User Profile: HarryPotter

HarryPotter

Member Since: January 23, 2013

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 17, 2014 at 2:43pm

    If you read the story, you would see that the writer has absolutely no idea what it means.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 7, 2014 at 1:56pm

    The law does not allow you to refuse service for any reason….

  • April 7, 2014 at 1:49pm

    If your business serves the public, you must serve all of the public. That is the law. If your “innermost religious beliefs” tell you to break the law, then there is a problem.

  • April 7, 2014 at 1:47pm

    But audio cables ONLY work with 2 males ends…. And microphone cables can have 2 male ends, 2 female ends, or one of each.

  • April 6, 2014 at 4:34am

    Blink, you got that dead on. She’s not a victim just because some people decide not to shop at her store. Also, a person is not a victim if they break the law and deny service to someone because of their sexual orientation.

  • April 6, 2014 at 4:32am

    You absolutely have that right. Be as disgusted as you’d like. Also, stop stinking your sexuality in my face, I don’t want to know who you have sex with. Gross.

  • April 6, 2014 at 4:30am

    What, did she donate to the FRC?

  • April 6, 2014 at 4:18am

    Actually, most Americans have a positive view of gay people, and a majority also supports gay marriage. Look at the latest polls. Also, “sodomy” refers to any non-procreative sexual practice, so that makes 99.999% of what straight couples do “sodomy” as well. Gay sex isn’t any less clean than straight sex.

    Responses (12) +
  • April 6, 2014 at 4:15am

    If the said gay business makes the type of sign they are requesting, then yes, they would need to make that sign. It is illegal to discriminate based on religion and religious beliefs.

  • April 6, 2014 at 4:13am

    I’m curious, do you all treat those who are dying of lung cancer with the same hostility as those dying of HIV?

  • April 6, 2014 at 4:09am

    First, she seems like a nice woman and I would have no problem shopping in her store. Second, if others disagree, and do not wish to shop there, that’s their choice and their right. Third, she is not a victim just because some people choose not to shop at her store.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 4, 2014 at 4:16pm

    Thegrt:
    Yes, he has the right to support and fun whatever discriminatory organization he likes. The public also has a right to pressure his company to fire him. His company has a right to fire an executive who does not embody the ideals they wish to portray. And he also has the right to resign to try and save face, and help the company.

  • April 4, 2014 at 12:54pm

    Perhaps if any of you actually read my last couple posts you would understand. And if you would respond to my comments instead of posting insults and blatant lies, we could have a conversation, and then maybe you could understand this too. But alas, it is not to be. Good day.

  • April 4, 2014 at 12:52pm

    Mikkel:

    You’re right. I’m hateful towards Christians. All my posts have very hateful language, and I am constantly fighting to ban them from getting married, or having the same rights as I do. Also, yes, it is all those evil gays who are trying to molest 14 year old girls. That makes sense. And we are definitely trying to recruit, because being gay is so clearly a choice!

  • April 4, 2014 at 12:20pm

    Actually, if you look any any scientific study, and not one printed by an anti-gay page, they all show that gay parents raise children just as well as straight parents. In fact, a recent study showed that gay parents even raise children better than straight parents. Feel free to look them up.

  • April 4, 2014 at 2:10am

    Simple:
    This will be my fourth, and last time trying to help you understand this. First, he wasn’t fired, he resigned. Second, refusing to tolerate intolerance is not itself intolerance. In fact, allowing intolerance to stand unchecked would be a silent assent, and would actually be intolerance.

  • April 4, 2014 at 2:07am

    Squid:
    I’m not sure. Why don’t you ask them. My thoughts on the matter are as long as no babies are created, they aren’t harming anyone else.

  • April 4, 2014 at 1:02am

    Bell:

    I’ve answered that question twice now. I’m not bothering to do it again. As for speaking out against gay marriage, you, and everyone else in America has always been free to speak out with words or money. Some jobs, especially those in higher positions are held to greater scrutiny, and even outside of work they still represent their company. Therefore, their actions cannot go against the ideals of the company. If an executive at a Christian company said that God doesn’t exist, and Christianity is holding America back, he would likely be fired.

    I think the post of George Takei’s FB page put it very succinctly: “Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences. This man donated money to a campaign designed to keep LGBT people from full equality and to deny our families equal rights under the law. He was free to make that choice, but we are free to hold him accountable. If he’d donated money to White Supremacists to help outlaw interracial marriage, there’d be little outcry over his ouster.”

  • April 3, 2014 at 11:33pm

    Bell:
    Once again I answer – if gay marriage is against your religion, don’t get one and don’t go to one.

  • April 3, 2014 at 11:20pm

    Balthazor:
    I agree with 95% of that. Certainly many gay people jump to extremes when the issue is brought up. Even I have been guilty of this, though with many of the other comments we’ve seen on here, I’m sure you can understand how this can happen. Not that that makes it right. Still, it would be like when interracial marriage was banned. Was that just a different line, or was it discriminatory and even fairly racist to have that ban? Same with gay marriage. As for the courts, by allowing straight people to legally marry, but not gays, we are being treated differently under the law and that is unconstitutional, and therefore a job for the courts. Civil rights should never be up for a vote.

123 To page: Go