User Profile: Honestybefore truth

Honestybefore truth

Member Since: September 11, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • September 15, 2014 at 12:04am

    While I understand (or think I do) “where your coming from”, it is your assumption that those that have used that phrase meant it in a wholly Religious vein. In some cases you may be right, but to paint all with an idolatry brush is more than a bit closed-minded and closer to bigoted.

  • September 14, 2014 at 11:47pm

    The Big Mick;
    Excuse my apparent ignorance, but what is a LMC? A quick search offered only non-sequitur type definitions, some rather profane. If your going to use acronyms you should offer the meaning at least a few times before assume anybody else will know what it is in reference to. Also it shows where your prejudices lie that your primary conclusion is that the Troopers were some how “dirty.” From what small amount of information in the story it would seem the shooting was a “sniper” type attack. None of the criminal elements you suggested is known for such. Drivebys yes, the occasional ambush yes, but highly skilled marksmen most of those guys aren’t.

  • [2] September 12, 2014 at 1:08am

    The difference between every intelligent American and Micheal Moore; it took him 6 1/2 years to figure out what we knew even before Obummer was elected. Whats worse is the reasons Moore uses to come to his conclusion aren’t even in our top 100.

  • [3] September 12, 2014 at 1:01am

    Of course! Standard Liberal tactic: Why ask permission, when its easier to offer a false apology (Of course only when caught and held up to public scrutiny).

  • September 12, 2014 at 12:57am

    I’m apologize, but the only good thing about these type of debates here, is that they remind me that civilized people can have disagreements about matters religious without someone being branded heretical and losing their head. Take a hint (PLEASE!) Islam.

  • [9] September 11, 2014 at 6:56pm

    I bet the Student Council Pres. believes in Women’s Lib., as well as all the other usual Liberal causes, pro-LGBT, abortion, etc. But here is where I get confused, how does she square support of Hammas with its Islamic tenets against all those issues? Is she stupid on purpose, or is it inherited.

  • [1] September 11, 2014 at 6:35pm

    Nor was there anyone to explain why building a consensus is ultimately futile, one of the tenets of Islam abjures believers from taking the side of non-believers in any conflict with a Muslim. Now, on occasion (when its in the interest of a faction for other reasons) you will see some join in defiance of the stricture, but it never lasts long because the hardcore factions start to pressure the joiners. And no Muslim wants to be on the crazy’s s&!t list.

  • [10] September 11, 2014 at 6:20pm

    Bad, but I find the last part of the statement by the Police Chief more concerning.
    …unless such recordings interfere with police activity.
    I’ve seen this wording in a number of policies and statutes: What is interference?, Who decides at any given incident what constitutes interference?, Does the tie go to the citizen?
    If they expect their officers to adhere to a policy it should be spelled out in both detail and spirit.

    Responses (2) +
  • [13] September 9, 2014 at 4:13pm

    What follows is not directed specifically to Glenn’s experience or even Ray Rice. I was raised by a single Mother, and was taught and learned to never hit a woman. Having stated this, it is likely that this post will make me unpopular.
    All young boys have been taught never to hit a woman, or in the wording of the times, a “Lady.” The problem is that women have been becoming less and less “ladylike” over the last several decades. I am not talking about women being demure, or knowing their place. I am talking about their capacity towards violence. It would never occurred to my mother to hit someone, it just wasn’t done. It would only have occurred to her daughters in self-defense. Now a days it seems most younger women have no problem “throwing down” at the slightest provocation. Yet the admonition still stands. Women want to be equal to men, the Women’s Liberation coalition demand it, but still want all those “outmoded” protections. Maybe its time to change the saying back to “Never hit a Lady.” If a women strikes a man, acting in a manner that divorces her from the traditional definition of “ladylike”, responding like a “man”. Maybe she should be treated, in return, like a man?

    Responses (1) +
  • September 9, 2014 at 3:51pm

    I had wondered where the phrase that is on our money came from (not ever having heard that verse). The University’s staff that thought this up and then put it in motion must have very large huevos, considering the left leaning atmosphere in Universities today. So I am impressed, but would be ever more impressed if the school were to actually teach it to the whole student body. And even further, to make sure that the student athletes could actually read it.

  • [36] September 9, 2014 at 1:08am

    Someone, who has the appropriate background, should start a website like KickStarter with which honest Americans can raise funds to reign in government overreach.

    Responses (3) +
  • [35] September 9, 2014 at 1:02am

    Ah Detroit, a shining beacon of Progressive gubernment. And what Chicago will become in a very short while.

  • [11] September 9, 2014 at 12:58am

    One sad thing about this is that the taxpayers are going to be stuck for either course of this pregnancy. Another is that this young woman is the poster child for her generation. And for the most depressing point, this is women provides the best argument for abortion, imagine her as a mother.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] September 8, 2014 at 8:44am


    I see you have a problem with both the truth and honesty. The truth is I did no such thing as threaten anyone. I merely pointed out that once convicted of a capital offense its is far less expensive to actually use a capital sentence proscribed by the law of the land. As for the truth, having read your past posts, I would say you are neither real nor independent.

  • [4] September 8, 2014 at 5:53am

    I’m sure they have, the American people just won’t hear the entire truth of it though.

  • [22] September 7, 2014 at 9:45pm

    I could be wrong, but wasn’t the sentence for Treason a firing squad? Why waste taxpayer money housing and feeding them? A court ordered bullet to the head is way cheaper.

    Responses (5) +
  • [3] September 7, 2014 at 6:46pm

    While I find Ron Paul amusing with his intellectually lightweight and pacifist stances. It is his self-professed adherents and dogmatists that I find truly scary.

  • September 7, 2014 at 2:12am

    You are correct, never trust a Communist or a Liberal! Wait, that was a redundant statement. It’s easier and more accurate to just to say; Never trust an lying hypocritical piece of trash!

  • [1] September 7, 2014 at 2:05am

    Yet Spock and Kirk follow a “maddened” McCoy through a alien portal to Depression era Earth in the first season of the T.V. show (episode “The City on the Edge of Forever”) So, [Science] Fiction also follows the model of Life imitates Art. Real world Scientists also seem to either not to be able to make up their minds, or be hidebound and determined to ignore truth when it conflicts with their personal beliefs.

  • [6] September 5, 2014 at 2:25pm


    Have you Libertards started muttering that “stuff” in your sleep yet, having used his name to excuse your limp noodle Presidents every failing for the past six years. It has become just a monotonous rumble to everyone with a functioning brain.

123 To page: Go