Muslims will go for polygamy now that the door is opened. What’s to stop that?
 June 26, 2015 at 5:03pm
Then it may well be individual citizens who are hounded and perhaps hounded out of a job due to their belief i.e. Brendon Eich of Mozilla who, when found that he had donated to Prop 8 was summarily ousted.
 June 26, 2015 at 4:52pm
“work place violence”
 June 25, 2015 at 4:52pm
Yes, someone already suggested contracting with certain churches/church groups.
 June 25, 2015 at 4:34pm
I read another report where Roberts was said to have given a little smile when Scalia referred thusly.
 June 25, 2015 at 4:32pm
What is even more frightening is that if a dem gets elected president next, they will be appointing leftist/progressive justices.
 June 25, 2015 at 4:28pm
Not intentential? BS!
We are living under soft tyranny!
Don’t they have laws on sedition in Britain, because this guy needs to be charged (not this particular incident, but all the ones in which he’s promoted terror and threatening the govt)?
 June 17, 2015 at 6:42pm
They are using every method possible: $, media, lawsuits, etc. to get us “accustomed” to them. Just look how much they’ve done in this country since 9/11.
 June 17, 2015 at 6:39pm
and big time in universities…..
 June 17, 2015 at 6:36pm
On the other hand “Know thy enemy”.
I think we need to know all about it/him. We need to fight their propaganda with the truth.
I’ve read it and am reading other books on him. I can’t comprehend how people would want to use this person who murdered, raped, pillaged, etc. as a role model.
I get what you’re saying though- dangerous!
 June 17, 2015 at 6:30pm
Here’s where Donald Trump could use a few of his billions by buying the other side pointing out just what mohammed was and did and what sharia is.
It is frightening the inroads islam has made in this country.
 June 16, 2015 at 8:12am
Bigun was being sarcastic. See the signature at the end.
June 12, 2015 at 9:26am
It may be for naught, but please try to contact your rep and tell him/her “NO!” or better yet, “H-ll NO!”
202-224 3121 for Capitol Switchboard
Paul Ryan’s office 608 752 4050 (because DC office voicemail is full and has been for days)
I want him to know I am NOT HAPPY!
 June 2, 2015 at 5:47pm
I have to wonder if this was a test case by this woman. Why would a muslim woman who wears a hijab want to work at A&F, a company whose advertisements and clothing are contradictory to her “modesty” claims.
In Canada, the Parti Québécois, before their last election, unveiled a charter that would have banned headscarves and other overt religious symbols in the workplace. Headscarves are in every governmental department. Headscarves in law enforcement. Headscarves in industry. Everywhere. But because Christians in Quebec would also have been relegated (to not wearing enormous crosses, which they never do anyway), the PQ lost the election. That was wrong. In order to ban headscarves, I would accept that I may not wear an enormous cross to work. No problem. The French seem to be the only people willing and able to deal with Islamic symbols — they want to get rid of them. I feel that this was indeed a test case by this girl in order to force her symbolism into an unusual place, Abercrombie … because it wasn’t quite there yet? And she used our laws to do it.
Your laws. She used your laws to do it. But it could just as easily happen here in Canada or any other country with religious freedom. It's going to have to be all or nothing, all overt religious symbolism banned from the workplace, or none of it.
 June 1, 2015 at 10:08am
Why stop there? How about you just re-write the Bible to include whatever you wish? Remove a little here, add a little there? How convenient for you.
Shouldn't they ask God Himself how He would like to be referred to before they try changing the pronouns?
Of course, they would have to know Him before they could talk to Him.
Christians do it all of the time. For believers, god should transcend his or her pronouns.
They're working on it, honesty.
There are religions already that have deities with androgynous attributes. Why not join them rather than demand that others change for you?
'Not everyone is on board with this proposal, calling it the 'work of a few lunatics'
'A Warning to Priests' Malachi 2:1-9
Malachi 2:8-9 'But ye are departed out of the way, ye have caused many to stumble at the law, ye have corrupted the covenant of Levi, saith the LORD of hosts. Therefore have I also made you contemptible and base before all the people, according as ye have not kept my ways, but have been partial in the law.'
Hosea 4:6 'My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.'
Revelation 18:4 'And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, "Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues."
@Honey...they've already done that...
I'm sorry... what kind of crackpot thinks "God the Father" is female?
What you suggest HAS BEEN DONE.
Pretty much the entire basis for the bible was but verbally 'transferred' one generation to the next. Do you not think there was some 'modification' going on as it traveled down those MANY generations .
And then it was finally 'printed'. And printed / translated into pretty much every conceivable language. Do you not think there was some 'modification' going on as it traveled down through those MANY interpretations.
And just how many versions of the bible are there?
NO TWO people have or ever will interpret the bible in the same way. (And that's even if they are reading from the very same bible - let alone all the various language and versions.)
This idea of calling God both a He and a She is obviously coming from someone who does not understand God. Why don't we get rid of the words Mom and Dad, because someone may feel less of a Dad if the kids always call Mom "Mom".
What these pastors do not understand is that we are created in God's image. In order to have children, spiritual or mortal, there must be a man and a woman involved. God has a wife and She is just as much a God as He. We would not exist without Her. However, because we are disrespectful to God and use His name in vain and as a curse word, God has shielded His wife from this and allowed Her to remain untouched by humanities crude nature. This, in my opinion, shows that God (by that I mean the He God) actually elevates His spouse to a higher level than He. Women are not going to gain respect by referring to God as both a He and a She, they are going to gain respect when the men in the world start treating women like God does and when women start treating men like His wife does. You can't demand respect, you must earn it by giving it.
As they do today... Males maintain the majority of 'power' and so... It's only is common sense / 'natural' that those writing the bible used the male identifier as the authoritative 'body' in such.
NO WAY the writers of the bible would have ever identified the supreme being as a She as that would have meant giving women equal - if not greater - status than men and... Well we all know that just would never / can't happen.
The concept of a Supreme Being - all knowing / all powerful... The concept itself is really unfathomable and so... About the only way it was going to get 'sold' to the masses was if it could be put into a more relate-able context and so... Again, with male dominance worldwide... It was only 'natural' to make the Supreme Being... Male.
Just think how different things would be today if Jesus was a woman.
If Muhammad was instead a woman?
If Buddha was female?
The supposed god so many of you believe in could have easily 'shaken things up' - instantly created greater equality for women - if this god would have sent Its only... Daughter.
The inequality of the sexes in Christian teachings is one of the reasons I was pushed away from the religion. I come from a large family and have all sisters and... The sexual inequality offered in the religion I was raised on - and also in society in general - has always bothered me a great deal.
wigone "why are your scriptures in English?"
LOL that was a joke, right?
Yes just like oblamer and the other useless oxygen suckers are doing to the Constitution. Picking and choosing!!!!!!!
Utterly satanic, these females are. The scriptures are clear that no woman should hold spiritual authority over men and now they want to call God a she. Feminism is in lock step with satan
They will suffer greatly during the rapture (John 3:36)
"women serving as bishops will make a key difference only if God is she as often as she is he"
Anyone with this position does not have even the simplest understanding of the Christian God. Assigning a male or female gender to God is an attempt to limit His existence and power. It's a fool's errand. He is neither male nor female. To attempt to limit Him thusly is pure hubris.
Don't stop there, rewrite whole Bible with only females, no men. That would be great, thanks.
Galatians 4:4-5: “When the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman … to redeem us.”
Isaiah 7:14: “Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel (God with us).”
Genesis 3:15: “I (God) will put enmity between you (Satan) and the woman (Eve), and between your seed and her SEED; He (Jesus) shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise His heel.”
God promised that one day He would plant a ‘SEED’ in a woman, a ‘her Seed’. As you know, ‘hims’ have seeds not ‘hers’. ‘Hers’ have eggs....But, in this case, God specifically told Eve I will give you a Seed, and the Seed will supersede the serpent (Satan). God said that He would save the world through a ‘Seed’ in the womb of a woman.
Once again, all this is, is 'Liberation Theology' that mocks God, mocks commonsense and mocks The Holy Word of God. More 'Doctrines of Disobedience.'
....Honor thy mother and thy father
why do you dishonor your mothers?
“This means that women can see themselves as less holy and less able to represent Christ in the world.”
No individual represents Christ in this world. Christ represents Himself.
Well. We do live in an era where fathers can look like mothers too, right?
So no real surprise in any of this blatant moronic stupidity of epic proportions.
The greatest oxymoron of all.
Church of England - how about just call your pan-gender god "Jenner"? Then it can be a he and a she at the same time.
You mean like how King James re-wrote the bible, or how the Council of Nicaea put the bible together. Do me a favor and find a bible that has not been cherry picked and edited to read the way the author likes.