User Profile: HI_Don


Member Since: January 23, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [2] August 19, 2016 at 11:39am

    From the hostages own mouth – We were forced to sit there in the plane on the tarmac and not allowed to take off until after the money plane arrived. So, they paid first, and then got the hostages back – by his own words he just paid a ransom. End of story.

  • [2] August 19, 2016 at 9:56am

    It’s really pretty simple to figure out.
    Iran waited for the money before they let the plane of hostages leave. It was not America that held the money until the hostages were back. Thus, it was a ransom and Iran was in control. You can’t say you leveraged the Iranians when your plane didn’t wait for Iran to move first. How was America going to withhold money when Iran was already offloading it before the hostage plane left the ground? What exactly was the “leverage” if at that point Iran had taken the money and then not let the other plane leave? There is no other explanation that fits other than “Ransom Payment”.

  • [39] July 28, 2016 at 10:36am

    Well I for one wish Nancy would please put the mask back on. For that matter just about every one of the liberal screeching cackling herd in the liberal crowd. What is it about being a liberal that causes you to sound and look like a Hillary Clinton / Nancy Pelosi / Maxine Waters type? I can only sumize it has something to do with a curse from God.

  • [3] July 25, 2016 at 1:36pm

    Clinton wants us to believe Russia hacked her because they like Trump??

    Gee, did anyone think perhaps Russia might have done it in support of the Socialist that was running against her that evidently needed some aid since the DNC and Hillary were cheating against him? Russia, support a socialist? Naw – probably right that they were in favor of the rich, smart, capitalist over the fear that they might get the stupid woman that passed them the “Reset” button and destroyed all of the U.S. Efforts across the middle east with Muslim Brotherhood success.

  • [4] July 15, 2016 at 4:02pm

    Fox news let this traitor “call in” and gave her air time??

    No media (well at least legitimate media if there is any left) should talk to, print, or give any time to Killary without making sure the FIRST question is “Will you apologize to the American people for all the blatant lies you about your email, your handling of classified information, and your attempt to blame “republicans” conspiracy when all along you were at fault?”
    If she will not absolutely without shifting blame state she lied and is at fault and apologizes – end of conversation. No media coverage, no allowing her to make statements nothing. Treat here like the proven liar she is. Who cares what she might have to say when you know she will just lie.

  • [2] July 7, 2016 at 12:04am

    If anyone was serious they would be calling Killery back to Congress to answer to making false official statements under oath to Congress in her 11 hour testimony since the FBI just established she was lying. But that would just be called partisan by the media anyway so why bother. 50% of Americans are going to vote for this evil woman even if she is caught on film executing Trump on the 6 o’clock news. That is what is sad here. Half of Americans are just that stupid, greedy, and clueless. When your country looks like that- Democracy and Freedom has already passed long ago people. Might as well go to your local federal office and line up for your slave tattoo number and agree never to have a free minded thought ever again under penalty of firing squad – because it is coming sheeple.

    Her husband is a serial rapist and pedophile who will continue to please himself with 16 year old sex slaves on fantasy Island as First Pervert in the White House and Killary is going to enrich herself and destroy America in the process, and ISIS is coming to behead the Christians and the Gays and anyone else who won’t succumb to Sharia. That is your next 8 years unless 10% of the idiots in this country smarten up.

  • [5] June 29, 2016 at 10:14am

    Matthews interjected, “How much brains does it take to pack yourself up with TNT and go running into a crowd and blowing yourself up?

    None really Chris, none at all, why are you thinking of applying? Cause if anyone is qualified in respect to “no brains”, well your a shoe in. Surprised you don’t have your own vest already, but then again your weapon of choice is to chant racism and global warming. You’d have to learn to pronounce Allah Akbar.

  • [3] June 29, 2016 at 10:07am

    Pattern? Looking for a pattern are you?

    How about looking into the apparent trend that ever since Obama moved to get Iran Billions of dollars and delivered on that promise that there has been a significant uptick in funded, coordinated, organized, and equipped terror attacks? Hmmmmm. Maybe you could do a story on the potential that has for a trend Sherlock.

  • [1] May 20, 2016 at 9:06am

    We the people have been told for so long by both the GOP & Dems that they don’t care what we want and what our issues are- that frankly we don’t care if they like Trump’s issues or not – get in line, you work for us.

    I don’t like some of Trump’s issues either – but I HATE Billeries. Third party is a sure way to give it to the second woman president since our current one seems to relate to female now making zim the first woman president (that stole Clinton’s thunder). Why not bring on Trump now. He couldn’t possibly be lying to us more than the current bunch of politicians we have.

  • [3] May 10, 2016 at 8:49pm

    Yet claims to be so brilliant and ready to govern????? Hmmmmm. Disconnect or simple political spin?

  • [12] May 4, 2016 at 12:19am

    Hillary will keep us just as safe as our ambassador of Benghazi. Who could dispute those qualifications? We will be as safe as secrets on her server. And she knows how to deal with men who stray from the reservation – just ask Paula Jones.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] March 25, 2016 at 1:52am

    The anti-Trump ad uses images that his wife took willingly for commercial reasons and Trump feels “attacked”. That somehow justifies name calling, threatening, and making up artificial pictures to demean Cruz’s wife? Why is anyone supporting this child who wants to be king. We already have one who uses the power of the federal gov. to punish his enemies.

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] March 18, 2016 at 12:38am

    Cruz lost in a contest of GOP in fighting and vote splitting. That is why the polls show that TRUMP does the WORST against Hillary – Cruz shines far brighter in a Hillary contest due to the absolute stark contrast between conservatism and liberalism. Trump has more of a chance at losing to Hillary because in that contest it is the arrogant wanna be King control freak (no matter the punish the liberals agenda) against the “WOMAN”. Cruz comes across serious and patriotic and constitutional, against the liar, cheat, and incompetent. Trump will be eaten alive by the media in the General for his history of Liberal support, political pandering for wealth, adulterous past. Who was the one GOP candidate Trump NEVER attacked during the debates – Florina. What makes Trump look the pettiest right now – his constant attack on Megan Kelley. Trump is a hustler and a deal maker which will not suit him well in a contest against Hillary.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] March 18, 2016 at 12:29am

    The choice is clear – You can vote for someone who is self centered, egotistical, has little useful experience in political leadership, is known for a tyrannical temper, has made threats to personal enemies that border on liable and inciting criminal acts, sounds more like a proposed empirical leader than a patriotic servant, and makes promises that will require violation of the constitution to complete – OR, you can let Hillary win. Frankly I don’t see much difference between the radical left wanna be king Obama than the results of having a tyranical right wanna be king Trump – I only hope it is all media hype to use fear and pomp to get the white house and Ben Carson is right that inside Trump is a better guy than he pretends. I would rather have the promises of Cruz in flat tax abolish the enormity of the IRS, stroke of the pen abolish all the unconstitutional Obama directives, and return to Constitutional conservatism than the bluster and bravado of Trump. But when 60% of the people are afraid more about the loss of welfare and free college and fear global warming more than heading down the path of fascism and socialism, I’m afraid the polls suggest Trump will be our NEXT dictator, this time from the right instead of the left, but a control freak dictator none the less. He already has talked about limiting the press & restricting free speech of HIS enemies – People don’t seem to see that is just as dangerous as Obama’s enemies list.

  • [4] January 27, 2016 at 12:12am

    Proves Donald is a narcissist. Who in the heck picks a fight with Meg Kelley? What kind of PR can you possibly win fighting with a popular and beautiful national news host with exceptional ratings and audience on a conservative network? Logic isn’t making this call, that’s stupid self pride and a king syndrome.
    Let Fox announce they just added Rush Limbaugh to the panel and watch Trump run for the hills. He knows the true and trusted conservative voices have caught on to him and are urging their audiences to run away from his big talk and liberal history.
    I like what Trump did to the discourse and getting things fired up, but he is no conservative, he is no constitutionalist, and he is not to be trusted that his “Deal” making will be any better than Harry Reid’s. Thanks for thinning the herd and making sure we don’t get progressive Bush or liberal Christy. Now lets all back the real conservative Cruz and turn this country around.

    Responses (1) +
  • [12] January 7, 2016 at 10:37pm

    Taya must have introduced herself, there is no way that idiot actually knew who she was without a teleprompter at least.

  • [2] January 4, 2016 at 9:40pm

    This is more Trump Media bait. He can’t wait for Hillary to ask about the fake video.

    If he had actually shown mexicans, that would be racist anyway.

  • August 5, 2015 at 1:13pm

    “the U.S. would be “screwing” Iran if Congress rejects the international nuclear deal”

    Just what part of Iran’s years and years of sponsoring terrorism, hatred of America and the West, plotting to get and use WMD, and just general being really bad guys in the world doesn’t Kerry get? Was he opposed to “screwing Hitler” during WWII? Was he worried how Napoleon or Stalin might not get a fair shake? If you don’t screw with your enemies good deals, what is the alternative? Why isn’t he talking about doing the deal is “Screwing Israel, Europe, and all freedom loving people of the world”? What’s next, good deals for North Korea? We can start calling this administration the good deals for evil team with all they have done to reward bad things aka Cuba, Mexico, Muslim Brotherhood, Russia. Just don’t let it be know your a Christian who wants to express an opinion about God’s rules for sin cause there is no good deal coming your way other than a great big Bigot label.

  • [3] August 3, 2015 at 2:19pm

    “I liked the black community. I had fun there. There’s people who will just crack you up.”

    Oh, is that what the call the Knock Out Game now?

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] July 7, 2015 at 5:41pm

    Well there you have it from the tolerance crowd. “Believe like us or shut up or get out!” Christians can’t have opinions or beliefs unless they are the same as what they tell you they need them to be. Everyone must make concessions so they don’t have too. Everyone else must feel bad because they shouldn’t be made feel bad by anyone. No one can speak contrary to the speech they endorse. No pride unless it is gay pride, everyone else be ashamed and marginalized.

    Sorry, but that just isn’t how tolerance works.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go