To Beck and all the folks who are crying that their conscious just won’t let them plug their noses and vote for Trump because of his “personality” and demeanor with this or that. Let me leave you this to think about – How will you sleep at night with your conscious knowing you allowed Hillary to be elected? Take the words of Wayne Grudem:
According to Grudem:
Once I put the choice in those stark terms, there is a good way to make a decision. Since I find both candidates morally objectionable, I am back to the old-fashioned basis on which I have usually decided how to vote for my entire life: Whose policies are better? Do I agree more with Trump’s policies or with Clinton’s?
It isn’t even close. I overwhelmingly support Trump’s policies and believe that Clinton’s policies will seriously damage the nation, perhaps forever. On the Supreme Court, abortion, religious liberty, sexual orientation regulations, taxes, economic growth, the minimum wage, school choice, Obamacare, protection from terrorists, immigration, the military, energy, and safety in our cities, I think Trump is far better than Clinton.
I will sleep very well knowing I didn’t vote for CANKLES nor her GOOD friend in DONALD RUMP…
HIS POLICIES ARE HER POLICIES…
Take a serious look with out your colored glasses on and you will see, ( if you are HONEST ABOUT it.).
That the are BOTH MARXISTS…
SHE SUCKS/HE SUCKS
 October 21, 2016 at 11:39am
Anyone with that sole argument had better justify why it was ok to vote for Bill Clinton when he ran since he had more proof, more scandal, more accusers, and more verification (and it all turned out true and continued into the White House). All we have with Trump is what we had with Cain – rumor and allegation that looks mostly shady doesn’t match current events, and as with Cain it all turned out false to smear his image before the election. This is the Liberal tactic, always has been – Obama used it, Clinton used it, Gore tried to use it and every time it turns out false. But with Bill, it was true, it was proven, it was established but they didn’t care, so why does it matter now?
Yet, Don's character was tarnished before running, it is just that Don supporters didn't pay much attention to it before and now, won't even consider his character before running.
 October 21, 2016 at 11:25am
When you’ve made your living and political career race dividing and someone comes along and promises to better education in the ghettos, Drop crime in the inner cities, help the citizens keep jobs that are going to illegals, and lift people from poverty, I guess that your only option is to say it is racist and it disgusts you. Typical politician of our current system that only wants to keep playing the game. This is who Trump is running against. He doesn’t want the OTHER party to control the corruption, he just wants to keep HIS corruption. The citizens are tired of being slaves and tools of the elite class. Vote Trump! Disrupt the system.
So, what you are saying is, Trump is taking the same liberal position towards the inner cities, that democrats have held forever...
Which makes sense.. because Trump is liberal RINO.
You are right
Trump doesnt want the OTHER party to control the corruption, so he joined the OTHER party, to make it liberal too, and he succeeded.
Trump supporters are the occupy wall street/blm of the republican side.
The people booing were also people who hate Catholics
October 20, 2016 at 6:05pm
Trumps answer should have been:
“Honor the election outcome? Well just let me say this. While I was a businessman, and crooks like Hillary were politicians, I followed the laws they passed. No one is accusing me of breaking the law. I complied with tax laws, and corporate laws, even when crooks like her jerked businessmen like me around so they could make special preference for their friends and pull tricks to enrich their own pocketbooks. And after the election I think I will be President and I will fix all this corruption. But if I’m not, if all her lies and corruption and dirty politics are effective enough to fool the American people into believing a liar, then I will continue to follow the law. And I believe, so will many of the people that currently employ Americans. We will do what businessmen and women have been doing for the last decade – try to make a living. And in many cases that requires taking jobs overseas, moving factories to foreign countries, and watching America suffer under crooked politicians just like Hillary Clinton who are paid Billions of dollars to rig the system, take from government budgets for their own personal gain, and steal money meant for helping refugees and disaster victims. How is that new mansion of yours Hillary? How does it feel to live in Chappaqua while Haitian disaster victims are still waiting for the money you stole? Can you sleep at night?”
 October 20, 2016 at 5:54pm
If your Samsung 7 blows up in your hands, you do have to replace the phone, am I right?
 October 20, 2016 at 5:52pm
We could say this about Obama I suppose with his record as a senator when he ran for office and about his conduct as President:
“Unlike his opponent, he actually shows up to work”, making reference to Obama’s spotty attendance record at Senate votes while campaigning for president during the 2008 Democratic primary.
“Unlike his opponent, he didn’t walk away from Chicago’s Black community when the politics got tough. When you’re watching TV or walking down the street in Chicago and you see gangs killing your kids, how do you deny what is right in front of you? I thought he was from Chicago”
Strange how Liberals always use criticism that they subconsciously ought to realize points the fingers right back at themselves. – Hypocrisy.
 October 20, 2016 at 5:38pm
Not a Samsung 7 – a coo-coos egg.
Republicans said we would loose our plan – you said they were trying to scare us
Republicans said we would loose our doctor – you said they were trying to scare us
Republicans said it would raise costs – you said they would go down
Republicans said it would lower quality – you said it would make things better
Republicans said it would lower competition – you said it would increase providers
Republicans said it would be full of bureaucracy – you said govmt. was needed to make it better
Republicans said it would be unsustainable and add to the deficit- you said it would pay for itself
Republicans said insurance companies were getting back door access – you said it was to punish big insurance
Republicans said it wouldn’t fix the problem, just shift the cost – you said it would lower the number of uninsured
Republicans said govmt. had a bad record for doing this sort of thing – you said building a website is easy
Republican said it was a path to single payer – You said you weren’t going there
Republicans said it would result in death panels – you said no one would make those choices
Now you say it is a Samsung 7, and you need to “tweek” it just a bit. I say, you lie, you can’t be trusted, and you think we are stupid. You’ve never told the truth yet, why should we believe you now?
How much is the tweek going to cost? Has Hillary included this tweek in her budget that will not add a cent to the national debt? Which of her billionaire friends are going to bankroll Obamacare?
I agree but republicans did not stop it either so they all are complicit in this deal as well.
 October 20, 2016 at 4:54pm
The biggest criticism anyone has about Trump are things they said about President Robert Kennedy – only the press wouldn’t print it. The smallest criticism of Hillary that exists are things I would be in jail for.
 October 20, 2016 at 4:52pm
Doesn’t matter if Hillary gets in either, since she plans to sell them and put the money into the Clinton Foundation.
 October 20, 2016 at 4:32pm
And then when Clinton left office, they stole the furniture and china, and stole all the “W” keys off every computer and left mean and illicit messages all over the White House for all the new administration to find. And then when Obama came into office they blamed Bush for everything bad and made him the scape goat for the entire 8 years of his presidency. So don’t talk to me about “Presidents” being the bigger person and above the politics when it comes to transfer of power – that only applies if you’re a Republican.
Right Hi_Don, because that is what THEY ARE. Now with Trump WE ARE THEM.
 October 20, 2016 at 3:44pm
There was no “Clintonomics”, there was not Bill Clinton economic recovery or success. Bill was a complete ineffective idiot who became sterilized in scandal. It wasn’t until his second term, when the public began to reverse course, that the Republican Congress led by Gingrich with his “Contract With America” that forced him to return to tax cuts and Reaganomics that the economy turned and it produced the first real deficit reduction and surplus in Government in decades. Hillary constantly brags about her husband’s accomplishments, but he didn’t do anything. It was the Republicans in congress that did what she tries to take credit for.
1. The surplus is a lie. There was no surplus. They just changed the accounting.
2. It was dot-com bubble that temporarily boosted the economy. But that's not real growth.
There is nothing to be proud of there. Stop believing lies. Start learning.
Thank you for pointing out the real truth
October 20, 2016 at 3:39pm
And it was Obama that was caught telling the Russians “Tell Putin after the election I will have more flexibility” and then suddenly the Russians own a huge portion of the U.S. Uranium with Sec. Clinton’s help . But you’re worried about Trump, not the party that lies, steals, cheats, and enriches themselves at the taxpayer expense.
 October 20, 2016 at 3:30pm
Talk about the phishing scam! Clinton says she hired an investigator and has proven it was the Russians who hacked her buddy, and you believed it enough to put that liar in print. Now who is the noob?
Still doesn’t explain what they said, who they said it to, and why they lied and lied and lied and lied and lied……
Still doesn’t explain the graft, corruption, collusion, etc.
When Obama says Clinton is more prepared to be President than anyone in history, he means more trained in Solinski, Soros, Socialism, Graft, Corruption, Misdirection, Propaganda, and Mind Control. It has nothing to do with being ready to do the people’s business.
October 19, 2016 at 12:26pm
Has anybody actually stated or seen any evidence that the Russians were involved in the emails getting to Wikileaks? This whole talking point that Russia is behind the leaks and that Russia wants Trump for president is unsubstantiated. It is the typical Left tactic to simply state a point over and over until people assume it must be true. How do we know it isn’t the NSA that gave the email to Wiki just as Judge Napolitano said. How do we know it isn’t China? How do we know it isn’t people who work directly for Wikileaks? And why would Russia prefer Trump? If it were Russia, why didn’t they help the Socialist in the race Bernie Sanders? They would have had all this stuff back then and could have taken Hillary out before she even became the candidate and who thinks Trump couldn’t have beaten Bernie Sanders? And if the corruption is Russia, why is Bernie supporting Hillary after all she did to him and his campaign? This is all a Clinton smoke screen. The issue isn’t Russia – it is the content of the emails! It is the lies under oath. It is the incompetence in office. It is the Pay to Play. It is stealing the hundreds of Millions of $ relief effort money from Haiti by despicable power hungry Clintons. It is decades of coverups, destroying others reputations, and scandal after scandal after scandal. It is the politics of Washington. It is Crooked Hillary. They want you to think it can’t be done – but VOTE people. Mr. Smith goes to Washington!
Nope, it's a diversion from the truth, like her entire campaign. The only time I have seen her campaign show any truth in this campaign was with a picture of her bus, proving that they were full of sh@t.
The Russians prefer Trump because he's had business dealings with them. His former campaign manager was the señor advisor to the pro-Russian party leader in Ukraine. Another Trump adviser was fired for his relationship with Russian investors close to Putin. And how do we know it was Russia? The code used, the origin IP (which cannot be fully spoofed despite what movies pretend), and the fact that Russian-state TV broke several of these stories HOURS before WikiLeaks released them publicly.
There isn't just smoke...there's a massive forest fire that only the willfully blind would refuse to see.
The best question is why is WikiLeaks targeting Clinton? Assange HATES Hillary...she wanted him jailed - and even suggested taking him out by drone. He also hates America (and has admitted it) and feels that Trump would destroy our credibility internationally.
Why would Putin, or anyone else in the Russian government/oligarchate, prefer Trump to the candidate that they've already bought and paid for?
 October 18, 2016 at 6:04pm
Just as an FYI, I have been enjoying the YouTube reruns of Trey Gowdy’s greatest moments just to lift my spirits, and noted an amazing line from Hillary Clinton during one of her Q&A’s with Gowdy in congress. Gowdy was grilling her over the Blumenthol emails and how Blumenthol had critisized Obama using at times even some hateful and vulgar language to which Hillary responded something to the effect “Well, if you don’t have any friends that say unkind and unflattering words I congratulate you, however….” as if to dismiss the content as simply a human nature moment.
Wonder if she would characterize Trumps hot mic tape as a human moment of unkind and unflattering words easily dismissed?
No...Trumps words were him talking about sexually assaulting women...
 October 18, 2016 at 10:52am
So of course the FBI gave him an immunity agreement in order to get the evidence right? And I’m sure he had no intent to do harm so we can just call him careless and call it a day.
 October 17, 2016 at 2:56pm
Now that made me laugh…Hillary mild speaking let alone THE MOST mild speaking? That’s a good one. Now tell me the one about the three little bears because I can never stop after just one fairly tail.
 October 17, 2016 at 12:27pm
Like they guy who tosses a kid into the lake so he can be seen by the TV news crew as the hero who rescued the same kid – Nice PR move. But doesn’t change the facts that Hillary’s rhetoric is inciting these actions. Her “dangerous” speeches causing vandals to destroy political advertising and offices, and thugs to beat up Trump supporters at rallys and events. It is the left that is connected to the anarchists, looters, and dissidents.
Now that's good satire...
....the most mild speaking candidate for the Presidency we've had in some time is using "dangerous " language...
 October 17, 2016 at 12:22pm
I’ll be voting for the Raging Combover Narcissist – who might be a sexist because we have had that before without any real bad things happening – ie Kennedy and Bill Clinton to name just two that even the Dems don’t mind calling their own. But I’m certainly NOT going to go with the Murderous Criminal Sociopath because that is Hitler territory, that is Stalin, that is signing the death certificate to Democracy and our Republic. I’ll take inept over corrupt any day of the week.
Pretty simply choice actually. I won’t even have to hold my breath or plug my nose.