User Profile: Heffe44


Member Since: April 21, 2011


  • [-1] November 4, 2015 at 5:41pm

    You are assuming a lot. First, you have no idea if he tried to buy a gun. And if a background check really stopped him, then that proves the point that the gun control crowd has been trying to make, that background checks work and should be expanded. Secondly, you are right, murderous intent can’t be controlled, but we can control the tools used. Remember, nobody died. It would not have been the same story if he had a gun. Thirdly, the “good guy” you are talking about was the police. Nobody is trying to take the guns away from the police. They are properly trained. the problem comes when you have untrained people using guns in public places, ie: the lady at that Walmart that used her gun to stop a shoplifter.

    I find it odd you called me illogical. “You keep on using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.”

  • [-3] November 4, 2015 at 2:34pm

    At least no one died. if he had a gun there would have been several deaths.

    Responses (5) +
  • [-12] October 7, 2015 at 3:45pm

    The issue is not that the Pope met with Kim Davis, it’s that he was tricked into meeting with Kim Davis. The homosexual couple you reference is a long time friend of the Pope and was invited to the embassy by the Pope himself.

    If the Pope knowingly met Kim Davis, they wouldn’t be calling for him to resign.

  • September 17, 2015 at 7:58pm

    one the state investigations was from Florida. That is a Republican State House and Republican Gov. They found no wrong doing. Please go to other news sites other than The Blaze. There is a whole world out there.

  • [-2] September 16, 2015 at 3:32pm

    The SCOTUS said slavery was legal one time and it was widely agreed upon as the worst SC decision of all time. On the flip side, several different courts, numerous times, over the course of 200yrs have all agreed on what the Establishment Clause means. You are simply wrong to think otherwise.

  • September 16, 2015 at 3:17pm

    @smudgercat17 That doesn’t make a lick of sense. The case law originated from the SCOTUS’ ruling on the constitution. Case law IS the Constitution.

  • [4] September 16, 2015 at 2:13pm

    I did the read the article. That is why I commented the way I did. The only place where his type of reasoning make any sense is on The Blaze and websites like it. In the real world he gets laughed out of the courtroom.

  • [9] September 16, 2015 at 1:43pm

    How can you think this is well thought out. His “rebuttal” flies in the face of 200yrs of case law. The courts have repeatedly stated that when the Government acts based on religious intent is it unconstitutional. The whole “freedom of religion, not freedom from religion” is complete BS.

    We are not a theocracy.

    Responses (6) +
  • [2] September 3, 2015 at 2:28pm

    We are a secular nation. In a secular nation your religion is subservient to the civic code. That is not new, that is how it has always been. If you believe otherwise, you are lying to yourself.

  • [1] August 19, 2015 at 3:07pm

    This is the only comment that is needed. this comment should be copy and pasted into all the comments on this thread.

  • [3] June 29, 2015 at 6:35pm

    I am all for their right to do it, but did anybody see the one truck with the Confederate flag flying above the American flag. Hmmmm, I wonder how well that would go over if the rainbow flag was flying higher than Ol Glory?

  • [5] May 22, 2015 at 6:38pm

    Lena Dunham never claimed to be a moral compass. She is not outspoken in judging anyone’s life choices. She didn’t take part in robo calls that stated that homosexuals would “molest your children”. It is not just the crime, It is the hypocrisy.

  • [7] May 22, 2015 at 6:35pm

    Katie and Lena Dunham did claim to a moral compass. They didn’t campaign against homosexuals saying they would “molest your children”. The actions are forgivable but the hypocrisy is not.

  • May 20, 2015 at 6:36pm

    You should read about the case of the West Memphis Three. It took almost twenty years and several appeals to free them. They were innocent the whole time.

  • [-10] May 14, 2015 at 8:08pm

    @jr23 That comment is ridiculous. Most educators are dedicated to their students growth and learning. Why else would they choose to teach for the wages they do?

  • [-8] May 14, 2015 at 7:53pm

    @kaydeebeau Hahahahaha… you should really read that back. There is a whole lot of assumption in there. “I feel people are honking too much…” haha.. Romney carried your state 54% to 44%. Republicans currently control 28 of the 46 State Senate seats. I guess I’m not seeing the signs of scary Liberals invading your State.

    But I do hear you guys have nice gold courses. You got that going for you.

  • [52] May 14, 2015 at 6:57pm

    This was in South Carolina… not really know as a Bastion of Liberal ideology.

    Responses (10) +
  • [1] May 12, 2015 at 5:12pm

    Here is the real story–

  • [2] May 1, 2015 at 6:15pm

    It sounds like she is asking those involved to act within the law. Seem reasonable to me. Just because you are black shouldn’t mean you cant speak out against systemic and institutional racism.

  • [10] May 1, 2015 at 5:51pm

    She comes from a family that has five generations of police in it. And a least three of her immediate family members are police officers. Would those same concerns about a conflict of interest be raised if she was not to prosecute?

Restoring Love