone who wastes a city officials time whining about this.
 January 23, 2015 at 3:39am
Maybe, if he’s on his best behavior in Hell, he’ll get to shove the pineapple up Hitler a time or two.
 July 24, 2014 at 2:45am
As ambitious and enjoyable as the Paul Schaffer/Will Lee rendition was, I would have to side with the Donna Summer sentiment of other posters. Although he did better than I thought he would, Will couldn’t touch Donna Summer in his prime, let alone at 61.
February 1, 2014 at 2:12am
Why is the ‘Crat establishment not keeping her on a tighter leash? She’s a horrible spokesman for her causes and and some of her impromptu gibberish makes W look like Stephen Douglas.
August 3, 2013 at 5:25pm
Not only is it improper to
Incinuate that it would be a
Good thing to call an aging member of the house a
Genuinely despised word in the American psyche. but it would
Engender a greater polarity in the otherwise
Regular Joes that are able to live in harmony above this nonsense.
June 20, 2013 at 5:19pm
Mr. McDermott represents the district next to mine. Here in Washington, he’s affectionately referred to by the local pundits as “Baghdad Jim”.
June 11, 2013 at 12:12am
I wouldn’t mind so much if she walked in and started doing that when I was at the next urinal, unless I looked over and her kosher frank was bigger than mine.
January 22, 2013 at 6:11pm
Soy – I’ll grant you that the soldier cited his service to add weight to his point, and that his service applied to things other than immediate defense of the homeland if you’ll grant me the fact that his actual point was totally valid.
January 22, 2013 at 6:07pm
I’ll grant you that he abused his service record to add credibility to his point and that the action he saw dealt with things other than an immediate threat to the homeland, if you’ll grant me that his actual point is no less credible because of it.
January 22, 2013 at 3:40pm
Being as the San Francisco ruling involves the digestive tract, does this mean that the two Dearborn stores must have all fists meet Halal requirements?
January 22, 2013 at 3:28pm
Granted, the consumer has the ultimate right to drive the market, why the hell would ANYONE with ANY sort of dietary restrictions even attempt to eat at McDonalds?
January 22, 2013 at 3:17pm
McDonalds being a taxpayer does not render it an agent of the state. It’s actions have no bearing on protecting religion from state bias. Where it may be a little sticky here is the courts assigning monetary value to having one’s religious sensibilities offended. Forget it though, if a precedent for the amount has been set in a previous secular case or the court was following a guideline.
January 22, 2013 at 2:57pm
If McDonald’s was doing this due to this silly urge we self loathing whiteys have not to upset the darker people, I would agree with you. But I’m betting their motivation is economic, in which case I’d say Venditor Caveat (seller beware). The real tragedy here would be if the abovementioned self loathing played a part in the trial and sentencing.
January 22, 2013 at 2:34pm
You know, I like the idea of telling Muslims to speed up their trip to hell as much as the next guy, but if Micky-D wants to advertise that a ju-ju stick has been waved over the chicken carcass to get the Muslim business, then they have to abide by the same advertising rules as everyone else. That being said, I’d be willing to bet that lighter-skinned religious folk wouldn’t get the same “justice” from the stupid “white guilt” fools that have permeated the court system.
November 8, 2012 at 10:51pm
Those young schoolboys don’t know about OR give a danm women’s issues. This is the modern day equivalent of crying and acting sensitive in the ’70s. It’s the charmless wussy way to land some trim.
October 26, 2012 at 12:33am
I was going to recommend that you knock that Obama kid on his butt for doinking your brother like that, but you’d be in a long line as he seems to want to do the same to all of us.
October 26, 2012 at 12:19am
I don’t get it. It’s an election year. Contrary to the girly-men in the press that seem to feel that they’re shaping public opinion, America loves action. “Cowboy Diplomacy” is NOT a derogatory term. He could’ve made more political hay out of this than he did with Bin Laden. Does he love emulating those wussy Europeans that much?
October 22, 2012 at 11:38pm
Let Mitch Rapp handle this. He’ll get it done.
April 28, 2012 at 7:55pm
Boo-hooo-hoooooo…..I’m so suprised that Dan Savage is yet again screaming from the rooftops, “I am still a rabble-rousing piece of monkey excrement, just in case any of you have forgotten.” I was hoping he’d have pulled his head out of his smug, self-righteous bum by now and realized how panzie-a**ed being a 47 year old bully amongst high-schoolers actually is. The real blame for this fiasco rests on the shoulders of the adults who thought that Dan Savage would be a good mentor for students of journalism. Students of sophmoric attention-whoring, yes.