User Profile: He_Is_Risen


Member Since: May 24, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • August 30, 2014 at 10:21am

    Moderate-extremist — let’s just pretend that the parties are exactly the same as they were in the 1800s and early 1900s, and that the Southern Strategy never happened.

  • August 28, 2014 at 11:47pm

    And yet Beck and Cameron think that “atheists” are the ones who are “destroying” Christmas.

  • [3] August 27, 2014 at 10:50pm

    Though Cameron and the Blaze spin this as putting atheists in their place, unbeknownst to them, their real target here are their fellow Christians. It is fundamentalist Christians who sit in judgment of other Christians for keeping traditions that are held-over and borrowed from our pagan ancestors and heritage, telling them that they are not “real Christians”. Even the person that Cameron is trying to convince in the film is not an atheist, but a fellow Christian who believes the traditions are “un-Christian.”

    And Cameron claims that he is going to show up atheists and prove that some Christmas traditions do not have pagan origins. Seeing as how the audience for this movie are not audience but Christians, his goal is not to convince. Instead, it is to confirm the beliefs of his audience. Doubtless his argument will be lacking in both substance and evidence.

    Responses (4) +
  • [1] August 27, 2014 at 9:31pm

    If you support bad movies simply because someone slaps a Christian label on it, you will continue to get bad movies…

  • August 27, 2014 at 9:23pm

    Evidence that biology is not being taught in schools?

  • [2] August 27, 2014 at 9:20pm

    God Is Not Dead was one of the worst movies I have ever seen, and completely exploitative of the Christian community. It spoke not to Christians, but down to them. Instead of providing them ammunition and tools by which to navigate relationships with people of other beliefs, particularly atheism, it instead stereotyped and cliched. Any Christian who tries to use the arguments found in God Is Not Dead will find themselves having their butts handed to them.

  • [-1] August 27, 2014 at 8:54pm

    Eastinfection — by “bastards”, softimage means “blacks”.

  • [-5] August 27, 2014 at 8:53pm

    Obviously, none of them were followers of the Blaze.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] August 27, 2014 at 8:51pm

    Whew, good thing this preacher is a liberal, otherwise this might would be evidence of the conspiracy to destroy Christians.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] August 27, 2014 at 8:50pm

    500,000 cops are not shot every year in the line of duty. Whoever told you that is feeding you a line of crap.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 26, 2014 at 6:26pm

    Shrugged — if you think Obama is “my leader”, you have the wrong person.

    Besides, Obama’s lies are not somehow justification for Ferguson’s lies. One lie does not transform another lie into the truth.

  • [-1] August 26, 2014 at 6:25pm

    lock_n_load — here you go.

    In short — they beat an innocent man bloody, then charged him with destruction of property when blood got on their uniforms. After he sued the department, they charged him with assault over the incident. Then, during the trial, the officers in question claimed they never had blood on their uniforms.

    This same department was caught in a lie regarding the tear-gassing of reporters — claiming it was by accident, and that they helped the reporters pack up their gear and shepherd it to safety. Video showed otherwise.

    Keep in mind this same department hired at least two officers who are accused of using excessive force against children while working for other departments.

  • [-2] August 26, 2014 at 5:24pm

    So because the St. Louis PD says that at least one shot was fired in the car, and the audio doesn’t support that — the audio is wrong and the police are right. Got you.

    Except. none of the evidence presented so far supports the claim at least one shot was fired in the car. According to Ferguson PD, Brown and Wilson fought over the gun and it went off in the car during the struggle. Yet Brown had no gunpowder residue on his hand, or anywhere on his body.

    So, all the evidence is wrong, but the police are right. Evidence be damned, the word of the police trumps it.

  • [-3] August 26, 2014 at 9:14am


  • [-9] August 26, 2014 at 9:13am

    Police officer in a department with a history of using force and intimidation as a first resort gets pissed that someone didn’t immediately obey his order. A scuffle ensues. Maybe some punches are thrown. Victim breaks away, takes off running. Cop fires shots at the fleeing victim, one striking him under the elbow (as evidence in the autopsy — medical examiner says wound is consistent with strike from behind). Victim drops to his knees to surrender. Officer, in a fit of rage over being struck, fires more shots.

    Then again, we can just take everything the Ferguson PD says as gospel, despite the complete lack of evidence supporting any of their claims, and despite being caught in lie after lie.

    Responses (5) +
  • [-10] August 26, 2014 at 9:04am

    jbruce — the facts don’t support your beliefs, do the facts must be made up!

    Responses (2) +
  • [-7] August 26, 2014 at 9:04am

    Racist piece of crap.

    Responses (4) +
  • [-14] August 26, 2014 at 9:04am

    Yes, because that is what people do when they are being shot at, turn back towards the gunfire.

    What evidence is there that he was racist, other than you hate blacks and you are projecting your own racial hatreds on them?

    Responses (3) +
  • [-14] August 26, 2014 at 9:03am

    Didn’t realize that being a “thug” was grounds for execution.

    Responses (4) +
  • [-28] August 26, 2014 at 9:02am

    ” The fact is the kid was a thief on drugs who assaulted a police officer.”

    No evidence whatsoever that Brown assaulted Wilson. They have yet to produce any evidence to support their claims. And this is the same PD that has accused people of assaulting their officers in order to cover up those same officer’s wrongdoings.

    Responses (3) +
123 To page: Go