The anti-Trump ad uses images that his wife took willingly for commercial reasons and Trump feels “attacked”. That somehow justifies name calling, threatening, and making up artificial pictures to demean Cruz’s wife? Why is anyone supporting this child who wants to be king. We already have one who uses the power of the federal gov. to punish his enemies.
Cruz started it ....letting the Caucuses see pics of Melania nude...he had to know that the Mormons would be offended since they are so moral.
His wife is proud of being a successful model. the indication that she was unacceptable as a First Lady because of her modeling, that ticked the Donald off.
 March 18, 2016 at 12:38am
Cruz lost in a contest of GOP in fighting and vote splitting. That is why the polls show that TRUMP does the WORST against Hillary – Cruz shines far brighter in a Hillary contest due to the absolute stark contrast between conservatism and liberalism. Trump has more of a chance at losing to Hillary because in that contest it is the arrogant wanna be King control freak (no matter the punish the liberals agenda) against the “WOMAN”. Cruz comes across serious and patriotic and constitutional, against the liar, cheat, and incompetent. Trump will be eaten alive by the media in the General for his history of Liberal support, political pandering for wealth, adulterous past. Who was the one GOP candidate Trump NEVER attacked during the debates – Florina. What makes Trump look the pettiest right now – his constant attack on Megan Kelley. Trump is a hustler and a deal maker which will not suit him well in a contest against Hillary.
You never answered my point about the GOP base refusing to vote Trump if he's running against the Benghazi Bitch. That's number one. Will you then vote Trump?
And second Trump turned out new voters in the primaries this year, and converted many Democrats. That's not vote splitting. Don't count on them voting Cruz in November.
Lastly your argument is primarily that Trump can't win the general election. Fine. But if he becomes the nominee I hope you know that's not a sane reason for not voting for him.
 March 18, 2016 at 12:29am
The choice is clear – You can vote for someone who is self centered, egotistical, has little useful experience in political leadership, is known for a tyrannical temper, has made threats to personal enemies that border on liable and inciting criminal acts, sounds more like a proposed empirical leader than a patriotic servant, and makes promises that will require violation of the constitution to complete – OR, you can let Hillary win. Frankly I don’t see much difference between the radical left wanna be king Obama than the results of having a tyranical right wanna be king Trump – I only hope it is all media hype to use fear and pomp to get the white house and Ben Carson is right that inside Trump is a better guy than he pretends. I would rather have the promises of Cruz in flat tax abolish the enormity of the IRS, stroke of the pen abolish all the unconstitutional Obama directives, and return to Constitutional conservatism than the bluster and bravado of Trump. But when 60% of the people are afraid more about the loss of welfare and free college and fear global warming more than heading down the path of fascism and socialism, I’m afraid the polls suggest Trump will be our NEXT dictator, this time from the right instead of the left, but a control freak dictator none the less. He already has talked about limiting the press & restricting free speech of HIS enemies – People don’t seem to see that is just as dangerous as Obama’s enemies list.
 January 27, 2016 at 12:12am
Proves Donald is a narcissist. Who in the heck picks a fight with Meg Kelley? What kind of PR can you possibly win fighting with a popular and beautiful national news host with exceptional ratings and audience on a conservative network? Logic isn’t making this call, that’s stupid self pride and a king syndrome.
Let Fox announce they just added Rush Limbaugh to the panel and watch Trump run for the hills. He knows the true and trusted conservative voices have caught on to him and are urging their audiences to run away from his big talk and liberal history.
I like what Trump did to the discourse and getting things fired up, but he is no conservative, he is no constitutionalist, and he is not to be trusted that his “Deal” making will be any better than Harry Reid’s. Thanks for thinning the herd and making sure we don’t get progressive Bush or liberal Christy. Now lets all back the real conservative Cruz and turn this country around.
Since Trump won't be on the stage I hope Megan Kelly goes after Cruz like she did to Trump. Then we will see if you Crazy Cruzers still think she is fair...
 January 7, 2016 at 10:37pm
Taya must have introduced herself, there is no way that idiot actually knew who she was without a teleprompter at least.
 January 4, 2016 at 9:40pm
This is more Trump Media bait. He can’t wait for Hillary to ask about the fake video.
If he had actually shown mexicans, that would be racist anyway.
August 5, 2015 at 1:13pm
“the U.S. would be “screwing” Iran if Congress rejects the international nuclear deal”
Just what part of Iran’s years and years of sponsoring terrorism, hatred of America and the West, plotting to get and use WMD, and just general being really bad guys in the world doesn’t Kerry get? Was he opposed to “screwing Hitler” during WWII? Was he worried how Napoleon or Stalin might not get a fair shake? If you don’t screw with your enemies good deals, what is the alternative? Why isn’t he talking about doing the deal is “Screwing Israel, Europe, and all freedom loving people of the world”? What’s next, good deals for North Korea? We can start calling this administration the good deals for evil team with all they have done to reward bad things aka Cuba, Mexico, Muslim Brotherhood, Russia. Just don’t let it be know your a Christian who wants to express an opinion about God’s rules for sin cause there is no good deal coming your way other than a great big Bigot label.
 August 3, 2015 at 2:19pm
“I liked the black community. I had fun there. There’s people who will just crack you up.”
That was a really odd comment. Which ones-- the gang bangers, drug peddlers, the hookers, the junkies, or the homeless. Which ones of those crack you up the most?
 July 7, 2015 at 5:41pm
Well there you have it from the tolerance crowd. “Believe like us or shut up or get out!” Christians can’t have opinions or beliefs unless they are the same as what they tell you they need them to be. Everyone must make concessions so they don’t have too. Everyone else must feel bad because they shouldn’t be made feel bad by anyone. No one can speak contrary to the speech they endorse. No pride unless it is gay pride, everyone else be ashamed and marginalized.
There is a difference between being free to do things your own way
....and demanding that everyone approve of and support the choices you make - or else.
How would they feel about a reversal of their own policy? They are outnumbered by straight people after all. I think that they would be screaming about infringement on their human rights then. Straight people have human rights too. The same rules need to apply to all.
 July 7, 2015 at 5:28pm
smart cities, even if their objective is to raise revenue, don’t attach jail time they attach late fees. Then in severe cases they would send animal control to take the animal until fees, fines and boarding charges are paid and then you turn a $10 fee into hundreds in revenue from those who fail to responsibly get their dogs shots and license on time. But making the owner a “criminal” is just plain stupid and infringes on police handling real crime.
 July 6, 2015 at 5:33pm
I have yet to hear one person actually quote the words that Trump said and explain why they should be considered offensive. I’ve heard people try to say what they think we should believe he meant, but never simply stating him by quote. I’m not a fan of Mr. Trump but I have a hard time disagreeing with, let alone being offended by his anti-rape stance or his anti-criminal stance in immigration reform. Why are so many others having issue with this I’ll never understand. Maybe we can get Hillary or Josh Ernst to explain in detail what Trump said that was so offensive to Mexicans. Are they saying Mexicans find being anti-rape offensive?
 July 6, 2015 at 5:23pm
Come on Blaze – Where is the update and fact check?
Deaths in the U.S. over July 4th Holiday weekend.
Killings by Shark _____
Killings by ISIS ______
Killings by Mexicans ______
Let’s even add a few:
Killings by Cops _____
Killings by texting while driving ____
Killings by DUI ______
Killings by abortions at PPH _____
 July 6, 2015 at 2:19pm
Not sure what it looks like but it’s covered in nuts and filled with fruits.
July 6, 2015 at 2:10pm
Problem is if all we care about is funding this fine then all we do is encourage more lawsuits for LGBTQXYZ folks to claim injury and get rich.
The truth here is that if these were not two gay women – one of them would be smart enough to bake her own damn cake! The “mental” damage was done long ago, way before they entered a wedding cake bakery so I think I would counter sue based on predisposed condition if nothing else.
The only “Go Fund Me” effort here ought to be to raise money for a counter suit – not a dime to pay the bogus fine. The husband ought to go on TV and confess that he was solely responsible in preventing his wife from baking the cake for these two women and that she had nothing to do with it and that he intends on doing jail time instead of the fine which he is unable to pay.
What are they going to give the guy for sentencing on “lack of diverse thought”? What is the precedence here for failure to render service? They can’t possibly give the guy more than a year sentence when we have multiple violent criminals who are illegal aliens under the catch and release program murdering women in the streets. When we have “community service” for Hollywood drug addicts. When we have revolving doors for gang style shootings among the Rap community. Let’s get some perspective here. Their crime was “not baking a cake” without taking their money. Under this ruling my kids will all claim mental anguish for the numerous “no dessert” rulings of the past in our house.
Right, don't give gays the excuse to keep harassing anyone daring to oppose them. The Labor Commission should only be allowed to issue a type of "traffic" ticket & associated fine level if they think there is some kind of violation that you can appeal. If the so-called offended party as any other claims they should have to sue in Civil Court. The Labor Commission should have no such juristriction. The owners should confess nothing & refuse to pay any fine. I would close up shop & move out of state 1st, if f not choose jail.
Further, unless 1 can prove they had no other choice but to go to that particular bakery they have no case. They should have to prove they took every step to avoid such a conflict (to avoid stepping on another's 1st amendment rights). No outrageous judgments should be allowed for such a minor offense if 1 was indeed committed.
Again, from what I know, the only chance America has is for states to vote to secede (again, nothing like the slavery issue that should never have happened), threaten to follow through & force a permanent change in the Constitution to protect marriage in accordance with natural law. Otherwise, these perverts will just keep appealing & setting up situations to keep suing to screw the rest of us & our children. The law can be used to ruin anyone & these types are aggresive & will pursue you (I was sued for 25 years with taxpayer dollars for making a complaint). Circulate this post. Immediate action is required. Read my other posts.
 July 6, 2015 at 1:47pm
I think it was the added wind resistance of raising his finger in the #1 configuration that did it.
 July 6, 2015 at 1:32pm
It should have read “Another Black Pastor Church Attack Narrowly Escapes Death at Hands of Mentally ill Man Claiming to do God’s Work. Black Leaders Continue to call for Confederate Flag to Come Down!”
 July 6, 2015 at 1:05pm
I was in the military for 25 years, retiring in 2009. I’ve Never heard anyone suggest it was Country before God, nor would I have believed it if they had. It is abundantly clear to me in studying history as well as our nation’s founding that the precise issue of ever dismissing God’s leading role in our governing was to be considered the nail in the coffin. There is still time and hope for America, but the sounds of carpentry coming from the mortuary are unmistakable. As for me and my house, I have used a religious statue as a flag pole top for a very long time now and my motto has always been God, Family, Country, and self. So if the country ever turns on me, there is no doubt where I stand.
It does beg the question of what a military member should do if confronted by a lawful order that violates religious beliefs.
 July 2, 2015 at 7:27pm
Makes me think of the Salem which trials. Drown her in water, if she floats the water is rejecting her and she is a which and must be killed. If she sinks and drowns she is innocent.
Seriously though, this is just sickening. I’m sure one of ISIS definitions of Gay is “not man enough to fight with ISIS”. The height chosen looks not enough to cause instant death, but high enough to ensure painful death.
 July 2, 2015 at 6:47pm
The envelops would have had mayo stains if that were the case – but good thought.
July 2, 2015 at 6:43pm
No, the incompetence comes in reading comprehension. The checks were found in the dumpster still in their unopened sealed envelops. So they could not have been scanned or processed.
Probably part of their program to force businesses to pay late fees and penalties under the claim they didn’t pay on time. Most likely a state employee goofing off realized they had fallen behind during Christmas holidays in processing work and tossed them to hide the evidence knowing they would get rebilled later.