User Profile: HI_Don

HI_Don

Member Since: January 23, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • February 27, 2015 at 6:59pm

    Spell check ANYONE. Especially if your going to put it in a headline or in giant bold letters in the middle of the article and it is supposed to be the main point of the article – at least spell check that.

    What the heck is “American flag resesign”

    Responses (1) +
  • February 27, 2015 at 6:58pm

    And New doesn’t mean better. If it isn’t broke – don’t fix it. I’d rather spend energy on fixing the broken country than working on a perfectly good flag.

  • February 27, 2015 at 3:01pm

    That’s easy. If someone was inside it wouldn’t be missing because the person inside would know where it was. Nothing is missing as long as someone knows where it is. So, by logic since the house is missing, no one was inside.
    (Kind of like the old tree falling in a forest when someone IS around)

  • [1] February 27, 2015 at 2:52pm

    Dorothy said she couldn’t land the house on Hillary because she is technically a B**ch, not a W**ch. But I said “What difference does it make anyway?”

    Unfortunately I couldn’t persuade her.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] February 27, 2015 at 2:21pm

    Acuity? How many people walk into your ER and say “Help me, I have a very rare disease and this medicine is needed every two minute or I will DIE, and my IV pump is broken – I need an immediate IV can you help me?” And besides a gunshot wound to the chest or some form of massive trauma or heart failure, what trumps that in acuity? Especially for the time invested that it would take to put in an IV.

    Did the woman not have some kind of medical bracelet or documentation? How long would it take to google the medical term she used for her condition?

    Responses (1) +
  • February 27, 2015 at 2:06pm

    This video is typical. Terrible weather, congested traffic, and a few idiots thrown in. Most are stuck in traffic and waiting their turn in a long line of vehicles. Notice that lane the snow is mostly melted from the heat of the cars. Then in this no-man’s land center lane it is all iced up and along comes a SUV flying along way too fast for conditions with no regard for the safety of others or the possibility of reacting to any hazard. Throw in a few pedestrians who are safe enough to move between the snarled slow traffic but just pop out between cars without really taking a good look.

    At the very beginning of the video look to the far right and you will get a glimpse of the traffic light mounted at the right side of the road. No overhead light and impossible to see if traffic was on your right. And the light is mounted on the near side of the intersection, not the far side of the intersection so that it is out of view once stopped. All their roads are this bad so people run red lights constantly. The pedestrians are headed for the bus stop on the other side of the road.
    Notice right after this car passes – another goes hurling by using the same center lane in the opposite direction. It is just anarchy of the roadways. Makes you appreciate how well our roads are designed and how well MOST of us respect the other motorists and pedestrians.

  • [3] February 27, 2015 at 1:53pm

    In seriousness I believe it was a Doberman in a sweater.

    Either that or Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Hard to say actually.

  • [2] February 27, 2015 at 1:51pm

    After watching a large number of these former soviet bloc area traffic videos, I’m convinced that there are two things at play.
    1) These places have possibly the worst drivers in the world. Despite obvious conditions they arrogantly and ignorantly continue to drive the same way. The old continue to do the same thing and expect different outcome definition of idiocy. They regularly turn left from the right hand lanes, they have some kind of obsession with sharing the center lane in opposing directions, and there is a urgency that prompts a large number of drivers to force themselves around stalled or slow traffic at high rates of speed using any means available no matter how unsafe including a complete disregard for weather conditions as a factor that ought to slow down any sane driver.
    2) These places have perhaps the worst roadway controls and features in the world. There are few well controlled intersections and those that are controlled with signals or signs are poorly marked or signaled. In most of the intersection crash videos you have a hard time finding the traffic light in the background and when you do it is typically a blinking red or yellow light. They don’t use the same red/yellow/green traffic light structure we do and I can’t figure out how it works and evidently neither can the drivers because they simply all run through intersections and fight for priority. Lanes are not clearly marked and lane sharing is common. Pedestrian safety is nonexistent.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] February 26, 2015 at 3:52pm

    I’m pretty sure it would still be called global warming, but the important thing is for the democrats to figure out how to tax it.

  • [3] February 26, 2015 at 3:44pm

    Yea, she wished. I’d rather have this thing over for dinner than DW. Probably smells better too.

    Debbie is going for the woolly sheepdog, not wooly rhino look.

  • [5] February 26, 2015 at 3:39pm

    Exactly what I was thinking. If it is old, perhaps it isn’t a wooly Rhino, maybe it is a saber-toothed hairball.

    By the way, wooly rhino’s are not extinct. They still walk the halls of Congress.

  • [17] February 26, 2015 at 3:31pm

    You want to get rid of guns you talk about “certain guns” and you mislabel semi-automatic as “machine guns” or mis-state and call them “automatic rifles”

    You want to get rid of guns you talk about “certain guns” and you redefine AR-15 as “Assault Rifle -15″ (Instead of ArmaLite brand/design) and call them “military style” and “combat rifles”

    You want to get rid of guns you talk about “certain guns” and you start conversing about “Ghost Guns” and lack of background checks and too easy to acquire

    You want to get rid of guns and you attack “certain guns” by targeting “high capacity” and “hundreds of rounds per second” fiction.

    You want to get rid of guns and you realize you can’t so you go after ammunition and you create a shortage by using the government to buy up all the available ammo and use banking industry to remove gun related business credit.

    You want to get rid of usable guns by going after ammo and you go after “certain ammo” by calling it “armor piercing” and “cop killer bullets”.

    You want to get rid of gun ownership – you talk about all in favor of 2nd amendment, just in favor of “controls”.

    The strategies just keep evolving and mutating from the same sources.

    SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED – criminals aren’t, why should good citizens?

  • [32] February 26, 2015 at 3:18pm

    Obama was trying to figure out how they lost the house for quite a while. Then he also lost the senate. But evidently he really doesn’t care about either that much.

  • [5] February 26, 2015 at 3:16pm

    I’m pretty sure you don’t take that very far – just find the neighbors with a coincidently similar but modified new structure. Bet this is one of those 2nd homes someone noticed was only getting used a couple months during the year – so they knew how long they had to move it, maybe even disassemble it. Once again, to be aware of the owner habits, probably a close neighbor who happens to own some big equipment.

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] February 26, 2015 at 3:04pm

    LibertarianSocialist is a Troll! Watch him change his handle and re-appear.

  • [1] February 26, 2015 at 3:03pm

    LibertarianSocialist is a Troll! Watch him change his handle and re-appear.

  • [6] February 26, 2015 at 3:02pm

    LibertarianSocialist is a Troll! Watch him change his handle and re-appear.

  • [1] February 26, 2015 at 3:01pm

    LibertarianSocialist is a Troll! Watch him change his handle and re-appear.

  • [3] February 26, 2015 at 2:57pm

    LibSock~
    First – it is clear that Obama and Dems like Reid and Pelosi represent the interests of far wealthier people -they are just liberal socialist people not corporate people so you give them a pass, Americans don’t. Republicans do represent the interest of wealthy people, and people who want to be wealthy, and people who would just like to keep the wealth the earn.

    Second – Obama’s record isn’t what is running, the article speaks of trying to defend Hillary’s, but beside that you right – Obama’s record is neither of what you stated – it is “completely indefensible”.

    Third – what are statistically trends if not historical? The lunatic fringe is neither Right or Left WING, it is unfortunately the liberal progressives in both parties collaborating and fighting to see who can destroy and suck the life out of the country first. Conservatives like the Tea Party are not Right Wing radicals – they are conservative. Radical right are fascists. Wanting the Constitution and Bill of Rights to return to front and center is hardly a radical principle – your labeling is only a propaganda effort to slander as liberals are so fond of doing. I’m sure “LibertarianSocialist” is just another troll name from the same basement underwear wearing team that includes “DemocratsforDemocracy”. Your only intent on this website is to mislead and malign and slander trying to create the impression that there is disparity among the right. Quit slandering the liberty bell and libertarian name -socialist

  • [3] February 26, 2015 at 2:37pm

    I hope Netanyahu uses the term “Radical Islamic Terrorists” about 500 times in his speech to congress.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love