User Profile: HI_Don

HI_Don

Member Since: January 23, 2012

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 16, 2014 at 11:37am

    I’m no gun expert – but the first thing I noticed is that the gun “looks like” a 45, but the casing appears very small like maybe a 22. The little or no recoil might match a 22 but definitely not a 45. I don’t think the slide looks like it actually moves, and it looks more like the whole video is moved rather than the camera gets jerked as I would expect from someone who accidentally fired a weapon. I also would have thought some debris from shooting the wall would be present like flying wall tile or dust from drywall etc. I’ll vote for fake.

  • April 15, 2014 at 10:42pm

    Excuse me? Uh, our government is going after 14 year old kids with RC helicopter’s and GoPro camera’s and charging them with illegal “Drone” usage and someone thinks having the government monitor the entire city with a robotic eye in the sky watching every back yard and every street corner is O.K. in the name of crime fighting? You think for one second your local governor or mayor wouldn’t use this to follow all of his opponents supporters home from a gathering to see where they live and send the cops to issue parking tickets, litter notices, and any other city ordinance they could harass them with? You think the IRS has power just by going after your paper work – try city hall with the power of 24 hour surveillance.

  • April 15, 2014 at 8:33pm

    Dear Mr. Rumsfeld,
    Don’t worry about the accuracy, we will let you know if we determine you owe more. And don’t feel too badly about being concerned and confused over our policies. We too find our selves unsure as to issues at the IRS. Like, we are not sure that your tax information and personal information is being kept confidential or if it has been shared with your enemies. We are not sure from day to day which party will be in charge and what we will be asked to do to target you or reward you. We can only opperate on the assumption we shouldn’t tell you about it either way. Do you have any idea what it is like to work day to day not knowing which congressman or white house official is going to have marching orders for imeadiate action while also swearing you to secrecy, and then worrying about who might throw you under the buss at the first sign of media attention? Believe me we fully understand your sense of confusion. But if it helps, how about you just send us everything you have and we will simply send back what we don’t want or use?

    Signed,
    your pals at the IRS.

  • April 15, 2014 at 7:20am

    I don’t see anything wrong with this at all except his choice of words. If you want to try to drive down the threat of violence (which clearly this guy is making the claim the feds are the ones ratcheting it up, he is wary the feds are making threats of shooting people) then if you are a peaceful movement you demonstrate that by having your kids and women with you. You don’t put the 300 lb hot head males in front who are open carrying. What he said was if you are going to make these threats that YOU intend to respond with force and violence, then let them show how much of an aggressor they are going to be with women and children up front? What he is saying is that they want their rights, and they don’t intend to be pushed around – BUT, they are not going to be the ones to make the aggressive moves and to show that they intend to put the women up front – and if they intend to be the aggressors just let them contend with the media images of them being aggressive to women and children. This is why the feds pulled back and out. They knew they were going to loose the media war and look like a bunch of jack boot thugs. SUV’s, and automatic weapons vs a bunch of cowboys on horses and six shooters was bad enough, but against women and kids – they promptly retreated. But you know they will be back – just as soon as no one is watching this bully, they will issue a sucker punch.

  • April 15, 2014 at 7:11am

    And the feds repeated that pattern with several of the western states realizing it was a way to land grab. Show me where in the constitution the feds are supposed to own land? It is designed as a unifying government for the STATES that govern and control THEIR lands – the U.S.A. is supposed to be about PRIVATE property ownership with “we the people” in control of the government, not the government finding ways to control and manipulate the people.

  • April 15, 2014 at 7:09am

    Oh, no, it isn’t over yet. Far from it. It won’t be over until Harry figures out how to get his hands on the land, the money or both.

    “Well, it’s not over. We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it.” – right Harry – cause that is the President’s job. Violate the immigration law, violate the gun laws, violate the labor laws, violate the brand new Health care law (even though you wrote that one), violate the constitution – then just walk away from it.

    After hearing Cliven Bundy’s logic – I find myself agreeing with him. The federal gov. pulled a fast one on Nevada. Unlike other “territories” they hoodwinked the populace to agree to join their property into the united states for the purpose of becoming a state and then pulled a fast one by claiming the feds would retain the ownership of the land as they formed up the boarders. It’s like hiring a security company to install a perimeter system on your house and then they tell you they are moving in and entitled to two of your three bedrooms and the kitchen. Nothing in our constitution was EVER designed for the fed gov to own 85% of one of the states. The offer to become a state of the Nation required title be given to the Nation IN EXCHANGE FOR the creation of the state which thus requires the Nation to recognize the STATEs existence and boarders within the Nation. Creating the State by definition should have transferred ownership to the new state. I agree with Clive

  • April 13, 2014 at 11:18pm

    That was really cute. Brings a bit of a smile from the fromp I feel every time I think of our Gov. and the idiots running it.

  • April 12, 2014 at 5:30pm

    Listen Iran – We mean business here – NO SPECIAL TREATMENT, we have our sovereignty. Your ambassador will have to enter the U.S. just like everyone else – Walk in through the Mexico boarder! Then Obama and Holder will make it illegal for us to throw you out.

  • April 12, 2014 at 5:28pm

    Just watch – here comes the lawsuit – Wheel needs to be Ebonics sensitive.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 12, 2014 at 5:16pm

    Why doesn’t he just simplify his speeches to the following no matter what the occasion:

    “blah blah blah BAD REPUBLICANS blah blah blah BUSH’S FAULT blah blah blah RACIST blah blah blah UNFAIR RICH PEOPLE blah blah blah JOBS blah blah blah I’LL DO WHAT I HAVE TO blah blah blah IGNORE THE FACTS IT IS ACTUALLY WORKING blah blah blah blah IT’S NOT MY FAULT blah blah blah RAISE TAXES blah blah blah INCREASE SPENDING blah blah blah CONGRESS PLAYING POLITICS blah blah blah I’M WORKING AS HARD AS I CAN blah blah blah MUSLIMS GOOD CHRISTIANS BAD blah blah blah LETS DRINK BEER AND PLAY GOLF blah blah blah I NEVER KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT THAT UNTIL I SAW IT IN THE NEWS blah blah blah FAKE CONSPIRACY.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 12, 2014 at 5:08pm

    And when is the great leader going to pay the women in the whitehouse the same pay he does the men in the whitehouse staff? The great hypocrite again has spoken!

  • April 12, 2014 at 2:24pm

    This is only a effort to diffuse and disperse the protest. Then they will come back like a thief in the night – and continue the process of killing and burying the cattle out on the range. Once the cattle are gone – the issue is gone. The feds have time on their side, and manpower, and funding courtesy of our tax dollars. Unless a court takes action and makes a ruling – the feds will win this – and by the time you realize it – it will already be over.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 11, 2014 at 12:27am

    No, your forgetting, the idea is to replace Letterman – thus you cannot kill what was already dead. There is no death warrant – only a continuation of the the talking dead.

  • April 11, 2014 at 12:10am

    Another reason she shouldn’t be President – her reflexes stink. The thing was by her before she even flinched. Malkin would have caught it in mid air and thrown it back.

  • April 10, 2014 at 11:19pm

    Easy solution – just have him contact Rev. Al Sharpton – I think he can fund the debt using his left over cocaine dealer money or his FBI informant dues.

  • April 8, 2014 at 2:39am

    Ah, look – Bush came with his wife and Bill probably left with the three blondes.

  • April 7, 2014 at 3:17am

    @ Enuff –
    No such thing. In any situation there are always at LEAST two witnesses. 1) you-even if you attempt to lie to yourself. and 2) God – so nothing is untraceable ultimately. You can only get away with being dishonest for so long, and ultimately everyone pays the piper.

  • April 6, 2014 at 8:46pm

    Wait wait wait! The cash was untraceable in a bank bag that had the owners Drivers license and paperwork in the bag? Just how do you call that untraceable? Just how would anyone claim they didn’t know WHO to return the cash to when you have the person’s ID?

    They did the right thing giving it back EXCEPT I don’t know why I would have gone to the cops – I would think it better just to make sure it got back myself – why tempt a police evidence room to make some claim that their drug dog “alerted” and thus had the rights to confiscate it?

    Responses (7) +
  • April 5, 2014 at 2:14am

    Make sure you fill from both ends of the tunnel at the same time. If you don’t know where the other end of the tunnel goes – then that is where the flame throwers come in. Fill the tunnel with highly explosive gas – and look for the belch of smoke and flame across the boarder. That might be a good place to start looking.

  • April 4, 2014 at 7:51pm

    @Vision Harry who posted: “Well let’s save a few trillion and call that the new “Trans-National Highway To Prosperity for Hookers, Whores, Terrorists and Drug runners”.”

    You mean – the jobs Americans refuse to do? Better add migrant workers, thieves, rapists, and gardeners to the list and you might have something.